Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: 2011 In Extreme Home Runs

Fire Tom Hansen

Thank you, Tom Hansen.

As I'm sure you're aware, Saturday's game will not be on television.  This marks the second time in three conference games that the Ducks will not be on TV.  Its certainly not for a lack of effort on the Ducks' part--they've put together broadcasts and shown them on tape delay.  But they are not allowed to broadcast them live because the Pac-10 games on ABC and FSN contractually get "exclusivity."

Because people in Oregon give a shit about USC/Arizona.

I'd be curious as to the numbers if exclusivity actually helps the ratings.  But the die hards like me are simply going to listen to the Duck game on the radio.  Casual Duck fans will simply find another way to spend their Saturday.  But Tom Hansen signed off on the crappy TV contract that not only limits us to second rate networks such as FSN and Vs., but makes it so that a  school cannot even broadcast a game in their own city?  What kind of an idiot would sign off on a deal like this?  A deal which takes your product away from consumers?  Tom Hansen did.  Apparently having to do with getting enough volleyball and softball games on the air, as if ensuring that softball gets airtime should be a large priority.

In the meantime, that same TV contract largely keeps us off ESPN.  Our ABC games pretty much stay regional (unless its SC), and our FSN games can be pre-empted in many markets by local baseball and hockey.  Great job promoting our conference, Tom.

Sadly, its just one in a long list of stupid decisions by Mr. Hansen.

Lets take Tom's stance on the football postseason.

You all know that I'm a playoff man.  It was possible that we could have the start of a playoff soon, but Tom killed that idea, largely in the name of preserving the Rose Bowl.  Seeing how it is very arguable that no conference has been more harmed by the BCS than the Pac-10, that is a questionable stance.  That said, I have also said that if we are not going to have a playoff, then we need to preserve tradition and keep the Rose Bowl a Pac-10/Big 10 matchup (which is Tom's reasoning for no playoff).  Instead, we've seen teams such as Nebraska, Miami, Oklahoma, and Texas twice in the Rose Bowl.  Tom Hansen has refused to engage in talks for a playoff, which is what the sport needs, in the name of the Rose Bowl, but he has also allowed the Rose Bowl to be destroyed.

Nice job there, Tom.

Lets talk basketball.

Since the reincarnation of the Pac-10 basketball tournament, it has been played in the Staples Center in LA.  Not only has this led to an advantage for the LA schools, but the building has been empty when UCLA or USC is not playing.  The fair thing to do for the schools, and the best thing for the fans, would be to rotate the tournament among the big conference markets.  Phoenix, LA, Oakland, Portland, and Seattle rotate the tournament so that each gets it every five years.  In fact, Portland put together a bid for the tournament which was considered to be more lucrative than that put forward by LA.

So naturally Tom re-upped with the Staples Center for another five years.

In fact, Tom is a big reason that the Pac-10 gets little respect outside of LA.  Most of our national TV football games involve USC, most of our national basketball games involve UCLA.  Our showcase event is always in an empty Staples Center.  The Rose Bowl is in LA.  Almost everything people outside of the West Coast see is in LA.  That LA fans are the worst on the West Coast are irrelevant.  Everybody is based on what LA does.

I will give credit where credit is due.  Making the Pac-10 schedule a round robin was a stroke of genius.  That said, good decisions are something that have been sorely lacking in the last decade of the Hansen era.  The major grievances above lead me to only one conclusion:

Its time to fire Tom Hansen.  And fire him soon.

So I implore you to contact Mr. Hansen and ask for his resignation.  His contact information:

thansen@pac-10.org
(925) 932-4411

And contact your AD and college president demanding that they pressure Hansen:

Oregon:
AD--Pat Kilkenny:  kilkenny@uoregon.edu, (541) 346-5432
President--Dave Frohnmayer:  pres@uoregon.edu, (541) 346-3036

Oregon State:
AD--Bob DeCarolis:  bob.decarolis@oregonstate.edu, (541) 737-2547
President--Edward Ray:  ed.ray@oregonstate.edu, (541) 737-4133

Washington:
AD--Todd Turner:  huskyad@u.washington.edu, (206) 543-2212
President--Mark Emmert:  emmert@u.washington.edu, (206) 543-5010

Washington State:
AD--James Sterk:  jsterk@wsu.edu, (509) 335-0200
President--Elson Floyd:  floyde@wsu.edu, (509) 335-6666

California:
AD--Sandy Barbour:  athletic.director@berkeley.edu, (510) 642-0580
Chancellor--Robert Birgeneau:  chancellor@berkeley.edu, (510) 642-7464
Stanford:
AD--Bob Bowlsby:  rbowlsby@stanford.edu, (650) 723-4591
President--John Hennessey:  hennessey@stanford.edu, (650) 723-2481

Arizona:
AD--Jim Livengod:  livengod@arizona.edu, (520) 621-4622
President--Peter Likins:  plikins@arizona.edu, (520) 621-5511

Arizona State:
AD--Lisa Love:  lisa.love@asu.edu, (480) 965-9743
President--Michael Crow:  Michael.crow@asu.edu, (480) 965-8972

UCLA:
AD--Dan Guerrero:  dguerrero@atheltics.ucla.edu, (310) 825-8699
Chancellor--Albert Carnesale:  acarnesale@ucla.edu, (310) 825-2151

USC:
AD--Michael Garrett:  daniellm@usc.edu, (213) 740-8177 x3843
President--Steven Sample:  presoc@usc.edu, (213) 740-2111

Comment 9 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Yeah, it's pretty depressing
My household has spent large sums of money in each of the last 2 years on ESPN's College Gameplan.  While I've gotten my half of the money out of it for Vol games, we've been more than disappointed by the lack of Duck coverage.  I'm still a little peeved that I had to listen to the Stanford game on the internet from an enemy-friendly broadcast viewpoint (but thanks for posting that link, guys!)

Meh.  Stupid stupidheads.

Go Ducks.  Go Vols.

by SnoConeGod on Oct 11, 2007 9:23 AM PDT reply actions  

tom hansen sucks.
Dave,

I was excited to see the "fire Tom Hansen" headline, because I really wanted to write my own diatribe on why he sucks so much in the comments.  Then, I read your list of grievances and realized you already wrote pretty much everything I was going to write.

It's sad that the pac 10 can't showcase the #9 team in the nation to anyone, not even its own fans.  

It actually benefits the Pac 10 to have as many games on TV as possible, as that would bring in more total viewers than it would take away from, say, USC/Arizona.  Another game on the schedule would pull audience from other conferences' games and non-sports programming as well.

Also, it means more ads that the networks can sell, and more revenue to bring in, even though the ratings dilute slightly.  Too bad we have an idiot for a commissioner.

by gribbit1 on Oct 11, 2007 10:11 AM PDT reply actions  

Move to Norman, Tom
I have one more bullet point for Tom's shit list.  I was incensed at how quick on the draw he was to bend over for Bob Stoops and the entire Big 12 amidst the replay controversy.  He did not go to bat for us or that replay official one bit.  Yeah, we got a big break, I admit.  But that was a horribly officiated game from start to finish with many outcome-impacting calls.  Again, we got the biggest break, but OU got some too.  How about their go ahead TD in the fourth qtr that was snapped after the play clock (second time on the drive that happened) and that blatant no-call offensive PI on Malcom Kelly where he shoved our DB in the back completely out of the ABC frame and caught the "wide open" TD?  Plus that replay official only had an end-zone replay to review, not the angles ABC showed 30 times.  He saw OU came out of the pile with the ball, but that was unreviewable.  He had to decide from an endzone angle whether or not Paysinger touched the ball before 10yds.  How the hell is he supposed to tell that??  Instead of publicly chastizing the officials for the onside kick call and bluntly stating "Oregon shouldn't have won that game," how about talking about how there were many calls in the game that officals blew, ones that each team took advantage of.  And defend the replay official who was never given the necessary resources to make the call that the rest of the world could see.  Just a pussy-whipped move that leaders everywhere should be ashamed of.

by jteubs on Oct 11, 2007 8:16 PM PDT reply actions  

Yes.
I've thought for a long time about what to say, and I can just say, in response, "Yes."
Go Duckies!

by JShufelt on Oct 12, 2007 8:32 AM PDT reply actions  

You Don't Get It
Look, I'm not saying it doesn't suck that the game won't be on TV, but to say that it's because of a bad TV deal is just wrong. Let me ask you this - how would you feel if we were selected for an ESPN, ABC, FSN telecast -- great opportunity to have the program showcased to potential recruits around the country -- and each of the respective markets around the country were allowed to pre-empt our game for a local matchup?! You know we'd all be screaming bloody murder and calling for Hansen's head because we got a raw deal. Do you not think fans in California will be scratching their heads to see Oregon-Washington next weekend instead of Cal-UCLA?

Every network gets exclusive windows - it's just how the business works. Look at the TV deals with the SEC, ACC, etc. It's the way the business works. And besides, you can always just go to the game and watch it first hand!

by nwsportsfan on Oct 12, 2007 10:38 AM PDT reply actions  

No
every OTHER conference in America has multiple games on at the same time.  And its not pre-empting a game--most OSN affiliates show no other college football (KEZI being the exception).

I will be at the game this weekend, but driving to Palo Alto for the Stanford game was not a realistic option.

This is bullshit, and I'll say it again--FUCK YOU TOM HANSEN.

by David Piper on Oct 12, 2007 10:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

sorry
not trying to tear your head off.  But I do get it.  Local matchups should always have first priority.

In every other conference, a team like ours that wants to broadcast their own games would be allowed to broadcast all their games.

by David Piper on Oct 12, 2007 10:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

Is there any hope?
People have been complaining for years about the Pac-10 football TV contract. When does it expire? Is there any hope for change in the future?

Also, I have never read a positive word about Tom Hanson. From where/whom does he draw his support?

Every year we bitch and moan, but nothing changes. Seems odd that, from what I can tell, none of the decision-makers are inclined to take any action.

by DavisDuck on Oct 13, 2007 5:51 AM PDT reply actions  

Seriously, write Tom Hansen!
So I just finished my e-mail to Hansen, and I'm sending copies to all the presidents and AD's.  Who knows if any of them will even read it, but at least I've had my say.
Duck Life!

by GustyJ on Oct 13, 2007 9:37 AM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Addicted to Quack, SBN's Oregon Ducks blog and fan community.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
So you just signed a bunch of blue chip recruits...

Recent FanPosts

Mostinteresting_small
ATQ Fantasy Baseball 2012
Square_envelope_electric_purple-p121411710380622431j65uf_400_small
To Whom It May Concern
Sarah_b-day_small
A bit disappointed today
Angryduck_small
benzduck's Trivia Contest #1
Small
If Kelly Goes to the NFL, Who Would Oregon Hire?
Small
Darron Thomas' Surprise Decision to Bolt for NFL Should Be Celebrated, Not Scorned
Bns_small
The Ducks can learn from the New England Patriots.
120103_oregon_rose_bowl_tb_small
The Three Musketeers... Wait, they're Quarterbacks? Where's Darron? PANIC!
Angryduck_small
A Lexicon of Expert Darron Thomas Departure Invective

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

ATQ Twitter Feed


Managers

207873_1005773153454_1498651968_14034_9616_n_small David Piper

Pre_small ntrebon

Img_0525_small jtlight

Mostinteresting_small Takimoto

Domsicecream_small dvieira

Editors

Pettingzoo_small PaulSF

Atq-spoon-5_small Matt Daddy

Authors

Ryan__rusty_small jcgoducks

N679617597_457761_5158_small kanders4

Small nds500