Addicted To Quack: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Steve McNair Dead - Former NFL QB Shot and Killed


How will the Oregon 'D' hold up tomorrow?

It's been busy around here with Dave's resignation and such. So we're getting all our posts in today! Make sure to check out Jeremy's preview of the Cal defense, as well as our Q&A with Cal Golden Blogs.

While a lot of press has been given to when Oregon has the ball, focusing on Masoli and the 3-4 defense of Cal, it seems that the other side of the ball has been overlooked.

For Cal, on the offensive side of the ball, it starts with the first man to touch the ball every play: Alex Mack. He’s the best lineman in the Pac-10, and one of the best in college football. It will start with him. To see what he’s capable of, check out this video by the always great Danzig. Mack has the ability to clear the middle in almost every play. There are few offensive linemen this dominating, and this will by far be the toughest job Linehan and Harris face all season.

Star-divide

But beyond Mack, Cal is having some injury issues. They came into the year with arguably the best offensive line in the Pac-10 (in the discussion with our own offensive line), but they have sustained a large amount of injuries. They will be missing 3 starters and their first reserve. At the tackles, first year starter Mitchell Schwartz will have to face Nick Reed, his toughest test in his short career, while JC transfer Donovan Edwards will make his first start against the dangerous Will Tukuafu. To make matters worse for the Bears, it sounds like redshirt freshman Justin Cheadle will be playing in the place of senior Norris Malele.

This should make life much easier on the Oregon line, with that much inexperience in place. Mack is a star, but the Cal ground game will have a tough time getting going if Oregon ends are constantly creating pressure and getting into the backfield early. And this type of pressure is imperative. In Cal’s worst game of the season, against Maryland, they failed to create running lanes, and were held to a mere 36 yards on the ground. Though they will have problems in the very center, due to the inexperience on the Cal line, there will be a lot of opportunities to limit Cal’s rushing attack due to quick penetration outside of the guards. If Harris and Linehan can simply not get steamrolled, which is harder than it sounds, Oregon should be able to do an adequate job winning the battle at the line.

But even if Oregon gets penetration, they have to execute. Cal has two very good running backs in Jahvid Best and Shane Vereen. Both are small, fast, and a threat to take it to the house at every moment. If a defender gets a hand on the ball carrier, they must make the tackle.

In terms of the passing game, I feel confident that Oregon should be able handle this portion of the Cal offense, due to a combination of pressure on Riley and the inability of the Cal receivers to catch the ball. But then again, I felt similarly when we played Boise State as well, and we all know how that turned out.

The Cal running game must be stopped if Oregon wants to compete in this game, and this is made even more important due to the predicted wet conditions. But Oregon must play fundamentally sound in defending the pass.

I have little doubt that the Oregon secondary should be able to cover the Cal receivers well, especially down the field. We saw this happen in the ASU game, and all ASU receivers were covered incredibly well throughout the entire game. Cal, with a young receiving corp that has faced the dropsies all season, will most likely meet a similar fate.

However, there three key things that must be stopped.

  1. Kevin Riley. He is somewhat mobile, and if Oregon is bringing pressure around the ends, he will have the ability to step up, and create some more time in the pocket. Also, Riley has not been spectacular, but has not made mistakes either. It is unlikely that he will lose this game for Cal.
  2. The passing games to tight ends and receivers. This was the main culprit of many of the problems against BSU, and the Oregon linebackers and safeties must play sound football, and not get beat. At this point, I think that these problems have been at least somewhat corrected. Play action defense has gotten better, and the secondary and linebackers have been doing a much better job at knocked inside receivers off of their routes. This must continue.
  3. Cal could go conservative and work its way down the field, as UCLA did a few weeks ago. UCLA moved the ball using short passes and getting itself into third and long situations. They gained some momentum this way, and started to execute in the second half. I can see Cal going this route, and working its way down the field, but at the same time, it is very hard to make long drives work this way. One or two mistakes, and that drive is over.

Overall, this won’t be an easy game defensively. If Cal comes out and gets a few first downs rushing, that will open up the play-action, as Ward or Chung come up to the line and cheat against the run.

And what will be possibly the most important aspect of this game is the field position. If the Oregon D starts with poor field position, Cal will score some points. But if Cal must work with a long field, Oregon is disruptive enough that over a 60+ yard drive, they can usually get a big play or two that will stop that drive.

If Cal has its way on the ground, this will be a tough afternoon. But if Oregon can get Cal into enough predictable situations, I like Oregon’s chances.

0 recs | Comment 12 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Addicted To Quack

Morning Quack Fix: 6.10.09

Jun 2009 by PaulSF - 14 comments

Morning Quack Fix: 6.3.09

Jun 2009 by PaulSF - 41 comments

Comments

Display:

My fear

Good job on breaking this down. And I’m sure most Cal fans would be right there with you, nodding our heads, about what the Ducks need to do.

From what I’ve seen, Cal’s offense has just not been consistent, due to probably every reason you can imagine: poor QB play, poor WR play, dropped passes, poor OL blocking, bad run decisions, etc etc etc. The only thing positive is there are times when they do look very very good. If Cal can maintain their consistency, then this becomes a much more interesting game.

Go Bears!

by SoCal Oski on Oct 31, 2008 12:10 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

This was posted over at CGB but I haven't seen it here:

Oregon @ Cal won’t be in HD. I guess somebody thought Iowa vs Illinois was a more compelling matchup.

ಠ_ಠ

by Berkelium97 on Oct 31, 2008 12:34 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That suffers from lameatosis. But at least this one was televised.

It's spelled "S-h-u-M-i-l-d-l-y-A-t-t-r-a-c-t-i-v-e"

by JShufelt on Oct 31, 2008 12:47 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Rain

Given the weather forecast for tomorrow’s game, does anybody else expect this to be a defensive showcase on both sides? In wet conditions, would it be fair to say that Oregon has the upper hand given that we are relying heavily on the run this season? Or will the weather even matter? What are all your thoughts?

GO DUCKS!

by ATLDuck on Oct 31, 2008 1:58 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I just don't know

I’ve been going back and forth in mind about this game even before the ASU game. I have it in my brain that Cal is right up there with USC and we are coming in with some big shoes to fill. My gut tells me that our defense has their work cut out for them and that ASU was a fluke against a team that was one-dimensional. Even with the drops and WR issues at Cal, this doesn’t feel like the same situation.

Cal has a fairly good running back in their backfield as well. I’m at a loss at how this one will turn out

--Dominic

Autzen Stadium is where great teams go to die." - J. Brady McCullough, The Michigan Daily.

by dvieira on Oct 31, 2008 2:10 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think either Cal or Oregon will win in the end.

It's spelled "S-h-u-M-i-l-d-l-y-A-t-t-r-a-c-t-i-v-e"

by JShufelt on Oct 31, 2008 2:19 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Tsk tsk tsk

There you go kowtowing to the CGB crowd again…

by ntrebon on Oct 31, 2008 2:23 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Cal's RB

The one difference is that Best is a quick, cutting RB, whereas BFT will go straight forward. Depending on the field conditions, that could turn out to be a huge difference. If it gets sloppy Best could have a hard time making those quick cuts. Pounding the ball up the middle isn’t as succeptible to that. I’m not saying that’s what it will come down to, but keep your eye on it because it could turn out to be a huge factor.

I like the yellow helmets!

by MarineCorpsDuck on Oct 31, 2008 2:50 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That somewhat answers my question. I think that’s a good point. It will also probably affect JJ carrying the ball but it’s a great thing that we’ve got Blount who is a different style of runner.

by ATLDuck on Oct 31, 2008 2:53 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Great breakdown. I had something similar and used some tables from GoDucks.com to illustrate my points. Somehow the html from GoDucks.com broke CGB?!?!? No idea how. But so, it got erased and I had to restart. I had to rewrite it and I have a shitty, shitty version up now.

But we seem to basically agree on how this game will go. I don’t know what that means, but I guess great minds think alike! Good luck tomorrow. Go Bears!

Please disregard the above ramblings as those of a clearly delusional fan.

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Oct 31, 2008 2:54 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

How will the Oregon ‘D’ hold up tomorrow?

Not well, my friend. Not well at all…

President Lincoln once said, "a house divided against itself cannot stand." So everyone get on board with Riley, lest we all fall!

by CaliSeth on Oct 31, 2008 3:03 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Addicted to Quack, SBN's Oregon Ducks blog and fan community.
Start posting about the Ducks »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Sleeper running back: LaMichael James
Small
Next Nick Reed
Dscn3070_small
College Football Preview, Part 4 of 11
Dscn3070_small
College Football Preview, Part 3 of 11
Dscn3070_small
College Football Preview, Part 2 of 11
Dscn3070_small
College Football Preview, Part 1 of 11
Small
Is it time to expand Autzen again?
Uowhitehelmet_small
Five Matchups I'd Like
Atq_small
How about some BBall? Pac 10 rundown
Img_1275_1_small
So, does Lane stay or go?

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

I have bought into doing kickass uniforms for doing kickass uniforms' sake. This is what I think would kickass in 2011.
Check out the poll at the bottom
Roper to Montana
Ropert ---> U of Montana
Ted Miller On Video - Can The Ducks Stay Healthy?
Know thy Opponent 2009: Oregon Ducks
Seattle Times reports Pac-10 in talks for better bowl game
Cupcake Detection!
Bored? Check this out. Funny, yet informative.
CFN posts its Purdue preview

Post_icon New FanShot All FanShots Carrot-mini


Managers

Safeco-david_and_deb_small Addicted to Quack

Pre_small ntrebon

Img_0608_small jtlight

Editors

Domsicecream_small dvieira

Oregon_duck_football_helmet_small JConant

41932caf48d25-44-1_small PaulSF

Official Partner of CBS Sports