Reliving the Season: Fresno State
Coming off our week two spanking of Michigan, we were all very excited about the potential for our season. But there were also many reasons to be nervous. First off, the opponent was Fresno State, the BCS killer. They had gone 0-4 against us to this point, all very close games. We were the one program that Pat Hill didn’t have on his win resume, And this would be his last chance. But lose, and you were hosed, because FSU always tanks their conference schedule. Couple that with a bit of a history for big letdowns after big wins (Michigan ’03, Oklahoma ’05), and I was anxiously awaiting for this day to pass.
And, as the Ducks would prove to me again and again, my nervousness was completely unfounded.
As BLAZERPROPHET so eloquently put it:
“FSU is a quality team and we just flat out kicked their ass."
Here is the recap that I wrote at the time:
The Fresno game was a bit different than the other games Oregon played. Against Houston, the team was still working out the wrinkles. The defense looked fairly poor (although many of us, myself included, vastly underrated Houston's running attack), and the offense took awhile to get going. But when the offense got going in the second half, the Ducks just blew them away. Against Michigan, Oregon decided to put on a show and sling long passes and trick plays at will. Fresno was a different kind of football--we're going to run all over you, and there's not a damn thing you can do about it. And even a tough, physical team like FSU wan no match for Oregon running game.
There's not really even much to analyze about the run game. The Ducks had 307 yards on 47 carries, for an average of 6.5 per. They went inside and outside, and there were big holes everywhere. With the notable exception of the last two plays of the first possession, the offensive line did a great job and there were just huge holes everywhere. And I mean holes you could drive a truck through. Usually, you don't notice offensive line play unless its really bad. Well, I noticed this for being really good. They dominated FSU's defense. And, of course, if you give our RBs holes, they're going to exploit. Stewart was awesome, going off for 165 yards on 17 carries, including an Autzen record 88 yard TD run, which was the first time at Oregon that he really just turned on the afterburners and blew away the defense. Through three games, Oregon has had over 300 yards in every game, and is third in the nation in rushing. Not too shabby.
The running game was so good, that Dixon didn't have to venture into the air too often. But when he did he maintained his cool efficiency: 14/20, 139 yards, and two touchdowns. He was still off on a few passes (he missed a deep ball to Williams, and threw behind Dickson over the middle causing Dickson to go down as he caught it), but his decision making has been so good that the few off throws have hardly mattered.
At this point, we know about the offense. But the real shocker in this game has to be the play of the defense. On 36 carries, the Bulldogs had a paltry 60 yards on the ground. That's a 1.7 average. Fresno was stuffed for loss time and time again. This was probably aided by the Bulldogs having both starting guards out, but for the second game in a row, the Duck defense was able to get deep penetration into the Bulldog backfield, and Fresno running backs had nowhere to go. I can't remember the last time Oregon had a game where they didn't allow a 100 yard rusher, but they broke that streak emphatically in this game.
The secondary gave up a few more big plays than we are used to seeing, but still came up big forcing two turnovers. Walter Thurmond picked up a fumble for a score, then returned an interception to the 8. As if our offense isn't good enough, the defense has been responsible for putting them in a lot of good situations this year. Also, one of the biggest improvements from the Houston game to this game has been containing the QB. Whereas against Houston when all the receivers were covered the QB scrambled for first downs, those are now coverage sacks.
That's really about it. Everyone did their job. We kicked their ass.
Only one injury note. Jeremiah Johnson tweaked his hamstring. He should be okay for next week, but if there's any doubts, I would hold him out of the Stanford game. I like our chances against the Cardinal even without JJ, so there is no reason to rush him.
So now its onto league play. Stanford could be a bit of a trap game. But, then again, we said the same thing about Fresno. If Oregon continues what they have been doing--getting better every game, running the ball, and not turn the ball over, they should beat the Cardinal by three touchdowns. The margin for error gets smaller. Let the run for the Roses begin!
Three games, three beatings. And I was feeling awfully cocky at that point. This team was looking like a juggernaut. And visions of Roses--and even beyond--were dancing in my head. It not only confirmed the Michigan result--but in many ways improved upon it. This team was not content to be a flash in the pan. They were going to bring it every game, and show no mercy.
And with Stanford coming the next week, we had every reason to expect a fourth straight pummeling.
GO DUCKS!!!
--Dave
0 recs |
29
comments
Comments
Great Recap
There should be a rather low quality vid on Youtube of Jonathan’s 88 yard cut or two, one’s a field angle. You might’ve ignored them for the aforementioned reasons.
I’ll post my own remembrances of the game later. School now. I’ll tell you write now they’re gonna sound a whole lot like yours, Dave.
Chronic Poster Extraordinaire. Not a good thing.
by butthol on Jun 2, 2008 8:16 AM PDT 0 recs
2005
It appears that this blog is in response to the last game FSU played against Oregon at Bulldog Stadium. It sounds like you are very proud of what Oregon has accomplished against Fresno State. However, although I agree they have all been close games, let’s not forget about the 2005 season. I’m sure you remember that game.
Let’s recap: Fresno State up 17-0 in the second half and Oregon was driving in hope of finally getting on the scoreboard, but, Oregon fumbled the ball on that drive. Fresno State recovered and was in position to continue DOMINATING Oregon. But, wait, the Pac-10 officials review the play and despite the “clear” fumble, it was still given back to Oregon, which they ultimately scored and finally got on the scoreboard.
Then 16 consecutive penalties were called against Fresno State (to Oregon’s 6), which allowed Oregon to get back in the game and ultimately win by a field goal. All of this while at Auzten (sic) Stadium. This type of stuff also happened later than season against USC (Reggie Bush stepping out of bounds), but we’ll leave that for another conversation.
So the point is, don’t get too happy because Oregon continually squeaks out close victories over Fresno State while FS is on the road. You can thank the Pac-10 officials and the “Big Conferences” v. “mid-major conferences” mentality that “protects” the big schools and assures their victory in hopes of getting into the bigger BCS bowl games.
The college game is about $$$ and major conferences, which Fresno State isn’t apart of. So I wouldn’t toot your horn all that loud cause Fresno State (heart and talent wise, along with mental toughness) would handle any Pac-10 school “anytime, anyplace.” Ask USC from that 2005 game when they were Ranked No. 1 and they’d let you know that thank goodness the Pac-10 officials saved that season for them, cause the real ass kicking happened to both Oregon and USC that year.
Fresno State is on the verge of doing something special this year, and I hope that we go undefeated, get into a BCS game and play the likes of Oregon on a neutral field on the national stage (without Pac-10 officials) and watch what happens.
by BulldogFaithful on Jun 2, 2008 4:42 PM PDT 0 recs
Thanks Troll.
Because Dave TOTALLY said that we kicked your ass in 05. I remember that game, I don’t remember terrible officiating. I just remember Terrence Whitehead’s little flair catch in the backfield, which he switched fields about 3 times en route to a ~70 yard TD.
Also, explain this to me:
Then 16 consecutive penalties were called against Fresno State (to Oregon’s 6), which allowed Oregon to get back in the game and ultimately win by a field goal.
So you guys, playing the dirty style of football that you play, accredit losing to us by a FG to the officials? Also, I’m really baffled as to what constitutes “16 consecutive penalties”, while we have 6 in the meantime? Maybe you were preoccupied while trolling, so I’ll cut you a break here. It happens.
This all said, you guys have definitely been competitive. I believe Dave rattled out the sentiments of most of us, when he said we were pretty scared of you guys. That should show the respect given unto you guys enough. Be satisfied.
I too hope you finally get your recognition, I just think that no whiner ever got his or her due wish.
If I were you, I’d be happy to be in the Wac. That’s the only way your program could dream of going undefeated. Now keep it civil from now on, troll.
Chronic Poster Extraordinaire. Not a good thing.
by butthol on
Jun 2, 2008 6:16 PM PDT
up
0 recs
And secondly,
are you butthurt that you got your ass whooped, no strings attached? You have nowhere to run about the said 2007 game. Give us a break.
Chronic Poster Extraordinaire. Not a good thing.
by butthol on
Jun 2, 2008 6:17 PM PDT
up
0 recs
To expound on this point....
This crap is the very reason that Fresno State fans are the most annoying, whiny fans in the nation. Yes, even more annoying than Beaver fans, who simply have an inferiority complex. FSU fans think they can hang with the big dogs because they do once or twice a year. Some years, they even beat a BCS team.
However, they cannot even win their own fricken conference. It’s truly pathetic. I went to the FSU game in Fresno in 2006, and the game was literally their entire season. This troll is talking about going undefeated when they can’t even win the WAC. Give me a break. Even if they can beat Wisconsin, UCLA, and @Rutgers, and Toledo, they still have to win their own conference, which they haven’t done under Pat Hill.
I respect what FSU tries to do, but they need to set their priorities straight. I am very thankful Oregon isn’t playing them in a while, where they have nothing to gain and everything to lose because FSU won’t take their entire schedule seriously.
by jtlight on
Jun 2, 2008 6:49 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Actually,
I think it was pretty obvious I was talking about the ‘07 game in Autzen, not the ‘06 game at Bulldog Stadium. As for the ‘05 game, you blew it., plain and simple.
--Dave
Addicted to Quack, SBN's Oregon Ducks blog
by Addicted to Quack on
Jun 2, 2008 8:32 PM PDT
up
0 recs
16 penalties to 6 look it up
Poor officiating is not the point. The point was about bigger conferences getting the love because money and politics is what its all about. Please don’t talk to me about winning conference titles cause what has oregon won? Oregon gets the hype every season until they lose 2-4 games in conference and goes to a subpar bowl game, whipty do. And, if you saw that game, then you saw the fumble when FSU was up 17 and you were holding on to the goose egg.
I don’t know about calling Fresno State fans annoying – that may be your own bias, but the arrogance that reaps from Autzun stadium, knowing that Oregon is going to get that win, is far worse than what can be said about the pride that comes from FSU fans. That’s all we got – hard work and pride.
And you’re right, we are in the “inferior” WAC, and we don’t have the 4 star recruits, nor do we have the biggest or strongest players. But regardless we got the heart to take the likes of USC, Wisconsin, etc. punch for punch. Player for player without all the bells and whistles of Pac-10 vs. WAC, big v. small, we’d push any pac-10 school around by simple hard nose football.
No one is doubting that the Oregons get the advantage with the Dixon’s and Bush’s and all the millions of $$$ that goes to your conferences, but as you admitting, we got you “scared.” That’s more rewarding that what the record indicates.
What saves you against opponents like Fresno State is your home field and officials. And if you want to call that last trick play on the extra point by belotti at Bulldog Stadium in 06’ as a great victory, well go ahead and boast that pride. But what that really said was your coach knew he wouldn’t be able to stop FSU with the amount of time left, so the only way to assure a victory was to do a trick play in the waning seconds of the game. Ask OK how they feel about Boise doing that trick play at the end. Not much of a moral victory.
I’ve seen all the games against Oregon and all have been close, all but one at your house and the Refs definately played a role in the outcome and my point was simply because of where the money is. “Three game, three beatings” is a joke.
We could go back and forth, but what matters most is who is scared and who is not. We have far less talent and despite the extra push you get from the refs, we still role punch for punch.
Like I said, this is yet another year we have an opportunity to go undefeated and if Oregon can actually play better in their own conference, maybe we’ll get you on a neutral field to play some smash mouth Bulldog Football in a major bowl game. There’s a reason why Kansas State and Wisconsin did, and tried to get out of a game with Fresno State this year and you’ve said it best – “scared”...”with everything to lose.”
by BulldogFaithful on Jun 2, 2008 11:57 PM PDT 0 recs
Dude....
No, what matters most is not who is scared and who is not. What matters is winning and losing. And I would say that no one is scared of Fresno State, not Oregon or any of its fans at least. We have a respect, and a disrespect for your team. Why? Because you do play toe to toe with the big boys…..once or twice a year.
But in my mind, this matters little if you can’t win the WAC. All the disadvantages you cite do not stop FSU from winning the WAC, yet they have never won it outright under Hill. If you want other teams to respect you fully, then win your friggin conference.
One other thing. Pat Hill, FSU, and its fans cannot take any responsibility over anything. Pat Hill is a baby, and a whiner, full of excuses, and this comes out in your post, complaining about reffing and Oregon running a fake play. Are you kidding me? And you know what, Oregon fans may be arrogant. We expect Oregon to beat FSU when we play. We know it’ll be a tough game, but we expect the win, and we’ve been the better team all 3 times we’ve played.
I think it’s laughable that you are even talking about FSU going undefeated. Sure, anyone can go undefeated any year, but FSU has’t come close. You place all your season on the “big boys,” but can’t go better than 6-2 in the WAC.
by jtlight on
Jun 3, 2008 5:39 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Ouch
the harsh reality stings
--Dave
Addicted to Quack, SBN's Oregon Ducks blog
by Addicted to Quack on
Jun 3, 2008 8:12 AM PDT
up
0 recs
So does it not count that we "scare you"
because you guys expect to lose, and therefore shoot low? Not saying you don’t compete. Again, you need to get off the reffing. I do not remember the said fumble at all.
Bulldog fan, you’re welcome to come around and talk football, just don’t throw around that we’re greedy and favored. We’re a college football team, not a 6 year old.
Talk don’t troll.
This is all the space your sig should occupy.
by butthol on
Jun 3, 2008 8:39 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Whats wrong with the WAC?
Our trolling friend Bulldogfaithful keeps using this big vs. little and us vs. them excuse as to why his team has never beaten the Ducks. Unless my memory has escaped me didn’t Boise State go undefeated and beat a Oklahoma powerhouse in the Fiesta Bowl?
Now if your lame ass theory holds true then BSU should not have even been close, let alone WIN. I love that game and I saw no referee basis against a smaller Non-BSC team.
Maybe you should alter your excuse to this- The big time conference refs hate US and love every other WAC team and for that matter every other Non-BSC team except us. Wooies me.
Do me a favor go back to your own fan website, stop trolling others fan sites and trying to start something that isn’t there. This post (on our own fansite) was merely a recap of last year games, there outcomes and the reasons the game ended the way it did. Your pissing and moaning and lack of any original or even legitimate reasons for defeat serve no purpose. I think you should leave the past alone and worry about the teams you have on your schedule this year. Defending a game you lost last year will do nothing for your team this year.
by DuckinNC on Jun 3, 2008 10:46 AM PDT 0 recs
Progress
If you have problems with fans that have a different viewpoint, or may see something different than you, then maybe you should charge a fee for this blog; thus, only people who care, and want to talk all that positive, go ducks crap would sign up.
Otherwise, this is free blog and I will comment all I want. If you don’t like it, then don’t come back to the conversation. Mind you, this quacky site was only found because I “searched” Fresno State Football. If it wasn’t for whom ever is the host of this site to write a blog quoting his readers talking about , “As BLAZERPROPHET so eloquently put it: "FSU is a quality team and we just flat out kicked their ass,” then I wouldn’t have felt compelled to state my point of view (which is stated above).
Of course I don’t expect Oregon fans to agree with me about the refs, or the major conference love, and every point I made above, but all you guys have done is talk shit about Fresno, Fresno State fans, name calling and minimalizing what I am talking about here. So have some class.
Not once have you said anything about your football program, coaching philosophy, or what not. All any of you have said is that I’m trolling, not welcomed and Oregon and it’s fans are just so superior, and that is what is expected, right? Oregon as a whole is nothing compared to California, so I don’t know what all that pride is about.
Not once have you ever refuted my statements with any football knowledge, or recall any plays that disproves what I am saying. Simply saying, ” I remember that game, I don’t remember terrible officiating…”Again, you need to get off the reffing. I do not remember the said fumble at all”....”Pat Hill is a baby, and a whiner, full of excuses, and this comes out in your post, complaining about reffing and Oregon running a fake play.”
I’m not complaining, I’m stating facts. I saw all the games too, and I see the home field advantage play throught the refs, I saw the 2005 game and, yes, that was a fumble, and the reason I know this is because the Pac-10 institutes instant replay, which, as you remember (since you all claim to have watched it), it slowly shows frame by frame the ball coming out of your back’s hands while his knee is about 5 inches from the ground. And at that moment the score was 17-0 in favor of the road team. And you did what after they gave the ball back – finally were allowed to score. cause you didn’t score on our defense up to that point.
So all this talk about, “Because Dave TOTALLY said that we kicked your ass in 05”...”So you guys, playing the dirty style of football that you play, accredit losing to us by a FG to the officials?”....”are you butthurt that you got your ass whooped, no strings attached?”..” FSU fans think they can hang with the big dogs.” What big dogs? What was it about any of the games the two schools have played that makes any of you guys even think that way?
Because of what happened in 2007? Please, Fresno State was coming off a 3OT loss based on another controversial call over at College Station the week prior having a little tango with the aggies. So, yes, you got a tired Fresno State team coming off a harsh road loss coming into your house..again. And yes you have a fast scrambling QB at that time that was pretty hard to keep up with.
Or if your talking about the 2006 game in Fresno, what? It was close the entire time, low scoring and a trick play and the end gave Oregon the win, so what? But yet you guys boast so much pride as though you have just man handled FSU each and everytime. Tone it down a bit and get a little more educated on the topic before you start spewing at the mouth.
Please, and all this talk about beating a BCS school once of twice a year, come on guys, you know football don’t you? Ask yourself how many of you “big boys” want to come play on the road at Fresno State. I have the answer – 5. Out of the 38 games Pat Hill, the whiner to you, scheduled against BCS opponents, only 5 have come to the Valley. And if you’re going to tell me that home field means nothing, then you guys should come down more often.
Do you think that it is random that Kansas State, or “big boys” to you, wanted out of their third game with us just because they really wanted Montana State? Or, do you think it’s random that Wisconsin offered to pay 1Mil to FSU to change their 9/13 show down from Fresno to Lambaugh Field? Why don’t the Beavers play us anymore? Come one guys, open your eyes and remove the wool from over them. You can’t be that naive, or that self consumed with blinded admiration of your beloved ducks.
People don’t steer clear from us, or will only play at their house because of nothing. So don’t marginalize my rants and start talking shit about me personally or our fan base just because you’re blind fans that only wants to see and believe what best suits you. I talk facts and each and everyone one of them can be substatiated. It’s on tape and the camera don’t lie.
In closing, if you don’t want non-oregon fans here, then don’t talk shit about things that aren’t true. Oregon does not kick Fresno States ass each and everytime they play. Only one game was a blow out. All the others, which is more than three (only shows your lack of knowledge) have been decided by mere field goals, which as I stated have been helped by refs and a trick play here or there.
And as I stated more than once. I HOPE both Fresno State and Oregon play out and win their conferences with near perfect records to, oh let’s say, get into the Rose Bowl, or Orange Bowl and then the nation will get to see whose ass has really been getting kicked all this time (except one game, I know).
Cheers, fools.
by BulldogFaithful on Jun 3, 2008 9:36 PM PDT 0 recs
People are annoyed because you're post doesn't reflect what this thread is about
This thread is just one post in a continuing series where Dave rehashes last season (btw you need not wonder “for whom ever is the host of this site” because he signs it Dave). Yet you have brought up the 2007 game once and not until your 3rd post. Given that this is the only time you’ve posted and it was to hijack the thread then yes you’re a troll.
You say you felt compelled to post because “As BLAZERPROPHET so eloquently put it: “FSU is a quality team and we just flat out kicked their ass" To be honest this seems like the nicest way to describe a 52-21 victory, Dave also said “Fresno State, the BCS killer.” I really don’t think there is any disrespect here. And I certainly don’t think that these quote are a reason for rehashing an 05 game – your post doesn’t refute any points about the 07 game and simply bolster the opinion that FSU is a quality team. Finally we don’t boast because we think we blew you out every time, we boast because we beat a Pat Hill coached FSU every time we play them. Sure it’s usually a very small difference, but it is always a win no matter who’s stadium it’s played at.
Speaking of the 05 game, what is more likely, the refs purposely threw the game for Oregon or that Pat Hill’s hard hitting all out approach cost FSU in the end. While the high intensity approach can take a team by surprise and set the tempo, it also can lead to players overperusing and being out of position. Which can lead to penalties and susceptibility to misdirection plays (like the tick play in 06). I think that makes a lot more sense than a vast BCS refing consipacy that takes a win away from FSU, yet only allows UCLA to put up 6 against Utah. But I digress, even if the refs blew a call, id did not score any points for Oregon, FSU still could have stopped them.
You say “Not once have you ever refuted my statements with any football knowledge, or recall any plays that disproves what I am saying. Simply saying, ‘" I remember that game, I don’t remember terrible officiating.’ Yet in your VERY NEXT paragraph you say “I saw the 2005 game and, yes, that was a fumble” So when we see the game it is not fact, when you see it it is fact. Glad we cleared that up.
Later you bring up the 06 game which you imply was closer than the score represents because we won on a trick play. I don’t understand how it makes it the game closer or otherwise diminishes FSUs home loss. Trick plays work when a coach recognizes a team is playing an undisciplined aggressive style of play and has the balls to call trick play. Sounds like good strategy to me.
Then you eventually bring up the 2007 game and argue FSU lost because they were tired from the game before. I think that fatigue makes sense in basketball and baseball pitching, but when there is a whole week between games, why don’t the players get enough rest? If they’re over tired shouldn’t the coach let them rest?
So you have an excuse for the 05 (refs), 06 (trick play), and 07 (tired). Given that you have an excuse for every loss, I really wouldn’t blame anyone from calling you a whiner. Can you do this for every game FSU has lost in the last 4 years? Please don’t just wondering.
In this post you make the point that nobody wants to play FSU at home. Although nobody isn’t exactly right, Oregon beat FSU at home for 1, I generally agree with that point. The problem I have is that you argue that others on this board disagree with you – who? All we do is say things like “FSU is the BCS killer.” And FSU is doubly dangerous because if a team looses to FSU the loss looks worse and worse as the schedule goes on because under Pat Hill FSU has never won their conference outright (they tied for 1st in 99), and have never won more than 6 conference games. At least if a team looses to Hawaii or BSU they have the decency to win the WAC more than once a decade. Yet for someone who complains that people don’t respond to your points, you never respond to Pat Hills under achieving ways in the WAC. I suppose there is nothing else to be said.
So instead you have nothing left to do but reiterate how one blown call gave up a 17 point lead, how a trick play negates a road win, or how being tired accounts for a 52-21 blow out. Reiterate the point that we don’t respect FSU even though we all will readily admit we get very nervous when we play FSU and give it labels to reflect that. Reiterate that you have little to add but conspiracy theories, excuses, and pointless bluster.
by bradLL99 on
Jun 4, 2008 12:30 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Well-put, Brad
I have only one thing to add. Back when Oregon was more of a middling program and I was new to sports fandom (1996ish), I used to stress about blown calls and argue the woulda’s, shoulda’s, and coulda’s of losses. Eventually, I GREW UP and learned the truth of what all my coaches always told us players: if you can’t beat a team despite blown calls, an unfavorable location, fatigue AND the skills and will of the other team, you have no one to blame but yourself – WINNERS FIND A WAY TO OVERCOME. Sometimes adults (even good coaches like Bob Stoops) temporarily lose sight of that, but history and the record-books don’t.
Blindandrabiddogfaithful, I don’t portend to represent the blog administrators here at ATQ, but I think its safe to say that the ATQ community shares my sentiments – enlightened opinions and respectful comments from non-Oregon fans are always welcome and appreciated. Trolling, flaming and abusing the patience and hospitality of your hosts, however, are not. Until you learn the difference, get the hell out of here.
"They're partying at Rennie's!" - ESPN Sportscenter
by nobeansdux on
Jun 4, 2008 1:18 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Yep
Nice post, Brad. I have been utterly confused as to why BF keeps bringing up the games from ‘05 and ‘06 when it seems pretty clear that the original post is about last season’s game. I guess as Dave continues his posts about last season’s games, he should make sure to include his thoughts about every game the two teams have ever played. Hell, maybe he should just go ahead and write about all of our previous opponents—whether we played them last season or not.
by ntrebon on
Jun 4, 2008 7:50 AM PDT
up
0 recs
hmmm
Maybe I should recap the 1939 NCAA tournament? Or will the Ohio State trolls come out and slam me about how they should have won?
--Dave
Addicted to Quack, SBN's Oregon Ducks blog
by Addicted to Quack on
Jun 4, 2008 8:19 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Well...
I don’t know about claiming that they should have won, but I am sure they’d probably bring up how they shut us out 7-0 in softball last year.
Because it is relevant and all…
by ntrebon on
Jun 4, 2008 8:27 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Wow
It’s my understanding that 17-7 is still two scores ahead, maybe try to finish?
And as I stated more than once. I HOPE both Fresno State and Oregon play out and win their conferences with near perfect records to, oh let’s say, get into the Rose Bowl, or Orange Bowl and then the nation will get to see whose ass has really been getting kicked all this time (except one game, I know).Because the BCS is all about the hot Oregon-FSU matchup, hate to break it to you but near-perfect in the WAC won’t even get you in to the Holiday Bowl.
by jessenumber1 on
Jun 4, 2008 8:45 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Bulldog Faithful
Why did I call you a troll? How about because your inflammatory response HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT THE ARTICLE WAS ABOUT?
I was talking about last years game-one game-where the final score was 52-21. Sorry, but that’s an ass-kicking. Other games in the series have been very close, as you point out, but ‘07 was nowhere near close. I didn’t comment on the other games, other than a brief statement that they were all close, so I fail to see why you find them relevant. Of course, you seem to think that I claim we kicked your ass in the ‘05 game, an asseration that I never made. That’s why we’re getting irritated with you—because you’ve gone completely off topic in an inflammatory manner.
We do respect your program and felt very proud of not only serving our five game commitment to you while others were punking out, but winning all five games. It is rare among BCS teams to do so unscathed.
And to say that FSU always tanks their conference schedule—I don’t apologize for the truth.
You claim that this is a free blog and you will comment all you want. Realize that you will comment only as long as I allow you to. How long that is will be up to you. We have a reputation for being very welcoming of other teams’ fans, so long as they are respectful. I don’t object to you talking about any of your points here, but please make sure you have read the article and understand it before blasting it and making yourself look like a fool. Because I would find it hard to believe that you are illiterate, the logical excuse for your comments is that you are simply trolling. Otherwise, why would you be so off topic?
--Dave
Addicted to Quack, SBN's Oregon Ducks blog
by Addicted to Quack on Jun 4, 2008 8:43 AM PDT 0 recs
It's about time
Dave, bradll and others, now we’re talking and having a conversation here. I like your talking points, and many of them actually makes sense. And I agree, we haven’t won our conference, we don’t rise up for UTEP, and the likes, and only get up for the “big boys,” and trust me, it upsets me each and every year. Fresno State let’s me down year after year – that’s the life of a mid-major program with “major” aspirations. I know all of this.
The reason we got off topic was all the spewing going on because I was venting about the 2005 game. I knew the Original post by Dave was about the 2007 game, but as soon as I got to “kicked their ass,” it just brought back the near past of 2005, cause that was our year, that was the year Pat Hill could have did something special and finally do what BSU and Hawaii did following the seasons after.
But Oregon gave us an unearned loss regardless of your points of view, THEN we go to the coliseum and go back and forth with USC to get another loss with questionable calls (Reggie Bush running out of bounds on a critical play), but’s let’s not get off point. And because we rise up so hard for the big boys, after that second loss FSU just lost all momentum, which carried over into the 2006 season.
I’m sure you guys can relate as Oregon does the same thing almost every year – ranked, go higher, lose to a couple pac-10 school, fall out of rankings, and get holiday bowl invites. So you guys can at least appreciate my frustration. And you’re right, I didn’t read the article. I knew it was about 2007, but it doesn’t sit well with me when Oregon fans in particular start talking shiznit about kicking FSU ass cause to me, that automatically reminds me of 2005, when we, yet again, had a chance to win the WAC and get into a BCS game.
So the whole point of coming into “your site” was to simply state my case to duck fans about 2005 to anyone that would listen for two reasons. 1) cause I don’t know any duck fans, and 2) if you’re a true fan, then you know as well as I know that Oregon did not win that game. But enough of that already – we’ll never agree.
In fact, there’s a bar here in San Fran called the R Bar and everytime there is a Oregon game on the place is full of you happy fans – and I pleaded my case to them their too. I looked some dude straight in the eyes and said, “if you’re a true fan, then you know Oregon didn’t win.” he just smiled and kinda shrugged. It’s all in good fun. Fresno is my hometown and I will always support Pat Hill and the Bulldogs.
But you guys don’t have to rub it in and remind us of what we already know – Fresno State ultimately tanks a game they should have won. I know, I watch year in and year out. But the overall message that I was saying is that Oregon is not much better than FSU cause we do pretty much the same thing in our respective conferences every year, come in 2nd, 3rd in the conference and get into a subpar bowl game, so don’t act otherwise. That’s all.
But this year, it’s another year where it looks promising, senior QB, preseason ranking and 4 solid games before conference play – I’ll look to them to maintain the momentum and win the WAC, finally.
In closing, as my headings suggest (2005 – progress – it’s about time), it’s about reaching the next plateau, and it is overdue for my beloved Bulldogs. It’s getting closer and closer.
Sorry to impose on your fans only blog.
by BulldogFaithful on Jun 4, 2008 6:29 PM PDT 0 recs
Very good points -
Disclaimer: been drinking . . . a lot (kickball night) – sorry for the typos
Please feel free to comment like these, I think now that I understand why you jumped onto 05 it makes a lot more sense. Perhaps we were a tad jumpy, because of a few OSU fans and a crazy BCS conspiracy theorist. As far as the 05 game, I think I disagree mainly that a true fan would agree with you – arguing sports, especially college sports, is always biased and people are awful at recognizing their bias and when they do they cannot correct for it. Thus a true fan would be especially biased. I’m not saying Oregon or FSU fans are biased, I’m saying they both are, and opposing views any controversial call will be impossible to resolve.
The thing about FSU not winning their conference is it makes loosing to them or barely beating them look even worse in the eyes of the pollsters. So if we were playing you I would be a big FSU fan this year, instead I’m a BSU, Utah State and Purdue fan, but I’d love to see FSU beat Sconsin and Rutgers.
Btw where is R Bar, I may be in SF during our season opener.
by bradLL99 on
Jun 5, 2008 12:01 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Are you serious?
First, it is totally ridiculous to be claiming that Fresno State got an unearned loss (which isn’t even a real thing) against Oregon in 2005, for 2 reasons.
1) You can NEVER blame a loss/win on one play, especially a play early in the game (if it was when the game was 17-0, it was second quarter, not half) . In the case of this particular play, from what you’ve said, it was incorrectly ruled down. Do you know how often this happens in any game? You simply CANNOT claim that this would change the outcome of the game.
2) Oregon went up by 10 points with 4 minutes in the game. Fresno State scored a TD that didn’t really affect the game in the end, so the game was closer than it appeared. This fumble would have altered the game, but how greatly?
Plain and simple, FSU blew it. They didn’t make adjustments. They played out of control, or Pat Hill ball, and racked up stupid penalties. I’m not saying the game was well-reffed, but the vast majority of the fault lies on the shoulders of the FSU coaching staff, and even FSU fans agree with this.
I will say this, and I am a true fan: Oregon won the game.
Oregon fans have had their reasons to complain about calls, but I choose to not do that. It’s petty and does nothing. If you want to be a great football team, you have to overcome and take advantage of the breaks. Complaining incessantly, and holding onto calls for years is incredibly immature.
Two other things….
But you guys don’t have to rub it in and remind us of what we already know
Umm, you came here! You come here spouting gibberish, and we point out the truth, and that upsets you?
Oregon is not much better than FSU cause we do pretty much the same thing in our respective conferences every year, come in 2nd, 3rd in the conference and get into a subpar bowl game, so don’t act otherwise.
Umm, what? There is a BIG difference of 3rd in the Pac-10 and the WAC. Thanks for the laugh though.
As we’re said before, Oregon respects Fresno State. We take them very seriously. But at the end of the day, Mike Bellotti has never lost to Fresno State, and Pat Hill has never beaten Oregon. No excuses, that’s how its turned out.
by jtlight on
Jun 5, 2008 6:02 AM PDT
up
0 recs
More thoughts....
As for the USC/Reggie Bush out of bounds thing: to say that this non-call affected the outcome of the game is even more ridiculous that the fumble thing. While he may have stepped out of bounds, this wouldn’t have changed possession of the ball, he had still ripped off a pretty sizable run (to the 25). USC still had the ball and the lead in field goal range, and there is really no reason to believe FSU would have stopped USC on that drive anyway, as they were on fire that quarter.
Overall, you really need to let this go. FSU had a really good team that year, and you should have won the WAC, and you lost to 2 Pac-10 teams that were in the top 10, but you still collapsed down the stretch in your conference. You can blame that on let-down, but good teams don’t let down, especially in the WAC.
And here’s my overall view on bad calls: They happen. All the time. I am embarrassed by Oregon fans that blame things on the refs. Over the entirety of a season, you’ll get breaks, and you’ll lose breaks. And the great teams take advantage of what they are given, and overcome those that they don’t get. Great seasons hinge on that. You may blame the Pac-10 or say the big conferences want to keep the little conference down, but I don’t have any empirical evidence to believe that. In the cases you’ve provided, you’ve given only anecdotal evidence regarding bad calls, and given really only an example of one call. They do go both ways, and with the 16 penalties, that is a lot, but is very indicative of Pat Hill teams. I don’t recall the fumble, but I do recall the penalties, and most were well warranted (personal fouls, false starts, etc.).
And, since you’re here, I’ll give you my honest (in my mind fair) assessment of FSU football. In my opinion, Pat Hill is not going to be a great coach because he lets these little things eat away at his team. Playing with a chip on your shoulder is only good for so long. But we’ve seen again and again from FSU, losing to well disciplined teams (Boise State). Oregon respects FSU, and the fans and team take playing them very seriously. But Pat Hill runs a very undisciplined team. We saw the Chip Kelly offense in 2007 rip through an incredibly indisciplined defense, that preyed on that weakness. You must defend the spread Oregon ran last year with the most discipline ever, everyone must play the gaps, etc. But they didn’t do that, and Oregon ran hog wild.
I’m not meaning to rip apart the FSU program. I have a lot of respect in many areas for the football program. FSU plays incredibly hard (against non-WAC competition). They take pride in what they do, and that’s to be comended. But I just don’t think that Pat Hill is a very good coach. That’s my opinion, others here may disagree, but I’ve seen enough of how they play to think that unless he changes how he coaches, I don’t think that FSU will be going undefeated anytime soon. Because in game, he doesn’t make adjustments, and instead of taking responsibility, staying cool, and responding, he loses his composure, and so does his team.
Good luck in the coming season.
by jtlight on
Jun 5, 2008 9:27 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Not to undermine anything anyone else has said here, but
Pat Hill looks like a walrus.
This is all the space your sig should occupy.
by butthol on Jun 7, 2008 9:57 AM PDT 0 recs










