Too Early Preview: Ducks vs. Washington
University of Washington Huskies
Location: Seattle, Washington
Enrollment: 42,974
Coach: Tyrone Willingham (11-25 @ UW, 76-76-1 overall)
2007 Record: 4-9 (2-7 Pac-10)
Allow me to make a list of things I hate more than the Washington Huskies:
1. Certain political figures who shall not be named
2. Wal-Mart
That’s about it. Any longtime readers know my hatred everything purple and gold. So their struggles over the last few years leave me with little sympathy for the Puppies. I’ve often wondered how a team in such a great city of wealth could fall so far, but you’d better believe I revel in it. Since their Rose Bowl appearance in 2000, Washington’s spiral to irrelevance has been met with these records:
2001: 7-4
2002: 7-6
2003: 6-6
2004: 1-10
2005: 2-9
2006: 5-7
2007: 4-9
That’s a whole lot of bad, only made worse by the truth that this team has no future, either. Outside of Jake Locker, this team has no talent. They finished 60th in the nation in total offense last year (394.2 ypg), and an abysmal 104th in total defense last year. Ty Willingham is on the hottest seat in the nation, and his ass is sure to be shitcanned at the end of the year.
Lets take a look at Satan’s minions:
When Oregon has the ball:
Did I mention that Washington’s defense is somewhere beyond bad? They were 89th against the run and 104th against the pass last year, so equally bad against both. And, you remember running for four hundred sixty something yards against them last year. Washington does return six starters, but are still plagued by a fundamental lack of talent on the defensive end. A new defensive coordinator is sure to help, but how much?
E.J. Savannah had 111 tackles at outside linebacker last year, and is probably the only player on that end worth mentioning by name—though his eligibility remains in question. The others are a mix defensive linemen with little experience, uninspiring linebackers, and a senior laden defensive backfield that has roughly as much skill as my one year old son.
As I’ve said, though, this defense is equally bad on both sides of the ball. I’d expect Bellotti to break Costa in easy, with a heavy dose of JJ and Blount in this game. Those guys should be able to keep each other fresh the whole game long, which should lead to big rushing numbers by the end of the game. Costa will have a lot of safe passes early on (flats, bubble screens, etc.) until we can take a couple score lead. I think at that point, Bellotti will let him take a couple of chances to get comfortable. Costa will get somewhere around 150 yards thorough the air, but we could get over 300 yards rushing. I’d be extremely disappointed if we didn’t have around 40 points.
When Washington has the ball:
There’s been some bagging on Jake Locker but he’s not overrated—he’s the real deal. We know he runs like a beast. And, while he need major improvement as far as passing accuracy goes, we saw last year what can happen if he’s able to find his touch on the deep ball. Locker does have a bit of a hamstring issue, but its not expected to keep him out of the game.
Let me begin by making one thing crystal clear—Locker’s not going to be gift wrapped two deep blown coverages by the secondary this time. It was that group’s worst performance of the year in that game, and its not going to happen again. At least not against this opponent. Every Washington receiver of not is no longer with the team. However, one man to keep an eye on is freshman Chris Polk, who is expected kind of like James Rodgers. Watch the fly sweep. Louis Rankin is gone, but Brandon Johnson, a serviceable back, will step into the starting job. The offensive line is very good, and starters return at fullback and tight end.
This unit is okay, but it is very unknown at the skill positions besides Locker.
Special Teams:
The Huskies are very good at punter and kicker.
Final Outlook:
The offense is a mystery, but I expect them to be pretty good. Look for them to get up about 24 points as our defensive line and linebackers work out some kinks. However, their defense is something terrible. We saw a record running performance against them last year, and I expect the same this time around. Tons of yards for JJ and Blount, and a 42-24 opening day win for Oregon. Puppies go home licking their wounds, and all is good in the world.
GO DUCKS!!!
--Dave
0 recs |
9 comments
Comments
I think the key is
Keep Locker in the pocket and make him throw. Don’t put too much pressure on him and get him out running around. Just let the secondary do it’s job.
by echris on
Aug 18, 2008 7:58 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Too Early Preview: Ducks vs. Washington
Good Summary – I pretty much agree. Here’s an experpt of how I broke it down for the Huskies on Bob Condotta’s Husky blog last week – for some reason it wasn’t very well received:
"To borrow a phrase from Bob Newhart "I don’t mean to be condescending (That means to talk down to") but I’m confident we’ll smoke you again and everybody will change the channel by the 3rd quarter (except me, I’ll be sitting in section 11 laughing my ass off).
I’m not going to predict that we’ll get 500 rushing yards or anything, but 350 seems about right.
I’ve been around a while and watch our practices every single day – so take note that Coach Brooks said this; by about the start of the 4th quarter, it’s going to feel like you’re big brother has you in a head-lock, dishing out noogies, asking “why are you crying?” and there really wont be anything you can do about it, except suffer and humbly request mercy.
You should see our 4th string by about that time and the score won’t be a total embarrassment.
Ducks 56, UW 20
by Coach Brooks on
Aug 18, 2008 10:44 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Nice Try...
The Huskies have more than Jake Locker, and you will hear their names throughout the game. Names like Chris Poik, Donald Butler, Daniel Teo’Nesheim, Kevario Middleton, D’Andre Goodwin, Nate Williams…The Huskies are young but have a lot of skill; if the young talent can step up, roasted duck will be served.
By the way…“puppies” is funny…but no name alteration is needed to laugh at Oregon; the Ducks. HA! We can bark at our home games…you have to say “O” because no one wants to quack.
by Free Lance Warrior on
Aug 18, 2008 11:59 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
It's too bad
that most people that actually watch college football disagree with you. Washington’s RBs, WRs, and DL is absolutely horrendous.
They have had hideous recruiting classes and you’re deluding yourself, 1) if you think that UW has decent talent, and 2) if you think that “talent” will step up.
We are the power. We are the flower. We are the awesome blossom.
--www.AddictedToQuack.com
by jtlight on
Aug 18, 2008 12:12 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
don't forget
their DBs are horrendous as well
--Dave
Addicted to Quack, SBN's Oregon Ducks blog
by Addicted to Quack on
Aug 18, 2008 1:16 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The first time I read this
“their DBs are hormonal as well”
Your friendly neighborhood placekicker.
by qrsouther on
Aug 18, 2008 4:56 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It's never too early...
…to predict a Duck victory. 12 days!
by inroywetrust on
Aug 18, 2008 1:24 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Where do you go in Seattle in case of a tornado?
Husky Stadium, they never get a touchdown there
by teedawg on
Aug 18, 2008 5:48 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs











