Addicted To Quack: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Steve McNair Found Shot to Death


Too Early Preview: Ducks vs. Washington

University of Washington Huskies

Location:  Seattle, Washington

Enrollment:  42,974

Coach:  Tyrone Willingham (11-25 @ UW, 76-76-1 overall)

2007 Record:  4-9 (2-7 Pac-10)

 

Allow me to make a list of things I hate more than the Washington Huskies:

 

1.  Certain political figures who shall not be named

2.  Wal-Mart

 

That’s about it.  Any longtime readers know my hatred everything purple and gold.  So their struggles over the last few years leave me with little sympathy for the Puppies.  I’ve often wondered how a team in such a great city of wealth could fall so far, but you’d better believe I revel in it.  Since their Rose Bowl appearance in 2000, Washington’s spiral to irrelevance has been met with these records:

 

2001:  7-4

2002:  7-6

2003:  6-6

2004:  1-10

2005:  2-9

2006:  5-7

2007:  4-9

 

That’s a whole lot of bad, only made worse by the truth that this team has no future, either.  Outside of Jake Locker, this team has no talent.  They finished 60th in the nation in total offense last year (394.2 ypg), and an abysmal 104th in total defense last year.  Ty Willingham is on the hottest seat in the nation, and his ass is sure to be shitcanned at the end of the year.

 

Lets take a look at Satan’s minions:

 

When Oregon has the ball:

 

Did I mention that Washington’s defense is somewhere beyond bad?  They were 89th against the run and 104th against the pass last year, so equally bad against both.  And, you remember running for four hundred sixty something yards against them last year.  Washington does return six starters, but are still plagued by a fundamental lack of talent on the defensive end.  A new defensive coordinator is sure to help, but how much?

 

E.J. Savannah had 111 tackles at outside linebacker last year, and is probably the only player on that end worth mentioning by name—though his eligibility remains in question.  The others are a mix defensive linemen with little experience, uninspiring linebackers, and a senior laden defensive backfield that has roughly as much skill as my one year old son.

 

As I’ve said, though, this defense is equally bad on both sides of the ball.  I’d expect Bellotti to break Costa in easy, with a heavy dose of JJ and Blount in this game.  Those guys should be able to keep each other fresh the whole game long, which should lead to big rushing numbers by the end of the game.  Costa will have a lot of safe passes early on (flats, bubble screens, etc.) until we can take a couple score lead.  I think at that point, Bellotti will let him take a couple of chances to get comfortable.  Costa will get somewhere around 150 yards thorough the air, but we could get over 300 yards rushing.  I’d be extremely disappointed if we didn’t have around 40 points.

 

When Washington has the ball:

 

There’s been some bagging on Jake Locker but he’s not overrated—he’s the real deal.  We know he runs like a beast.  And, while he need major improvement as far as passing accuracy goes, we saw last year what can happen if he’s able to find his touch on the deep ball.  Locker does have a bit of a hamstring issue, but its not expected to keep him out of the game.

 

Let me begin by making one thing crystal clear—Locker’s not going to be gift wrapped two deep blown coverages by the secondary this time.  It was that group’s worst performance of the year in that game, and its not going to happen again.  At least not against this opponent.  Every Washington receiver of not is no longer with the team.  However, one man to keep an eye on is freshman Chris Polk, who is expected kind of like James Rodgers.  Watch the fly sweep.  Louis Rankin is gone, but Brandon Johnson, a serviceable back, will step into the starting job.  The offensive line is very good, and starters return at fullback and tight end.

 

This unit is okay, but it is very unknown at the skill positions besides Locker.

 

Special Teams:

 

The Huskies are very good at punter and kicker.

 

Final Outlook:

 

The offense is a mystery, but I expect them to be pretty good.  Look for them to get up about 24 points as our defensive line and linebackers work out some kinks.  However, their defense is something terrible.  We saw a record running performance against them last year, and I expect the same this time around.  Tons of yards for JJ and Blount, and a 42-24 opening day win for Oregon.  Puppies go home licking their wounds, and all is good in the world.

 

GO DUCKS!!!

 

--Dave

0 recs | Comment 9 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Addicted To Quack

UW Thoughts

Aug 2008 by Addicted to Quack - 9 comments

1 Day to UW - Remembering 1994

Aug 2008 by jtlight - 6 comments

Week 1 Prediction Thread

Aug 2008 by ntrebon - 11 comments

Comments

Display:

I think the key is

Keep Locker in the pocket and make him throw. Don’t put too much pressure on him and get him out running around. Just let the secondary do it’s job.

by echris on Aug 18, 2008 7:58 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Too Early Preview: Ducks vs. Washington

Good Summary – I pretty much agree. Here’s an experpt of how I broke it down for the Huskies on Bob Condotta’s Husky blog last week – for some reason it wasn’t very well received:

"To borrow a phrase from Bob Newhart "I don’t mean to be condescending (That means to talk down to") but I’m confident we’ll smoke you again and everybody will change the channel by the 3rd quarter (except me, I’ll be sitting in section 11 laughing my ass off).

I’m not going to predict that we’ll get 500 rushing yards or anything, but 350 seems about right.

I’ve been around a while and watch our practices every single day – so take note that Coach Brooks said this; by about the start of the 4th quarter, it’s going to feel like you’re big brother has you in a head-lock, dishing out noogies, asking “why are you crying?” and there really wont be anything you can do about it, except suffer and humbly request mercy.

You should see our 4th string by about that time and the score won’t be a total embarrassment.

Ducks 56, UW 20

by Coach Brooks on Aug 18, 2008 10:44 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Nice Try...

The Huskies have more than Jake Locker, and you will hear their names throughout the game. Names like Chris Poik, Donald Butler, Daniel Teo’Nesheim, Kevario Middleton, D’Andre Goodwin, Nate Williams…The Huskies are young but have a lot of skill; if the young talent can step up, roasted duck will be served.

By the way…“puppies” is funny…but no name alteration is needed to laugh at Oregon; the Ducks. HA! We can bark at our home games…you have to say “O” because no one wants to quack.

by Free Lance Warrior on Aug 18, 2008 11:59 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It's too bad

that most people that actually watch college football disagree with you. Washington’s RBs, WRs, and DL is absolutely horrendous.

They have had hideous recruiting classes and you’re deluding yourself, 1) if you think that UW has decent talent, and 2) if you think that “talent” will step up.

We are the power. We are the flower. We are the awesome blossom.
--www.AddictedToQuack.com

by jtlight on Aug 18, 2008 12:12 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

don't forget

their DBs are horrendous as well

--Dave
Addicted to Quack, SBN's Oregon Ducks blog

by Addicted to Quack on Aug 18, 2008 1:16 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The first time I read this

“their DBs are hormonal as well”

Your friendly neighborhood placekicker.

by qrsouther on Aug 18, 2008 4:56 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It's never too early...

…to predict a Duck victory. 12 days!

by inroywetrust on Aug 18, 2008 1:24 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Where do you go in Seattle in case of a tornado?

Husky Stadium, they never get a touchdown there

by teedawg on Aug 18, 2008 5:48 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Addicted to Quack, SBN's Oregon Ducks blog and fan community.
Start posting about the Ducks »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Sleeper running back: LaMichael James
Small
Next Nick Reed
Dscn3070_small
College Football Preview, Part 4 of 11
Dscn3070_small
College Football Preview, Part 3 of 11
Dscn3070_small
College Football Preview, Part 2 of 11
Dscn3070_small
College Football Preview, Part 1 of 11
Small
Is it time to expand Autzen again?
Uowhitehelmet_small
Five Matchups I'd Like
Atq_small
How about some BBall? Pac 10 rundown
Img_1275_1_small
So, does Lane stay or go?

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

I have bought into doing kickass uniforms for doing kickass uniforms' sake. This is what I think would kickass in 2011.
Check out the poll at the bottom
Roper to Montana
Ropert ---> U of Montana
Ted Miller On Video - Can The Ducks Stay Healthy?
Know thy Opponent 2009: Oregon Ducks
Seattle Times reports Pac-10 in talks for better bowl game
Cupcake Detection!
Bored? Check this out. Funny, yet informative.
CFN posts its Purdue preview

Post_icon New FanShot All FanShots Carrot-mini


Managers

Safeco-david_and_deb_small Addicted to Quack

Pre_small ntrebon

Img_0608_small jtlight

Editors

Domsicecream_small dvieira

Oregon_duck_football_helmet_small JConant

41932caf48d25-44-1_small PaulSF

Official Partner of CBS Sports