Thoughts on the QB situation
All offseason I talked about how Oregon would be very tough to beat if we got B+ play out of our QBs. On Saturday, we got D- play, and we should have lost that game. If this QB play continues, we'll be lucky to go .500 the rest of the season. And I say "QB play" because we will not see Roper for a few weeks. And I don't see this as a bad thing for 3 reasons:
1) In the Purdue game, he was awful on the spread option. His decision making was flat out terrible. When Jeremiah Johnson was in, the Purdue defense was keying on him, hard. Roper had multiple opportunities to tuck and run, and did not, and Purdue did not respect the play.
2) Ken Woody talked about this in his game recap, but Roper did not have a good pocket presence. He had a tendency to run out of the pocket rather than stepping up. And he cannot throw on the run. He loses whatever arm strength he had, and is not accurate.
3) He cannot throw the ball deep. Jaison Williams (who in my opinion is getting too much blame thus far) had one-on-one coverage on the outside most of the day, but we were never able to take advantage of that, because either Roper cannot throw deep, or the coaches will not let him throw deep. This flaw has been apparent since the UCLA game last year. He has consistenly had low yards per attempt, and the only reason that has gone over 6 in any game is because receivers have taken short passes and made more out of them.
These three flaws were serious problems in the Purdue game. They can be corrected, especially with the rocket that Masoli has, but who knows if he was the decision making/consistency that is necessary to run the offense well.
Honestly, I'm excited to see what Masoli/Harper can do. They have the talent to make this offense succeed, and will be playing (at least for the next 2 weeks) against very beatable teams.
So, I'm optimistic for the next few games. There is talent at the QB position, and we'll see how it grows over the next few weeks.
0 recs |
51 comments
Comments
Situation
I’m optimistic as well. I’ve supported Roper, but I’ve always thought that Masoli has the upside and that excites me. He’s had a few games to get some snaps, and gets to start his first game at home, then basically get a gimme road start at WSU. The only thing that has scared me about Masoli so far is that he seems to be too pumped up when he gets in the game and it seems to take him about 2 – 3 series to settle in.
I read something (I think on ATQ) that summed it up: Roper is a good backup QB, but he just doesn’t seem to have what is needed to win a PAC 10 title and/or a Rose Bowl. It’s going to be interesting to see if Masoli entrenches himself as the starter.
I personally don’t want Harper to start….I see so much potential in this kid and would love to see them continue to take it slow with him. I’ve always hated the 2 QB system, but we’ve never had a situation quite like this where Harper is so electric that you’d be crazy to not get him some snaps. I’d like to see it something like 80% Masoli / 20% Harper.
I’m on the fence about J-Will. I think that the wind probably had some effect on the receivers in the Purdue game. J-Will and the rest of the receivers REALLY need to step up now, so he’s got every chance in the world coming up to prove that too much of the blame is being placed on him.
"Droppin' knowledge like J-Will drops first downs" Dave - Addicted to Quack
by MarineCorpsDuck on
Sep 15, 2008 9:53 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm not afraid of the 2QB system right now...
At this point, Harper isn’t a full time QB, and isn’t capable of leading the offense. He doesn’t have the refinement with the passing game. Now, he’s more like Tebow his freshman year. Only this time we don’t have an experienced, good passing QB to lead the team 80-90% of the time.
--www.AddictedToQuack.com, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
by jtlight on
Sep 15, 2008 10:02 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Harper/Masoli
Very excited about their future, not sure about the present.
by ntrebon on
Sep 15, 2008 9:53 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Harper is definitely a guy for the future. He’s not ready to Start. Hopefully Masoli has brushed up on the offense, and he’s ready.
I’m not worried with the QBs, we have amazing talent. Chris Harper and Darron Thomas are awesome athletes, and Masoli has a few games under his belt, and has shown he can play ball. Despite the overall inexperience, I feel pretty good about our situation at QB, from top to bottom. More so than last year, Post-Dixon.
J-WIll has only one legitimate drop, which was against Purdue – yes, he’s missed some catches, but they haven’t been easy ones to make (Though he still should have made them). The 4th down drop was bad, but he hasn’t had enough opportunities to make the catch this year, and I for one would really like to see him more involved. He towered the Purdue defenders, and he was almost always in a man-on-man match up, but we didn’t toss the ball his way. That’s a match up he wins.
Go Duckies!
by JShufelt on
Sep 15, 2008 10:08 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Word jtlight.
Great post. Masoli is ready, or as ready as he is going to be, and his decision making can’t be worse than Roper’s. I spent 3 hours looking at giant holes with 15 yards in front of them that Roper chose to ignore for no good reason.
I’m not sure you have justified the lack of desert for 50/50’s received blame. The passes he dropped were almost invariably at clutch times, and fantastically thrown. He is our #1 receiver, and he needs to step up.
by everett on
Sep 15, 2008 10:10 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
The Roper era is over
The Sun Bowl showed what Kelly can do in this sort of situation. The difference now is that the QBs he has to work with are both ‘his’ guys. That’s not suggesting CK and MB won’t remain objective about it when Roper returns, but common sense would suggest that he’s going to be able to do a lot more with Masoli & Harper than he was able to do with Roper at the end of last season.
by grimc on
Sep 15, 2008 12:01 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Ummmm I think that's a little too far
“Roper era over” seems way too bold for a 2 or 3 week MCL sprain while we play cupcakes. Now, maybe next year Chip can finally maximize the potential of his new toys, but right now the Roper era is on hiatus for precautionary measures.
Your friendly neighborhood placekicker.
by qrsouther on
Sep 15, 2008 7:59 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
you guys don't think we're being a bit hard on Roper
I mean, I’ve never heard so much criticism for a guy whose 4-0 as our starting quarterback.
Roper isn’t great, and Masoli definitely has more tools for the offense. I’m excited to see what we do, and confident that we’ll win the next two, even if its just on the strength of the run game alone.
But I’m not ready to bury Roper yet.
--Dave
Addicted to Quack, SBN's Oregon Ducks blog
by Addicted to Quack on
Sep 15, 2008 12:20 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Lyle Moevao was also 4-0....
We may be too hard on him….
But what worries me the most is his inability to throw the ball deep. That won’t get it done against competent defenses.
--www.AddictedToQuack.com, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
by jtlight on
Sep 15, 2008 12:31 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Deep ball
….and if we have all figured that out, you KNOW Pete Carroll and the rest of the PAC 10 have too. I like Roper and I was supporting him and preaching that people need to give him a chance, but I feel like he’s reached his ceiling. I could be completely wrong though, like I was yesterday when I said “nope, the game’s over, we (the Chargers) just recovered that fumble and there’s NO WAY they can overturn it.”
"Droppin' knowledge like J-Will drops first downs" Dave - Addicted to Quack
by MarineCorpsDuck on
Sep 15, 2008 12:34 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I've got the same feeling about a ceiling
I think that’s where this Roper talk is generally coming from—a lot of people might have the sense that we’ve seen his best, and while it’s serviceable and occassionally great, we expect more. A Dixon Hangover.
by grimc on
Sep 15, 2008 12:49 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
yep
his delivery doesn’t help with the deep ball. I’m excited to see what Masoli can do. I just don’t think its given that things will be better.
--Dave
Addicted to Quack, SBN's Oregon Ducks blog
by Addicted to Quack on
Sep 15, 2008 12:55 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It most definitely is not...
He did a good job against UW, but played fairly poorly against Utah State.
He has upside, but has some work to go to get there.
--www.AddictedToQuack.com, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
by jtlight on
Sep 15, 2008 12:56 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ya, but...
Am I being mean to roper to judge him by his actions? Perhaps. Do you also think that fans are being mean to Williams when he drops a pass? Why do we treat QB’s like they can’t handle criticism? Just asking. Roper is still a gladiator for my team, and I will always respect that, yet I have a ruight to want the best QB at the helm. A bit hard, no I don’t thinks so. Honest.
by fightingduck on
Sep 15, 2008 2:12 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The ABR Club
Judging by the comments about Roper that have been happening since Spring, I think it is time to coin a phrase….the “Anybody but Roper” club. He had a bad game against Purdue and we won. Chip Kelly is a good offensive coordinator, has done good things with Roper and Roper himself has made some excellent plays (as well as some bonehead ones). If you think he has reached his ceiling by the beginning of his Sophmore year, I hate to think what your comments were about Dixon during his Junior year when he was benched in favor of Brady Leaf.
I’m not saying Roper is the next Dennis Dixon but people need to reset their expectations from where they were last year. Right now, we are doing ok and winning ball games. Expectations for the season are high but we have a lot of football to go. Masoli and Harper will get more opportunities in the next couple of games and I’m interested to see how it goes but if we start losing games, does this mean we should stick with these guys just because Roper isn’t a “Chip Kelly System Guy”? Roper is a leader on the team right now and benching him after one bad game would destroy his confidence. Give him a break and root for Masoli and Harper to go out and showcase themselves positively.
--Dominic
Autzen Stadium is where great teams go to die." - J. Brady McCullough, The Michigan Daily.
by dvieira on
Sep 15, 2008 3:25 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Are we really being too harsh on Roper??
He had an AWFUL game against Purdue. That’s really all that has been pointed out.
He had a SOLID game against Washington, and he had a mixed bag of highs and lows against Utah State.
People are just excited to see what some of our other guys can do too. I’m not a big Roper lover, and I haven’t ever been a big Roper lover, but as far as I can tell, he’s still our starting QB – I don’t expect Masoli, or Harper to change that in two, three, or seven weeks.
But to not say he had a horrible week against Purdue – well, Roper WAS the weak link on the offense. Purdue didn’t play great defense – roper consistently threw behind his targets, and never threw it to the open man down field. Out of all his pass attempts, I would say FIVE were on target. That’s not good. Be an apologetic if you want, but he made a lot of mistakes.
Roper is still a capable guy, and I would rather have him start next week, but he needs to be more consistent (Which is something that has been said since spring).
Go Duckies!
by JShufelt on
Sep 16, 2008 6:22 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I’m not sure anyone would argue against the fact that Roper had an awful game at Purdue. And while I agree with you (and others) when you say he needs to be more consistent, I think he needs to have time to develop that consistency. I don’t think his sample size is large enough to justify burying him yet
--Dominic
Autzen Stadium is where great teams go to die." - J. Brady McCullough, The Michigan Daily.
by dvieira on
Sep 16, 2008 12:35 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Masoli
Does anyone know why Masoli never played against Purdue? I don’t understand how he seemed to clearly be the #2 the first two games and then doesn’t play at all in the third game?
by KDean75 on
Sep 15, 2008 12:29 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Not to mention it was one bad game!
Roper didn’t do the things we needed to do, and yet we still won. He is still green and has some refining to do on many parts of his game. After he is healed and gets more game time, he will be an efficient QB.
However, there is MORE than enough talent to supplant him as the starter. We have seen that with Masoli and Harper. Even Thomas will give him fits. All four of these men will get more reps and get stronger.
The two-QB system is working and will continue to work as long as they make the right play calls for the right situations. Bringing in either Harper or Masoli will have success because it will keep Defenses on their toes. They can’t prepare a good game plan because they don’t have the knowledge of what we can and will throw at them. CK will get a game plan together and the Ducks will execute.
On to Darron Thomas…who cares if we lose his redshirt status? If the guy is as good as why we recruited him, we can’t afford him to transfer to another team like the other two QBs did when it was obvious they wouldn’t see ample playing time. He should be able to fall into the game plan in the same way that Masoli and Harper have.
by 071903 on
Sep 15, 2008 12:31 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Was it Thomas or Harper that was recruited more as an athlete?
When they first arrived, wasn’t one of them talking about how playing at QB was a position option along with others like RB or WR?
by grimc on
Sep 15, 2008 12:37 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Redshirt
By redshirting, he could get MORE playing time in the long run because he won’t be in the same class as Harper any longer.
"Droppin' knowledge like J-Will drops first downs" Dave - Addicted to Quack
by MarineCorpsDuck on
Sep 15, 2008 12:39 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
But if Thomas leaves
He gets playing time for another team…
by 071903 on
Sep 15, 2008 12:49 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Darron Thomas will not leave this program.
Dennis Dixon didn’t split after his Freshman year dude… especially considering how quickly we go through QBs.
Your friendly neighborhood placekicker.
by qrsouther on
Sep 15, 2008 8:02 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
3 QB System
Are you suggesting a 3 QB system? I’m okay with burning his redshirt IF Masoli and/or Harper go down, but I wouldn’t want to burn it just to get him a few meaningless snaps. If you aren’t suggesting 3 QB system, what are you suggesting? I’m not trying to be a jerk, I just really don’t understand. I don’t know enough about Thomas, but clearly Harper has shown the coaches that he’s better at this stage. Any snaps we give Thomas are snaps taken away from Harper, so we would risk losing him at that point too. It’s a tough decision, but one I trust the coaches to make.
"Droppin' knowledge like J-Will drops first downs" Dave - Addicted to Quack
by MarineCorpsDuck on
Sep 15, 2008 1:46 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
*Oops
That was supposed to be a reply to 071903’s post above.
"Droppin' knowledge like J-Will drops first downs" Dave - Addicted to Quack
by MarineCorpsDuck on
Sep 15, 2008 1:46 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No need to burn Thomas' redshirt
Masoli is only 5-11 and I do worry to a brief extent about him being swallowed up in the pocket, but to this point he’s made all the throws. Harper’s run threat is obvious and he can do the short passes of around 10 yards until his arm gets stronger. (Fun fact: Harper completed 73% of his passes in high school. While we’d love to see him throw more, there are more contributing factors like his shoulder at play.)
From what I understand, Harper is a film room junkie and has really taken to learning the QB position…so much so that Bellotti has been comfortable giving him significant burn in three games. Thomas has supposedly been a little disappointing and needs that year to really master the offense. If he ends up doing his best Dennis Dixon impersonation three years down the line, we’re all the better for it so I have no problems making him an afterthought.
Rob Moseley said that Bellotti does have a freshman walk-on QB on the practice squad to be the emergency third-stringer, and at this point I’d honestly say that’s good enough for me.
by Freeing Ray Schafer on
Sep 15, 2008 2:38 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I went in expecting Thomas to pull it all out soon
But he shows his age on and off the field, let me tell you. He looks about as old as me, has his freshman QB brainfarts, and I bet he doesn’t even shave yet.
Your friendly neighborhood placekicker.
by qrsouther on
Sep 15, 2008 8:04 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Not at all...
A 3-QB system won’t work, even though it had been one for the first two games. Each QB brought somthing different to the table and opponents had a hard time both preparing before the game and creating favorable match-up during the game. Oregon goes no-huddle and planning to bring in the right QB for the right situation will work well.
I just hate to see someone who is touted as having a boatload of talent on the bench. If there is a way to make sure he sticks around without using the red-shirt, then so be it. I hope that we don’t need to use him at all, but if the talent is there, go for it.
by 071903 on
Sep 16, 2008 4:28 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
sorrey but J Will has dropped AT LEAST 2 EASY need to be caught passes in every game. I want him to be great , but its not going to happen. as much as i like harper ( I am a huge fan and he is our future) he cant pass yet so i believe masoli is our present. please stay healthy and go ducks
by allduckedup on
Sep 15, 2008 3:58 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
As a Beaver fan
I know first hand what it’s like to love a QB one minute, and hate him the next and then love him 2 minutes after that. Moevao has only lasted because of his, er, “persona” on the field. Matt Moore (much like Dixon) was absolutely the most hated man in Corvallis his JR year. By the end of his SR year, he the hero of the 2nd best team in Oregon St history, leading us to 8 victories in 9 games. People were calling for Sean Canfield(!) over Matt Moore. Now we’ve had Sean Canfield, and he has found himself the most hated QB in Corvallis. I think when he returns he’ll be 3rd string. Ryan Gunderson anyone?
My point being, is don’t be too hard on a kid who’s only 3 games into his Sophomore year. He’s going to make mistakes. It’s bound to happen. Roper has done well for you guys, and don’t expect Masoli to be much better right away. He may be more athletic, yes, but how do you know how his leadership skills are?
I can’t believe I just stood up for Roper. I’m going to gag myself
The Artist Formerly Known as OrState GoBeavs
by The VD Special on
Sep 15, 2008 7:19 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
funny stuff VD
and I agree with you (though not about the gagging part)
bottom line, Roper is a sophomore. He’s a sophomore!
The guy is basically brand new. anyone remember how good Dixon was as a sophomore? no, because he was splitting time with Brady Leaf behind Kellen Clemens.
If we had a senior QB on this team, he would be playing, but we don’t. We do have a group of sophomores and freshmen though, and that’s what we’re stuck with. So maybe Roper sucks, but he’s pretty good for a young guy that nobody ever thought would play a down for this Ducks team when we switched to the spread option.
They've gone to plaid!
by gribbit1 on
Sep 15, 2008 7:43 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't get it
Roper doesn’t suck. He made a few bad reads Saturday. The Saturday before that, he made one, and never looked back. He learned from the mistakes.
His completion percentage and YPA is cellar-dweller, but he’s just playing the hand he was dealt guys.
Your friendly neighborhood placekicker.
by qrsouther on
Sep 15, 2008 8:06 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
He can't throw deep
Or at least not well enough for Belotti to let him throw deep. So if he’s going to be in, he has to manage the game and not average more than 1 pick when playing the vaunted defenses of UW, Utah St., and Purdue. Plus I would not argue that he has learned from his mistakes when interception count is going up.
by bradLL99 on
Sep 16, 2008 9:30 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I’m not sure Masoli or Harper can throw the long ball either. Masoli has a 48 yarder and Roper has a 60 yarder under this year. Just some numbers to throw out.
Roper’s Passer Rating (through 3 games)
UW – 162
Utah State – 160
Purdue – 67
Average: ~103
Dennis Dixon
2005 – 142
2006 – 120
2007 – 161
You take out the one bad game and you have a pretty good passer rating.
--Dominic
Autzen Stadium is where great teams go to die." - J. Brady McCullough, The Michigan Daily.
by dvieira on
Sep 16, 2008 9:45 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Masoli’s 48-yarder and Roper-s 60-yarder were both catch-and-runs
by inroywetrust on
Sep 16, 2008 9:52 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It's the old announcer comment after a long screen pass...
“That’ll help the ol’ yards per attempt average.” They may be useless, but they’re not wrong
by inroywetrust on
Sep 17, 2008 8:18 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
As InRoy said...both long passes were catches and runs...
Which makes both examples fairly pointless. It’s easy to rack up good ratings against bad teams, when they can’t stop the catches and runs. Purdue stopped those, and Roper was unable to capitalize on the safeties coming in because he was either not allowed to throw deep, or was unable to throw deep. Either way, that won’t get it done against about 1/2 the defenses we play.
Also, with Roper, you cannot just throw out the bad games. Because of his physical inabilities, he must be consistent and precise in every game, especially if we want to compete for Pac-10 titles.
No one is disputing that Roper has had decent to good games. But to claim that he will continue to progress past a certain point is absolutely foolhardy. We’ve seen what he can do the past few games, and its fairly easy to see how far that will take him, even if he plays his best.
--www.AddictedToQuack.com, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
by jtlight on
Sep 16, 2008 10:00 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Catching and running was Dixon's MO
A lot of his yards came from screens the UO’s WRs broke open or little 5 yard crossing routes that turned into 20+. Yards per attempt is one of those ridiculous stats that may or may not prove anything, especially in an offense like UO’s. A passing team like USC it may be a better indicator of what their QB is doing, but not this offense. Just saying.
The Artist Formerly Known as OrState GoBeavs
by The VD Special on
Sep 18, 2008 6:11 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Dixon still threw deep.
Yes, he got a lot of yards from screens, but he went deep still. Dixon was a gun slinger.
I can probably dig up more if you’d like.
Go Duckies!
by JShufelt on
Sep 18, 2008 6:40 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hmm... THere were suppose to be links...
by JShufelt on
Sep 18, 2008 6:42 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Many others...
First play against ASU last year…
Others in that Michigan game…
Winning play against Oklahoma.
One things for sure: Dixon could throw the ball deep, and made the defenses play when they brought in their safeties.
--www.AddictedToQuack.com, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
by jtlight on
Sep 19, 2008 5:24 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Like I said...
“I can probably dig up more if you’d like.”
Dixon didn’t just dump to the bubble screen. He threw deep.
Go Duckies!
by JShufelt on
Sep 19, 2008 7:27 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm not sure he can throw accuratly at all
but I do no from watching he can throw hard, Roper can’t or wont.
by bradLL99 on
Sep 16, 2008 10:01 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
An old adage
An old adage applies here…
The most loved player on a football team is the backup QB.
I will give you this Jtlight. You are right in what you say that claiming he will continue to progress past a certain point is absolutely foolhardy. Where we differ in our opinions is where that certain point exists with Roper. The expectation that the Oregon Ducks QB to be a heisman-calibar, 300 yards a game, 150 rushing yards, throwing bombs all over the field is just not realistic with any QB we have on the roster for this year and most likely next. That being said, we have some great talent and potential Roper, Masoli and Harper and they give us a very potent attack when used collectively.
Perhaps these arguments were the same the Oregon coaching staff was having amongst themselves before the season started.
--Dominic
Autzen Stadium is where great teams go to die." - J. Brady McCullough, The Michigan Daily.
by dvieira on
Sep 16, 2008 11:02 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't expect Roper to blow teams away...
I expect him to be able to make the safeties respect the deep pass and not make dumb decisions.
While the decisions and mistakes outlined in the first two points in the original post can be corrected, Roper cannot overcome his inability to throw deep anytime soon. It’s not even about throwing it all the time. He’s been unable/not let to throw the ball downfield once in any of the games, and the Purdue game gave perfect circumstances. From what we’ve seen, he is unable to throw the deep ball to such a degree that the Purdue safeties were leaving our WRs in 1-on-1 coverage most of the game. This isn’t a matter of not mistakes/growth/maturity. This is a lack of physical skills.
I want Roper to succeed. But this weakness is very glaring, and the more I think about it, the more it scares me. If opposing teams bring their safeties up without harm to them, our running game will get hurt, especially against teams that aren’t Purdue.
We need a QB that can not make mistakes sure, but we also need a QB that is at least a marginal threat, either with his feet or his arm. At this point (and from what we’ve seen of physical skills), Roper is neither to a great degree. He is ok on his feet, but nothing special, and is below average on arm strength, and possibly even accuracy.
He can play solid games, sure, but as teams learn his weaknesses, that will hamper the rest of our game. Even with near perfect games, it will be tough to beat the upper caliber of the Pac-10 if they do not respect the deep threat. Otherwise, it turns every play into a red zone situation.
--www.AddictedToQuack.com, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
by jtlight on
Sep 16, 2008 2:25 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Dixon
Dixon was actually pretty good as a sophomore. Not experienced starter great, but he was decent.
Roper is a sophomore, and has a lot of growth, but this is not a rebuilding year. I have high expectations for our starting QB. I’m not expecting a senior year Dixon-type of play from QB, I’m expecting our QB to minimize mistakes, and run the offense. Roper has a lot of growing to do, but he doesn’t have the time to do it.
Roper doesn’t suck, he had ONE bad game. One game isn’t a trend, but it does show signs of areas that need work.
Go Duckies!
by JShufelt on
Sep 16, 2008 6:32 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
We should have a senior QB this year
If we wouldn’t have burned Dixon’s redshirt year in 2004 for a mere handful of plays, he would be a redshirt senior THIS season.
Please Kelly/Bellotti, keep the red shirt on Thomas this season. Only take it off him, if he’s TRULY needed.
by bigrez on
Sep 16, 2008 11:41 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yes...he's a sophmore...
There have been a few defenses of Roper…I’ll deal with them all here.
I’m not disputing that he’s young, or has room to grow. But to say that Roper has a lot of room to grow is not very true. He doesn’t have all that much room to grow. If he’s have completed a few more passes and had a few better reads, we would be seeing most likely the best out of him.
And after a few games, I feel confident saying that type of QB will not beat the USCs of the world.
He could become the best decision maker in the world, but if he can’t throw it deep, the safeties are gonna come in on us all day, and stop the running game and over the middle passes, and Roper will be screwed.
On top of all this, at this point in his career, Roper will have down games. We just saw one. And because of this, it’s not a bad thing to see what the more talented backups can do. They may have more poor mental play, but with an increase physical ability. So let’s see what happens. It would be tough to play worse that what we saw this weekend.
Is this bashing Roper? Not at all. I’m appreciative of what he’s done, but I’m also being realistic about his skill. At it’s most refined level, it will never be a Dennis Dixon, Joey Harrington, or Kellen Clemens. He simply does not possess the physical skills necessary to take the team to the next level.
I was willing to overlook this when Costa went down. But after seeing what the offenses lack, and how we can no longer go down the field, I really don’t think we will be able to beat talented, competent defenses unless you have a QB that is a deep threat.
--www.AddictedToQuack.com, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
by jtlight on
Sep 15, 2008 9:00 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Masoli
Hey Y’all – it’s unfortunate that Rope got hurt but I do agree that he does not have quite the tools necessary to really make this type of offense go. I think the lack of mobility hurts us tremendously and I have yet to see him throw the deep ball. Both are especially necessary just to keep the defense in check. With more experience, I think Masoli is the best option we have. Does anybody know why Belotti had Harper as the 2nd string last Saturday? Does Masoli have some sort of injury? I love Harper; he’s an end zone threat with every touch but his passing is going to be kept extremely limited. Overall, I think Chip Kelly will do a good job in developing an offensive game plan to utilize both players’ skills. It’s great to have both these guys as our options but I think Kelly will have a wider variety of plays to call with Masoli as our starter. GO DUCKS!
by ATLDuck on
Sep 16, 2008 8:34 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs













