Young Ducks Emerge As New Stars
It's halftime. A good time to relax, regroup and reflect.
Oregon's 2009 football season is rich with story lines. Chip Kelly's first season as a head coach. All the pre-season hype. The disaster that was Boise, compounded by LeGarrette Blount's post-game MMA display and subsequent suspension. A skin-of-the-teeth win over a Purdue team that clearly isn't very good. A better win over Utah, where the Ducks overcame adversity created mostly by themselves. More off-field news as The Blount Plan continues to evolve amid mixed support and criticism. Three conference wins later, it's game on.
No story, however, is more compelling than the play of Ducks youngsters, back-ups and first-year starters. Oregon's post-Boise success has been led by many of the guys we expected would play well: Masoli, Dickson, Maehl, Thurmond, Matthews and Paysinger. It also is the result of hard work put in by a whole new group of Ducks who are becoming household names among even casual Duck fans. With some time to kill during the bye week, now seems the perfect time to contemplate how these players have stepped up to lead the Ducks back to prominence.
LaMichael James (RB, Freshman) - Is anyone else as jacked as I am that we still get three more years of this kid? He's the lightning all right, and he's helping Oregon thrive without much thunder. James has 581 net yards on 92 carries - 6.3 yards per carry. He's punched in four TDs. LaMichael is a threat from anywhere on the field. His spin move is quickly becoming a "signature", and I thought he was just one cut away from going about 95 yards against UCLA.
Javes Lewis (ROV, Sophomore) - Lewis had big shoes to fill this season. In fact, clown shoes big. So far so good. One INT, one huge fumble recovery and return for a TD against Purdue, two forced fumbles, and he's tied for second on the team with 37 tackles. And that blow-up of UCLA QB Richard Brehaut...I thought the kid might not get up.
Kenny Rowe (DE, Junior) - Be honest. Did you really expect this kind of production from Kenny Rowe? He's crushing opposing QBs, with 6.5 sacks, tied for second in the Pac-10. He had seven tackles against UCLA. Rowe has forced three fumbles. How will the Ducks replace Nick Reed? We have our answer, and he's a game changer.
Kenjon Barner (RB, Freshman) - Maybe Barner will be a cornerback again at some point. Right now, he's doing a fantastic job of being ball carrier. Barner ranks second on the team with 467 all-purpose yards: 178 rushing, 46 punt return, 236 kick return, and a handful of receiving yards. He's found the end zone twice. There have been many big plays in Oregon's six games. Few more timely or more important than Barner's 100-yard kick return to open the second half of a must-win road game against UCLA.
John Boyett (FS, Freshman) - If it weren't for Blount's blow-up after the loss to Boise St., the injury to T.J. Ward would've been THE source of post-game pain for Duck fans. Now we wonder out loud whether we're eager to see Boyett come off the field when Ward is ready to go. Let me remind you why... Boyett trails only Casey Matthews for tackles. His two interceptions have come late in games, effectively sealing the deal both times. He appears to be a heady player with veteran smarts, good cover skills and the ability to make open field tackles. Boyett's reaction and subsequent play on a Purdue receiver sealed a much needed win and provided the team with the momentum and confidence they needed to rise above the slow start.
Eddie Pleasant & Josh Kaddu (SLB, Sophomore x 2) - These two bring speed and intensity to Oregon's defense, and will do so for two more seasons. Pleasant has 22 tackles, an interception and a nose for fumble recoveries - three so far. Kaddu has 18 tackles, including three for losses. When you talk about the sudden emergence of a defense at Oregon and Nick Aliotti having the flexibility to run multiple fronts, the discussion has to include these two up-and-coming stars.
Jackson Rice (P, Freshman) - He's the punter. Not a lot of glory there, but Rice has been solid and then some. Sure, he's shanked a couple. He's one year removed from high school football. Through six games, Rice is averaging 39.3 yards a punt. He has the look of a guy who may be averaging 45 yards a couple seasons down the road. More than one-third of Rice's punts land inside the opponent's 20, and yet he's had just one touchback. He has five punts over 50 yards.
Mark Asper (RG, So.), Carson York (LG, Fr.), Nick Cody (OL, Fr.), Darrion Weems (OL, So.) - The rapid maturation of Oregon's offensive line would not be happening without these underclassmen stepping up. Asper and York are solid starters. Cody and Weems are seeing considerable playing time and look like future starters. Oregon's offensive machine sputters if this group isn't on top of their game. The growth we've seen along Oregon's offensive line since the opening game is nothing short of remarkable.
There are others worth mentioning, but I'll leave those for the group to comment on. Stop. Think about it for a moment. Relish it. We're in the midst of what could be a special season. At the same time, the future of Oregon football appears to be as bright as those crazy yellow jerseys.
5 recs |
28 comments
|
Comments
Rec'd for awesomeness
I remember thinking at the beginning of the season that the schedule really did us no favors. By that I mean that this year set up to be great, schedule-wise, but could be a tough learning process for a lot of the team’s new starters. 2010 would be a much better year, talent-wise, but the schedule would be brutal.
Not to get ahead of myself, but 2011 looks pretty damn sweet. Assuming the relative powerhouses in the conference stay the same (that’s actually a pretty big assumption – UW and Stanford look like they’re trending up, while Cal is probably trending down), 2011 could be an amazing year, both schedule AND talent-wise. Thomas is still somewhat a question mark at QB, but everyone raves about his potential. And look at all the other guys from this team that will have two full seasons under their belt. Everyone but Kenny Rowe, basically.
Let’s keep this train rolling!
I feel the need, the need...for speed!
by Gorbachav5 on Oct 14, 2009 12:25 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I hear a lot of talk about the 2010 schedule, I just don’t buy it…
While we’ll definitely have a tough stretch in the last month and a half, it looks like Arizona, Stanford, and UCLA are all on the rise, and we get those teams at home.
We’ll have a ridiculous amount of talent and experience coming back next year, that schedule is not an excuse.
--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
by jtlight on Oct 14, 2009 1:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree.
What usually makes our even-year schedules hard is the road-gauntlet of USC, Cal, and Arizona State, and sometimes the Civil War. But, if this year is any indication, Cal and Arizona State will not be the teams they have been the past half-decade or so. USC should be stalwart as ever, and lord knows what the Beavers will be in a year.
I’ll agree with you that Stanford is on the rise and a dangerous team on the road (say it with me: this year’s trap game), but I think UCLA on the road versus UCLA at home are hardly worlds apart. Arizona on the road has lately been the Devil’s cat’s-paw, so I suppose playing them at home is nice, though I do not feel their program is on the rise – not with one Mike Stoops in a position of authority there.
Addicted To Quack [dot] com; Six-hundred and ninety-four yards of total offense.
by qrsouther on Oct 14, 2009 3:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not offering it as an excuse
The USC game and Civil War (despite the recent two-year anomaly) will be tough road games. Who knows where Cal will be next year? But 5 Pac 10 road games is tougher than 4 Pac 10 road games, and the road game against Tennessee won’t be a walk in the park either.
I’m simply looking at factors that could detract from the team’s success. Yeah, the talent should win out, but we can’t dismiss the schedule out of hand as not having an impact. It certainly looks tougher than this year’s.
I feel the need, the need...for speed!
by Gorbachav5 on Oct 14, 2009 4:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right now, 5 Pac-10 home games is no different than 5 Pac-10 road games, because WSU is on the schedule….
And you’re right that we can’t dismiss the schedule completely. However, as far as road locations go, I’d rather play at Reser, Cal, and USC, than a rejuvenated UW. That’s one of the toughest venues to play in, that only Autzen matches in crowd noise.
--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
by jtlight on Oct 14, 2009 4:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's a close call
USC, Cal, OSU, ASU vs
UA, UCLA, Stan, UW
The only game that really scares me on the bottom slate (in terms of being a tough place to play) is UW. Arizona’s not easy, but doesn’t scare me nearly as much as USC or OSU. I give the slight nod to the top group as being tougher, but it’s closer than I thought at first.
Anyway, I didn’t mean for this to get into this much detail. My main point was that I like the way the team looks for at least the next two seasons after this one. Oregon is built for success over the relatively long haul and shouldn’t need to experience any severe rebuilding years.
I feel the need, the need...for speed!
by Gorbachav5 on Oct 14, 2009 5:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
One thing not being mentioned is the continued excellence in recruiting by Kelly and the staff
I think we have definitely seen an uptick on the recruiting since Kelly has gotten here, and you have to think that some of the guys we are even talking about right now (i.e. Boyett, LMJ, Barner, etc) weren’t even on the team two years ago.
With those guys maturing and reaching junior and senior status plus with the new recruits that Kelly and staff bring in, 2 years from now will look just as good if not better…schedule being favorable or not.
Hi, my name is Matt Daddy and I am a....
HUGE FREAKING DUCK FAN!!!!!!... "Hi Matt Daddy"
by Matt Daddy on Oct 14, 2009 5:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good points
I feel the need, the need...for speed!
by Gorbachav5 on Oct 14, 2009 5:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Funny you brought this up Matt. I looked this up yesterday, but it didn’t seem to fit the context of the post…
Scout’s current ranking of Oregon’s recruiting class is no. 47, based on scoring that is heavily weighted toward quantity of commits. However, when you re-sort the teams based on quality – in this case I’m referring to average stars – Oregon ranks no. 16 at 3.38. Considering all the talented youth on this team, quality wins the day for Ducks 2010 recruiting, not necessarily quantity, though quantity will undoubtedly climb as we get closer to LOI day.
By the grace of Juju, we all are day-to-day.
by JConant on Oct 14, 2009 9:27 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great find!!!! (any links?) I bet the quality is pretty specific too.
For example, I doubt there are too many safeties or RB on that list. I bet there are some pretty high TE, defensive lineman, etc.
I could foresee Oregon not having that highly ranked recruiting class due to the more specific recruits we go after. Less quantity, more quality, and even more specific to our needs quality
Hi, my name is Matt Daddy and I am a....
HUGE FREAKING DUCK FAN!!!!!!... "Hi Matt Daddy"
by Matt Daddy on Oct 14, 2009 9:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Here’s a link to the Scout.com rankings. You’ll need to sort by clicking the column label “Avg.”. And here is the list of current verbal commits.
By the grace of Juju, we all are day-to-day.
by JConant on Oct 15, 2009 8:06 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also, the main problem with 2011 is just normal player loss. We’ll lose Kaiser and Thran, and all of this years D-line will be gone, along with Casey Matthews, Talmadge Jackson, etc. There’s a great base there, and it could be great, but anytime you’re breaking in a new QB, things can get dicey.
--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
by jtlight on Oct 14, 2009 4:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not if your QB is a "JC" transfer...

Addicted To Quack [dot] com; Six-hundred and ninety-four yards of total offense.
by qrsouther on Oct 14, 2009 4:39 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Not saying it can’t be a good season, like last year, just that its awfully tough to win conference and national titles with a new QB.
--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
by jtlight on Oct 14, 2009 4:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
At least (assuming the redshirt process wroks to snag him for 2012 as well...I am an atheist PRAYING that it does)
Darron Thomas would at that point have a whole lot of experience in our system, I would without a doubt trust him completely to get the job done in 2011
A much needed bye week; and two whole weeks to focus the inner hatred of UW even moreso than normal.
Locker...Welcome to my profile, You will be formally introduced by Juju at a later date, 10/23 to be more specific!
by CaDuck on Oct 14, 2009 5:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
USC has done it every time they’ve introduced a new QB (except possibly this year, but starting a true freshman is a LOT different than starting a fourth year junior who’s been in the system for three years). Texas, Florida, Alabama is having success with a new QB this year, etc.
It’s a trademark of great programs that they can bring in a new QB and maintain the same level of quality. Does Chip Kelly have Oregon at “great program” status yet? Probably not quite, but he has the resources to get us there.
I feel the need, the need...for speed!
by Gorbachav5 on Oct 14, 2009 5:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sure, but that happens every year. Those guys get replaced by incoming talent. It just looks like there’s a great core in place for at least three more years.
I feel the need, the need...for speed!
by Gorbachav5 on Oct 14, 2009 5:27 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Man… if LMJ cut that last tackler or picked up that block and got a TD… that would have probably been sportcenter’s top play of the day.
It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-H-I-M-S-E-L-F"
by JShufelt on Oct 14, 2009 12:34 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I was wrong...would've been 99 yards.
Highlights from UCLA game. Check LMJ at about :55.
By the grace of Juju, we all are day-to-day.
by JConant on Oct 14, 2009 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
that madmike guy
should be awarded a medal or something. his highlight videos of Ducks games are must see as far as i am concerned
Under winter skies
We stand glorious
And with Oden on our side
We are victorious
by WhiteRabbit on Oct 14, 2009 11:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, He has one up within two days after the game
Always!
A much needed bye week; and two whole weeks to focus the inner hatred of UW even moreso than normal.
Locker...Welcome to my profile, You will be formally introduced by Juju at a later date, 10/23 to be more specific!
by CaDuck on Oct 15, 2009 7:07 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
to bad he is too fast for DJ Davis
he needs to learn his finishing moves. but hey, three more years for that
Much of the credit goes to a defense that hasn’t allowed a substantial touchdown drive in nearly a month
by trumpetduck on Oct 14, 2009 12:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
In his post-game interview...
He said he was actually trying to wait for Davis to block…But he has LMJ speed, so blocking in front of him is easier said than done! He seems to have learned to trust his speed to get the job done (remember J-Stew’s performance when he finally cemented that concept of using speed to get it done…Absolutely breathtaking!)
A much needed bye week; and two whole weeks to focus the inner hatred of UW even moreso than normal.
Locker...Welcome to my profile, You will be formally introduced by Juju at a later date, 10/23 to be more specific!
by CaDuck on Oct 14, 2009 5:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He is great in traffic
LMJ can get you 5 – 10 yards seemingly every time if he can get even a tiny hole at the line of scrimmage. It’s when he’s got one man to beat that he gets a little too cute and jukes himself into the arms of a DB. But yeah, he’ll get better at that, and then we’ll see some long TD runs.
I feel the need, the need...for speed!
by Gorbachav5 on Oct 14, 2009 12:59 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Chip Kelly on PTI. Just another straight up interview.
They gave him 5 minutes which is big time on that show.
“That Boise State, they’ve got a great football program. Well coached and their players play hard.”
“I think people talk too much about polls. The real fun is practicing all week and then going out to play on Saturdays.”
Ya gotta love that man.
by DONALDUCK on Oct 14, 2009 3:27 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Jeff Maehl got Special teams award (with Kenjon Barner) from Duck coaching staff.
I inquired about that. Andy Mac said, "(for) His work as a gunner on punt coverage, downing the ball inside the 1-
yard line."
by DONALDUCK on Oct 15, 2009 12:31 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 



















