Weekly Juju extravaganza!
by CaDuck on Nov 1, 2009 11:18 AM PST
66 comments
First off, we are 7-1...We handily dismissed USC.
We owe all of this to Juju. And as Juju's humble servant, it is my duty to provide a weekly candidate for Juju inflicted shenanigans.
Before I begin, I would like to ask if anybody will NOT vote for Gerhart. If you don't, you are insane. Now that I have alienated a few dozen people, time to begin (I'm licking my chops already!)
Toby Gerhart- A massive halfback that is huge; 6-1, 235. In case you don't know by now, he is massive and huge; and has repeatedly carried Stanford on his back. Last season, he accounted for just over 1100 yards, and accumulated a rather frightening 16 rushing touchdowns. This year, he cracked UW to the tune of 200 yards on 27 carries. Against USC (and a much better o-line than Stanford), we contained Gerharts closest comparison; Allen Bradford fairly well. Fortunately, he is a senior so we will never see him after this (Am I overlooking Stanford now?! PANIC!!!!).
I know we can contain Gerhart, however a little help never hurts.
Andrew Luck-Luck is a very good QB with even better size to follow suit; 6'4 235. Luck has not had a bad game all season; and is in my opinion a better freshman QB than Barkley is. Because of Gerhart we will be stacking the box much like we commonly did against USC. Expect a very similar defense. However, we need our CB's to win their one on one matchups, or else Luck may have a great game. Shall we curse him?
On a final note, We love you for what you have done thus far this season!
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or the Addicted To Quack Moderators. FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable Oregon fans.
0 recs |
66 comments
Email
Print
Comments
My vote goes for Luck.
If we contain or moreover shut down Luck and the passing game, Gerhart is their only other option and that’s when the game is under control for us. Oregon historically does much better against big backs than small backs (ditto with USC, in fact), so I think Gerhart will not be as big a factor for Stanford than Luck.
Addicted To Quack [dot] com; Six-hundred and ninety-four yards of total offense.
by qrsouther on Nov 1, 2009 11:32 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I voted for Luck for the exact same reason.
Autzen - where teams go to R.I.P.
BCS, you make me tired.
by MarineCorpsDuck on Nov 1, 2009 12:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Luck
Can deal with long Stanford drives through Gerhart, since the Duck offense can score in less than two minutes on any given drive, it’s the big chunks the Ducks have to avoid.
Life is hilarious.
by SolGoode on Nov 1, 2009 12:27 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I voted for Gerhart, because the ball will be in his hands almost as much as Luck's
But another one to consider is Owusu. He is a tremendous special teams player (our ST has looked better the last couple weeks, but he is definitely a game changer there). And a speedy WR. It is going to take an entire secondary to keep him in control.
Kenny Wheaton #20; The Pick - 1994 v UW. Matthew Harper #20; The Pick #2 - 2007 v USC. John Boyett #20;...
by Matt Daddy on Nov 1, 2009 12:28 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Gerhart
Same thing as Cal and USC, stop the run and force the QB to beat you, if it’s working for us then why change strategy now?
by QuackinAK on Nov 1, 2009 12:52 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Luck
Because we always stop the run well anyway, because Gerhardt while awesome has had a little bit gimpy leg already, because the QB curse has been working.
by Bill Musgrave on Nov 1, 2009 2:31 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Somebody's not really into the whole brevity thing.
Addicted To Quack [dot] com; Six-hundred and ninety-four yards of total offense.
by qrsouther on Nov 1, 2009 2:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hmmm, third shortest post on the list.
Somebody’s not really into the accurate judgement thing?
by Bill Musgrave on Nov 1, 2009 3:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not into the whole run-on sentences thing, that is.
Addicted To Quack [dot] com; Six-hundred and ninety-four yards of total offense.
by qrsouther on Nov 1, 2009 3:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I support Mr Musgrave and his grammar
Is it Saturday yet?
by trumpetduck on Nov 1, 2009 4:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
KyleApproved
Addicted To Quack [dot] com; Six-hundred and ninety-four yards of total offense.
by qrsouther on Nov 1, 2009 4:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Best thing to do when you're talking shit is to make sure you don't fuck up yourself.
Oh, an even better concept is to take a deep breath and relax.
by Bill Musgrave on Nov 1, 2009 4:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Uhh... sorry?
I was referencing an ATQ joke from a while back, that’s all…
Addicted To Quack [dot] com; Six-hundred and ninety-four yards of total offense.
by qrsouther on Nov 1, 2009 4:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, missed it, my bad.
My internet sarcasm meter is broke, or maybe I’m grumpy because beating the shit out of USC on Saturday is more fun than working all day and night Sunday.
I will continue to embed Wizard of Oz lyrics in my posts for your ripping pleasure.
by Bill Musgrave on Nov 1, 2009 4:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Say what about the Wizard of Oz?
Addicted To Quack [dot] com; Six-hundred and ninety-four yards of total offense.
by qrsouther on Nov 1, 2009 4:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
My first run-on sentence you were trashing goes:
Becasue… because… because…
ie: Because of the wonderful things he does.
When I re-read it, I thought – no doubt it is a run on and furthermore, it sounds like that fucking Wizard of Oz song.
I don’t know the other reference you’re talking about. I know I’ve written some tomes in my day, and many a run-on sentence.
by Bill Musgrave on Nov 1, 2009 4:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
My bad, too, in that case.
I don’t remember that song at all — maybe that’s fortunate from your review of it. The last time I saw the Wizard of Oz I was six years old and that fucking witch on the bicycle was freaking me out.
Addicted To Quack [dot] com; Six-hundred and ninety-four yards of total offense.
by qrsouther on Nov 1, 2009 5:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
the witch was creepy
but those flying monkey will give you nightmares.
Kenny Wheaton #20; The Pick - 1994 v UW. Matthew Harper #20; The Pick #2 - 2007 v USC. John Boyett #20;...
by Matt Daddy on Nov 1, 2009 5:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Munchkins don't make a person all that comfortable either.
by Bill Musgrave on Nov 1, 2009 5:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
small hands
Kenny Wheaton #20; The Pick - 1994 v UW. Matthew Harper #20; The Pick #2 - 2007 v USC. John Boyett #20;...
by Matt Daddy on Nov 1, 2009 5:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And almost as fast as LMJ and Barner
by Bill Musgrave on Nov 1, 2009 5:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The witch was creepy. But you can kill her with a squirt gun. The monkeys, however, can fly. That means there’s always the chance they buzz your head and get their scraggly little money paws caught in your hair. Kinda like a bat.
By the grace of Juju, we all are day-to-day.
by JConant on Nov 1, 2009 5:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
and if you ask CaDuck
some of them throw poo too
Kenny Wheaton #20; The Pick - 1994 v UW. Matthew Harper #20; The Pick #2 - 2007 v USC. John Boyett #20;...
by Matt Daddy on Nov 1, 2009 7:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
When they focus...They are freaking sharpshooters
"FOCUS LIKE A POO FLINGING MONKEY!"
by CaDuck on Nov 1, 2009 7:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Smell like cabbage
Addicted To Quack [dot] com; Six-hundred and ninety-four yards of total offense.
by qrsouther on Nov 1, 2009 6:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
yes, good call
Kenny Wheaton #20; The Pick - 1994 v UW. Matthew Harper #20; The Pick #2 - 2007 v USC. John Boyett #20;...
by Matt Daddy on Nov 1, 2009 7:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Anyway, for clarity, I didn't know you were referencing something. I thought you just had a silly run-on sentence.
And that reminded me of the ATQ “brevity thing” line. No ill feelings.
Addicted To Quack [dot] com; Six-hundred and ninety-four yards of total offense.
by qrsouther on Nov 1, 2009 5:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It's all good.
I think I’m too new to know the “brevity thing”.
And now, back to replays in my head of Masoli striding 50 yards untouched.
In some ways, it was so much more fun when DB’s tried to tackle him.
by Bill Musgrave on Nov 1, 2009 5:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
also how are we not higher than 8th in the new BCS
Q: How many OSU freshmen does it take to change a light bulb?
A: None, it's a sophomore course.
by axemen23 on Nov 1, 2009 4:57 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
We are on the west coast and not named USC.
But I would think gameday and the Nat’l spotlight would have helped change that!
"FOCUS LIKE A POO FLINGING MONKEY!"
by CaDuck on Nov 1, 2009 5:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think the loss to BSU is killing us. Had we lost to UW…
Defending maligned chants since 2009
by Gorbachav5 on Nov 1, 2009 10:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Any explanation from the poster who voted for an "other" candidate?
I’m just curious :)
"FOCUS LIKE A POO FLINGING MONKEY!"
by CaDuck on Nov 1, 2009 5:39 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
No kidding. Can anyone – without looking – name a third Stanford player?
By the grace of Juju, we all are day-to-day.
by JConant on Nov 1, 2009 5:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Jim Harbaugh,
Oh, wait….Awww crap!
"FOCUS LIKE A POO FLINGING MONKEY!"
by CaDuck on Nov 1, 2009 5:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
John Elway!
Am I doing this right?
Defending maligned chants since 2009
by Gorbachav5 on Nov 1, 2009 10:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ha, this made me laugh.
Whalen, Owusu, and Pritchard
Though all three only became “recognizable” after I looked them up.
In addition, it appears the Whitaker family of San Diego, CA produces intelligent kickers, because both #46 Eric (Fr) and #39 Nate (Jr) made the team. Nate starts and is 8/12 on field goals for the season.
Thought everyone would like to know.
by Bill Musgrave on Nov 1, 2009 6:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Owusu is who I was going to say.
He’s very, very dangerous on special teams. Though, not sure how much he’s dangerous elsewhere.
Addicted To Quack [dot] com; Six-hundred and ninety-four yards of total offense.
by qrsouther on Nov 1, 2009 6:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Owusu vs Barner Special Teams stud return - off!!!
"FOCUS LIKE A POO FLINGING MONKEY!"
by CaDuck on Nov 1, 2009 6:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
First kick returner runs, second returner duplicates and embellishes.
Defending maligned chants since 2009
by Gorbachav5 on Nov 1, 2009 10:45 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
Hahaha! Rec’d.
It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-H-I-M-S-E-L-F"
by JShufelt on Nov 2, 2009 6:45 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Its a walkoff! A walkoff!
"They gained seven or eight yards a carry on their bad plays." -Pete Carroll
by CaDuck on Nov 2, 2009 6:53 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Barner! He's so hot right now!
Addicted To Quack [dot] com; Six-hundred and ninety-four yards of total offense.
by qrsouther on Nov 2, 2009 8:11 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
But can he turn left?
Also: who gets the honor of reading the eugoogoly for the Trojans’ PAC-10 title hopes?
"KENNY WHEATON'S GONNA SCORE!! KENNY WHEATON!!--Jerry Allen, 1994"
by M. Fletcher on Nov 2, 2009 11:21 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Listen to your friend Billy Zane, Owusu! He’s a cool dude.
Defending maligned chants since 2009
by Gorbachav5 on Nov 2, 2009 4:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Zoolander is Amazing!
That is the bottom line, can’t argue against that kind of logic!
"They gained seven or eight yards a carry on their bad plays." -Pete Carroll
by CaDuck on Nov 2, 2009 5:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
First time I watched that movie I thought it was pretty dumb. Second time, I thought it was decent. The third time, especially after 5 beers, I thought it was hilarious.
Defending maligned chants since 2009
by Gorbachav5 on Nov 2, 2009 5:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Uh, First time I watched that movie?
Amazing!
TOBY, Toby Gerhart...THE Toby Gerhart? I formally welcome your presence.
We appreciate all of your needed contributions Juju! WE LOVE YOU
by CaDuck on Nov 2, 2009 5:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Obviously the eugugolizer
"They gained seven or eight yards a carry on their bad plays." -Pete Carroll
by CaDuck on Nov 2, 2009 5:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Rob Moseley should.
He’s an excellent investigatory journalist after all.
Addicted To Quack [dot] com; Six-hundred and ninety-four yards of total offense.
by qrsouther on Nov 2, 2009 5:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Owusu is VERRRRRRRRRYYY dangerous
and if Oregon reverts back to their games 1-5 special teams play, he will make us pay. On O he had a chance on the first pass against OSU to catch a huge TD.. he was like 3 yards past the DB and dropped the ball. I will contend that changed the game, because OSU was looking for the play action the rest of the game after getting TOTALLY burnt on that first play… he just didn’t make em pay
Kenny Wheaton #20; The Pick - 1994 v UW. Matthew Harper #20; The Pick #2 - 2007 v USC. John Boyett #20;...
by Matt Daddy on Nov 1, 2009 7:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Colt McCoy
And anyone on any of those teams ranked above us!!
by oregon_fan on Nov 1, 2009 6:49 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Voted for Luck
If we can shut down the QB, good things happen.
Although, I think the tree would be a good “other” choice.
nearly got hit with a t shirt cannon t shirt while typing
worse than travis
-Ben.
by rockingharder on Nov 1, 2009 10:47 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I voted Luck
But it was really a toss up. Gerhart is a beast, but I feel like Juju has delighted in shutting down QBs. Best is the obvious exception, but Prince, Tuel, Locker, Barkley…Juju loves him some QB voodoo.
Defending maligned chants since 2009
by Gorbachav5 on Nov 1, 2009 10:47 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Oh, sesquipedalian Juju - - -
Thank you, revered one, for heeding last week’s prayer (you remember—-something about stomping those smog-sucking southlanders), and bringing victory (in STYLE, SHIT yes!) to your faithful Webfoots.
(Even if you did send me to a 1-4 record in the Jersey Contest.)
We humbly entreat you to shine thy light upon our brave boys again this week as they take on Stanfurd, a school built on the false religion of science instead of on true faith. (C’mon, have you BEEN to Palo Alto?)
We thank thee for the light of thy countenance.
Quack.
Life is a sport: Watch other people play it.
by Al Orange on Nov 2, 2009 8:38 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Oh yeah - an GO YANKEES!!!
Life is a sport: Watch other people play it.
by Al Orange on Nov 2, 2009 9:09 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
If there is any justice in the world
Juju will smite you just for this.
Defending maligned chants since 2009
by Gorbachav5 on Nov 2, 2009 9:34 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Juju is a Yankee fan. How else can you explain their century-long success?
Unless (horrible thought) George Steinbrenner actually IS Juju!!!
Life is a sport: Watch other people play it.
by Al Orange on Nov 3, 2009 2:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You bite your tongue. You bite it right now.
It's spelled "T-A-K-O-T-U-E-S-D-A-Y-S-!-!-!."
I support inroywetrust in his support of The VD Special in his support of me supporting Roger Kieschnick in his quest to becoming the best Kieschnick ever to play professional baseball.
by Takimoto on Nov 3, 2009 2:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Come on man - stop messing around! This is the JUJU you're messing with!
formerly rockingharder
by Mr. Knox on Nov 3, 2009 6:42 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Would've voted for Stanzi...
…but Chip Kelly compelled me to stay focused on this week’s game vs Stanford.
"KENNY WHEATON'S GONNA SCORE!! KENNY WHEATON!!--Jerry Allen, 1994"
by M. Fletcher on Nov 2, 2009 11:24 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Okay, so what's the final decision?
It appears the majority have voted for Gerhart, and I can’t really argue with that decision. So get that ugly seal off your avatar and let’s channel Juju’s anger here! We don’t have all week!
Defending maligned chants since 2009
by Gorbachav5 on Nov 2, 2009 4:56 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I can't believe that you called that poor little seal ugly, have you no soul?!
The all knowing ATQ masses have spoken, and Toby Gerhart has claimed the dubious honor of being claimed by my profile!
Juju, if there is anything you need, ANYTHING, it is my duty as your humble servant to provide…
"They gained seven or eight yards a carry on their bad plays." -Pete Carroll
by CaDuck on Nov 2, 2009 5:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I’m very glad Gerhart won. If we stop him, we will win the game.
--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
by jtlight on Nov 2, 2009 9:05 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Well, Luck is no pushover,
They run almost the same offense as USC does, but slightly watered down due to lesser talent. Their recievers are worse, and their O-line is not nearly as good either.
Could be a great game; or an utter domination on our behalf.
If we stop Gerhart, and get up on the scoreboard early; we will easily jog away with it…
TOBY, Toby Gerhart...THE Toby Gerhart? I formally welcome your presence.
We appreciate all of your needed contributions Juju! WE LOVE YOU
by CaDuck on Nov 2, 2009 9:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recommended FanPosts
Recent FanPosts
FanShots
Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.
Recent FanShots
Certain photos copyright © 2010 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
