How the Oregon defense matches up to the Arizona Wildcat offense
For most of the season, we were ranting and raving about the Oregon defense. It seemed like the Ducks finally had a defense to match the offense. The defense helped the Ducks through many tight games, and excelled in all phases of the game.
And then, Stanford punched our defense in the mouth, and our defense had it's worst performance of the year. The Ducks give up over 500 yards and 7.0 yards per play, when they had not given up over 5 yards per play in any other Pac-10 game.
However, despite that failure, I'm feeling very optimistic for our defense, and think they match up very well with Arizona this weekend.
Arizona has done an excellent job this year, plugging in Nick Foles as a replacement for Willie Tuitama, and Foles has been incredibly efficient, throwing few interceptions, and completing almost 70% of his passes. Yet, his style is very different from Andrew Luck.
Arizona's runs the "Air Raid" offense implemented by offensive coordinator Sonny Dykes. This passing attack is similar to the spread systems run by Texas Tech, and rely on efficiency from the QB position. Arizona also has done a very good job running the ball from their passing formations, and will benefit from the addition of Nic Grigsby, who gets back from injury this week.
In some ways, the Arizoan attack reminds me of the Oregon attack. They do an excellent job spreading the field horizontally, much like the Ducks have done, and run the ball from the same formations. However, they don't have the same commitment to the run that Oregon has, and Arizona has run the same number of running plays as passing plays this season (323 of each).
I have no doubt that Arizona will do a decent job running the ball against the Ducks. Oregon has been solid yet unspectacular against the run this season. However, they have done an excellent job (in every game but Stanford) at getting big plays here and there to force other teams into one-dimensional situations. I believe the same will happen against Arizona. The Wildcats may get some good gains here and there, but it will be only a matter of time until they get into 2nd or 3rd and long situations, allowing the Ducks to concentrate on the Wildcat passing attack.
And when the Wildcat's pass, I like the Ducks chances. First, it's important to note that Nick Foles is not Andrew Luck. Both are asked to do very different things. Luck killed Oregon with the deep ball, and showed accuracy (and a bit of luck) on his deep passes that we likely won't see again this season. Foles does not have that deep threat. In fact, though Arizona has the 2nd best passing attack in the Pac-10, they also have a surprisingly low number of big plays. In fact, though Oregon has roughly 75 less pass attempts on the season, they have roughly the same number of pass plays over 15 yards (45-41 in favor of UA), Oregon has a significant larger number of pass plays over 25 yards (20-12).
This isn't a big surprise, as Foles has not been that accurate when he's gone down the field. But it's also just how the Arizona offense plays. They run a large number of screens and crossing patterns, in an attempt to get one of the many talented receivers in the open field. They find holes in zones, and have a very effective passing game. Without Rob Gronkowski at TE, Arizona just has not had any reliable deep threats, and so they haven't developed this part of their offense.
Yet, I feel that passing game feeds right into Oregon's strengths. After watching the Stanford game, it was clear that Oregon was not truly ready for a deep passing game. While the corners did an adequate job, Luck put many balls right on the money, and though he completed only 60% of his passes, he still average 12.6 yards per attempt. The Cardinal stretched the Oregon defense vertically, and was able to convert enough of the deep attempts to keep the Oregon defense on their heels.
However, Oregon has done an excellent job covering the field horizontally. The Oregon line and linebackers cover the field from sideline-to-sideline as well as any team in the country. They tackle very well on the edge, and any play that does not develop incredibly quickly is able to be chased down by the quick Oregon linebacking corp. Luckily for Oregon, this is the exact type of offense that Arizona runs.
On top of this, some of Arizona's plays do not develop quickly, and it seems that Foles has been slow to make some decisions. For example, in the first offensive play against California, Arizona motioned their FB Chris Grownkowski into the slot, and the pre-snap formation ended up like this:
You can see the cushion Cal is giving both receivers on the bottom of the screen. Jeremiah Masoli has done a spectacular job this season reading this at the line and throwing it over the instant he gets the snap. However, as part of a predetermined screen, Foles hesitated for a few seconds before throwing the ball, allowing Cal to react to this, limiting the play for a 5 yard gain. We have seen Oregon take advantage of defenses in this position for 10-15 yard gains over and over this season. Whether it was indecision, or just how Arizona runs their offense, Oregon will do very well against these predetermined plays.
Against Oregon, a team with incredible linebacking speed, this indecision will be very costly. With the type of offense Arizona runs, they cannot afford plays with little to no gain. They have thrived on efficiency. And the Oregon defense is set up very well to disrupt what Arizona has been doing all season.
A cause for concern is also the pass rush, which was not up to par against USC and Stanford. However, Arizona's offense will make getting pressure on Foles very difficult. They simply get rid of the ball too quickly on many of these plays to get to the QB. However, if Oregon can limit the Wildcat short passing game, then it will be open season. The Wildcats simply have not shown a consistent ability to get open downfield, nor has Foles shown the ability to hit them. After giving up 3 sacks last week (all in downfield passing situations), the Wildcats are vulnerable in that area.
I believe that Arizona will have to work hard for every yard and every first down that it gets. Yards won't come easy for the Wildcats, and when that happens, scoring can become very difficult, especially if the Ducks can keep the Wildcat from starting with good field position.
The Ducks defense is set up very well to limit what the Wildcats can do offensively, and I'm excited to see how they perform this weekend.
5 recs |
16 comments
|
Comments
I've been thinking the same thing all year...
I’ve watched about three Arizona games this year and one thing that always stood out to me was how quickly Foles releases the ball. This actually is in favor for our defense as I’ve even seen our athletic pass rushers like Rowe peel out of his hand-to-the-ground position and move back into coverage and break up passes, or confuse the QB enough to give our blitzing LB’s a chance to make a play from the edge (which Pleasant has done with great success this year)…the speed of out entire D allows for a great match up against Zona’s offense. I don’t think they’ve seen a D as fast as ours yet, and when they did see a LB core as athletic as ours in Cal they weren’t the same offense.
I’m worried about this game only because Tuscon is a crazy place to play when the students actually care about what is going on, so it’s imperative that the Ducks start fast like they did in ‘07 (please no Derrick Jones moments) and I think that will be enough to throw Zona off of their game plan. Arizona is a good team, but they really haven’t played the best conference teams yet — OSU’s defense was still finding their identity when they went up to Corvallis and stole one — so I think our fast, athletic defense will cause big problems, too.
Great article, JT.
Discipline is the most important thing for the D to work on this week
If we stay disciplined, as against USC, we can simply not give their guys any place to go.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
trouble is, it's hard to play "balls-out" and "disciplined" simultaneously.
If Foles’ OL can give him time to scan the field, I fear he’ll be able to find his targets, especially if NA’s backs gamble and overcommit. Best thing for us in this game is that he doesn’t have a big reliable TE to hit across the middle.
I’m worried about things like bubble screens and passes to Grigsby/Antolin for 6 yards turning into 30 because our LBs are crashing in and the safety is out of position.
Foles isn’t as good when he leaves the pocket. Keep him moving, keep the pressure on, and I like our chances.
Great writing JT
Couple of quick points:
1. Oregon’s speed has caused problems not only because of how fast they can recover, but also becuase they confuse QB’s and lineman with adjustments. Look at the LB’s right before the snap… most of the time they are moving, switching, or showing blitz. Then who actually blitzes after the snap may be totally different, and the QB and lineman have to react perfectly together. Stanford was able to take this away with a downhill power running formation and bringing in an extra o-lineman… Arizona doesn’t have that luxury.
2. I think this point is totally underrated for Oregon this year:
Ducks can keep the Wildcats from starting with good field position.
Our special teams have been a thorn in the defense’s side all year (long returns, fumbles, bad punts, etc). Oregon needs to tighten this up, because AZ has a decent return man. With the confusion and speed we have on D, it is very tough to consistently have long drives to score against us. When we cut the field down for the offense, it puts us in an exponentially more difficult situation.
Kenny Wheaton #20; The Pick - 1994 v UW. Matthew Harper #20; The Pick #2 - 2007 v USC. John Boyett #20;...
Barner is much better at deciding when to go after punts
Than he was eariler this year. He just needs to catch balls more cleanly on kickoffs and he’ll be fine.
Thankfully his minor injury was NOT to his hands.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
Plus...
ST’s was waaaay better in the ASU game. I think the kick coverage we saw against Stanford was an anomaly…I think that whole game was an anomaly.
As I have said all along,
I am very excited to see Barner develop into our designated ST stud. For the most part, he has played progressively smarter every game (lets not think about the ASU fumble :)). KENJON TO THA HOUSE!
There is a time and place for everything...But its always Juju time!
Chug-a-chug-a-chug-a-JU-JU
Currently initiating Eddie Pleasant BLITZkreig upon Nick Foles. Standby for further information.
If Arizona snapped the ball directly to their RB, what would it be called? The Wildwildcat? The Wildcatcat? No matter what, it won’t be as cool of a name as the Wild Beaver (hehe) they are running up in Corvallis, but I’m confused as to what they would call it.
Sad thing is,
When I saw this title of this article, I immediately thought about that dammed formation; not the team we are about to play!
There is a time and place for everything...But its always Juju time!
Chug-a-chug-a-chug-a-JU-JU
Currently initiating Eddie Pleasant BLITZkreig upon Nick Foles. Standby for further information.
I think it is just called "Offense"
Kenny Wheaton #20; The Pick - 1994 v UW. Matthew Harper #20; The Pick #2 - 2007 v USC. John Boyett #20;...
Our big problem on D has been that we tend
To give up either negative yards, 1 or 2 or 10/more. So we need to be solid in the tackling game.
That being said, if we can force Foles to beat us, I’m feeling very good about it.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
Just an observation...
With our defense, it seems that their series is very strongly dictated by what they allow on first down. If we allow 4 yards or more on a first down; it seems that our boys cannot recover and prevent the first down. If we stop em cold or limit yardage on 1st down; I know it is going to be a 3 and out.
Wow, that sounds very trivial. But its true! I swear!
There is a time and place for everything...But its always Juju time!
Chug-a-chug-a-chug-a-JU-JU
Currently initiating Eddie Pleasant BLITZkreig upon Nick Foles. Standby for further information.
Not at all trivial.
Down and distance becomes a strong indicator of tendencies. When the offense has its way with the defense on first down, second and third down become all about protecting against the big play. Squash the offense on first down, and second down becomes far more predictable, allowing the defense to execute their game plan rather than be dictated to by the offense.
I’d rather we get a little conservative on 2nd and five and give up six yards – and start the process over again – than blitz out of position and give up an explosion play. Like time of possession, no one’s ever lost a game because they gave up too many first downs.
"...the noise is one aspect, but you can feel the intensity of their crowd." - Pete Carroll on Oregon's Autzen Stadium.
Like time of possession, no one’s ever lost a game because they gave up too many first downs.
I don’t think that is entirely true. Sure TOP stats get blown WAY out of proportion, but 1st down conversion does hold some relevance to success in a game (see Washington v USC 2009).
I think Oregon’s D is “too young” to be able to regroup after giving up a decent gain on 1st down. What I mean, is that it takes both a physical and mental toughness that comes from lots of experience of being able to react to what they see.
Second and short is a killer for a D. There are a lot of variable for the D to consider (play action, deep ball, run middle, run outside, screen, etc). Pretty much the offense can run whatever they want cause they still have a manageable 3rd situation, It takes an experienced D to be to read and quickly react to what the offense is going to do on second and shut it down. I will say this again, this is the first year for many of these guys playing this scheme and they have done a marvelous job executing. The experience they are getting this year will pay HUGE dividends next year when they are seeing similar siutations, knowing their assignments, and reacting for the more than the first time.
I am truly trying to not get too excited about what I expect from these guys next year, but their play this year, their youth, and another year of this scheme…wow, I can’t wait. Next year’s D will be the best Oregon has seen in a long time.
Kenny Wheaton #20; The Pick - 1994 v UW. Matthew Harper #20; The Pick #2 - 2007 v USC. John Boyett #20;...

























