Stopping the OSU offense, part 1: tackle, tackle, tackle
So over the last week, I have watched a bunch of video of OSU highlights from this season (can be seen here). I am going to try and highlight a number of the sets and plays they run and how I think our defense can match up.
Before I do, let's look at some of the key players for OSU and how Oregon needs to match up with them. This OSU offense is unlike any OSU we have seen in a while. They are healthy, their stars have been playing well lately, and they know the system they are running very well. Everybody on this team is well coached. They don't have a lot of physical "wow" factor on the team, but they make sure to make the most of every aspect of the players they have.
The key to this game defensively is going to be to make them one dimensional and then play fundamentally sound and disciplined football. If Oregon tries to over pursue, or take too many angles on OSU, they will burn them for big plays.
I wish I could track the number of missed tackles in this game, because I think it will be the statistic that determines the winner. If Oregon gets to the Rogers brothers, they have to bring them down. When Oregon gets to Canfield, they have to get the sack. Oregon CANNOT let him escape and get a second chance in the play. Oregon has to take away the other guys on OSU 1:1 and make them rely heavily on James and Quizz against overloaded sets to produce the yards needed. Autzen needs to be a factor and help Oregon's defense by rattling their young offensive line and turning short yardage situations into obvious passing downs. Lastly, Oregon has to tackle, tackle, tackle!!! Oregon needs to fly to the ball, wrap up, and bring them down. Missed tackles will turn punting situations into first downs, and short plays into game changers.
On to the breakdown. First, highlighting some of their stars and statistics:
Quarterback Play:
|
Effic |
Cmp-Att-Int |
Pct |
Yds |
TD |
INT |
Lng |
Avg/G |
|
|
Canfield, Sean |
147.47 |
260-370-6 |
70.3 |
2797 |
19 |
6 |
87 |
254 |
Canfield is the most efficient QB in the Pac 10 (sound familiar... cough... Stanford... cough... Arizona). He has done a tremendous job throughout the year improving on a number of areas that got them beat earlier in the year. Early in the season the Rodgers brothers accounted for over 70% of their total yards rushing and receiving. That number is down to 61%. Canfield has made a concerted effort to spread the ball around and has started hitting the TE and other WRs more often making defenses play a little more honest. His TD/INT ratio is one of the best in the conference. Plus, his completion percentage is really high. Oregon is going to have to try to force him out of the pocket. He is not a very good scrambler, and if Oregon can cut down the field and make him throw to one side, they can limit not only what type of passes he throws, but also who he throws those passes to.
Rushing Game:
|
Att |
Gain |
Loss |
Net |
Avg |
TD |
Long |
Avg/G |
|
|
Rodgers, Jacquizz |
239 |
1355 |
42 |
1313 |
5.5 |
19 |
61 |
119.4 |
|
Rodgers, James |
49 |
297 |
37 |
260 |
5.3 |
1 |
33 |
23.6 |
We all know the two names listed here. Quizz is a BEAST. He is a work horse who looks like he has no intention of slowing down whatsoever (man, can you just go to the NFL already!!). Most of Quizz's runs come out of the pro style offense that Riley employs. He is second in the league in yards and attempts per game and also second only to Gerhart in touchdowns. James Rodgers has increased his number of carries this season, but his yards and TD's are both down. Personally, I think they are not running the "Fly Sweep" as effectively as previous seasons, and it is hurting James' production. Recently they have gone to some more "Wildcat" (Wild-Rat) offenses with Quizz taking the direct snap and James in motion. Look for this in the Civil War, as it has been a thorn in Oregon's side defensively. Both Rodgers are not big "Gerhart" like runners and Oregon's front seven should be able to bring them down. The key is bringing them down on first contact. If you let these guys break tackles and get to the second level, Lewis, Boyett, Jackson, Johnson, and Harris are going to have trouble containing them. I don't look for OSU to run over Oregon offensively like Stanford did, but they will institute a number of the same formations and if Oregon does not tackle properly, the Rodgers brothers are going to have a huge day.
Wide Receivers:
|
No. |
Yds |
Avg |
TD |
Long |
Avg/G |
|
|
Rodgers, James |
77 |
865 |
11.2 |
8 |
87 |
78.6 |
|
Rodgers, Jacquizz |
67 |
436 |
6.5 |
1 |
35 |
39.6 |
|
Adeniji, Damola |
47 |
672 |
14.3 |
4 |
41 |
61.1 |
|
Halahuni, Joe |
33 |
462 |
14 |
3 |
48 |
42 |
First two names on the list look familiar? Quizz is more of an outlet for Canfield and besides the screen play, not a lot of passing plays are called for him. James is their go to guy. He has big play threat, and he is also a great route runner. The guy can pretty much do anything at the WR position. Once again, NO YARDS AFTER THE CATCH! He is going to get open and make plays, but we have to limit those plays to the yards thrown for, and no more. Adeniji has become the second option for Canfield in the passing game, and runs a lot of deep routes. Look for Harris to be locked up on him all day and this is going to be Harris' biggest test all year. Halahuni is their TE. He definitely has some plays called his way (more in the second half of the year), but he is a great safety valve for Canfield. If James is covered and Adeniji does not get open deep, Halahuni will most likely be running an underneath route. Paysinger is going to need to be on him like stink on Corvallis (oh and Paysinger, if you feel like actually catching one of your INT opportunities this game, feel free to take it back to the house).
Offensive Line:
|
LT 77 Philipp, M. |
6-3 |
313 |
FR |
|
LG 70 Johnson, Grant |
6-3 |
278 |
SO |
|
C 60 Linnenkohl, A. |
6-2 |
297 |
JR |
|
RG 73 Peat, Gregg |
6-3 |
295 |
SR |
|
RT 50 Remmers, Mike |
6-4 |
299 |
SO |
Probably the biggest improvement all year has come from their guys up front. As you can see this is a young group and also not a very big group of guys either (compared to Stanford who had four 300+ o-line man, and a beast of a FB too). Quizz's abilities mask a lot of problems that still exist with the OSU o-line, but they are more fundamentally sound then they were earlier in the year when a lot of OSU fans were looking for Moevao to return so that their QB wouldn't have to play every game from his back. I think Oregon is going to be able to exploit some of the weaknesses that still exist, but it is going to take a very disciplined game plan. Since OSU's o-line is still young, when OSU is in obvious passing situations Oregon should be able to throw a number of different blitz packages at them that they haven't seen and allow an Oregon LB or Safety to get after Canfield (if only they will let Casey Matthews out of jail for this game). Also, because they are a relatively undersized o-line, Bair, Toeania,Tukuafu and Ferras should be able to hold their ground and force Quizz to make reads off the LBs shooting through the gaps.
Lastly, I won't take time to tell you how big the Autzen crowd is going to need to be, you can read it here. Just remember, this is #1 versus #2 in the Pac 10 for the third time for Oregon this year and the first time for OSU, and this is the first time a number of these young o-line have experienced this type of intensity, this amount at stake, and this level of noise...ever. Let's hope Autzen accounts for 25 yards worth of false starts and turns a couple of 2nd or 3rd and shorts into long and obvious passing situations.
Conference Rankings:
|
OSU Offense |
Oregon Defense |
|
|
Scoring |
3 |
5 |
|
Rushing |
6 |
5 |
|
Passing |
1 |
3 |
|
Total Offense/Defense |
3 |
3 |
|
Sacks Allowed/Gained |
9 |
2 |
|
Turnovers Lost/Taken |
1 |
2 |
|
3rd Conversions/Stopped |
1 |
5 |
|
Red Zone Scores/Stops |
1 |
1 |
|
Red Zone TD Scores/Stops |
2 |
8 |
As you can see, OSU is highly ranked in a lot of offensive categories in the Pac 10 this year. As much as OSU relies on Quizz to carry their rushing load, they are only 6th in the Pac 10, but 1st in passing. OSU really uses the run very well to set up their pass. Their play action is some of the best we will see since BSU. Unfortunately, they are 9th in sacks allowed, so we should be able to get to Canfield. OSU does not turn the ball over very much (oh and by the way, Quizz has never fumbled...jinx...jinx...jinx... QUIZZ HAS NEVER FUMBLED!!!) and Oregon is really good at taking the ball away. This is going to be a matchup of a very good, well balanced offense versus a good defense in their own house.
Tell me what you think. I think Oregon has the ability to turn Canfield into a scrambling passer and force OSU into a lot of TE passes and outlet valve throws to Quizz. I hope Oregon has taken the extra time this week to work on tackling and making sure they fly to the ball and bring down the guy. This is going to be a great game for the state of Oregon and for the Pac 10. Go Ducks!!!!
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or the Addicted To Quack Moderators. FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable Oregon fans.
36 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Good post, Matt
I think third downs are going to be HUGE in this game. OSU has been very good at converting their third down opportunities, while Oregon’s defense has been just okay at preventing it. I just can’t help but think about that third down pass interference against Lewis in the Stanford game. Not that that was Lewis’s fault, but just to illustrate how absolutely vital it is to get third down stops against an efficient offense that is clicking on all cylinders.
Let’s face it, OSU is going to put up some points. But it’s critical that they don’t take wind out of the sails of the Autzen crowd early in the game. Get some key third down stops in the first half, break up any momentum, and let the offense do its thing. I like our chances if that happens.
Defending maligned chants since 2009
Funny side note
Guess who is #1 in the conference in 3rd down conversion….
….still thinking?……
That’s right, Washington. A team I find a lot of similarities to scheme-wise to OSU. They run a very similar offense, only OSU has much better talent. I think you will see a lot of the same schemes defensively as you saw against UW in the civil war.
Kenny Wheaton #20; The Pick - 1994 v UW. Matthew Harper #20; The Pick #2 - 2007 v USC. John Boyett #20;...
The difference there, I think, is the overall quality of the offense. OSU has three weapons to be worried about (Rodgers x 2, Canfield) while UW only had one (Locker). I don’t normally hold much stock in third down conversion percentage, but the Stanford game is looming large in my mind. If the defense had been able to get one lousy stop on third down in the first 25 minutes of that game, I think the entire game changes complexion.
Similarly, I think that if OSU comes out firing on all cylinders, it’s going to be vital to get a couple key third down stops to break up that momentum.
Defending maligned chants since 2009
They are not that deep
That’s the difference.
Their top line talent might be quite good but their backups are well, not.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
Let me clarify
There are a lot of differences to the UW offense (player abilities, knowledge of their system, fundamentals, backups, etc) but I think what we will see is a lot of similar packages to UW. I think the difference between this game and Stanford is going to be we can get after Canfield, and he is no where near as mobile as Luck.
I would like to see Oregon force a couple of 3rd and long situations early (and we may not stop them all), so we can throw some zone blitzes and misdirection blitzes at their o-line and make them have to think and react. Combine that with the Autzen crowd early and I think the D will be fine in 3rd down conversions. OSU’s offense is going to have to play really well early to get them a big lead like Stanford.
Kenny Wheaton #20; The Pick - 1994 v UW. Matthew Harper #20; The Pick #2 - 2007 v USC. John Boyett #20;...
And we have to avoid stupid turnovers
That’s the downside of the spread of course. Its a high risk, high reward offense and a few bad snaps, fumbles, etc. can really be a big problem.
Masoli has been quite good about not throwing INTs but we need to be sure to secure the ball on every play.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
OSU is the worst team in the conference at creating turnovers I see this game as being played pretty clean. The only difference is that if we can force Canfield out of the pocket and make him throw into covered areas, we might be able to get a pick or two.
Oh and Quizz never fumbles…jinx…jinx…jinx
Kenny Wheaton #20; The Pick - 1994 v UW. Matthew Harper #20; The Pick #2 - 2007 v USC. John Boyett #20;...
Yeah but some of our fumbles can be self inflicted
Its not the problem it was earlier this year but you have to be careful.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
The Autzen crowd is a big advantage, no doubt. Getting after Canfield will be the key, although I think a lack of mobility in comparison to Luck is largely irrelevant. Luck might as well have grown roots back there in the pocket; our D-line didn’t come anywhere near him most of the game. But OSU’s O-line isn’t nearly as beefy as Stanford’s, so that’s a plus.
Defending maligned chants since 2009
When you have the mobility that Luck and Locker have, the LB’s have to be careful on their blitzes. They can fire up the middle, but if the QB gets to the outside, he is going to be looking at a large open field to run.
With Canfield, we can bring the MLBs and force Quizz and Canfield to the outside, cutting down the field and not have to worry about Canfield taking off for 30 yard jaunts.
Also, the play action pass is a slow developing play, and if our LBs read it right, we should be getting after Canfield quicker than he’d like, and since his speed isn’t something we need to wory about, I think we will be able to get after him some… unlike Luck and Locker where we still needed to worry about him scrambling.
Kenny Wheaton #20; The Pick - 1994 v UW. Matthew Harper #20; The Pick #2 - 2007 v USC. John Boyett #20;...
And to get ahead early
Canfield has a history of forcing the ball into bad situations and throwing picks if OSU is losing. Which they haven’t much this year since they’ve mostly started well and faded late (exception was the USC game but almost every team wore down USC at the end this year). In the UCLA game for example they took a lead, blew it and then had to march down the field to win it late.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
Seems like our linebackers are all going to need to play well in this game.....
I also see Kenny Rowe being a big factor and playing out of a 2 point stance on most downs. The biggest factor in this game in my mind will be the play of TJ Ward/Boyett. If they can manage to get a few pass break ups on balls down the seam and across the middle it will really slow down the Beavers attack. If these guys are a step late all day we’re going to be in for a shootout. Go Ducks!!!
by NICKPAPAGEORGIOTHEDUCK on Nov 30, 2009 3:06 PM PST reply actions
Hmmm...
Lets blitz at that Grant Johnson feller. Small and inexperienced. Oh dear Allioti, please come here…
Juju, you complete me...And now as your humble-as-ever servant, I kindly request the following:
So, how is it that one brother is named "James", and the next one "Jacquizz"?
Anyways, based on the picture; they look as if they have a relationship thats a little too comfortable.
Funny thing is CaDuck
Since Canfield is left handed that is not his blind side, plus his tackle next to him is a freshman
But it is the side that Eddie and Rowe typically bring their zone blitzes. I could see Eddie putting him on his arse like he did that AZ lineman a time or two.
Kenny Wheaton #20; The Pick - 1994 v UW. Matthew Harper #20; The Pick #2 - 2007 v USC. John Boyett #20;...
Exactly...
Dearest Eddie oh so Pleasant stuck it to the o-lineMAN for AZ, he can do this again. Preferably again and again and again.
Juju, you complete me...And now as your humble-as-ever servant, I kindly request the following:
So, how is it that one brother is named "James", and the next one "Jacquizz"?
Anyways, based on the picture; they look as if they have a relationship thats a little too comfortable.
What to read into this?
From Rob Moseley’s practice update:
…but Blake Cantu was listed with a head injury, notable because he had been taking some reps with the scout team offense at running back, playing the part of Quizz Rodgers.
Yes, Cantu maybe getting knocked around by the defense while playing the role of Faux Quizz. Notable indeed.
"...the noise is one aspect, but you can feel the intensity of their crowd." - Pete Carroll on Oregon's Autzen Stadium.
Here's what I read into it...
Eddie Pleasant is in Civil War ready mode.
Kenny Wheaton #20; The Pick - 1994 v UW. Matthew Harper #20; The Pick #2 - 2007 v USC. John Boyett #20;...
I'd be willing to track broken tackles in this game,
For both teams while narrowing it down by how many broken tackles per player, if anyone wants me to.
Only losing THREE starters from the USC game. (Offense and Defense)
Ladies and Gentlemen your 2010-11 Oregon Ducks.
by QuackQuackAttack on Nov 30, 2009 5:36 PM PST reply actions
The matchup I'm really interested in watching in our WRs vs your DBs
Outside of James, our WRs are very big. And don’t be fooled, Halahuni is a VERY athletic TE. It presents probably the most interesting match up in this game. We know Quizz is going to produce— he has produced every game he’s played in. But what happens in the passing game is extremely important to our offense
Thursday, December 3rd. Autzen Stadium. Eugene, OR. CIVIL WAR FOR THE ROSES! Game on. GO BEAVS!
I was suprised by how pass oriented your offense actually is. For all the hype that Quizz and the Fly sweep to James gets, it really is your passing game that has dominated this season. Halahuni is a big strong athletic TE (oh and he blocks really well too), Riley has done a great job of mixing him into the plays and he has definitely made the most of the opportunity.
I think you are right. The WR match ups (outside of James) is going to be very interesting. Aliotti will most likely play zone coverage and make the guys get open in between defenders. I know Adeniji had some drop problems early in the year, but he seems to have found a nice niche being a deep threat to James’ underneath routes and Halahuni’s post and crossing patterns.
All in all, Oregon’s secondary is one of the best in the Pac 10. Nobody has defended more passes and broken up more passes. It should definitely be very interesting to see. Let me know if I am missing something.
Kenny Wheaton #20; The Pick - 1994 v UW. Matthew Harper #20; The Pick #2 - 2007 v USC. John Boyett #20;...
You are pretty spot on. Here has been the dilemma for defensive coordinators that I have seen in the 2nd half of this season.
1. When teams play zone coverage, our receivers are excellent route runners, and have a great ability to find a hole in the zone. Adeniji has stepped up immensely with this, and has become a huge threat. But we usually don’t get a lot of YAC when the teams play zone, so usually its a 10-15 yard pass and that’s it. But we get those 10-15 yards, which has been really effective on 3rd downs to give us the first down.
2. When teams play man coverage, our receivers size allows them to go up and get the ball. This usually enables us to get more YAC, especially with James. Despite his small size, James has been a lot faster then most of the DBs that have covered him this year, and it has allowed him to go deep. He’s our first legitimate deep threat since Matt Moore was QBing and Sammie Stroughter was playing WR. However, this also forces Canfield to be a much more accurate passer, which is where he struggled early in the year. He has since improved and played about as good as any QB in the country.
So really, for Aliotti, its pick your poison.
The one thing that is crucial, however, is how few balls our receivers drop. This is part of the reason for Canfield’s amazing efficiency numbers this year.
Thursday, December 3rd. Autzen Stadium. Eugene, OR. CIVIL WAR FOR THE ROSES! Game on. GO BEAVS!
by The VD Special on Dec 1, 2009 12:45 PM PST up reply actions
I will not take anything away from your recievers (they have been really good all year). I think a key will be “when” they play zone and “when” they play man. Also, as Oregon found out the hard way at Stanford, execution will determine EVERYTHING.
1. I would like to see the zone on 1st and 2nd when OSU is looking to run, so that if they do play action, Oregon is not getting beat deep too badly.
2. I hope that Aliotti goes man in 3rd and long situations to make OSU make the plays (o-line, WR, QB, everyone) while the crowd is going nuts and the zone blitz is getting in Canfield’s face.
If OSU makes the kind of plays that Stanford did, at Autzen, hats off to them. If Oregon is able to get enough stops and allow their O to march and score, its going to be a long day for OSU. I’ve said it before and I will say it again, I don’t think we will shut down OSU completely, we just need to give our O a chance to win this game.
Kenny Wheaton #20; The Pick - 1994 v UW. Matthew Harper #20; The Pick #2 - 2007 v USC. John Boyett #20;...
I think we’re going to make OSU go deep. It has not been their strength this season. Canfield, despite completing over 70% of his passes, is averaging only 7.6 yards per attempt and 10.75 yards per completion. Luck is averaging almost 16 yards per completion. and 8.9 yards per completion despite a 56% completion rate.
OSU thrives on being efficiency and working the zones and short game. I hope Oregon forces them to try to beat them vertically.
As you said, if OSU can make the plays Stanford did, hats off to them. But they haven’t proven they can do that like Luck and Stanford did, so let’s make them do that, and get them off their typical game.
--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
I would change it up some to keep Canfield off balance. Especially on first or second when the play action comes into play. I think Ward is going to be hawking the line of scrimmage all day on Quizz and TJ3 will have duties on James. I could see Matthews and Paysinger going into zone to take away Halahuni and bring support on James in the middle in first and second down situations while Harris and Lewis play zone over the top on Adeniji.
I agree though when we get them into 3rd and long. Make Canfield throw the deep ball. I respect Adeniji to make some plays deep, but i don’t think they can do it consistently all game (sort of the same game plan as Cal… Riley’s only option most of the time was a deep pass that he wasn’t able to complete and they were sent back to the sideline while our offense motored down the field).
Kenny Wheaton #20; The Pick - 1994 v UW. Matthew Harper #20; The Pick #2 - 2007 v USC. John Boyett #20;...
Yeah, we’ll definitely want to mix it up, but I don’t mind having safeties come up on run and pass coverage, and let the corners handle the deep stuff. I think our corners are very good. TJ3 has been excellent in pass coverage, especially deep all year, and the rest of the secondary has been solid on the long ball.
Outside of that, change things up a lot. Sometimes drop a safety, or both. Other times, bring them. There’s a whole lot you can do with the middle and edges with the defensive versatility we have.
--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
I really want to see a lot of 3-3-5 in this game. I think if they put that little ball hawk Boyett in the back to help on the deep stuff and bring Lewis and Ward closer to the line to either show blitz or help in run support it will cause OSU to either check down to the deep ball or call more shotgun and play action plays taking away their power run formations.
Besides you can bring Matthews to the outside of Rowe and drop Pleasant into the middle just fine and still bring four (just like in the UCLA game) protecting against the fly sweep.
Kenny Wheaton #20; The Pick - 1994 v UW. Matthew Harper #20; The Pick #2 - 2007 v USC. John Boyett #20;...
Speaking of Damola Adeniji...
Can you enlighten me as to anywhere one could possibly get an Adeniji jersey in the next two days? Are there any other famous #80’s in Beaver history?
Addicted To Quack [dot] com
Officially getting some more often than The VD Special since 2009.
Oh, you mean
Chad Ochocero?
"Precious in the sight of the Lord, is the death of His Saints." - Psalm 116:15 Rest In Peace, Nick.
I am more interested in the the front seven of
Oregon vs you oline. Can OS protect Canfield? The only we we are beat in the secondary by your role players if Canfield has time to survey the field. Our dbs were draped all over guys in the Stanford game but Luck had a year to pick us apart. I see us faring better at home against an inexperienced and relatively undersized oline.
Agreed. Our OLine is crucial. When Canfield was getting pressed early in the season, he struggled. But the offensive line has had the biggest improvement of any position since the beginning of the year. Those early sack numbers have decreased rapidly, and play has improved.
But the thing to remember is USC got pressure on Canfield as well and he tore them apart. If our OLine can stop you 3/4 man rush, then we will be fine. If you start sending blitzes, Canfield has done well to pick them up and get the ball to Quizz or Halahuni.
Thursday, December 3rd. Autzen Stadium. Eugene, OR. CIVIL WAR FOR THE ROSES! Game on. GO BEAVS!
by The VD Special on Dec 1, 2009 12:47 PM PST up reply actions
Look at who you played the last four games
WSU, UW, UCLA, and Cal (10, 6, 7, 4 in sacks in the Pac 10). Your team hasn’t really seen pressure since USC. Against USC your 3rd down conversions were 7-15 and they sacked you 3 times. By contrast Cal you were 11-18 on 3rd and they sacked you 2 times.
I think sacks are important, but I really feel like the biggest factor will be 3rd down conversions on long situations. Definitely a game within a game… should be fun.
Kenny Wheaton #20; The Pick - 1994 v UW. Matthew Harper #20; The Pick #2 - 2007 v USC. John Boyett #20;...

by 














