Addicted To Quack: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Network Message: 50% Off: CBS/SB Nation Fantasy Baseball

Avoiding the letdown: how Oregon will beat Stanford

Oregon heads on the road this weekend to take on the Stanford Cardinal in Palo Alto. And after Oregon's victory over USC on Halloween, there is a lot of speculation that the Ducks will have a letdown game against the Cardinal.

First off, I don't think a letdown will happen. I have never seen such a focused Oregon football team. The Boise State loss really brought this team together, and the California win has spurred this team to work as hard as any team in the nation, week in and week out. All reports out of practice this week are that the Ducks are working as hard and as fast as ever.

But even beyond the trap game talk, it seems that there are many pundits and fans that are questioning Oregon coming into this game. They point to the bruising Toby Gerhart, to Oregon's close victory last season, and to the promising Andrew Luck.

However, when it comes down to it, this Oregon team is the best in the Pac-10, and Oregon should beat Stanford by two scores on Saturday.

Star-divide

First of all, the gameplan to beat Stanford has been developed: score a lot of points. Stanford has a porous defense. They are in the middle of the Pac-10 in most defensive categories (even though they have played a weak Pac-10 schedule thus far). Against those competent offenses they have faced (Oregon State and Arizona), they gave up 38 and 43 points. On the season, they are giving up 5.7 yards per play (in contrast, Oregon is giving up 4.2).

The Stanford defense can be scored on, and they simply do not have the athletes or depth to keep up with the Duck's offense for an entire game. Could Stanford stop the Ducks? I guess so, but there isn't any good reasons to think that will actually happen. I would be quite surprised if the Duck offense did not surpass the 40 point mark for the 5th time in 6 Pac-10 games.

On the opposite side of the ball, throughout the season Stanford has made up for these defensive deficiencies through ball control and a power running game on offense. The offensive line and Toby Gerhart lead a rushing attack that accounts for over 200 yards per game on over 5 yards per carry. Not surprisingly, this attack has allowed Stanford to lead the conference in time of possession.

Stanford has won those games where they have run the ball and controlled the ball, and lost those games where they could not control the clock and were forced to throw the ball. Stanford has lost every game where they have thrown 30 or more passes. Against Wake Forest, Stanford simply failed to run the ball. Against OSU and Arizona, Stanford got into a shootout and their team is simply not built to win those games.

In this week's game, I think the Oregon defense will be able to do a great job against Toby Gerhart. I expect the Oregon defensive line to plug the middle as they did against USC last week, and dare Stanford to try and take the ball outside. While Stanford will have solid plays every now and then, as with all other teams the Ducks have faced, the Cardinal will have a very difficult time moving the ball the length of the field.

If the Cardinal can't develop a consistent running game, the game will be placed in Andrew Luck's hands, and he has not excelled at that this season. While he has proven a great game manager, he has not quite reached the level of taking over games on his own. And if he is forced to throw, the Oregon defense will be free to pin their ears back and go after the QB When this happens, moving the ball will become even more difficult for Stanford.

Barring some sort of collapse on offense and defense, the Ducks should win this game easily. The Oregon offense should be able to move the ball. The Oregon defense is the best in the Pac-10, and should be able to limit both the Stanford passing and rushing games.

As always, that's not to say that Stanford can't win the game. This is college football. As we all know, crazy things can happen. Oregon could turn the ball over 5 times, give up some big returns in the kicking game, and maybe throw in two blocked punts and an onside kick for good measure.

But Oregon has most of the matchup advantages in this game, and I believe they'll leave Palo Alto with a victory on Saturday.

0 recs  |  Comment 70 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

For what it's worth...

…and it’s not much, the weather looks good in Palo Alto. Mostly sunny with some possible light showers Friday morning. Should be almost zero chance that a wet grass field will slow down Oregon’s team speed this week.

By the grace of Juju, we all are day-to-day.

by JConant on Nov 5, 2009 11:13 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Good stuff

I’m trying to be wary of overconfidence and want to maintain an attitude of PANIC at all times, so this may be a bit pessimistic. But a couple of things to think about:

1. Our defense has over-achieved. Certainly they’re playing great, but there’s a reason no one thought they would play all that great before the season started. Especially our cornerback situation being what it is, and an undersized D-line that, for the most part, couldn’t get much pressure on Barkley last week, Stanford could put up some yards through the air. The upside? Our defense is still fast, and their collective speed was eventually too much even for the vaunted SC offense, who wore down and allowed a couple of sacks in the second half. The same thing could happen this week.

2. Once again, turnovers will be key. Especially on the road, a fumble or interception at a bad time can really wreak havoc on momentum. Don’t FUMBLE! Upside: Since the Cal game, the Ducks have been pretty stingy with the turnovers. Masoli hasn’t thrown a pick in 97 attempts (Juju be praised). And the weather, as JConant pointed out, looks like it will cooperate, unlike the Cal game last year where I really felt Byrd’s fumble on a punt return was the turning point of that game.

3. Now to the non-pessimistic stuff. There’s absolutely no reason (barring turnovers, see #2) why this team shouldn’t put up 45 points on the Trees. Unless Harbaugh’s got some great defensive scheme up his sleeve, the offense should roll.

The Ducks take this one, 45 – 28.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 5, 2009 11:27 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

and an undersized D-line that, for the most part, couldn’t get much pressure on Barkley last week

The USC defensive line is the best in the nation. Our D-line didn’t win that battle, but didn’t lose it either, which was what it needed to do. I think they hold up just fine against Stanford, and with the extra pressure from the LBs (esp. if we’re up), will get a lot of pressure on Luck.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Nov 5, 2009 11:36 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

And by defensive line, I meant offensive.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Nov 5, 2009 11:36 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I know the announcers mentioned at some point during the game that Dowd wasn’t playing for SC. And Dowd might be the best O-lineman in the country, so without him, I think that takes SC down a few pegs.

And yeah, our D-line still held their own, which is certainly commendable. Still, I could see Luck being able to move the ball in the first half if he has time to throw. I think our line is fast enough to wear them down in the second half, but I wouldn’t be surprised to see another close, high-scoring game at half time, similar to the USC matchup last weekend.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 5, 2009 11:56 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Are we really that worried that Luck will have all day to throw? Stanford’s O-line has been good, no doubt, and have given up the 2nd fewest sacks in the league, but they’ve also throw the 2nd fewest number of passes (after Oregon). I don’t think they’ve really faced a defense like ours, that will be coming from all directions.

USC held a number of physical advantages over our line, and Stanford just isn’t even in the same league. They’re good (one of the best in the Pac-10), but USC is just head and shoulders in terms of talent above everyone else.

Stanford may be able to hang around in the first half, but as you said, we’ll wear them out.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Nov 5, 2009 12:24 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Again, USC without Dowd is not leagues ahead of everybody else on the O-line. Probably still the best, but it’s a much closer race. Dowd is a beast and should get a lot of credit for the O-line’s success. He was hurt last week.

If you factor in that this is a road game, and our secondary, while performing very well to this point, is still very inexperienced, I think there’s going to be an exchange of scoring in the first half.

I still think the Ducks will start dominating in the third quarter again, and take this one going away.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 5, 2009 12:43 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Can we really call Stanford Stadium a road game? I mean, their stadium has barely been 3/5 full this season. I wouldn’t be surprised to see a large part of the stadium green and yellow (and black and carbon)

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Nov 5, 2009 1:03 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t know, whether by luck or motivation or whatever, Stanford is like 11 – 1 at home over the past two years. Probably just luck, but still, that’s an awfully long run of success for a mediocre team with zero home field advantage.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 5, 2009 1:08 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Who was that one loss to? :D

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Nov 5, 2009 1:11 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Uh, USC.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 5, 2009 1:13 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The last two years includes this year and last year, for clarification.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 5, 2009 1:14 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Ah, my bad.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Nov 5, 2009 1:14 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Retractions and Corrections

And I’m sorry, it’s actually 8 – 1, I thought I had read 11 – 1 somewhere, but that’s false. It should be 8 – 1.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 5, 2009 1:17 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Oregon...

is 11-1 since we won against Stanford last year…

Both gold and muck come out of the same shaft...

by Fishdude on Nov 5, 2009 2:16 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

That may be what I saw.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 5, 2009 2:38 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Stanford’s O-line has been good against Wazzu, San Jose State, Wake Forest, Washington, UCLA, Oregon State, Arizona and Arizona State.

Those teams are all at the bottom in sacks. Stanford still has to play USC, Oregon and Cal who lead the league in sacks.

--Dominic, Addicted to Quack

Autzen Stadium is where great teams go to die." - J. Brady McCullough, The Michigan Daily.

by dvieira on Nov 5, 2009 12:50 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I swear I’m not the only one who thinks Stanford has a good O-line. In fact, that idea didn’t originate with me; I’ve read it from numerous pundits who know a lot more about college football than I do. Could those people be wrong? Probably not all of them. It’s a good line, that’s all I’m saying.

I mean, I still think we’re going to win by at least two TD’s. If you think Stanford’s O-Line is really that porous, then there’s not reason not to predict a 52 – 10 final score.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 5, 2009 1:11 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, I think they’re good. But Barkley had all day to throw in the first half, and had just about all day to throw. I don’t see that happening for Luck. He won’t be constantly harassed, but we’ll get some adequate pressure on him.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Nov 5, 2009 1:16 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Stanford's o-line is made to look a lot better than they actually are by two things:

1. A GIANT of a running back who when a hole doesn’t exist, creates his own.

2. The talent thus far they have played (WSU, Wake, SJSU, UW, UCLA, OSU and Zona). They still have Cal, USC, Oregon and ASU to go, the 4 best D’s in the Pac.

Kenny Wheaton #20; The Pick - 1994 v UW. Matthew Harper #20; The Pick #2 - 2007 v USC. John Boyett #20;...

by Matt Daddy on Nov 5, 2009 1:20 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Plus, don’t expect Aliotti and the D to let Luck feel to comfortable back there. You will see a ton of zone blitzes, LB’s at the line of scrimmage and safety blitzes now that Ward is back. I expect Aliotti to put 8-9 guys in the box all day and dare them to beat us deep.

Kenny Wheaton #20; The Pick - 1994 v UW. Matthew Harper #20; The Pick #2 - 2007 v USC. John Boyett #20;...

by Matt Daddy on Nov 5, 2009 1:22 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, okay, fine, but they’re still, you know, “good,” right? Or are they garbage? Aren’t UCLA and ASU both above average defenses?

I fully expect Allioti to have a good gameplan – he’s done that all year! But Luck has done okay throwing downfield this year. And here’s my main point – Oregon has put up some sacks against some pretty poor O-Lines – WSU, UW, UCLA, Cal (who should be good, but obviously isn’t). Against the best O-Line they’ve faced, it took them until the second half to get to the QB. I wouldn’t be surprised to see something similar, although not quite as drastic, this week. That’s all I’m really saying!

You guys are arguing with me like I’m calling Stanford the best offense in college football. They’re good, that’s all!

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 5, 2009 1:29 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Why do you love the trees so much?

You guys are arguing with me like I’m calling Stanford the best offense in college football. What? They’re the best offense in college football? PANIC!!

"KENNY WHEATON'S GONNA SCORE!! KENNY WHEATON!!--Jerry Allen, 1994"

by M. Fletcher on Nov 5, 2009 1:32 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I hate the Trees

I hate them with a passion. I’ve never hated anything so much as I hate that damn mascot. If you put me in a locked room with a guy punching babies and the Stanford Tree, there’s no hesitation – I go straight for that damn stuffed piece of leafy garbage and beat it senseless.

I just want to be realistic. They’ve had success at home. They’ve had success running the ball (against a couple good D’s). Their QB has the best passer rating in the Pac 10. Those things don’t happen by accident.

I fully expect us to give them looks on defense that will disrupt their offense. But I’m not going to blindly rule out their O having at least some first half success against our defense before they get a chance to tire them out.

In other words, PANIC!!! But not really.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 5, 2009 1:36 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Those things happen when they play their game and against inferior competition. We are a superior team talent wise, and they won’t be able to play their game against us.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Nov 5, 2009 1:41 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Here’s my point, they’re not as good as the upper eschelon teams in the conference, but they do what they do well. If you take them out of their gameplan you can expose them. Luck is a good passer (and by good I mean efficient). When they are forced to put the game on his shoulders, the O-line breaks down, and he is forced to scrammble (which he isn’t bad at) or he throws it away.

I think if you make them think at the line (which by the way is why USC was so good against us last week, they picked up every blitz package we threw at them very well, and it was only in the second half when they started to get tired that they started to break down) they are much more vulnerable.

Kenny Wheaton #20; The Pick - 1994 v UW. Matthew Harper #20; The Pick #2 - 2007 v USC. John Boyett #20;...

by Matt Daddy on Nov 5, 2009 1:48 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

And that’s what I’m saying – these guys will probably pick up more of the blitz packages than some of the O-Lines that we demolished – until they get tired. I doubt they’ll be as good at it as USC, but I doubt they’ll be as bad at it as the rest of the Pac 10 competition we’ve faced.

So I think Stanford’s going to put some points on the board in the first half. I mean, that’s not a revolutionary thought or anything. Oregon should still win by 17+ points.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 5, 2009 1:54 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I heart the Furd band

If ya can't get your Dick Enright, get your Dick Harter!

by Old Ducker on Nov 5, 2009 1:56 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

If you put me in a locked room with a guy punching babies and the Stanford Tree, there’s no hesitation – I go straight for that damn stuffed piece of leafy garbage and beat it senseless.

I think the correct answer would be to take the guy who is punching babies and beat the tree up using the guy as a weapon.

May we hand you your taints on a silver platter...

by 071903 on Nov 5, 2009 6:50 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

If you put me in a locked room with a guy punching babies and the Stanford Tree

What’s the difference?

It's spelled "T-A-K-O-T-U-E-S-D-A-Y-S-!-!-!."

I support inroywetrust in his support of The VD Special in his support of me supporting Roger Kieschnick in his quest to becoming the best Kieschnick ever to play professional baseball.

by Takimoto on Nov 5, 2009 7:09 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Hey-O!

TOBY, Toby Gerhart...THE Toby Gerhart? I formally welcome your presence.

We appreciate all of your needed contributions Juju! WE LOVE YOU

by CaDuck on Nov 5, 2009 7:49 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I think they’re good. Maybe even as “physical” as USC’s line, just not quite as skilled, especially at blocking the second level due to slightly lesser foot speed.

To Matt’s point above… It may be that Gerhart plays an important role in pass protection. His size allows him to compete physically with just about any blitzing linebacker. Of course, I haven’t watched enough Ferd Ball to know if he’s any good at it. It could be worth keeping an eye on.

By the grace of Juju, we all are day-to-day.

by JConant on Nov 5, 2009 1:36 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Here’s my point, they’re not as good as the upper eschelon teams in the conference, but they do what they do well. If you take them out of their gameplan you can expose them. Luck is a good passer (and by good I mean efficient). When they are forced to put the game on his shoulders, the O-line breaks down, and he is forced to scrammble (which he isn’t bad at) or he throws it away.

I think if you make them think at the line (which by the way is why USC was so good against us last week, they picked up every blitz package we threw at them very well, and it was only in the second half when they started to get tired that they started to break down) they are much more vulnerable.

Kenny Wheaton #20; The Pick - 1994 v UW. Matthew Harper #20; The Pick #2 - 2007 v USC. John Boyett #20;...

by Matt Daddy on Nov 5, 2009 1:48 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

They did play ASU 2 weeks ago, but they still lost to the only 2 good Pac-10 teams they’ve faced.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Nov 5, 2009 1:23 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I, for one, rec you for nicely measured panic.

What do we want - PANIC! When do we want it - NOW!

by Bill Musgrave on Nov 5, 2009 5:43 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

jlight...

great analysis about making Stanford unbalanced. I really like our chances wiht our offense. If our offense is clicking – watch out. I am waiting for two complete halves like we had against Cal.

by BisonDucks on Nov 5, 2009 11:52 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

I predict Ducks 42-28

This would be a good game to get an early lead in. I do not want to behind in the second half and have them keep pounding us with Gerhart.

by AugustDuck on Nov 5, 2009 12:08 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I just don’t see them getting that many TDs. They won’t be able to move the ball consistently, and if we force them to go the length of the field, they’ll be in trouble.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Nov 5, 2009 12:17 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I like these last two articles...

They have the appropriate amount of panic and focus. With Juju’s help, we’ll lop the branches (aka: running game) right off the trees and leave them helpless and waiting to be turned into lumber (aka: Pick 6 for John Boyett). Prediction: 48-24.

"KENNY WHEATON'S GONNA SCORE!! KENNY WHEATON!!--Jerry Allen, 1994"

by M. Fletcher on Nov 5, 2009 12:15 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Oregon 45, Furd 10

Stanford will score a TD off a turnover and a field goal from offense. That’s it. Costa will take over in the fourth quarter.

If ya can't get your Dick Enright, get your Dick Harter!

by Old Ducker on Nov 5, 2009 1:21 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I think this could be kind of like the Cal game

An overrated RB and an inconsistent QB running smack into the OR D.

"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely

by skywaker9 on Nov 5, 2009 2:07 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Can someon that is an ESPN insider...

go tell Miller that just because we rank 6th in the Pac-10 in rushing defense that it’s a meaningless stat? Upon further review, we hold teams to 3.28 yards per carry, which is 29th in the country. We got gashed once by Bolden. BSU took 50 carries to get their yards. We bottled up UTAH, CAL, WSU, UCLA & USC. UW surprised me a bit on the ground.

link

by BisonDucks on Nov 5, 2009 2:25 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I also love to hear about other teams watching the BSU tape, because Oregon has already ripped that gameplan apart a few times this year, most notably against Cal.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Nov 5, 2009 3:24 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

that's eactly what USC did last week too

bring the safety or OLB up to try and stop the run and we’ll either run it right down the middle and kill you, or make a quick screen pass and pick up 9-10 yards.

Kenny Wheaton #20; The Pick - 1994 v UW. Matthew Harper #20; The Pick #2 - 2007 v USC. John Boyett #20;...

by Matt Daddy on Nov 5, 2009 3:40 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah!

So keep watching that BSU tape. That would sure prepare you for LMJ…Oh, wait.

TOBY, Toby Gerhart...THE Toby Gerhart? I formally welcome your presence.

We appreciate all of your needed contributions Juju! WE LOVE YOU

by CaDuck on Nov 5, 2009 4:06 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Stanford doesn't have BSU's athletes either...

I hope they swarm to where they think the ball is. That way they can tackle the guy, pat themselves on the back while the real person with the ball runs in for a score.

by BisonDucks on Nov 5, 2009 4:17 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Some quick thoughts on defending the Stanford Power Running Game.

Toby Gerhart
6’1" – 235lbs: Averaging 5.1yds per carry.

Allen Bradford
5’11" – 235 lbs:
Before Oregon – Averaging 7.2yds per carry
Against Oregon – Averaged 3.7yds per carry with a long of 8.

LeGarrette Blount (Scout Team)
6’2" – 242lbs

This defense has got looks at big backs, and seemed to do just fine against Bradford. And that was with bigger threats, in my opinion, on the outside in Williams and Johnson. I believe Gerhart is the better runner but the Duck Safeties don’t have as much to worry about in the passing game.

Also, how does an undersized defense defend a big back? Gang tackling. I think they did a damn good job of that last Saturday.

"It amazes me that you understand (...) the number one play of what their offense is and what they do best, AND you still can't stop it!" - Craig James

by AcadianTraverse on Nov 5, 2009 5:58 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Does Boyett realize that he is too small to tackle huge backs for a loss?

Clearly, It is not his place in society to be roughing up those huge backs! Somebody needs to have a talk with him.

It is amazing how effective of a tackler he really is

TOBY, Toby Gerhart...THE Toby Gerhart? I formally welcome your presence.

We appreciate all of your needed contributions Juju! WE LOVE YOU

by CaDuck on Nov 5, 2009 6:03 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

That's because

Boyett is a very smart player, especially for a redshirt freshman. He doesn’t go for the big hit like other safeties do and instead focuses on not getting burned in coverage and making the sure tackle/trip up at the line.

by surgingchaos on Nov 5, 2009 8:06 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yep. He has clearly been well coached in both HS and now in College.

The only real mistake he has made all season was attempting to return his game clinching interception against Utah; leading to Eddie Pleasant tackling him. Against UCLA, he immediately went down after his interception to wrap things up.

Good smart kid; not to mention fearless

TOBY, Toby Gerhart...THE Toby Gerhart? I formally welcome your presence.

We appreciate all of your needed contributions Juju! WE LOVE YOU

by CaDuck on Nov 5, 2009 8:13 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Eddie Pleasant tackles everyone! No one is safe. I worry just walking near campus. Or, in the Duck shop at Autzen.

By the grace of Juju, we all are day-to-day.

by JConant on Nov 5, 2009 8:32 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Eddie Pleasant tackled me when I went to check my mail today. I’m really sore.

It's spelled "T-A-K-O-T-U-E-S-D-A-Y-S-!-!-!."

I support inroywetrust in his support of The VD Special in his support of me supporting Roger Kieschnick in his quest to becoming the best Kieschnick ever to play professional baseball.

by Takimoto on Nov 5, 2009 8:39 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

He comes out of nowhere and there’s no way you can out-run him. I prescribe an ice bath for you Takimoto. Trust me, I’m a doctor.

By the grace of Juju, we all are day-to-day.

by JConant on Nov 5, 2009 8:41 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Eddie Pleasant went grocery shopping

while there was a family shopping for produce at the same time. As their son was walking by the melons, he accidentally bumped one onto the ground. The melon started to roll away but the boy bent down quickly to pick it… just then Eddie Pleasant came around the corner and tackled the boy, picked up the melon and returned it for a touchdown!!!!

Kenny Wheaton #20; The Pick - 1994 v UW. Matthew Harper #20; The Pick #2 - 2007 v USC. John Boyett #20;...

by Matt Daddy on Nov 5, 2009 9:14 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Guys, this string is just silly, I mean Eddie is a great tackler but it's just on the football field.

Oh, hi Eddie, what are you doing here in Texa ..agarujlafuafh.

What do we want - PANIC! When do we want it - NOW!

by Bill Musgrave on Nov 6, 2009 4:53 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Hahaha!

TOBY, Toby Gerhart...THE Toby Gerhart? I formally welcome your presence.

We appreciate all of your needed contributions Juju! WE LOVE YOU

by CaDuck on Nov 6, 2009 7:21 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

lol

Kenny Wheaton #20; The Pick - 1994 v UW. Matthew Harper #20; The Pick #2 - 2007 v USC. John Boyett #20;...

by Matt Daddy on Nov 6, 2009 8:32 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You shouldn’t have been wearing your “World’s Best Quarterback” shirt.

It's spelled "T-A-K-O-T-U-E-S-D-A-Y-S-!-!-!."

I support inroywetrust in his support of The VD Special in his support of me supporting Roger Kieschnick in his quest to becoming the best Kieschnick ever to play professional baseball.

by Takimoto on Nov 6, 2009 11:12 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

But my kids gave it to me .. asfaseraeauug.

Dammit Eddie, don’t you have a plane to catch?

He’s done this like twenty times today, just keeps waiting for me to get back up and start typing, then DOOSH, down again.

What do we want - PANIC! When do we want it - NOW!

by Bill Musgrave on Nov 6, 2009 3:27 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You should get a replica Jim Everett jersey.

Check that, Chris Evert jersey.

Addicted To Quack [dot] com; Six-hundred and ninety-four yards of total offense.

by qrsouther on Nov 6, 2009 3:56 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Think I'll stick with tMusgrave

Eddie’s on the plane, no worries everyone, said something about bad luck or bad for Luck or something. Kinda hard to understand word for word when you’re getting sacked.

What do we want - PANIC! When do we want it - NOW!

by Bill Musgrave on Nov 6, 2009 8:56 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Well,

Asking if he has a plane to catch is just insulting him. Everybody knows he can run faster than a plane…Gosh

BTW, I like your new profile pic

TOBY, Toby Gerhart...THE Toby Gerhart? I formally welcome your presence.

We appreciate all of your needed contributions Juju! WE LOVE YOU

by CaDuck on Nov 6, 2009 4:46 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

No. That’s TJ3

It's spelled "T-A-K-O-T-U-E-S-D-A-Y-S-!-!-!."

I support inroywetrust in his support of The VD Special in his support of me supporting Roger Kieschnick in his quest to becoming the best Kieschnick ever to play professional baseball.

by Takimoto on Nov 5, 2009 8:39 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

um that's also not Allen Bradford

they must have switched the picture. Too humiliating for USC players to see their “big” back getting turned upside down by our freshman “little” safety… delicate sensibilities those Trojans have you know?

Kenny Wheaton #20; The Pick - 1994 v UW. Matthew Harper #20; The Pick #2 - 2007 v USC. John Boyett #20;...

by Matt Daddy on Nov 5, 2009 8:53 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Seriously.

Bradford has been having post traumatic stress after being tackled in the backfield by a scrawny, not highly touted little honkie.

TOBY, Toby Gerhart...THE Toby Gerhart? I formally welcome your presence.

We appreciate all of your needed contributions Juju! WE LOVE YOU

by CaDuck on Nov 6, 2009 7:22 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Addicted to Quack, SBN's Oregon Ducks blog and fan community.
Start posting about the Ducks »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Dixon01_small
Pac-10 Expansion

Recent FanPosts

N1222878_43736576_541_small
Tako Tuesdays: Art Show
Celebratemaehljpg-a3aecdc38c14c0c9_large_small
Another Oregon Arrest Continues the Pattern at Oregon- By John Canzano
Dscn3780_small
Lyle Moevao denied 6th year
Jeff_mug_h2_small
VOTE on SB Nation's Pac-10 all-conference awards!
Jeff_mug_h2_small
VOTE on SB Nation's Pac-10 all-conference awards!
N1222878_43736576_541_small
Help Write Next Week's Tako Tuesday!
Nike_o_small
Pent up frustration and a battle for ninth place...
N1222878_43736576_541_small
Tako Tuesdays: Radical Realignment [WITH AN AMENDMENT!]
Small
Crapzano's Sponsors
P1070915_small
Once again, a big thank you to ATQ

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

An Elite Era Ends- Who Succedes Kent?
Sports Chat 503
Not the best angle to see what he looks like, but we finally got our mascot on NCAA Football 11!!!!
Britteny Brittney (Or whatever the hell her name is today) Griner, also known as the chick that can dunk, gets her Blount on at a basketball game tonight.

Has the Baylor coach lost control of their team?  How will this discipline affect the possible future arrests of these women's team players?
Comcast Sports NW petition
Here's your chance to own an official OREGAN FOOTBALL hoodie, in pink.  

Buy it now! Only $24.95.

"More than 10 available.""
Dickson has wings, from the NFL Combine.
6.66
Joey takes a dip in the Willamette.
Ivan Maisel scores Kelly/Blowhardonzano Argument

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

ATQ Twitter Feed


Managers

Safeco-david_and_deb_small Addicted to Quack

Pre_small ntrebon

Img_0608_small jtlight

Domsicecream_small dvieira

Editors

Oregon_duck_football_helmet_small JConant

41932caf48d25-44-1_small PaulSF

Authors

N1222878_43736576_541_small Takimoto

Atq-spoon-5_small Matt Daddy

Official Partner of CBS Sports