Stanford offense pummels ducks by taking a page out of the Chip Kelly playbook
So, Oregon's offense has been pretty stellar over the past few years. But in the games where it has been most successful, as opposing defenses keyed on the Oregon rushing attack, Oregon went to the air to take other teams off balance. This was seen most markedly in last years Civil War beatdown. And, it was seen yesterday. Unfortunately, in a cruel twist, this strategy undid the Ducks defense yesterday against Stanford.
In the first couple drives of the game, the Oregon defense held Gerhart in check, forcing Stanford into a number of 3rd and long situations. On Gerhart's first 7 carries, he managed a mere 18 yards (one was a one yard touchdown run).
During that same stretch, Andrew Luck went back to pass 9 times, was 4/7 for 65 yards, and there were two penalties on Javes Lewis during that stretch (though one of which was just an atrocious, horrible call that was a big momentum swing in the game).
From this point on, in the middle of Stanford's 3rd drive, Toby Gerhart and the rest of the Stanford offense had their way with the Ducks defense. Luck had only 20 pass attempts on the day, but 8 of those attempts were in the first quarter.
Much like we have seen Oregon do over and over again with Kelly at the helm, Stanford used the pass to set up the run, and when they proved that they could move the ball through the air, the Oregon defenders had no answer. Luck had all day to throw, and he was hitting his receivers that were getting open much too quickly.
And that was pretty much that. The defense didn't get any breaks, and Stanford had it's way. There has been a lot of gnashing of teeth about getting outcoached and all this, but these things happen. An offense that is on, and is executing in all phases of the game is almost unstoppable.
Stanford's execution put the Ducks into react mode early, and if your defense is reacting rather than going out there and playing their own game, your will not often be very successful. Oregon was taken off their gameplan early, was forced to respect the pass, and could not generate pressure with their front 4. A defense that has to deal with a diverse offense that can throw or run will typically not be able to stop either.
So where does this leave us moving forward? Is this like the 2002 loss to ASU, or the 2001 loss to Stanford? Was this a fluke, or did Stanford expose something that other teams will be able to?
I'm still very optimistic about how this season will turn out. This game seemed to be a perfect storm on the defensive side of the ball. Stanford made few mistakes and has an offense that it set up to pound the Ducks speedy but undersized front 7. I think that the Ducks match up very well with the teams left on their schedule, though Arizona is looking mighty scary, and if Oregon wants to win the conference, it's margin of error just dropped significantly.
We still have a great offense, and I still feel that our defense is very good, though not world beating as we had originally hoped. The race for the roses still runs through Eugene, and with 3 games to play, that's about all we could have hoped for.
0 recs |
32 comments
|
Comments
Well said...
That first half for Standford was as flawless a half I’ve seen any team play. Jackson played good corner D…Luck was just dropping perfect passes in the smallest of places. The only thing I think we did to aide their dominant first half performance was continually going for slow corner blitzes. That killed me to see that happening again and again against a team that religiously lines up 7-8 people to block.
However, our passing game yesterday looked great. Was it just me or is Kelly opening up the playbook a little more (i.e. wheel routes to James, Masoli doing more play action, Holland constantly in motion, etc.)? There were only a couple of drives where I thought the offense panicked at the end of the first half and passed too much…but oh well.
I don’t think anyone here thought that Oregon was getting through the conference undefeated. It’s nearly impossible to do. What’s funny is the Pac-10 will once again — without doubt — prove itself to be the best conference in the nation with more than 6 teams with 6+ wins and all going bowling. Yet, the nation will still think we’re a weak conference because of all of those teams having 2-3 losses. Blah.
I’m not a guy who cares about the polls…but what in the hell are the writers thinking not dropping LSU AT ALL? Not even one spot? Come on. (That was my Rickert impersonation)
by kolson82 on Nov 8, 2009 2:04 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I began to wonder
If Peyton Manning had somehow switched bodies with Luck. I mean seriously, those our throws very few NFL players can make.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
by skywaker9 on Nov 8, 2009 3:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Pac-10 best conference?
You must be joking. SEC! SEC!
by PdxVol on Nov 9, 2009 12:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I know rankings don't matter....
But how in the world can USC be ranked way higher than us after we pummeled them last week???
Obviously with this loss, the slim chance we had at the NC has disappeared so the rankings don’t matter, but this is ridiculous.
by westspec on Nov 8, 2009 3:32 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
And Ohio State is ranked ahead of USC
Pollsters are idiots with short memories.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
by skywaker9 on Nov 8, 2009 3:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Something else that I'm thinking abotu that makes me think this was sort of flukey...
though fluke isn’t the right word. Basically, Stanford executed its gameplan to perfection. They jumped ahead on a couple big plays and were able to run the ball and control the clock with the lead. The Duck offense wasn’t able to get on the field all that much.
A couple breaks, this totally changes. What happens if that first PI is not called, and on their 3rd possession, Stanford must punt.
Stanford executed to perfection, and nothing should be taken away from them, but I can’t help but feel like we won’t see a repeat performance from the Ducks defense.
--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
by jtlight on Nov 8, 2009 3:44 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I will maintain my belief that we got out coached…but…
our defense did not make plays. I was telling my buddy in the first half as we were watching the game, that NOBODY on oregon’s D was making plays. Our guys let themselves get blocked, didn’t control their lanes, didn’t get into the backfield and make Gerhart cut before he was ready, etc.
We didn’t make plays. That is something we haven’t seen all year. All year, we’ve seen guys make plays… Saturday, they looked lost and refused to make plays. I don’t know if they expected Stanford to do something different, were tired or what… but nobody made plays…
Kenny Wheaton #20; The Pick - 1994 v UW. Matthew Harper #20; The Pick #2 - 2007 v USC. John Boyett #20;...
by Matt Daddy on Nov 8, 2009 3:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
We were on our heels. It’s pretty much as simple as that. We couldn’t get to the QB and make plays, and were reacting the whole game. The players were reacting, the coaching staff was reacting. And that’s not what you want.
When Stanford could run and pass, it put our defense in a very bad place, and they ended up stopping neither the run or the pass. We’ve seen this happen time and time again. It just sucks when it happens to you.
--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
by jtlight on Nov 8, 2009 3:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I know, I'm frustrated
I guess I expected more out of this coaching staff and this D. Hopefully this is something that they use to get better (both staff and players) like the way Kelly and the offense used the BSU game to get better throughout the season.
It just pisses me off that all year, I’ve been saying Stanford’s offense is the only one built to dominate this D… and it happened. Oh well, live and learn… hopefully they use this to get better.
Kenny Wheaton #20; The Pick - 1994 v UW. Matthew Harper #20; The Pick #2 - 2007 v USC. John Boyett #20;...
by Matt Daddy on Nov 8, 2009 4:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
In case you guys didn't here
Your game next week against ASU is on ESPN at 7:20 PM.
My prayers are with Best.
by ConnorOSU on Nov 8, 2009 4:13 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Kind of sucks
Cause it’ll be a late night for me coming back. Oh well. Worth it to see the Ducks exact vengeance on the Devils.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
by skywaker9 on Nov 8, 2009 4:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I am actually not that upset about this game
Stanford played by far it’s best game of the year and Luck was making throws that a lot of NFL QB’s can’t make. A lot that was due to our complete lack of pressure on the QB (our blitzing scheme was completely ineffective and Stanford had the right play called every time and executed it to perfection).
by ppilot on Nov 8, 2009 4:28 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
We just need to get used to normal Oregon football.
Offense vs offense. Absolutely no trace of defense.
Repent! Juju is obviously not pleased!
by CaDuck on Nov 8, 2009 4:34 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Come on, really? Our defense has one bad game against a very good offense and we’re throwing in the towel that our defense has been pretty good this year? We’re back to having a terrible D? I’m sorry but I just don’t believe it.
--Dominic, Addicted to Quack
Autzen Stadium is where great teams go to die." - J. Brady McCullough, The Michigan Daily.
by dvieira on Nov 8, 2009 5:32 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Me neither. A couple breaks, and things could be totally different. The game went just about as well as it could for Stanford, and props to them for forcing that to happen.
--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
by jtlight on Nov 8, 2009 5:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I know, I know...
Everything was just such a disaster. D-line played awful, Linebackers didn’t help much either, and Javes Lewis got stabbed repeatedly out there.
I am just panicking, like I always am. After our offensive meltdown in Idaho, it took a few games to retain dominance. I hope our defense can recover this week, we cannot afford for them to take a few more games to ascend to their plateau of sheer greatness (as we witnessed in every game but this one!). I am just irrationally panicking, like always.
Repent! Juju is obviously not pleased!
by CaDuck on Nov 8, 2009 5:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
Those bombs broke the Ducks’ backs. I don’t think the receivers even saw half of them. They were so perfect they just dropped down the chimney, into their hands.
by Bird Flu on Nov 8, 2009 5:00 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Is it Saturday yet?
This is going to be the longest week ever. EVER.
I need to know how well we will rebound from this disaster! I need to know!
Repent! Juju is obviously not pleased!
by CaDuck on Nov 8, 2009 5:05 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
This isn’t a disaster. We STILL control our own destiny for the Rose Bowl. The only thing that changed was the darkhorse talk about getting to the NC game and let’s be honest…we weren’t going to get there. We win out and we go to the Rose Bowl…2 of those 3 games are at home. Even if we lose to Arizona, we could still get there if we get help from USC beating Arizona and Stanford, both of those games are at home for the Trojans
If anything, take solace in the fact that the “Should Oregon be ahead of Boise State in the rankings?” talk is now all but done
--Dominic, Addicted to Quack
Autzen Stadium is where great teams go to die." - J. Brady McCullough, The Michigan Daily.
by dvieira on Nov 8, 2009 5:37 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
I am going to be completely honest...
that response calmed me down considerably. Very well stated, Rec.
After all, I am still amidst my 36 hour window of irrationality and oft belligerency.
Repent! Juju is obviously not pleased!
by CaDuck on Nov 8, 2009 5:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If anything, the only spirit that is broken is pride in being a one-loss team and not a two-loss team.
Addicted To Quack [dot] com; Six-hundred and ninety-four yards of total offense.
by qrsouther on Nov 8, 2009 6:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I’m not worried about ASU at home, but having to play the Wildcats in a couple of weeks, worries me. I tihnk that both Stanford and UA have matched up very well against us (at least in recent history), and with the way the Wildcats are playing, I believe that it will come down to the wire. I can’t imagine that their QB would not be able to do the same as what Luck did to our defense, and they will have a much stronger homefield advantage than Stanford did. I sure hope that this loss keeps this team in check!
by ATLDuck on Nov 8, 2009 7:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The Wildcats run a spread offense,
That worries me less. If they ran a power set, I would be crying right now.
Either way, we can only think about ASU right now.
Repent! Juju is obviously not pleased!
by CaDuck on Nov 8, 2009 7:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It"s not over yet
I think we were over confident. I think all the media hype and USC game left our heads in the clouds. Now that we are back on earth maybe we can take up like after the B State game and win out. Then crush a big ten team.
by 4x4 Duck on Nov 8, 2009 6:38 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Let down game...not a trap
But we still have a great chance to smell the Roses. That is the only thought that kept me from going irate and throwing a bag full of kittens through a house fan. I think the “Petros Factor” stirred me up even more during the game. I watched three-quarters of it in silence.
Stanford’s offense, specifically the offensive line negated any attack whatsoever for the Oregon defense. I kept seeing that three man front against seven or eight on the line for Stanford and thinking “how do you stop that?” I am not sure if you let Elizabeth Lambert play rover, Oregon would have had more success.
Jared is 100% correct with the run-setting-up-the-pass for Stanford. I think that Javes Lewis got exploited (two weeks in a row) playing out of a typical position and TJIII was in position at the right time a few times, but Luck threw a perfect pass and the receiver made a great catch. There is not much you can do with that otherwise.
I am sure that the defense can regroup, and return to dominant form. The Ducks need to cut down the penalties again. It’s a new season. Its Oregon vs. ASU for the NC. Win the day.
May we hand you your taints on a silver platter...
by 071903 on Nov 8, 2009 7:27 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
The worst part...
After our game, I watched the Cal/OSU game, and god damn Papadakis makes a freaking guest appearance in the broadcasting booth. Just when my anger was waiving…Petros shows the fu*k up and re-ignites it! AGHHH!!!
Repent! Juju is obviously not pleased!
by CaDuck on Nov 8, 2009 7:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If nothing else
Assuming we win out (with Washington at home and Washington State anywhere, it appears we will), your loss to Stanford assures that the Civil War will yet again have conference championship implications, in some way or another.
Think about it. 10 years ago, would anyone have thought that the Civil War could be that meaningful 2 years in a row. Including this game, it will have decided a conference champion 3 times in 10 years. Has there been a rivalry game in the Pac10 like that in a long time?
Defending Jacquizz against Jahvid since 2008.
by The VD Special on Nov 8, 2009 8:47 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
'Tis great indeed. The rest of my family are Beavs, so we enjoy this most years these days.
Thanksgiving dinner can get a bit rough for me, however… surrounded!
GEEEEEERHAAAAAAARRRT!!!!!!
(arms and eyes to sky, ala Stephen Colbert)
by Bill Musgrave on Nov 8, 2009 9:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No matter where you are...
You have the full support of 59,000
Repent! Juju is obviously not pleased!
by CaDuck on Nov 9, 2009 7:03 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Something I’m not entirely clear on:
Why didn’t the NCAA ever touch Blount? I was under the impression that unless it was during a game or involved amateur status, it was a school/conference thing, but I’m not 100% sure.
"Baton Rouge happens to be the worst place in the world for a visiting team. It's like being inside a drum."~Bear Bryant
"Autzen Stadium is where great teams go to die."~The Michigan Daily
by AllSaintsDay on Nov 9, 2009 1:15 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Oops, thought I was on the Blount thread. Think I’ll go repost this where it belongs.
"Baton Rouge happens to be the worst place in the world for a visiting team. It's like being inside a drum."~Bear Bryant
"Autzen Stadium is where great teams go to die."~The Michigan Daily
by AllSaintsDay on Nov 9, 2009 1:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs






















