Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: How Not To Criticize Tom Brady For The Patriots' Loss

The Oregon defense: better than they're getting credit for

If you've spent two seconds perusing any Ohio State Buckeyes blogs, you'll have no doubt read about the poor Oregon defense. This has been quite infuriating, simply because the analysis provided has been woefully ignorant. Case in point, a post from Buckeye Battle Cry, which will be joining SBNation on January 1st (Welcome guys!).

With a few exceptions at the beginning of the year, the Oregon D has been allowing apposing offenses to rush for pretty close to their season averages.

The crown jewel of this chart is Stanford’s #11 ranked rushing offense and the 236 yards they gained on the ground against Oregon, which of course led to a 51-42 defeat of the Ducks.

The good and still improving #17 [OSU] rushing offense (198.92 ypg) against the #40 [Oregon] rushing defense (130.64 ypg) that gives up basically whatever the offense wants to take.

Sounds good to me.

Unfortunately, this type of 2nd rate analysis is standard throughout the Buckeye blogosphere. SBNation's tOSU blog, We Will Always Have Tempe, front-paged this post.

What we can take from all of these posts is the infatuation with all things "total." Total yards, total points, total defense, etc. I've even seen some commenters go so far as mention time of possession. And if you're looking at the Ducks through this narrow lens, of course Oregon will not stack up.

Yet on January 1st, Buckeye Nation will be in for a rude awakening.

Star-divide

The first thing we need to do is get past this idea of total yards or rushing defense as a good indication of the Oregon defense. Oregon simply runs too many plays on both sides of the ball. Over the course of the season, the Oregon defense defended 864 plays. The Buckeye defense defended 773. This is a difference of about 8 plays per game, and is due mostly to the difference in pace that Oregon plays compared to most other teams.

To get a good feel for how these teams actually play, we really need to look at how they perform on a down-by-down basis. The best way to do this is to go to our friend Bill Connelly with RockMNation and Football Outsiders.com, who has done a great job breaking down these statistics.

And, if you've been reading this site for a while, you know I'm going straight to S&P+. For a full explanation of what these numbers mean, check out Bill's primer, and further post on Football Outsiders. Basically, this statistic is a great indicator of just how good teams are on a per-play basis.

Now, I'm not gonna sit here and say that Oregon's defense is better than OSU's. It's not. But, it's a lot closer than any Buckeye fan is willing to admit. Looking at these statistics, Oregon has the 15th ranked defense in the country, and beyond that has the 10th ranked rushing defense in the country (mostly because they have faced a lot of really good rushing teams). These results really shouldn't be a surprise. Oregon is giving up only 4.6 yards per play on the season, good for 11th nationally. And they are giving up only 3.41 yards per rush, good for 24th nationally (again, let's remember that S&P+ takes into account opponent strengths).

This Oregon team is where it is because of its defense. It faced potent offenses over and over throughout the season, and gave the offense an opportunity to succeed through strong defensive play.

We'll be getting into the matchups more in the week before the Rose Bowl, but the crux of Buckeye arguments thus far have been that the Duck defense just isn't that good. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Comment 137 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

What's the matter?

With those we’ll always have Tempe guys? As soon as you threw out the strength of schedule comparison he closed comments.

The road to Pasadena goes through Autzen...and the Ducks have punched their ticket to THE ROSE BOWL!!!!

by UOfootball on Dec 18, 2009 1:16 PM PST reply actions  

man those guys are awfully sure of themselves aren't they?

Under winter skies
We stand glorious
And with Oden on our side
We are victorious

by WhiteRabbit on Dec 18, 2009 1:19 PM PST reply actions  

I feel kinda weird myself, I've put the panic on hold for a few weeks.

It feels great, the headaches are gone, the nervous twitch is slowly subsiding, and a whole new world has opened up to me.

Of course, this only means double panic in the few days leading up to and including the Rose. I might go blind.

A House of Spears > An Ingram

by Bill Musgrave on Dec 19, 2009 7:24 AM PST up reply actions  

Links

Per the football outsiders link, OSU has faced two teams that have better defenses in the eyes of FO (Iowa and PSU) and Oregon has not faced a defense as good as OSU’s (in FO’s eyes).

But I am sure I am not taking account the number of plays Oregon is running.

by DougF on Dec 18, 2009 1:31 PM PST reply actions  

FO

Pfftttt………….BIG 10 doesn’t have better defenses, it does have terrible offenses. Can’t wait to watch this game live in Pasadena, but in the meantime, check out this new video – Oregon Ducks Football Highlights 2009 with I Love My Ducks by Supwitchugirl as the soundtrack – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pIX18y-AkEc

by themilman on Dec 18, 2009 8:38 PM PST up reply actions  

GREAT VID!!!!

I could watch that about a million more times.

Oregon State, Oklahoma State, Ohio State..just another OSU. Free Dennis Dixon!!!

by Matt Daddy on Dec 19, 2009 9:33 AM PST up reply actions  

who cares what we think?

i never understand why some fans get so offended by the thought’s and opinions of the other fan base. who gives a crap what we think of your defense? it’s not going to matter come jan 1 anyway?

i personally, don’t think your defense is great. they’re good, they’re fast, but they’re not great. you can throw out all the fancy statistics and numbers you want, but at the end of the day, the most important number their is — is the number of points your opponent puts up. this year, you’ve given up 24, 33, 36, 41, and fifty freaking one. great defenses don’t give up 51 points… to anybody, regardless of time of possession, ypc or whatever. yeah, the oregon d has had some great games, but they’ve also displayed some inconsistencies…

by davereg412 on Dec 18, 2009 1:38 PM PST reply actions  

Karma

I pray, Juju, to make this statement sting with your Karmic justice come Jan 1… " great defenses don’t give up 51 points… to anybody"

by Cheech on Dec 18, 2009 1:48 PM PST up reply actions  

So

While the DUCK D may be inconsistent, Ohio State’s CONSISTENT #6 Defense in all the land is built on a crappy strength of schedule.

The road to Pasadena goes through Autzen...and the Ducks have punched their ticket to THE ROSE BOWL!!!!

by UOfootball on Dec 18, 2009 1:50 PM PST up reply actions  

give me a break dude...

we’ve played some good offenses this year.

by davereg412 on Dec 18, 2009 1:52 PM PST up reply actions  

To Big Ten standards maybe..

Michigan?

The road to Pasadena goes through Autzen...and the Ducks have punched their ticket to THE ROSE BOWL!!!!

by UOfootball on Dec 18, 2009 1:56 PM PST up reply actions  

so freaking lame...

this whole “the big ten is a joke of a conference” is aging me. yes — we haven’t produced well in bowl games the last two years, but this is D1 competition we go against every week, and belitiling ohio states defensive accomplishments because of that perception is lame.

by davereg412 on Dec 18, 2009 2:00 PM PST up reply actions  

Big Ten is clearly better than the MAC or the SunBelt, or even The Big East. I agree with you about this. Hell, Purdue gave us a run for our money 2 years in a row.

by echo31 on Dec 18, 2009 2:02 PM PST up reply actions  

I wasn't trying

to belittle tOSU defense, but seriously strength of schedule is #61? That’s not perception about a conference. It is fact about the Buckeye schedule this year.

The road to Pasadena goes through Autzen...and the Ducks have punched their ticket to THE ROSE BOWL!!!!

by UOfootball on Dec 18, 2009 2:03 PM PST up reply actions  

No, the Big 10 isn’t a joke, other than the fact that they can’t count (rim shot). But the Pac 10 is a heck of a lot better. tOSU’s defensive accomplishments are just fine, but Oregon’s defense only looks mediocre until you look at the schedule they played. It was a hell of a lot tougher than tOSU’s.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Dec 18, 2009 5:11 PM PST up reply actions  

I would argue that the most important number is the final score and if your offense scored more than your defense allowed. Yes our defense gave up “24, 33, 36, 41, and fifty freaking one”, but our offense scored 31 to that 24, 37 to that 33, 38 to that 36, 44 to that 41(after 2 OTs) and 42 to that 51. Only one of those games was a loss, so clearly the more important number is the one that shows who SCORED the most points. Also, the point of this post is that part of the reason our defense gave up so many points at times was because our opponent had more chances to score because they had the ball for more minutes and more plays.

Seriously, take anOSU’s yards per play stat and multiply it by the amount of plays that our defense had to defend. Nevermind, I’ll do it.

anOSU = 4.07 yards per play and defended 774 plays for a totla of 3,150 yards allowed
UO = 4.58 yards per play and defended 864 plays for a total of 3,953 yards allowed

If anOSU had defended 864 plays, they would have allowed 3,516 yards
If UO had defended 774 plays, they would have allowed 3,544 yards

So, anOSU’s defense is better, but not by as much as a lot of people think.

by echo31 on Dec 18, 2009 1:58 PM PST up reply actions  

the point of the post was to convince me that your defense was good...

not that your offense was able to outscore the opponent. yes, the most important number is the final score, but we’re not arguing who won these games, we’re arguing how your defense performed in these games. and 24, 33, 36, 41 and 51 are not going to convince me of that

go look at the wisconsin — ohio state game. the badgers, a good offense, had the ball for almost 3 of the 4 quarters of football played, and they only managed 13 points.

by davereg412 on Dec 18, 2009 2:06 PM PST up reply actions  

Right, but our offense puts our defense on the field longer than most teams. Seriously, we either go 3 and out or score in less than 2 minutes. It’s a blessing and a curse.

by echo31 on Dec 18, 2009 2:09 PM PST up reply actions  

we’re arguing how your defense performed in these games. and 24, 33, 36, 41 and 51 are not going to convince me of that

So, you’ll completely dismiss analysis of WHY those scores happened based solely on the fact that you think they were too high?

Points allowed is neither explanatory or predictive. If I saw some team gave up 34 points, how do I know 28 of those points weren’t defensive TDs?

Wake Forrest only gave up 13 points to Navy, you guys gave up 27. Does that mean Wake Forrest has a better defense? Florida gave up 32 points to Alabama, surely they have had a bad defense. Pretty preposterous claims, in my opinion.

Oregon has a top 20 defense (FO), and I think that’s pretty good. From hearing what Ohio State fans have said, Oregon has an average-at-best defense. We’re about as tired of hearing about Oregon’s crappy/average/okay defense, as you are hearing “the big ten is a joke conference” sensationalism.

The “fancy statistics” are about the only way we can have an intellectual comparison without divulging into the “Big-10 offenses suck” or “Pac-10 defense, hahaha” crap that we both hate, because it takes the information on a play-by-play basis, and really analyzes the success and importance of it.

its spelled "S-h-u-t-t-h-e H e-l-l-U-p-F-E-L-T"

by JShufelt on Dec 18, 2009 3:35 PM PST up reply actions  

davereg412, why do YOU get so offended about our opinions about your opinions on 'Our Blog?'

   In some ways, you seem like you could be a pretty nice guy.
You kind of remind me of a beaver that comes on AtQ sometimes, wondering why we like to protect our turf. To them we replied 65-38 this past year, this year we say “Rose Bowl.”

For now, we are semi-patiently wondering whether not you will listen to the New Years reply for ‘d-average, whatever that reply will be.’

"We'll go."

by DONALDUCK on Dec 18, 2009 2:10 PM PST up reply actions  

i'm not offended...

i’m just contributing a buckeye fan’s perspective, is all. the reason i read this blog is because i feel i’m pretty level headed about things, and, quite honestly, i like the community here, and the good conversations that take place.

by davereg412 on Dec 18, 2009 2:13 PM PST up reply actions  

I was relating to your above post

with this quote “i never understand why some fans get so offended by the thought’s and opinions of the other fan base. who gives a crap what we think of your defense? it’s not going to matter come jan 1 anyway?”

Not offended? Just sayin’……sems like you are/were to me. But then wtf, I’m a Duck. (and a poet)

"We'll go."

by DONALDUCK on Dec 18, 2009 2:18 PM PST up reply actions  

i guess i see how my comments in this post have given that perception to you...

and feel kind of lame for it. you’re talking to a guy who has spent his entire life completely devoted to ohio state football, and for the last three years, have watched his program become the nations pinata. i think i need a drink to calm myself. last time i mentioned alcohol on this blog, i became a pariah.

i’m gonna go drink some… christmas ale?

by davereg412 on Dec 18, 2009 2:21 PM PST up reply actions  

Oh, the Pain!

Imagine mine. And I can’t drink anymore (allergy.) Same way for me but for Duck football. And for much longer. After the BS U fiasco, I was one of the small minority to stick with Coach Kelly, not knowing zakly what he was doing but having a faith in him because I’d watched and listened to him at practices, the way that he treated his players and feloow coaches. Such respect in all areas. And now, I didn’t get Rose Bowl tickets. Season ticket holder for many years, DAF donor (not enuf I guess), Alumus (MS’91), Oregon Club member AND, I didn’t get tickets. Pain? I got pain. I GOT PAIN. So, as they say around AtQ, welcome, and, if ya fuck up, somebody’s gonna call you on it and, if you’re like me, you need it, you’ll laugh, and you’ll be a better man (and blogger) for it.

"We'll go."

by DONALDUCK on Dec 18, 2009 2:34 PM PST up reply actions  

You’re welcome:


its spelled "S-h-u-t-t-h-e H e-l-l-U-p-F-E-L-T"

by JShufelt on Dec 18, 2009 2:57 PM PST up reply actions  

Now you’re speaking our language.

It's spelled "T-H-E-I-M-P-A-C-T"

I support inroywetrust in his support of The VD Special in his support of me supporting Roger Kieschnick in his quest to becoming the best Kieschnick ever to play professional baseball.

by Takimoto on Dec 18, 2009 4:38 PM PST up reply actions  

Thanks for the shout-out...

…the per-play thing is so important to good analysis, I think. Mizzou gave up a ton of passing yards last year (116th in the country), but nobody ever pointed out that a) they faced more passes than just about everybody else because they had a great run defense and were usually ahead in the game, and b) they faced the best collection of pass offenses in the country…you have to take per-play numbers and competition into account, especially with the hurry-up systems at Oregon, Oklahoma, etc., and that’s not always done.

Rock M Nation
Thrust nunchuk upward!

by Bill C. on Dec 18, 2009 2:08 PM PST reply actions  

Not to be all creepy… but… can I bear your child?

its spelled "S-h-u-t-t-h-e H e-l-l-U-p-F-E-L-T"

by JShufelt on Dec 18, 2009 2:26 PM PST up reply actions  

Well,

There has not been a comment thread turned homoerotic in some time. I suppose it was bound to happen again.

Juju, you have already blessed the Duck masses by diverting Terrelle Pryor to Columbus Ohio; and in the process granted us one magical Masoli who happens to be "sicker than E-Coli (I know from experience with E-Coli, Masoli must be pretty damn sick)". We are all mutually gracious for this blessing. However, in our time of dearest need, we request that one Terrelle Pryor succumb to your overwhelming collegiate football dictation skillz.
Your very own Humble servant,
CaDuck

by CaDuck on Dec 21, 2009 6:39 PM PST up reply actions  

I’ll take that as a “maybe when I’m ready to settle down”

its spelled "S-h-u-t-t-h-e H e-l-l-U-p-F-E-L-T"

by JShufelt on Dec 18, 2009 2:53 PM PST up reply actions  

  "You a smooooth talker, Vinnie, a real smooth talker.

"We'll go."

by DONALDUCK on Dec 18, 2009 2:59 PM PST up reply actions  

I would like to see number of points given up per possession. Does anyone compile the numbers that way?

Points per play may not take into account big play scores vs. long drive scores. At least not in a way that I easily conceptualize.

by encephalopath on Dec 18, 2009 2:35 PM PST up reply actions  

big play scores, yes...long drive scores, no...

…but that’s where Brian Fremeau’s per-possession FEI ratings come into play.

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/statistics/fei-ratings/2009

He has Oregon’s defense at #20 in his Defensive FEI…so pretty similar in the end…

Rock M Nation
Thrust nunchuk upward!

by Bill C. on Dec 18, 2009 2:37 PM PST up reply actions  

Bill Connelly!

Good to see you over here.

Addicted To Quack [dot] com
Now with even more vitriol.

by qrsouther on Dec 18, 2009 3:40 PM PST up reply actions  

Davereg412 we appreciate your presence on our blog...

You seem to have fairly level headed opinions that (given your love for your team) attempt to remain as objective as possible. I always try to do the same. I can tell you I am one Duck fanatic who is worried about your guys’ defense and also worried that we may see a rejuvenated tOSU offense that has pulled a couple plays out of the Oregon playbook (after watching so much film on us). Stanford did this to us effectively with three or four zone read running plays that went for decent gains of first downs. That being said I think you must take into account our constant no huddle offense and the impact this has on defensive statistics. Again, I am not saying our defense is great. But they are good and looking at the yards per play we give up, yards per rush and red-zone statistics will show you this. The reason we are not yet a great defense is our third down conversion rate we allow. Again, we enjoy seeing the view of the opponent so keep coming around.

by NICKPAPAGEORGIOTHEDUCK on Dec 18, 2009 2:35 PM PST reply actions  

We should send davereg412 beer… the real thing. See what he likes…

by encephalopath on Dec 18, 2009 8:38 PM PST up reply actions  

Donald Duck

go anyway. there will be tickets there. I guarantee a bunch of Duck fans scooped up 4-8 tickets not knowing who they would be for and will have people cancel/backout/not show and want to get rid of their tickets. Hopefully Im not eating crow and shelling out $350 for a crappy seat. fingers crossed

by NICKPAPAGEORGIOTHEDUCK on Dec 18, 2009 2:40 PM PST reply actions  

Thanx for the nice thots Nick the Duck

  My dilemma is that I am mobility handicapped (wheelchair sometimes) and needed a H/C parking spot in order to get close to the stadium, ya know? So, you see, I guess there is so difficulty…? But, thank you really, from the heart.

"We'll go."

by DONALDUCK on Dec 18, 2009 2:53 PM PST up reply actions  

Surprise, surprise

I finally “got” this concept yesterday. Oregon’s high paced offense gives their opponents more possessions than they would get if Oregon played a ball control offense. Giving your opponents more opportunities means you are going to get scored on more. There’s no way around that.

Oregon’s game plan is the berserker model. Kill as many of the enemy as quickly as possible even if it means taking more risks to you own safety. As long as you kill more than you lose, you get the W.

Wins come when your abilty to stop your opponent, plus your own ability to score exceeds that of your opponent.

Does the Defensive ranking only take into account total yards and points given up? As the post details, that may not be the best measure for assessing the effectiveness of Oregon’s defense.

by encephalopath on Dec 18, 2009 2:52 PM PST reply actions  

as a duck fan i see the two main factors:

1.) our 2nd down conversions (who needs three downs anyways except for old school, out-of-date offenses)

2. ) their 3rd down conversions

yes i’m taking the Fightin’ Ducks – 3 1/2

Life is about growth. People are not perfect when they're 21 years old. - Bill Walton

by NEP on Dec 18, 2009 3:05 PM PST reply actions  

So Dave is really Jim… huh?

http://www.thebuckeyebattlecry.com/?p=4219

Not sure how the the football transitive property gets applied through statistical rankings, but… OK.

by encephalopath on Dec 18, 2009 3:37 PM PST reply actions  

well

that makes me feel better.

--Dave
Addicted to Quack, SBN's Oregon Ducks blog

by David Piper on Dec 18, 2009 4:30 PM PST up reply actions  

Oh… I get it.

JT quoted tBBC post first.

davereg412 didn’t have anything to do with that.

by encephalopath on Dec 18, 2009 4:18 PM PST up reply actions  

I’m happy that tBBC responded.

its spelled "S-h-u-t-t-h-e H e-l-l-U-p-F-E-L-T"

by JShufelt on Dec 18, 2009 4:34 PM PST reply actions  

FCS championship game

Starts in 10 minutes, anyone watching? I watched the Montana App State game last week and found it to be surprisingly entertaining.

by QuackinAK on Dec 18, 2009 4:52 PM PST reply actions  

That is

The team Roper now plays for correct? Has he seen any playing time in the playoffs?

Sunny Pasadena on New Year's Day......

by UOfootball on Dec 18, 2009 5:21 PM PST reply actions  

i thought

he went to Montana St?

Under winter skies
We stand glorious
And with Oden on our side
We are victorious

by WhiteRabbit on Dec 19, 2009 12:20 PM PST up reply actions  

Go Griz!

Sunny Pasadena on New Year's Day......

by UOfootball on Dec 18, 2009 5:40 PM PST reply actions  

Nice pick

Sunny Pasadena on New Year's Day......

by UOfootball on Dec 18, 2009 5:51 PM PST reply actions  

I love your analysis, Jlight...

it just confirms what we see on the field. I can argue until I am blue in the face about how good are defense is but people just look at statistics and not the context.

Outside of Purdue and Stanford, I was very happy with our defense. Our defense played well against Arizona and Oregon State. In each of those games the Rose Bowl was on the line. Arizona was completely jacked up to play us with GameDay coming to their stadium for the first time every. If they could overcome us, they’d be the favorite to go the Rosebowl, which is still something they’ve never accomplished.

Do I need to say anything about the civil war?

Oregon State and Arizona are teams that can put numbers up on any defense in the country. Arizona will definitely get their chance against NU. We got OS and UA’s very best shot.

tOSU is going to do a better job in keeping the score lower than probably anyone we’ve faced. The problem I see for tOSU is that I believe our defense is better than their offense. I also think that the defenses are at an advantage in this game with the layoff. I really think that tOSU is going to have a really difficult time moving the ball. Aliotti is great with time to prepare against the rush. The two teams that beat us had very accurate downfield passers. A mobile quarterback is not a concern form because we have speed in spades on defense. I think we get to key in on the run and stop their offense. Our offense is going to struggle in the first half but slowly “chip” away at their defense and we’ll get enough spurts compared to sputters to put the game away.

  

by BisonDucks on Dec 18, 2009 6:10 PM PST reply actions  

Good stuff Bison

Apart from the Stanford game, i think our D has stepped up in key situations when they really needed to. I am actually kind of glad no one is giving our defense any respect, hopefully January 1st the Duck D will show the country what they are capable of.

Sunny Pasadena on New Year's Day......

by UOfootball on Dec 18, 2009 6:40 PM PST up reply actions  

Somebody gets it...

Bison, I’m a newbie to this sight and I can see that a lot of Duck fans know
their football. I have to say that you get it. The match up that will determine
the Rose Bowl that is.
I watched 4 Oregon games this year, BSU, OSU, Arizona, and USC. With the
exception of Boise, I thought the ‘09 duck offense looked as strong as the ’01
team that got screwed out of the BCS title game.
The other thing that got my attention was how quick the Duck D-line
moved for a line with their size. They are tall and heavy. The one
thing I saw that I think Ohio State can exploit is the slant and underneath
crossing route by the Buckeye TE’s. The #1 TE for Ohio State is 6’5" and runs
a good 4.65, 4.7. The #2 TE is 6’6", runs a legitimate 4.5, and has about a 30"
vertical leap. Last year he was a wideout as a freshman. If Pryor can somehow
learn to throw the slant accurately and can check down to his #3 receiver I think
the Buckeyes can move at will against the Ducks. I say this because I think the
LB’s are fast but undersized while the DB’s seemed to be a bit slow and can be
a weakness for Oregon if Pryor can learn how to pass without telegraphing his
passes. The Duck defense seemed to be well conditioned and have a lot of
stamina, but they didn’t seem to have the depth a good defense needs to compete
late in the season. This really won’t matter in a bowl game, though.
There is one thing I don’t the Oregon defense can prepare for and that’s the
speed and quickness that Pryor has. I’ve attended several Ohio State games
and I can say without a doubt that Pryor’s speed and quickness can’t be judged
by watching him on TV or film. I was at the ‘05 Texas vs OSU game and saw Vince
Young play, he was a stud, but Pryor is faster and quicker and just as strong.
All I can say is I think that this year’s Rose Bowl will be the best bowl game of the
year and that includes the BCS championship.

by BornABuckeye on Dec 18, 2009 9:59 PM PST up reply actions  

They practice against Jm every week,

read Rob Moseley’s blog about competition day and then check the stats and/or view the Washington game about Locker.
  Will TP get free? Maybe but he’ll pay to play that day, OK?
  If he can hit a slant or two, that’ll help, I’m sure, and that’s a good read. It looks open but it’s got to be quick and our line is so tall, it must be balls on accurate.
As to the speed of our secondary. I think that you are going to be surprised, perhaps Pleasant-ly surprised if Eddie drops into coverage on the tight ends.
Here’s the url for Moseley: http://www2.registerguard.com/cms/index.php/duck-football/index/

"We'll go."

by DONALDUCK on Dec 18, 2009 10:45 PM PST up reply actions  

I don’t think there is a question over that. Pryor is quicker than Masoli.

its spelled "S-h-u-t-t-h-e H e-l-l-U-p-F-E-L-T"

by JShufelt on Dec 19, 2009 12:31 AM PST up reply actions  

really?

             are you funnin’ me?

"We'll go."

by DONALDUCK on Dec 19, 2009 12:37 PM PST up reply actions  

No doubt.

its spelled "S-h-u-t-t-h-e H e-l-l-U-p-F-E-L-T"

by JShufelt on Dec 19, 2009 2:51 PM PST up reply actions  

As a Buckeye fan, I’d say it’s not really close but the other way. Masoli is quicker than TP but TP gobbles up yardage like Pac-Man gobbles up ghosts. You don’t recognize it’s happening but then you look up and 20 yards are gone.

by gahnki on Dec 19, 2009 7:19 PM PST up reply actions  

Wow

It is really asking a lot of a QB to learn to throw a slant accurately and check down to the third option in the few practices between the regular season and bowl.

Considering the Buckeye TEs had 15 catches all year I don’t think they will be a huge part of the game.

by jfwells on Dec 18, 2009 10:17 PM PST up reply actions  

Clarification

Should say that they won’t be a huge part of the game receiving the ball. Definitely will play a big part blocking.

Am much more concerned about Brandon Saine catching passes out of the backfield.

by jfwells on Dec 18, 2009 10:22 PM PST up reply actions  

Good info on the TEs… this is what I’ve been looking for.

“If Pryor can somehow
learn to throw the slant accurately and can check down to his #3 receiver I think
the Buckeyes can move at will against the Ducks”

That’s been the problem all year hasn’t it? Pryor’s ability to make good reads and accurate throws in the passing game. In that regard I think tOSU’s offense ends up looking a bit like Washington’s (though I think Locker passes better): Lots of talent, but inconsistent performance.

If they could get everything together and play a reliably consistent game, the players are there for Ohio State to be a top notch offense. Will that happen in a bowl game when it hasn’t previously? Hmmmm…. I don’t know.

by encephalopath on Dec 18, 2009 10:17 PM PST up reply actions  

I like the analysis on the slant plays. Oregon does play a lot of zone blitz so slants to the TE may be effective in a change of pace, especially if its the #1 option for Pryor. Our corners have good speed but it isn’t blazing. We’re also fairly light in the secondary because of injury. Those guys have done well for the most part. It will be an interesting matchup on the edges, especially if Pryor can make some completions early

--Dominic, Addicted to Quack

Autzen Stadium is where great teams go to die." - J. Brady McCullough, The Michigan Daily.

by dvieira on Dec 18, 2009 11:07 PM PST up reply actions  

That’s exactly what I was thinking. Of all the areas that I think Oregon has been weak at this year on defense, it’s the quick slants. The flats either result in a huge gain, or a huge loss. The success Canfield and Foles had were from quick passes. Luck just had the most ridiculous deep throws.

its spelled "S-h-u-t-t-h-e H e-l-l-U-p-F-E-L-T"

by JShufelt on Dec 19, 2009 12:34 AM PST up reply actions  

Good match up

this is a good match up for the Ducks offense. i live in Ohio and i have watched almost every Ohio State game for the past four years. Their defense has struggled against almost every spread offense they have faced. a couple of years back when Illinois still knew how to run a decent spread Juice Williams and Rashard Mendenhall punished the Buckeyes defense all day long. They have struggled against Navy and Purdue. Florida and LSU ran the spread well; but not nearly as well as Oregon will and they both bitch slapped TOSU’s defense.

by TBwin on Dec 18, 2009 6:39 PM PST reply actions  

This isn’t particularly true at all. In fact, it’s a product of the shoddy analysis that the original post refers too. The media ran with the “OSU can’t defend the spread angle” because it was the only common denominator they could see with their limited view of football.

Ohio State did not lose to Florida because they couldn’t defend a spread. They lost because Florida started every scoring drive but one on Ohio State’s side of the field. The average yards Florida drove to score was in the 30’s. The Ohio State offense totaled 82 yards on the night.

If Oregon lets Ohio State start almost every possession on their side of the field then it will look like Oregon can’t stop the Buckeye offense. And that would be false.

Illinois scored 28 points on the Buckeyes in 2007, and one touchdown was a fumble in the end zone that was missed by the refs. Hardly “unstoppable.”

Navy’s triple option is very unique. Nothing like what a traditional spread-option team runs.

LSU does not run a spread. They run a multiple offense. Most of LSU’s yards came from power football.

And, yes, Purdue runs a spread offense and scored 26 points. Ohio State also had 5 turnovers on the day. Guess which had more to do with the outcome? If OSU turns the ball over 5 times then I won’t feel strongly about their chances of winning no matter the opponent.


Their defense has struggled against almost every spread offense they have faced.

Holy Hyperbole, Batman!

by gahnki on Dec 18, 2009 8:34 PM PST up reply actions  

As a native Louisianan, I would like to submit that LSU runs a “Here, let’s give this a whirl” offense.

by AllSaintsDay on Dec 18, 2009 9:33 PM PST up reply actions  

That’s really funny. I can’t confirm that it’s true, but it’s still funny.

by encephalopath on Dec 18, 2009 9:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Yea, they really just throw a bunch of different stuff together each week and see if it works.

by gahnki on Dec 19, 2009 10:03 AM PST up reply actions  

You have all the angles covered

Those are some awesome excuses. Illinois had 260 rushing yards. I would call that unstoppable.Over the last few years offenses that spread the field and have capable personnel give Ohio States defense trouble. I would love to hear your next list of excuses.

by TBwin on Dec 19, 2009 8:59 PM PST up reply actions  

Did anyone actually watch OSU play this season?

I watched a lot of OSU games, they struggled, they lost to USC and Purdue. Good D? Yes, against the Big-10, hohum. Good offense, they did beat Iowa in overtime (sarcasm). Can’t wait to watch this game live in Pasadena, but in the meantime, check out this new video – Oregon Ducks Football Highlights 2009 with I Love My Ducks by Supwitchugirl as the soundtrack – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pIX18y-AkEc

by themilman on Dec 18, 2009 8:44 PM PST reply actions  

They beat Iowa in overtime when Iowa didn’t have its starting quarterback. I don’t know what to make of that. I didn’t watch that game.

Something I’ve been wondering about: For the two games Oregon lost, Oregon fans have a pretty good, detailed explanation of what happened.

With tOSU, all I’ve seen to explain their losses is, for USC, its was an early team-out-of-synch loss. And for Purdue, well tOSU looked like they were asleep that game.

I want to know from them, what went wrong? What element of your team’s game didn’t execute the way you thought it should or the way it did later?

Maybe tBBC can address those questions. As an Oregon fan watching the bowl game, I want the Ohio State people to educate me about what I’m going to see from their team. When is the stuff they do well working and when is it not? So far that hasn’t hasn’t happened.

by encephalopath on Dec 18, 2009 8:57 PM PST up reply actions  

Exactly!

All you hear from them is: “Oregon hasn’t played a defense as good as ours all year.”

Well what makes it good? Who are the players that are standouts? Is there something schematically that they do that is special, or is it all because of the magic fairy dust?

Enlighten us.

by jfwells on Dec 18, 2009 10:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Oklahoma

I sat in the Oklahoma section when they played at Autzen a few year ago and it was actually pretty nice. (Bought the tickets from OU fan on the way in).

They were friendly and knowledge about their team. I would point at a player on the field and ask, “Who is that guy?” And they would tell me something about his abilities and his play through his career. It was an interesting way to watch the game and I enjoyed it.

We and the tOSU fans will be watching this game together, spiritually speaking, on New Years Day. “Sitting in the Oklahoma section” is what I hope to elicit out of them before game day.

by encephalopath on Dec 18, 2009 11:03 PM PST up reply actions  

To be fair

Most Oregon fans describe BSU as an “early season, out-of-synch loss” mainly because that’s the easiest way to describe a game where almost everything went wrong – coaching, line play, offensive execution, etc.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Dec 18, 2009 11:05 PM PST up reply actions  

But when they elaborate, they will mention the booth to coach communication difficulties, the new offensive line, shotgun snap inconsistency, the difficulty of running the mesh exchange on the spread option (way better now than then).

Considering the number of turnovers the Oregon D played pretty well. On and on and on… the answer isn’t just the we sucked in the first game.

by encephalopath on Dec 18, 2009 11:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Consider that this below-average Oregon defense..

.. held Boise State to about half of its season scoring average.

those who do not remember history should read my blog...

by benzduck on Dec 19, 2009 12:33 AM PST up reply actions  

Sure, but neither is the answer for why tOSU lost either of their games…all you’re suggesting is that Oregon has somewhat smarter, or at least more verbose fans.

Also, I think the D struggled for most of the first three quarters. The linebackers were all over the place, and not in a good way. The D-Line didn’t get much going at the line of scrimmage. The Boise St. offense was underperforming pretty badly as well.

Pretty much everything except Jackson Rice, Michael Clay, and some solid secondary play went wrong that game.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Dec 19, 2009 8:54 AM PST up reply actions  

The linebackers sold their blitzes prior to the snap, they all but showed Kellen Moore their play.

Neither team played well in that game. Masoli was awful as he only targeted Maehl, on some well covered deep fade route half the game.

its spelled "S-h-u-t-t-h-e H e-l-l-U-p-F-E-L-T"

by JShufelt on Dec 19, 2009 9:25 AM PST up reply actions  

Our receivers dropped several passes (I’m looking at Jamere) which didn’t help Masoli’s confidence. Masoli seemed very mechanical, and reluctant to turn up the field and run it. The offensive line was blowing assignments the whole game and seemed confused, specifically that play where BSU got the safety: the center and the guard pulled but nobody picked up the the D-tackle and LB As a result they got into the backfield before the hand-off, LGB didn’t have a chance. The D-line got zero penetration most of the night, Kellen Moore had all day to hit his receivers. Most of this stuff has been corrected more or less.

by QuackinAK on Dec 19, 2009 6:28 PM PST up reply actions  

Love The Screen Name..

encephalopath, love the screen name. I have a friend who’s an encephalopod.
He’s smart and in the Navy. Almost an oxymoron, huh?
Concerning Ohio State’s losses, blame the USC loss on the coaching
staff for ultraconservative playcalling throughout the game, especially
the goal line offense. As for Purdue, too many turnovers and the players
admitted in post game interviews they took Purdue too lightly and they
went into the game against the Boilers expecting an easy victory. They
were surprised at how hard Purdue played. Overconfidence. Kills the
very best of teams.
Concerning the Buckeyes and the Rose Bowl, I look for the Bucks to
establish the run early in the game. The Buckeyes didn’t have the same
O-line starting lineup for 2 consecutive games until the 7th & 8th games
of the season. This is when they started to establish their identity as a run
first, pass when necessary offense. This is also about the time that Pryor
started to make good decisions concerning taking care of the ball.
The Buckeyes have 2 outstanding wideouts in Posey and Sanzenbacher.
Posey has speed and moves and Sazenbacher will catch anything if he
can get a hand on the ball, period. Also, the Buckeyes have 2 very good,
but not great RB’s. One of them, #1, Boom Herron, was the RB that ran
over USC safety Taylor Mays and made Mays less effective as a player
for the remainder of the year.
The Buckeye defense is extremely fast, quick, deep, and disciplined. They
are well conditioned and have good stamina. They go 8-9 deep on the line,
5 deep on their LB corp, and 6 deep in the secondary. They more often than
not line up in a nickel package to add more speed to the middle of the defense.
The Bucks don’t blitz as often as I’d like them to, but their quickness makes up
for it. When they do blitz, it is usually a zone or delayed blitz as this will usually
set up the opposing offense to not expect an all out blitz from 2-3 people or
the corner or safety blitz from a standard 4-3 defense. This is the only
predictable pattern I’ve seen from the Buckeye defense this year. Even
when they play a predominantly running team they still employ a nickel
package with alarming regularity. This is to keep people fresh and to increase
overall team speed.
As for individual players, Kurt Coleman, #4, Safety, will hurt anyone who comes
into his area because of his hard hitting. He’s never out of position and I haven’t
seen him miss a tackle since ‘07. #97, Cameron Heyward, one man wrecking
crew. #90, Thaddeus Gibson, & #43, Nate Williams, both converted LB’s who
line up at the rush DE position. They don’t always get the sack but they have
more hurries than opposing QB’s care to acknowledge. When it comes to the
LB’s, there is no weakness. Size, speed, quickness, depth, and experience.
The Buckeye defense is strong because the players are hardly ever out of
position and they have confidence in each other to make the play. The only
weakness I see in this defense is they tend to give up the early score easily
but make adjustments accordingly to shut down any opposing offense.
    

by BornABuckeye on Dec 18, 2009 11:07 PM PST up reply actions  

employing a nickel most of the time will make sense against Oregon as well, just because of our offensive packages. Oregon has a very unique misdirection game that gets set up from the get go. A 3 and out for us might be a “good thing” in certain situations because of the plays it will set up later in the game. A key to beating Oregon is to tackle well and stay at home.

Oregon spends the first 10-15 plays of the game figuring out how the defense will play them. If you can get stops early, don’t expect to consistently get stops later unless you can adjust quickly scheme wise. If Tressel and staff can keep Oregon off balance on the play calling side and minimize big plays, it’s a lot easier to get stops

--Dominic, Addicted to Quack

Autzen Stadium is where great teams go to die." - J. Brady McCullough, The Michigan Daily.

by dvieira on Dec 18, 2009 11:13 PM PST up reply actions  

YES

You are the man we want to talk to… and bring video.

by encephalopath on Dec 18, 2009 11:14 PM PST up reply actions  

AWESOME, AWESOME, AWESOME!!!!

BaB, thanks for stopping by, feel free to look around, grab a “good” beer, watch a video or two and stay a while.

Love the analysis of anOSU’s team. Thank you again!

Oregon State, Oklahoma State, Ohio State..just another OSU. Free Dennis Dixon!!!

by Matt Daddy on Dec 19, 2009 9:52 AM PST up reply actions  

ANOTHER VIDEO FOR DUCK FANS

I made a another video, Ohio State LOWLIGHTS, pretty funny, watch here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLHAYmWvlvk

by themilman on Dec 21, 2009 11:28 AM PST up reply actions  

YES... reply

encephalopath and dvieira,
Please remember that it’s 2:18 in the eastern time zone and the
beer is starting to have an effect.
I grew up on the Ohio State campus and went to school there.
Some of my neighbors are former OSU players.
The preceding statements were meant to shed light on my
background concerning Ohio State football.
I’ve been at the last 2 Ohio State – Oregon State games as
well as the last Ohio State – Oregon game in Ohio Stadium.
Are you guys aware that Belotti interviewed for the Ohio State
coaching job in 2001 before Tressel got the job?
encephalopath, I wish could bring video but my DVR
decided to take a vacation a week before the michigan game
and hasn’t come back yet.
My fellow Buckeye friends all say that Oregon has never beaten
Ohio State. I say that I’m afraid of the law of averages catching up
with my beloved Buckeyes. I also point out that this is 2009 and that
past records don’t have anything to do with this game. I can’t believe
how some CFB fans don’t get the fact that THIS IS WHY YOU PLAY
THE GAME ON THE FIELD!
While I don’t agree at all with Blount being allowed to play again,
I admit that he adds a dimension to the Duck offense I hate to see.
His ability to run isn’t the issue, it’s his blocking ability on pass plays
that concerns me. He brings the size, durability, and blocking ability
that cold weather teams need late in the season. SEC teams will never
understand this as they don’t play in snow and freezing rain.
Blount sat out the last 10-1/2 games for Oregon and this means he
is hungry and fresh for the Rose Bowl.
As for Masoli, he scares the hell out of me. I’ve been fortunate enough
to see John Elway, Drew Brees, Troy Smith, Vince Young, and Tom Brady
play live. If Masoli ever gets the patience to sit in the pocket and wait
for his primary to come open, he will be up there with Plunkett, Palmer,
Leinert, and Jake Locker in Pac 10 history. I’d bet $100.00 on it.
e&d, It’s almost 3:00 AM and I have to work tomorrow. I’ll be back
tomorrow night or Sunday morning. You guys have a good night
and I hope you get laid tonight if that’s what you’re looking for.
“Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son” – Dean
Wormer, Animal House
“But it’s a hell of a way to go through college” – J. Ferris
My college room mate’s response to our boss when he
was late to work one morning after we had been out
bar hopping the previous night.
I miss my youth more than my wife will ever know!

by BornABuckeye on Dec 19, 2009 12:04 AM PST reply actions  

Welcome, BornABuckeye, thanks for your detailed and level headed thoughts.

Animal House was filmed at the U of Oregon so I love your reference and leave you with the Arizona game creed (maybe the Iowa game creed for you):

D-Day: War’s over, man. Wormer dropped the big one.
Bluto: Over? Did you say “over”? Nothing is over until we decide it is! Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no!
Otter: Germans?
Boon: Forget it, he’s rolling.
Bluto: And it ain’t over now. ‘Cause when the goin’ gets tough…
[thinks hard]
Bluto: the tough get goin’! Who’s with me? Let’s go!
[runs out, alone; then returns]

A House of Spears > An Ingram

by Bill Musgrave on Dec 19, 2009 7:39 AM PST up reply actions  

BBC is turning into a flame WAR

He had a decent analysis comparing the two rushing defenses, but still seemed to miss the whole point jtlight’s been trying to get across about yards per play. Also they seem to be really defensive about the fact that we’ve beat the two teams that beat them. I honestly don’t think it means a whole lot, but it’s hard to ignore completely.

by ppilot on Dec 19, 2009 11:26 AM PST reply actions  

It is up to Ducks D to win this game

jtlight, mattdaddy, and BaB…thanks for hitting on the main issue of this game.

What I can’t quantify is average time-of-drive for buckeye scores. I am also looking for t.o.p. for drives of 70 yds or longer. I don’t know if it is actually relevant, but it seems it should be. OSU avg t.o.p. per game is 30:40. for about 29 pts. Ducks are at 26 min for 37 pts. If the buckeyes get 4-6 minutes more than avg holding the ball, can they convert that into the two scores they need to win?

Buckeyes have one (1) Conference 1st Team player at Safety (suspect he will be a spy on the “should have been first team” PAC-10 Conf QB. And three 2nd teamers on D. Ducks were able to outscore several teams with better individual defensive players: UCLA; USC; OSU, AZ. Ducks O is a game of matchups that Coach Kelly and Masoli have learned to exploit as they have played through the season.

Back to my original question, does the buckeye O show the ability to put together long, time consuming 6-8 minute drives, that result in 7 pts? If not, Ducks D will limit them to 30 pts and still win running away.

I’ll see everyone down there!!!!!

by rckymtnduck on Dec 20, 2009 2:01 PM PST reply actions  

rose bowl

first post, from columbus. hope we show well, as Tressel-ball is sometimes painful even for us back here in flyover country. love your state: been to Bandon twice, and third trip scheduled for next Sept. You guys know the wine thing too.

by buckeyegolfer on Dec 20, 2009 5:00 PM PST reply actions  

Bandon=Homesick

Thanks, now I need some MIsty Meadows Hucklberry Jam RIGHT NOW.

College--the best nine years of my life

by AZDeadHeadDuck on Dec 21, 2009 10:20 AM PST up reply actions  

Welcome buckeyegolfer.

  What so painful about T Ball? IYO?

We’ve got some international prize winners in wine from Oregon this year but I’ve not heard about ’em on AtQ.
Tako Tuesday usually features malted beverages but you could start a fan post and see if you can catch somebody in your backfield, so to speak.

"We'll go."

by DONALDUCK on Dec 20, 2009 7:38 PM PST reply actions  

OSU analysis

Just a couple of thoughts from an OSU fan’s perspective.

OSU on offense…At the beginning of the season, OSU attempted to run more shotgun/spread principles without actually running the best spread play (the read option). Pryor struggled severly in the shotgun and making the appropriate reads. After the Purdue game two things changed: (1) OSU’s offensive line became healthier; and, (2) OSU played from under center with running backs more often (for an Oregon fan that likes to watch a FB block, Zach Boren is pretty good). OSU’s strength on O the last five games is to establish the power running game and mixing in a playaction pass. OSU does have a game breaking receiving in Posey; however, he doesn’t get the number of balls per game to make him a national name. Sanzenbacher is a nice over the middle receiving who acts as a TE because OSU never throws to the TE. OSU’s RBs lack the vision of UO’s James but Saine has the speed (and really good hands) of Mr. James. Herron has the toughness to grind out yards. Against Michigan, OSU actually ran the spread option consistently for the first time all year. OSU’s offense, obviously, was much more difficult to stop. Pryor is one of the most deceptively fast players I have ever seen (I always thought VY looked fast, Pryor doesn’t look fast). Against, Penn St. Pryor connected on a long pass to Posey. Against Iowa and Michigan, he didn’t although it was open. I think OSU’s success in the Rose Bowl will be determined by Pryor’s ability to stretch the UO’s defense. If the threat to go deep is legit, OSU will be able to run the ball effectively. If there is no deep threat, UO will be able to load the box. OSU’s offensive line is above average. They have the ability to lean on smaller lines (see, Michigan…and don’t laugh because Michigan does have some good DL’s…see Graham) when pass protection is not the number 1 priority. If Oregon jumps out to a lead, OSU’s O-line will have their hands full. In general, OSU’s offense isn’t as a bad as they might seem. OSU could have scored more points throughout the season but Tressel calls a very conservative game. It will be interesting to see if Tressel comes out with new wrinkles. He has in the past (except against Florida) and they were successful (see against Texas with Pryor playing receiver and against LSU, it was 10-0 before OSU sh*t the bed, using Brandon Saine out of the backfield).

OSU’s Defense…This is a solid group of players, as I am sure everyone in Oregon has already been told. There are few weaknesses in the defense and those are in the secondary. The best part about OSU’s defense is the D-line. Cameron Heyward could be the best Defensive lineman in the country (actually second best behind Suh, what a stud) if he played consistently. He doesn’t. Thad Gibson and Nate Williams are fast DE’s who can put pressure on a QB quickly; however, Gibson tends to find himself out of position on good fakes. Doug Worthington is a good college DT. OSU does find depth along the line with Simon, Delinger, Larimore, Wilson and Rose. Other than Simon, those others provide size without the same quickness and speed. OSU’s D-line speed is great if Heyward bumps down to DT and Williams plays DE. I spent a lot of time on the D-line because if it is possible to stop Oregon, Gibson, Williams, Heyward, and Worthington is the type of defensive front to do it. The LBs are good but not great. Homan is solid but lacks elite speed and Rolle has the speed but finds himself not shedding blockers or overpursing a play too often. Spitler is a good third LB with a typical run stuffing attitude but lacks top end speed to chase sideline to sideline. OSU’s biggest problem on Defense is the secondary. Coleman is a stud at strong safety, but can be caught out of position in coverage. The CBs Chekwa and Torrence are great athletes who are big and fast. Chekwa has problems locating the ball in the air and downgrades him from great to good. Torrence is solid but lacks experience. The free safety position has been a nightmare (in my opinion) for OSU. Anderson Russell was a three year starter who just gets burnt in pass coverage against good teams (see gaming winning pass in Fiesta Bowl against Texas). Jermale Hines took his spot but has been dealing with injuries.

My biggest concern is that OSU’s nickel coverage includes Russell. He can be beat deep (Navy did it twice, NAVY!). The fun part about the Rose Bowl will be how Oregon’s offensive line plays. The read-option is almost unstoppable if the O-line blocks well. OSU has the ability to knock around Masoli and slow down James if breakdowns occur. I would be surprised if Oregon uses Blount in the Rose Bowl. OSU is built to stop RBs like Mr. Blount but is not quite as good at tackling the little man (watch Joe McKight make some HUGE plays against OSU). A healthy does of Mr. James might be too much to handle for OSU. Masoli must also keep the pressure off of the running game with some short and safe throws which he has been able to complete throughout the season. I don’t see that changing unless OSU blitzes more than usual (primarily a zone defense since 2001). Should be fun and exciting on that side of the ball.

As for special teams, OSU’s punter is struggling right now. Thoma prevents a lot of returns due to his short average and good angling of the kick, but he hasn’t been stricking the ball well. OSU is expected to get back Pettrey at kicker which would be a boost, he is good. I would except the level of atheletes to be similar at the other positions on the special teams units. OSU does have a bad reputation for not having speed but that mostly relates to the offensive and defensive lines. The special team units are good for OSU. Ray Small is a fantastic PR for OSU and has elite speed. He also returns kicks along with Lamaar Thomas who also is a fantastic athlete. I think OSU’s special teams are as good as anyone’s with Pettrey healthy.

Remember, Tressel IS a good big game coach. The last three bowl games (and USC in 2008) were against FAR better football teams than OSU. Period. Before these last three or four years, Tressel was undefeated in BCS games. I know, I know, the phantom flag against Miami shouldn’t count, etc…however; that Miami team was LOADED and they actually had to kick a FG to even get to OT.

I think Oregon has an advantage in this game due to the success of running the read option play with great athletes. I am not sure Oregon is FAR better than OSU and for that reason I think it will be a good game. The balance could tip in OSU’s favor depending on how the Oregon O-line plays against a great OSU D-line (and if Heyward shows up every play like he did against Penn St.). All in all, I look for a good game on Jan. 1.

Good luck Oregon.

Andy

by OSU2010 on Dec 21, 2009 8:46 AM PST reply actions  

OSU does find depth along the line with Simon, Delinger, Larimore, Wilson and Rose.

Your defensive depth won’t matter since we don’t give teams time to make substitutions

by echo31 on Dec 21, 2009 10:16 AM PST up reply actions  

This was more than a couple of thoughts.

So so many more than a couple.

A House of Spears > An Ingram

by Bill Musgrave on Dec 21, 2009 3:06 PM PST up reply actions  

By the length of this, this is something I’ve likely been looking for for a very long time.

I’ll have to actually read it when I get a chance.

its spelled "S-h-u-t-t-h-e H e-l-l-U-p-F-E-L-T"

by JShufelt on Dec 21, 2009 3:07 PM PST up reply actions  

If I May...

I’d like to piggyback on OSU2010’s and echo31’s comments…

There are two main reasons Ohio State has the advantage on defense. Hopefully I can clear these up.

The first reason is the D-Line. It’s been said before but it bears repeating; you don’t defend the option, you attack it. Any form of option football, flexbone, spread, etc… relies on timing and reads. If you can get pressure on the option game, and I’m not talking sacks and TFL’s though they are nice, you can shut it down. When I say pressure, I’m talking about disguising your coverage and forcing the QB’s reads to happen much quicker and with less information. The thing that Ohio State is very good at, and I’ve seen it all year, is putting pressure on the backfield, not just the QB but the backfield. This will be a great advantage for my Buckeyes. One reason for this is depth. I don’t mean to say that Ohio State will be subbing guys in and out every play, but when you have 7-9 guys that could start, you have a wide array of talent-sets to choose from. Finding the right combination of speed/athleticism/strength/power to plug into the d-line is a luxury. Few teams (read: none that I’m aware of) have enough O-Lineman to be able to put together a group of 5 that are tailored to negate a D-Line. This gives OSU a tactical advantage.

The second is tackling. One goal of any good offensive scheme is creating favorable matchups that can be exploited. In a power offense, you could run an isolation play out of the I formation and get your RB matched up against a weaker linebacker and hope he can break a tackle (Beanie Wells ring a bell?) In a pro-style passing game, you could run a strong WR or TE across the middle and match him up against a S (that’s how we lost to Texas last year). The spread offense relies on speed and athleticism and spreading the field to create a speed vs. speed matchup in the open field. It’s always nice to hit a speed receiver on the fly and torch a DB (Ted Ginn, especially against Notre Ame in the Fiesta Bowl) but it still comes down to tackling. You’ve all said yourselves how great Masoli is at running people over (and he is that). But here’s the thing. Ohio State is good at tackling. Really good. What’s more, the Ohio State defense is great at swarming to the play and staying in position to make a play in the first place.

Which brings us to the Rose Bowl. In the first couple of drives, you will see Ohio State play basic coverages with the back 7 and use different attacks on the D-Line to find the right combination of skill sets. Once the D-Line has established the best plan of attacking the running game, the defense will tighten up. This will allow the offense, which more than likely will have been shitting on themselves a couple of times before establishing the running game, to start playing Tresselball, that is, using the running game to shorten the game and play keep away, waiting for Oregon’s defense to make a mistake or two.

by RedDevilEA on Dec 21, 2009 10:56 AM PST reply actions  

Somebody let Coach Kelly that we have no chance of winning and should just forfeit!

by echo31 on Dec 21, 2009 1:37 PM PST up reply actions  

I never said you had no chance. In fact, I’d put Oregon at a 5-8 pt. favorite. I was just trying to offer some insight.

by RedDevilEA on Dec 21, 2009 2:57 PM PST up reply actions  

I know, but around here, we PANIC!!!!!!

by echo31 on Dec 21, 2009 3:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Hey Red, enjoyed your analysis, and, your quote,

“Few teams (read: none that I’m aware of) have enough O-Lineman to be able to put together a group of 5 that are tailored to negate a D-Line. This gives OSU a tactical advantage.”

You know of one now, whether you knew or not.

"We'll go."

by DONALDUCK on Dec 21, 2009 3:04 PM PST up reply actions  

ANOTHER VIDEO FOR DUCK FANS

I made a another video, Ohio State LOWLIGHTS, pretty funny, watch here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLHAYmWvlvk

by themilman on Dec 21, 2009 11:27 AM PST reply actions  

A better idea than spamming the comments over and over and over is to create a fanshot, which you can find on the right side.

its spelled "S-h-u-t-t-h-e H e-l-l-U-p-F-E-L-T"

by JShufelt on Dec 21, 2009 2:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Interesting thoughts and comments, but imo

misses part of the point on Oregon’s defense that can be devestating.

Power/man blocking running. The only team you played this year that runs a good scheme of that…..put up 51 pts. With that scheme, it’s not actually the yards and first downs that matter…it’s the beating put on the D-linemen and linebackers. Which either opens up the running game for big plays, or the passing game (by giving the qb time to find where the open guys are). The other teams you faced that could do that, but didn’t…got beatan by the otherwise solid defensive play.

Zone blocking for running plays is far more horizontal in movement, letting the defensive player take themselves away from the play.

Go Bears Go

by Rocksanddirt on Dec 21, 2009 2:53 PM PST reply actions  

We actually were handling the running game pretty well, until Luck started to make some ridiculous passes. When Stanford showed Oregon they aren’t a 1 dimensional team, and that we would have to cover with our Safeties and Linebackers, we got screwed over.

I’d also argue that USC ran a power/man blocking scheme.

its spelled "S-h-u-t-t-h-e H e-l-l-U-p-F-E-L-T"

by JShufelt on Dec 21, 2009 3:06 PM PST up reply actions  

I also believe so does:

Arizona State
Oregon State
and Washington

Oregon State, Oklahoma State, Ohio State..just another OSU. Free Dennis Dixon!!!

by Matt Daddy on Dec 21, 2009 3:09 PM PST up reply actions  

Special Note

None of the above have Toby Gerhart.

A House of Spears > An Ingram

by Bill Musgrave on Dec 21, 2009 3:12 PM PST up reply actions  

nor a sixth offensive lineman and a 244 pound fullback

Oregon State, Oklahoma State, Ohio State..just another OSU. Free Dennis Dixon!!!

by Matt Daddy on Dec 21, 2009 3:14 PM PST up reply actions  

But neither Arizona, nor Washington ran it very well.

Though, Arizona has a killer fullback.

its spelled "S-h-u-t-t-h-e H e-l-l-U-p-F-E-L-T"

by JShufelt on Dec 21, 2009 3:17 PM PST up reply actions  

Hey, Roxie, were you talking about Stanford?

I thot so. A. Luck, QB, was dropping passes into tea caps at 45 yards, which REALLY gave the running game what it needed.

Our FR safety played his one bad game of the year, both tackling and coverage.

And lastly, we were coming off our game against USC and Stanford was coming off a bye. Not excuses, just saying. That combination of circumstances might give the illusion that our defense is suspect.

On the other hand, we’ve had 3 goal line stands inside the five with NO points given up.

"We'll go."

by DONALDUCK on Dec 21, 2009 3:11 PM PST up reply actions  

Here is what I want to hear from anOSU fans

Kelly and Aliotti’s systems combined force your team to play one of two ways to beat them:

1. Go big formations for a majority of the game. Grind out 2-4 yards on power running/man blocking formations. Hope that when Oregon starts to cheat up to stop that you can make pin point passes deep to WR’s on fly routes (ala Stanford)

2. Play a spread (run-n-shoot) formation, dink and dunk short accurate passes to 4-5 wide formations and run off tackle every once in a while to keep the OLB’s honest (ala Arizona).

This is a serious question, which offensive system do you think Sweatervest and anOSU are going to try and employ? If they try and run conventional pro-style offense (ala USC, UW, UCLA) the speed of the LBs and DBs will keep you in long yardage situations too much. Screen passes will not work (trust me). Trying to mix it up and play a balanced game will keep your O on the field too long and they will get tired and eventually give up a big play. So which offense do you think anOSU has a better chance of executing to win the Rose Bowl?

Oregon State, Oklahoma State, Ohio State..just another OSU. Free Dennis Dixon!!!

by Matt Daddy on Dec 21, 2009 3:34 PM PST reply actions  

re: Here is what I want to hear from anOSU fans

To answer the question directly, OSU’s main offense will consist of a FB, RB, TE and two WRs. I don’t think there is any question about that after the #3 and #4 WR are not going to play in the game. The I formation under center is what got OSU the last 5 wins. Out of the I formation OSU will run a power play, an iso, inside zone and outside zone with a fullback leading the way. They have a few playaction pass plays and playaction roll out pass plays that can stretch the field. Posey is a legit deep threat, but Pryor has been unreliable in getting him the ball down the field.

Tressel’s non-play action pass plays can be run out of any formation with his favorite being the dig, drag, post. In my opinion, OSU needs to run the read option with Pryor so some spread formations can be utilized. I really hope OSU does run the spread and the read option. It will be interesting because it will pit speed on speed if Pryor runs a little bit. There is no question that Pryor will be the fastest QB Oregon has faced this year. Should be fun.

by OSU2010 on Dec 21, 2009 5:14 PM PST reply actions  

Thank you for your reply

With all that you said, I am pretty confident that Oregon will put Pryor and anOSU into a number of 2nd and long and 3rd and long situations. Two questions on that:

1. What is your confidence level that when put in a long situation, Pryor will be able to make the right read and throw the ball accurately (sometimes across the middle)?

2. Will Tressel have the… cojones… to run the ball on 3rd and 5-6, and will he follow it up with going for it on fourth?

I think if anOSU plays that way, their offense will be very tired (especially the O-line) and if the game is close or anOSU is playing from behind late in the game, Oregon’s speed and satmina will show it’s strength, leaving Pryor on an island a lot and forced to make accurate great throws late in the game on the run… thoughts?

Oregon State, Oklahoma State, Ohio State..just another OSU. Free Dennis Dixon!!!

by Matt Daddy on Dec 21, 2009 5:47 PM PST up reply actions  

re: Thank you for your reply

Answers:

(1) My confidence level of Pryor completing passes in a long situation is low. However, I wish that he would run more often when the pass play breaks down. He trys to stay behind the line of scrimmage to look for receivers downfield too long. My confidence level rises when he actually runs the ball in those situation rather than passes. If Oregon consistently puts OSU in long situations and can contain Pryor’s scrambles, Oregon wins hands down. Pryor’s best throws are across the middle because Tressel’s favorite play is the dig, drag, post with the WR running the dig getting many of the looks. Many of his throws outside of the numbers are not good. Pryor still throws the ball like a true sophomore (go figure) who didn’t play in a complex high school offense.

(2) Tressel always has the cojones to run the ball on third down regardless of the situation but it is always followed up with a punt on fourth down. Welcome to Tresselball; and no, I am not bragging about this. Rather, I am saying be ready to be frustrated (Oregon and OSU fans alike). There is no doubt that Oregon has great speed and stamina. This is a large obstacle for OSU to overcome.

Here are a couple of questions for you:

(1) Does Oregon have any depth along the defensive line to rotate players if OSU’s running game begins to click? I know that is a big if, but considering both teams like to run the football I think whichever team establishes a consistent surge in the trenches wins the game.

(2) What is the scoop on Oregon’s kicker and punter?

by OSU2010 on Dec 22, 2009 5:51 AM PST reply actions  

Here's my reply:

1. Yes, Oregon has depth at the D-line they are at least 6 deep. See here. But don’t let the stats confuse you. Oregon runs a 3-4 and will often times put Kenny Rowe DE/OLB in a three point stance (sometimes he will rush and sometimes he drops into coverage in a zone blitz).

Personally I don’t think it’s a question of “if” Oregon establishes the run, it’s more a matter of “when”. Outside of BSU no team has been able to contain our running game (and I woud say Oregon had more to do with containing the running game than BSU did).

2. Oregon has a true Freshman punter (Jackson Rice) and while a couple of times he has looked like a true frosh, most of the time he has been great. Morgan Flint the kicker is pretty much perfect 45 years and in, outside of that? Not so good.

Thanks OSU2010 I have appreciated the conversation. Look for other posts on the site to continue it about other topics (especially beer).

Oregon State, Oklahoma State, Ohio State..just another OSU. Free Dennis Dixon!!!

by Matt Daddy on Dec 22, 2009 8:00 AM PST up reply actions  

2. Oregon has a true Freshman punter (Jackson Rice) and while a couple of times he has looked like a true frosh, most of the time he has been great. Morgan Flint the kicker is pretty much perfect 45 years and in, outside of that? Not so good.

I would add that on kickoffs, Rob Beard rarely kicks it out of bounds if it isn’t windy. Instead he kicks it high so that the coverage team has time to get down the field. Most returners not named Owusu catch the ball around the 10 yard line and are tackled around the 15-20 yard line.

by echo31 on Dec 22, 2009 10:22 AM PST up reply actions  

and by out of bounds, I meant to say “out of the endzone”

D’oh!

by echo31 on Dec 22, 2009 10:23 AM PST up reply actions  

Good stuff.

Welcome OSU2010 and thanks for the detailed thoughts, great to learn about an opponent you don’t get to see very often.

A House of Spears > An Ingram

by Bill Musgrave on Dec 22, 2009 9:32 AM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Addicted to Quack, SBN's Oregon Ducks blog and fan community.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
So you just signed a bunch of blue chip recruits...

Recent FanPosts

Square_envelope_electric_purple-p121411710380622431j65uf_400_small
To Whom It May Concern
Sarah_b-day_small
A bit disappointed today
Angryduck_small
benzduck's Trivia Contest #1
Small
If Kelly Goes to the NFL, Who Would Oregon Hire?
Small
Darron Thomas' Surprise Decision to Bolt for NFL Should Be Celebrated, Not Scorned
Bns_small
The Ducks can learn from the New England Patriots.
120103_oregon_rose_bowl_tb_small
The Three Musketeers... Wait, they're Quarterbacks? Where's Darron? PANIC!
Angryduck_small
A Lexicon of Expert Darron Thomas Departure Invective
Duk3_small
An ode to Darron Thomas

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

ATQ Twitter Feed


Managers

207873_1005773153454_1498651968_14034_9616_n_small David Piper

Pre_small ntrebon

Img_0525_small jtlight

Mostinteresting_small Takimoto

Domsicecream_small dvieira

Editors

Pettingzoo_small PaulSF

Atq-spoon-5_small Matt Daddy

Authors

Ryan__rusty_small jcgoducks

N679617597_457761_5158_small kanders4

Small nds500