Why is Texas Tech like Oregon?
It’s always noteworthy when a University that places high value on its football program opts for good behavior even at the possible cost of a game (or more). That’s why this column made such a fuss over Oregon Ducks football coach Chip Kelly when he suspended his star running back for sucker punching an opposing player who was taunting him after a Ducks loss in their season opener.
Now we want to give three cheers for Texas Tech, who suspended football coach Mike Leach on the eve of Saturday’s big Alamo Bowl Game against Michigan State. Leach is accused of punishing a player who suffered a concussion in practice.
A source close to the player’s family told ESPN that he sustained a concussion on Dec. 16, was examined on Dec. 17 and told not to practice because of the concussion and an elevated heart rate. The source said Coach Leach called a trainer and directed him to move James "to the darkest place, to clean out the equipment and to make sure that he could not sit or lean. He was confined for three hours." According to the source, Leach told the trainer, two days later, to "put [James] in the darkest, tightest spot. It was in an electrical closet, again, with a guard posted outside."
The suspension will surely be litigated, and we’re not sure yet what all the facts are. What’s clear and indisputable, however, is that Texas Tech, occasionally maligned as a football factory, places player safety and ethical behavior above winning. Here’s hoping their first reward is a win over the Spartans Saturday in the Alamo Bowl.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or the Addicted To Quack Moderators. FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable Oregon fans.
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
douchetastic
Um, no.
Please to be reading the facts about the situation, and you will see that Leach was not engaging in any nefarious behavior. Tech just destroyed their football program.
Leach wasn’t engaging in anything nefarious? Locking a concussed kid up in a closet may not be nefarious, but it’s pretty damn insane. On top of that, this season he was suspending players over twitter, calling out their girlfriends, and losing control of his team.
It seems like this simply gave Tech an excuse to fire Leach "with cause."
--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
and save themselves a from having to pay a guy they really didn’t want to pay in the first place a couple million
LET CH3 RETURN KICKS!!!!
SBNation TT blog, Double T Nation ain’t happy. I don’t blame them, they had a good football coach.
--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
Probably the best line on this whole thing I have seen written
Texas Tech BOR….they accepted Bob Knight and his baggage and fired Mike Leach who made Texas Tech relevant in college football…go figure.
LET CH3 RETURN KICKS!!!!
No, I don't think there was anything nefarious
Look, you can not like Leach’s style all you want. This is the guy who put a player at a desk on the 50-yard line of the stadium in subfreezing temperatures for missing a mandatory study hall. This is also the guy who also won 9 games a season at a school that has averaged 5 wins a year for the other 75 years of its existence.
Tech under Leach also had the highest graduation rates for white and minority players in the Big XII and among the highest in the nation. His teams were up there with Duke and Northwestern, academics-wise. Another reason why the OP was douchey, or misinformed.
He had a policy that injured players stay with the team during practice, and James showed up wearing sunglasses although he was cleared to practice. Sunglasses being a no-no at practice, Leach put him in the dark room. Having played sports and been in the military, I get it. Other folks might not.
He didn’t punch anyone in the mouth or use racially charged language. This is football, not beanbag. Putting a kid with a mild concussion in a dark room does not harm the kid nor does it expose him to any other risk or humiliation beyond what is normal for kids on sports teams. Leach also made injured kids work out to the limits of their injuries. This is also concurrent with my sports and military experience, which does the same thing. The idea is to create disincentives to ride injury. It can be unpleasant at times, because it puts any injured player in a bad position, often unfairly. But with certain goldbricking players (and this kid seems to be one) coaches have no choice.
The real scandal here is how Craig James used his access to ESPN’s megaphone to push this issue to the national forefront. To the extent that Leach overstepped his boundaries, a sternly worded “don’t do this again” would have sufficed. Now the hamfisted tactics of the Tech administration have made the university radioactive. I can’t imagine any coach of quality sending his resume to Lubbock now.
And yeah – this is the same school and AD that hired Bobby Knight from IU.
Tech is about to lose serious money. They should settle with Leach quickly and early.
You’ve summed up nicely my thoughts on the whole affair. I’ve been following this over at DoubleT for a few days, and I feel bad for an enthusiastic fan base whose coach has just been railroaded by small-minded good ol’ boys, and the proverbial “little league” dad whose own checkered past played a part in destroying another college program in Texas.
I don’t think Leach is innocent in this situation at all. He’s been erratic and confrontational with players and admin for some time, and when they were given the smallest of windows to get out of millions in obligation to a guy they didn’t see eye to eye with in the first place they took it.
I feel bad for the fans of Texas Tech football. Here was a “fun” team and coach to watch and now they have been stripped with little regard for their interests.
LET CH3 RETURN KICKS!!!!
Leach will be fine. TT, on the other hand, not so much.
1. Leach is an excellent coach with an outsized ego that was not a good fit for the school that employed him. Gee, a coach with a high opinion of himself.
2. Leach was faced with a situation where a player, having reported a “mild concussion”, was unable to practice. As a coach, he made a decision to protect said player while still maintaining a visible level of discipline on his team. Did he believe James was “dogging it” a bit? Was it the shades that set him over the edge? Regardless, Leach’s actions appear to be twofold: Protect the injured player (which he did — nobody with a straight face can argue that his actions endangered James, beyond subjecting him to a certain level of humiliation) and send him a message. Anyone who has ever coached a team or even acted as a supervisor or foreman over a large crew understands the importance of the occasional “message”, especially when young adults of varying maturity levels are involved.
3. Young James complained to his parents.
4. His parents reported the issue to the administration — a much easier report to pull off if your dad’s Craig James.
5. The evidence shows the administration was waiting for just this sort of “incident” to make a case for firing Leach “with cause.” (See an email thread from the contentious contract negotiations of last winter here.)
A clear element of the reporting on the “incident” was the initial allegation that James had been “locked” in a “shed” with a “guard” (the “shed” was the size of my garage; the “guards” were trainers; and he was free to leave if he wanted, although James was risking his team status if he didn’t stay). The key to demonization is dramatization.
So. Texas Tech was determined to sack Leach. When someone is that dedicated to a cause, it matters little how much collateral damage is done; the end justifies the means.
Leach will be just fine. There is absolutely zero evidence over his career that he’s ever mistreated or damaged a player, his graduation record was excellent, he’s regarded as one of the great tactical minds in college football. He won’t be without a job for long.
Tech, on the other hand, has a few problems: how to mollify a fan base that’s gone postal, how to keep a recruiting class in line, and where to find a coach who’s anywhere nearly at the level of the guy they just sacked.
Leach was the only reason Texas Tech has even approached relevance in major college football. The TT administration, I fear, is about to learn the expensive lesson of how easy it is for a football program to return to also-ran status. It’s their loss.
those who do not remember history should read my blog...
I attend Angelo State University...
and this is our first year in the Texas Tech system. Lemme tell you one thing, I’ll be expecting my tuition to “effectively skyrocket” do to Leach suing the shit out of his former school. Ugh.
Many can try to imitate, but there can be only one...Masoli.

by 

















