Addicted To Quack: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: The Nova Blog for Villanova Fans!

Football Spring Preview: Running Backs

Over the next few weeks, before spring practice starts on March 30th, we'll be taking a look at each section of the team, assessing its strengths and weaknesses, and looking at any battles that will be taking place. Today we look at the running backs.

In recent years, Oregon has seen incredible production from the running back position. In the past 10 years, Oregon can make a very serious case for being the top running back school in the Pac-10. Oregon has turned out top back after top back. And 2009 shouldn't be any different.

The Starter:

Despite the suspension, I have full confidence that LeGarrette Blount will be donning pads as the starting running back in Boise next fall. And we all know what that will mean. We've seen a lot of great backs at Oregon, and Blount is comparable to any of them. He is huge, strong, agile, and has surprising speed. Though he carried the ball slightly over 10 times per game, he topped the 1000 yard mark, at a ridiculous 7.3 ypc. When on the field, there is little to criticize. He can run inside and outside, and has excellent vision. He has some of the best balance I've ever seen in a back, and for such a large guy, it's incredibly impressive. Just check out a youtube search for Blount, and it is clip after clip of ridiculous athleticism.

Blount's only issues are off the field. He was recently suspended for "failure to meet team expectations." Blount was surprisingly unconcerned about the situation, which could mean that this really isn't a serious issue, or Blount is oblivious to the gravity of the situation. However, If what Blount says is correct, then there should be little to worry about. While academic or personal issues could be harder to correct, Blount can easily take part in all strength and conditioning activity, and get back in Bellotti's good graces. With this move, it's clear that Mike Bellotti won't take any crap from his running back, so let's just hope it gets through to Blount. Though I think things will be fine, talented running backs can rarely be fully trusted.

What we simply need to see out of Blount during the spring is him on the field and in shape, cause if he's there, he will tear it up.

The Redshirt Freshman:

One of the strongest pick ups of the 2008 recruiting class was LaMichael James. However, James has been overlooked to some degree. He wasn't mentioned much last year due to two freshman QBs arriving for spring practice last year, as well as the saga around Terelle Pryor. And now, after undergoing shoulder surgery, and the recruiting of Bryce Brown, he seems to be getting lost again.

Star-divide

Yet, James is a back full of promise. He's got great top line speed, and has the ability to change directions and make people miss. At one practice last season, he stole the show when given the chance. James has that big play ability, much like Jeremiah Johnson, and he could fill JJ's role nicely. One thing that you'll notice from his highlight clip, is that with his speed, is that not only can he change direction quickly, but his speed allows him to turn the corner seamlessly, and blow past the defenders. Furthermore, he can catch the ball out of the backfield, which Blount has not done often, adding another dimension to the backfield.

Unfortunately, due to his shoulder surgery, James will be withheld from contact during spring drills. However, Oregon fans will get a chance to watch him during track season, as he is a member of the Oregon outdoor track team.

The Solid Backups:

Andre Crenshaw and Remene Alston, Jr. have seemingly been backup running backs for Oregon for some time, and will continue that role again this year.

In my mind, Alston, a junior, will be the 2nd back (after Blount) in the spring. Though younger than Crenshaw, he really stepped up last year in his opportunities. In some ways, he reminds of Jacquizz Rodgers, as he's 5'8" yet a stout 200 pounds. He has good balance and strength, and can go up the field well. He accrued 161 yards on 21 carries, in mop up duty, before breaking his foot in October. While Duck fans haven't seen much of him, he has good promise, and could see some very productive time this year.

Finally, senior Andrew Crenshaw wraps up the group. As a sophomore in 2007, Crenshaw saw quite a bit of playing time, including over 100 yards in the Stormtrooper massacre in Seattle. However, it just seems like he just does not have the talent to make that leap towards starting running back. In 2007, he had chances to shine, getting a good deal of carries with the injuries to Johnson and Stewart, but just didn't seem to really take advantage of that. While he is a very solid back, he doesn't do any one thing exceptionally well. Where James has exceptional agility and speed, and Alston has balance and strength, Crenshaw is average at all these aspects. And because of that, he'll probably end his career on the bench.

Unfortunately, at this very moment, Alston and Crenshaw are the only scholarship running backs that would be available to play were a game tomorrow. Needless to say, this is a frightening scenario. While Alston could be a very good back and Crenshaw is solid, if Blount and James are unavailable, it will be a significant problem for the offense. If further disaster did strike and even these two became injured, Chris Harper and Malachi Lewis would be available at running back as well, though let's just hope that doesn't happen.

Conclusion:

This spring will tell us just how deep our running back corp is. If Blount's suspension is not lifted, then we'll see Alston and Crenshaw, and they will most likely fight out the battle for 3rd string (or possibly 4th if Bryce Brown is signed). In college football, you never know who will be healthy when, so developing the entire depth chart could end up being very important, and getting to really see these players will either keep us praying every night, or give us peace of mind at the running back position.

GO DUCKS!

0 recs  |  Comment 28 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Based on what I've read

this is how I figure the whole Blount thing:

Blount gets the flu, mono, food poisoning, some sort of illness. Doesn’t tell any of the coaching staff, doesn’t show up to some meetings or something. When they finally get a hold of him, he tells them he was sick, they say he should’ve let them know and they have to punish him, if only to maintain team standards. He says, “Fine, I understand.” Remains nonplussed because he knows he’s going to be the starter next season. That attitude may change should we get Brown, and he might complain to Moseley or something, but still pretty much a non-worry.

by grimc on Feb 27, 2009 12:34 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

If we get Brown...

I still think he’s 3rd string behind James at this point. He has to prove himself. If he doesn’t, he gets some nice bench time. Blount is one of the most physically talented backs I’ve ever seen, and I doubt he loses carries to Brown.

Plus, James is our only speedster at this point, so I like him as a change of pace to Blount.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Feb 27, 2009 1:06 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Nice work Jared, keep 'em coming!

These articles are making me pee in my pants a little bit.

TMI?

by DavisDuck on Feb 27, 2009 1:02 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

There just might be a collective duck puddle on the ground.

I’m in the same boat… shoes… or whatever.

It's spelled "S-H-U-G-S-A-R-E-F-O-R-T-H-U-G-S""

by JShufelt on Feb 27, 2009 1:08 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

No kidding.

Seriously guys, with the bulk of the tough schedule (Utah, USC, Cal, ASU, OSU) flipping to Autzen – plus the fact that Utah, Purdue, USC, ASU and maybe Cal are breaking in new QBs – isn’t 2009-10 the year we have to get it done?

Damn. I think I just did a season preview in one run-on sentence.

You cannot hide from our weapons of Masoli destruction.

by JConant on Feb 27, 2009 1:44 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

We need a free safety….

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Feb 27, 2009 1:44 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Well, JTL, I’m too slow and I’d surely over-commit to the run. But just in case you’ve still got some eligibility left, Moseley left this note for you:

“…the Daily Emerald reminds potential football walk-ons of the schedule changes being implemented this spring. Tryouts are in two weeks, and practices will be in the morning in April.”

You cannot hide from our weapons of Masoli destruction.

by JConant on Feb 27, 2009 2:42 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I hope

you didn’t just do a five-word 2009-10 game recap…

by grimc on Feb 27, 2009 7:06 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

So...

Do you think that Blount is going to be the starter just because he was so solid last year as the “backup?” I wonder why they wouldn’t continue to want to use him as a red zone/4th quarter/change of pace back. Thunder as opposed to lightning. (that was lame I know)

It's spelled S-H-U-damn it I can't think of one!

by echris on Feb 27, 2009 3:38 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Blount's gonna be the starter...

Because he’s, by a long ways, the best running back that we have.

As far as the whole 4th quarter, change of pace thing, I don’t think boxing anyone into a certain use is smart, and I don’t think the coaching staff would do that. He’s out best running back, and we want the ball in his hands as much as possible. He split carries last year, because JJ was just as good. But that’s not the case anymore, so he’ll carry a bigger load.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Feb 27, 2009 3:45 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

All that I can disagree with right now...

…is that Blount’s vision is actually not good. I believe it was what actually kept him from running circles around D’s like SC and Cal. He didn’t seem to have faith in pushing towards the outside, would sometimes dawdle, and the play would slowly develop, rendering a potentially modest gain to a 2 yard loss.

I love LeGarrette Blount. He’s a total badass. But I will disagree with you here, sir, and say that the one thing Blount may need to work on this offseason will be his vision. Which, actually, is easily correctable. Gary Campbell is a great RB’s coach in that he does great with players’ vision. His laser-on-wall training was huge for Jonathan Stewart.

Addicted To Quack [dot] com; "In other news, Ropert was mauled by a velociraptor yesterday and sustained a life-threatening ACL injury and a pulled hamstring."

by qrsouther on Feb 27, 2009 5:40 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

He didn’t seem to have faith in pushing towards the outside, would sometimes dawdle, and the play would slowly develop, rendering a potentially modest gain to a 2 yard loss.

East-West, he did great when he had his shoulders down field. But otherwise, he left himself susceptible to a cornerback tackle.

It's spelled "S-H-U-G-S-A-R-E-F-O-R-T-H-U-G-S""

by JShufelt on Feb 27, 2009 6:16 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

By the end of the season...

It was darn good. When the hole is there, he hits it. He just has to learn (and I think he did), that if a holes not there, he just has to push through himself, and not let himself go down in the backfield. I would also say that this instinct is a small part of vision, and the most easily correctable.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Feb 27, 2009 7:07 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

He did improve it, I'll give you that.

But I would call it far less than excellent.

Addicted To Quack [dot] com; "In other news, Ropert was mauled by a velociraptor yesterday and sustained a life-threatening ACL injury and a pulled hamstring."

by qrsouther on Feb 27, 2009 7:15 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Interesting reminder about our rushing attack in the two losses to USC and Cal. With the near-perfect late-season execution still fresh in our minds, it would be interesting to go back and review where the running game went wrong in those games. Was it just poor decisions by the QB? Maybe Blount just hadn’t got “it” yet? Maybe sub-par line play?

Certainly those were some good linebacker corps we faced in those losses. Our preseason naysayers will say our flashing offense won’t overcome a good defense. Are we prepared to say with some certainty, “yes, in 2009 it will…”?

You cannot hide from our weapons of Masoli destruction.

by JConant on Feb 27, 2009 7:49 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I would say that the line was doing diddly squat in the two said games.

But it also didn’t help that the plays Blount had the ball were chronically slow developing, and that Masoli may have been making bad reads, both in the air and on the ground.

Addicted To Quack [dot] com; "In other news, Ropert was mauled by a velociraptor yesterday and sustained a life-threatening ACL injury and a pulled hamstring."

by qrsouther on Feb 27, 2009 8:01 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Seems like we were running a pretty short play book and became predictable, especially against USC.

You cannot hide from our weapons of Masoli destruction.

by JConant on Feb 27, 2009 8:06 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

We didn’t start to run the spread-option effectively until the UCLA game, and I have no idea why.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Feb 27, 2009 8:21 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Maturity following repetition is my guess. It just takes time. It’s maybe a little amazing how quickly the offensive developed once the breakthrough occurred late in the Stanford game.

You cannot hide from our weapons of Masoli destruction.

by JConant on Feb 27, 2009 10:55 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

This could be true...

Though I remember rarely running it (none of the Blount runs at USC were), and during Purdue and other games like BSU, I was thinking, why aren’t we running the spread option more…

And then UCLA comes along, and we’re running it every other play. And it wasn’t like the QB just wasn’t ever using the option. We were consistently running that stupid stretch play.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Feb 28, 2009 8:02 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not understanding your criticism...

Blount is excellent at seeing and hitting holes when they are there. In my mind, that is vision. He had two poor games, though in one, he only had 4 carries.

Does he wait for holes to develop, yeah. But for every time that leads him for a loss, he’ll have runs where he takes it for a huge gain. I don’t call that lack of vision. It might be too much patience, if anything.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Feb 27, 2009 8:25 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Actually, no...I stand by my original statement.

I went back and looked at all of Blount rushes from the Cal and USC games. USC was was a giant CF, and on Blount’s runs, he really cannot be faulted for vision. In every case, he made the correct decision. His vision cannot be faulted at all for the runs here. USC completely, utterly, and totally dominated are line. It was pathetic.

In the Cal game, his first two runs he did a very poor job, and made bad decisions. In the next two, they were improved. But come on, that’s two rushes in a row, and he was improved after that, not that he had a lot of chance. I also think it’s tough to judge this based on the fact that he only had 4 carries (the latter two spread throughout the game), and thus could get in no rhythm. So if you’re judging his vision based on this game alone, I consider that an invalid assessment.

Your initial statement above was true on only the first two runs at Cal. It’s a very plausible theory, but the game tape doesn’t bear that out on any of the other runs.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Feb 27, 2009 9:50 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks for looking…game film being far more reliable than our collective memories. Simple answer = those losses were a combination of an offense that hadn’t reached development facing defenses with the ability to shut down anyone’s running game (less USC versus Quiz). No way you can put that on Blount’s shoulders.

Every Duck running back has an area or two of needed improvement. In the end it always comes down to line play. We get great line play next year, BFT may be all-american. If we don’t he’s just another guy with flashes of big-time potential. Of those scenarios, I like his chances at becoming a household name outside the Northwest by midseason.

You cannot hide from our weapons of Masoli destruction.

by JConant on Feb 27, 2009 11:03 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

BTW...

I really dislike those “Related Fanshots” at the very top of the page. I was skimming the column looking for something free. Instead, my eye caught the “Alston Out For The Year” headline and for the 0.5 seconds it took me to process it correctly I about had a nervous breakdown.

You cannot hide from our weapons of Masoli destruction.

by JConant on Feb 27, 2009 11:11 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

With his play at the end of the Holiday Bowl...

He’s well on his way….

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Feb 28, 2009 8:03 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Malik Hairston sighting

ESPN, Spurs v. Cavs. Hasn’t done anything bad. Hasn’t done anything, to be honest.

by grimc on Feb 27, 2009 8:24 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Like tha LMJ highlight

He looks like the fastest back we have had for some time. Can’t wait to get him into space and let him roam free. We truly will have thunder and lighting.

Ducks Go!
yep, lots and lots of blow.
We should change the name of the blog to addictedtoblow.com

by trumpetduck on Feb 28, 2009 1:16 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Andre Crenshaw...

… is overlooked. I like James and Alston, but Crenshaw has a lot of experience and I think he’s going to be a significant contributor as Blount’s compliment. Don’t sleep on this guy.

Also, this bumper sticker is awesome. Check it out: http://www.zazzle.com/autzen+gifts

by kylion20 on Mar 7, 2009 4:27 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Addicted to Quack, SBN's Oregon Ducks blog and fan community.
Start posting about the Ducks »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Dixon01_small
State of the Ducks - Looking Forward and Back
N1222878_43736576_541_small
Editakorial: Rose-Colored Glasses

Recent FanPosts

Small
The Oregon Sutuation From an Opposing Fan's View
Chip_kelly_stare_small
TNQA's New Series: 2010 Game Previews-The DT and Canzano Editions, MS PAINT STYLE!
New_afro_trackduck_small
An old fart's perspective on the recent troubles.
Small
Pac-10 Championship Open Thread
New_afro_trackduck_small
Brad Ecklund, UO '48, five-sport star and All-Pro: An appreciation
Small
For the Future
Chip_kelly_stare_small
ATQ NCAA Basketball Tournament Bracket Contest [with update]
Uncle_phil_small
Replacing Ernie...what you're missing
Jeff_mug_h2_small
SB Nation's Pac-10 Tournament Preview

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Tedford just keeps stealing Oregon talent.
WR for Ashton Eaton!
Andy Staples Article on Chip Kelly's Disciplinary Decisions.
"Masoli pleads guilty to second-degree burglary. Pleaded down to a...
More Insight into LaMichael's Incident
Blount set to work out on March 18th.
Reasons SEHS Alums should make the trip to Portland Friday to see the Axemen play in the state semis
Who is more deserving of getting kicked out of UO? Kent, Masoli, or someone else?
Duck Fans: Are you ready to be the next U?
Dear Jeremiah Masoli

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

ATQ Twitter Feed

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Sam Houston's Gilberto Clavell, right, shoots a jump hook over Stephen F. Austin's Mark Gomillia in the first half during an NCAA college basketball game at the Southland Conference Championship, Saturday, March 13, 2010. (AP Photo/Bob Levey)

Sam Houston State Wins Southland; Prevents Stephen F. Austin Repeat

Dayton's Chris Wright (33) dribbles the ball away from Xavier's Mark Lyons (10) during the second half of a quarterfinal round NCAA college basketball game at the Atlantic 10 Conference Championships, Friday, March 12, 2010, in Atlantic City, N.J. Xavier won 78-73. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

Atlantic 10 Conference Tournament: Oh, Those Tricky Spiders

Morgan State's DeWayne Jackson (32) shoots over S.C.State's Jason Flagler, left, and Joseph Wright (13) in the first half of a NCAA college basketball game in the Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference men's finals on Saturday, March. 13, 2010 in Winston-Salem, N.C. (AP Photo/Rick Havner)

Morgan State Knocks Off S.C. State To Grab Second Straight MEAC Title

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Safeco-david_and_deb_small Addicted to Quack

Pre_small ntrebon

Img_0608_small jtlight

Domsicecream_small dvieira

Editors

Oregon_duck_football_helmet_small JConant

41932caf48d25-44-1_small PaulSF

Authors

N1222878_43736576_541_small Takimoto

Atq-spoon-5_small Matt Daddy

Official Partner of CBS Sports