Takimoto's 10 Most Important Ducks for 2009: #1-3 "The Triplets of YouTubeVille"
The moment you've all been waiting for. Don't worry, Justin Roper is still at #10. First, let me preface this with a short theory: if the Internet didn't exist, the 2009 Oregon Ducks would not be a Top-10 ranked team.
Of all the D-1 (I refuse to conform with that FBS bullshit) teams in college football, Oregon is the team of the future. We are at the forefront of college football exploration, from offensive schemes to uniforms to marketing. We make huge splashes nationwide in the form of billboards and diamond plating, and have PR'd our way into a place as a perennial conference threat. Most of all, our teams have a high propensity for making highlight-reel, replay-worthy plays, be in in the form of big hits, trick plays, more big hits, or sideline antics. Last season was a veritable gold mine for YouTube-worthy plays, as evidenced by 071903's recent post, which is chock full of amazingness. A side effect to the hype machine however, is that the team has to live up to the hype, and after rising to #2 in 2007, expectations are at the highest in Oregon history. We lost three important skill players, three starting offensive linemen, and a host of defensive players. Our highlight ability is what is keeping us so highly thought of in the national media. Anyway, on to the top 3...
1a. Jeremiah Masoli
1b. LeGarrette Blount
1c. TJ Ward
I'm lumping these three together. Sure, Masoli and Blount will touch the ball a little more than TJ Ward. Sure, we could survive a bad game from Blount if other things happen. But if we're going to have a BCS-caliber season, we need these three more than anyone to take their game to the next level. Let's start with TJ.
TJ Ward
- last season's leading tackler, with 101 (64 solo)
- his only INT came @ Purdue last year. He also had 8 pass breakups, 2nd on the team
- forced four fumbles, including two against Cal
YouTube highlights:
Stripping Jahvid Best (incidently, this is TwistNHook's favorite porno)
Not exactly a highlight, but more than one instance of TJ playing really poor FS
One thing is clear: TJ Ward can hit. He can hit people really hard. The shitty part about YouTube though, and my thesis for this FanPost, is that YouTube lets us vividly remember the really amazing things about Oregon football. You have to dig a little to find the bad stuff. I couldn't find an Oklahoma State Holiday Bowl compilation video, but our pass defense was shaky at best before Dez Bryant got hurt. TJ looked really bad against Boise State, but so did everybody else on our defense. TJ has never been strong as a cover DB, which is why he's now a safety. But he has to be able to do a better job of picking up the deep threats and locking them down. Case in point, about 40-50 seconds in to the Boise State video, as well as numerous instances from the spring game where he flat out lost his recievers in coverage. Granted, that was Jamere Holland at least a couple of those times, and he's real real fast. Still. Opposing teams know TJ's gonna whap you if you come over the middle, so they can and will go challenge him deep, and this will start with Boise State on September 3rd. For the Ducks to be successful, he needs to expand his scope of dominant territory. If TJ's on his game, it lets the rover do his job, it takes pressure off the corners, and it gives the front 7 more opportunities to make big plays in the pass rush. In short, he's important.
LeGarrette Blount
- 1002 yards rushing (7.3 yards per carry)
- 4 100+ yard games, and three more of 90+, with a high of 132 against Utah St.
- Oregon record 17 rushing touchdowns, including 3 against WSU, and 2 in five other games
- 9.3 YPC in Oregon's wins, 3.1 YPC in Oregon's losses
YouTube highlights:
Blount hurdles: Mark Lewis and a BSU defender, a Purdue defender, a WSU defender, an OK St. defender
Blount scores against: Utah St., Purdue, ASU, Stanfurd, Stanfurd again, UCLA,
Arizona
Blount breaks for a long run against: Purdue, OS, OK St.
Well shoot, if this guy isn't just a YouTube superstar. The Oregon Duck fan's infatuation with LeGarrette Blount extends back to last year's spring practices. We had just lost Jonathan Stewart to the NFL Draft, and we thought it would be tough, nay impossible, to replace a future every-down NFL running back. In walks this JC transfer from the South, and wows everybody at the '08 spring game with his raw power. Naturally it came to no one's surprise when he started running people over last season. Blount as the feature back however, draws a few concerns from me. It's not fair to compare him to J-Stew, but J-Stew had the balanced package. He could run inside and out. He knew when to try and cut it back and when to just lower his head and go through people. He had, and still has in the pros, unbelievable field vision, and could find holes better than anyone I've seen. Blount still doesn't have the outside running or the decision making necessary to stake a claim as a potential first-round draft pick and otherworldly Pac-10 running back. Concerns about his conditioning and his off-field issues have to be considered, but my main issue with Blount is his potential to become one-dimensional. Teams with good LB corps have been able to neutralize him (see USC and Cal). He has proven to be relatively easy to string out on outside runs, and this concern grows as our offensive line's health depletes. Do I think Blount will have a great year? Emphatically yes. But let's not start the Blount for Heisman campaign just yet.
Jeremiah Masoli
- 136-239 for 1744 yards, 13-5 TD-INT ratio
- 718 rushing yards (5.7 YPC) with 10 TDs
- changed his number to 8, after Takimoto wore it in the band Civil War
- finished 2008 strong, going 50-75 for 830 yards and 6 TDs in his final 3 games.
Rushing: Arizona, UCLA, ASU, Stanfurd, Cal, UCLA again, Civil War, Holiday Bowl, Holiday Bowl, Holiday Bowl
Passing: Holiday Bowl, Civil War, Arizona, Civil War, UW, Civil War, Civil War, WSU, UW,
He's 1a not only because he's the quarterback, but because of three, he's the one I'm most confident about. Yes, Masoli's passing skills come with a very low sample size. He also has a great reputation as a thrower extending back to his time at CCSF, and has only improved in all facets of his game as his knowledge of the offense has grown. He looked crisp in the spring game, hooking up with Aaron Pflugrad especially well. The strong showing by the recievers can only serve to benefit Masoli, who has got to be excited about throwing to new guys like Tunei and eventually Tyrece Gaines and Diante Jackson, as well as the returning wideouts. He's proven he can win games with his arm. He can win games with just his legs. He can take a hit, and he can dish them out. There are concerns, like his fondness for throwing rockets when he could put touch on his throws. But with a summer to throw, as well as fall practice to work with new QB coach Helfrich, he can only get better. He also has intangibles. He has unwavering confidence, as evidenced by his comments after the USC game last year. The thing I like most is the "it". You don't know what it is until you see someone who has it. Michael Jordan had it. Joe Montana had it. It's that competitive fire, that extra level of in-the-moment will that makes good players great, and great players unforgettable. Masoli has it. He thrives on big games, he knows how to win any way he can, and he's not afraid to jump into the trenches and get the W. He has that swaggar that his teammates can feed off of in game situations. And he's the most important Duck for 2009.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or the Addicted To Quack Moderators. FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable Oregon fans.
0 recs |
34 comments
Comments
Other
I’m going to say Jordan Holmes.
He may never have a personalized YouTube clip. But he’s the first guy to touch the ball every offensive down. If Jeremiah Masoli doesn’t have to spend any brain power focusing where the snap is going, everything else will flow flawlessly. We saw it during Spring Game. Bad snaps = mayhem in the backfield. Good snaps = Masoli is confident and in rhythm, conducting another masterpiece drive down field.
Jordan Holmes has to deliver the first note of every Jeremiah Masoli symphony on time and in tune.
I'm really tired of it not being football season.
by JConant on May 5, 2009 10:07 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
woldn't that be included in the O-line?
PADO
by Tortuga12 on May 5, 2009 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m with you. Let’s call the o-line my 1b choice.
My key differentiation point would be that the other four guys become nothing but a turnover prevention team if the ball is rolling around on the ground 15 yards behind the line of scrimmage.
I'm really tired of it not being football season.
by JConant on May 5, 2009 12:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The TPT. I like it. If you change “team” to “squad”, that makes it “TPS” and that my friend is excellent Office Space reference that just can’t be ignored.
“Damn it! how many bad snaps did we have? Have Jshufelt send us a TPS report!”
--Dominic, Addicted to Quack
Autzen Stadium is where great teams go to die." - J. Brady McCullough, The Michigan Daily.
by dvieira on May 5, 2009 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Turnover Prevention Squad it is. As such, said TPS report will include a detailed, weekly post-game analysis of the turnover battle won or lost by our Ducks. Fault will be found. Blame will be assigned. Jake Locker and anyone handling the ball for Washington State will be made to look foolish.
I’d like to task the Weekly TPS Report to JShufelt, but who am I to task anything to anyone. That is Jared’s or Nick’s job. Plus, I don’t want to upset JShufelt. He might attempt to assault me with his banana.
I'm really tired of it not being football season.
by JConant on May 5, 2009 1:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I use my banana only for good.
It’s spelled "S-H-U-M-W-O-W"
by JShufelt on May 5, 2009 1:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
this conversation is going towards a place that I definitely don’t find “apeeling”
--Dominic, Addicted to Quack
Autzen Stadium is where great teams go to die." - J. Brady McCullough, The Michigan Daily.
by dvieira on May 5, 2009 1:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So you’re saying we should “split” off this discussion?
It’s spelled "S-H-U-M-W-O-W"
by JShufelt on May 5, 2009 1:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, and welcome to ATQ by the way.
I'm really tired of it not being football season.
by JConant on May 5, 2009 12:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What's up with the new name?
I like turtles too, by the way.
The blogger formerly know as OSU
by ConnorOSU on May 5, 2009 4:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think he gathered.
Addicted To Quack [dot] com; Dear Joevan, Develop motor skills. Love, ATQ.
by qrsouther on May 5, 2009 8:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pardon, welcome as well!!
Addicted To Quack [dot] com; Dear Joevan, Develop motor skills. Love, ATQ.
by qrsouther on May 5, 2009 8:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Blount Concern
I know people love Blount, really going back to the Spring Game last year but I’m VERY concerned with losing JJ in the backfield and having Blount to carry the load. His vision and speed around the edge just isn’t where JJ’s was and we saw that all year. Don’t get me wrong, he’s great in between the tackles but if he was called on to stretch something around the edge, we often were dropped for a loss. Unless Blount has dramatically changed this summer (and I haven’t seen it yet), I think the stretch running play will be a concern if we can’t find someone to replace JJ’s awesomeness around the edge
--Dominic, Addicted to Quack
Autzen Stadium is where great teams go to die." - J. Brady McCullough, The Michigan Daily.
by dvieira on May 5, 2009 10:28 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The other concern with Blount is that last year, we unleashed him in the second half, when the other defense was tired. The hype is so high this year for this team, I hope they don’t disappoint.
by westspec on May 5, 2009 10:32 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think that this is the case at all……
Some of Blount’s biggest runs were off tackle or stretch. The winning run against Stanford was, as well as touchdowns against the Beavers and Oklahoma State. While JJ had a different type of agility and acceleration than Blount, and had success with the stretch play at times, he was not so great at times either. JJ was terrible against Purdue, when they ran stretch plays a lot.
It has nothing to do with Blount ability, but with the quality of the blocking. When the blocks were there, both backs were good. JJ and Blount both did a superb job on this play against OSU. But when the blocks aren’t there, the play falls apart. It’s designed to string the defense along until the back sees the hole and hits it, usually in the form of a cutback. And in that respect, I think that Blount was better at running that play than JJ was. Time and again, he saw holes that were barely there and hit them for big gains.
Granted, in the spring game and against USC and Cal he didn’t do much, I would say that wasn’t due to Blount, but due to pathetic run blocking.
--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
by jtlight on May 5, 2009 10:42 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
due to pathetic run blocking
That, and a couple teams with good to great front sevens. I’m ignoring Blount’s spring game performance at this point considering the line issues.
I'm really tired of it not being football season.
by JConant on May 5, 2009 10:56 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t know about this. I remember a TON of gamethreads last year where comments were made specifically about Blount running side to side instead of between the tackles. Vision was an issue all year in the criticisms of his game. Blaming it on “pathetic run blocking” when it was a consistent thing last year seems like a cop out, especially given our great our offensive line was. Just because its a new year and we all remember him running people over and making leaps over people doesn’t take away the other half of his game. No back is going to get positive yards every play but JJ was much better being the “lightening” than Blount was.
I understand about the criticism of JJ but he was not nearly as maligned as Blount considering those plays.
--Dominic, Addicted to Quack
Autzen Stadium is where great teams go to die." - J. Brady McCullough, The Michigan Daily.
by dvieira on May 5, 2009 11:07 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I really don’t think vision is a problem at all with Blount. I think he has great vision. He found holes he had no business finding consistently. I think the only reason his vision is called into question is due to his 1 yard on 13 carries against USC and Cal, and it’s real easy to say, hey, he has poor vision, whether or not that is the case. A while ago, I went back and looked at every carry from those games, and I think that these issues were not vision issues. There was simply no blocking. There was quick penetration by the defense, and Blount never had a chance to get going. This is more of a criticism of his acceleration and agility than vision.
I think that this erroneous attitude is due to a few called stretch plays that never panned out. But for every one of those, there were many that he turned successful because a semblance of a hole materialized.
If anything, you could say that Blount just doesn’t put his head down on these plays that end up going nowhere, and ends up getting a year or two less than he may have. But he seems to trust the line, and when the hole does open, he hits it and hits it hard. What was impressive about his Holiday Bowl run was how he hit the hole, and was 10 yards downfield before OSU could react. And then…well, he just did the rest.
--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
by jtlight on May 5, 2009 11:45 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
agree about SC Cal
Watching draft video of Clay Matthews (Go Packers!) there were multiple clips of him busting through the line and destroying Blount. It wasn’t Blount’s fault and maybe not even the lines fault, they just were an amazing front seven. And while we will see some good D fronts this season, nothing like those monsters. Blount should be fine on the stretch.
Ducks Go!
RIP CITY!
by trumpetduck on May 5, 2009 4:27 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agree with Jared, I do.
Blount can run the stretch. LaMichael James should also get lots of reps this fall and will likely satisfy our speed craving.
My concern with Blount is his conditioning and work ethic heading into a season where he may need to be the man in a larger sense than in 2008. John Hunt’s OregonLive video struck me as interesting (see it here) – Hunt saying Blount should be fine in the fall, so long as he doesn’t get “big time” syndrome. In that, Hunt exactly nailed my biggest concern about Blount. Any letdown at all and he won’t find the same success he had last season.
Other than snaps hitting Masoli right in the hands, the other thing I want to see/hear out of fall camp is reporters telling me “Wow, LeGarrette Blount really looks he’s ready to tear it up…”. With that, I will sleep easy heading into the BSU game.
I'm really tired of it not being football season.
by JConant on May 5, 2009 10:54 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know LaMichael James is supposed to be better at being Quizz than Quizz is but I haven’t seem him in contact drills, scrimmages or games. People can talk about how awesome a guy is on the practice field but I think the jury is still out until fall on him.
From the guys I have seen, Crenshaw has shown flashes this spring but needs to find that extra gear. Alston has been injured too much to get a good gauge on him.
--Dominic, Addicted to Quack
Autzen Stadium is where great teams go to die." - J. Brady McCullough, The Michigan Daily.
by dvieira on May 5, 2009 11:11 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed that LaMichael is an unknown at this point. Like I said, he “should” help. Definitely no guarantees.
I'm really tired of it not being football season.
by JConant on May 5, 2009 11:16 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
MY Blount concern
Is his weight. I saw him at the mall last weekend and he definately is not up to game shape. I am not sure where he went wrong on this, but he is looking at a potentially good draft status and could cost himself his future in the NFL, much less his future as a Duck. Here’s to hoping for a good summer of conditioning and getting his priorities straight. (borrowed a line from the FB coach in Dazed and Confused there…)
May we hand you your taints on a silver platter...
by 071903 on May 5, 2009 6:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He wasn’t able to participate in winter conditioning due to the suspension, and he’s apparently in better shape than he was. I’m not at all concerned about this. He’ll be at playing weight long before summer camp.
--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
by jtlight on May 5, 2009 6:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He'll be fine.
He looked 15 lbs. heavier 3 weeks ago, and at the spring game he still only looked slightly chunky. I know he’ll be ready by fall practice at the extreme latest. He’s a big, strong guy who knows how high he’s aiming. No doubt he burns off all he needs to.
Though, I am still concerned with his ability to actually run the ball come this year. It may sound silly to say that about a Senior who just rushed for >1000 yards, but I want to see him start cranking out the yardage sooner rather than later. His weight is no more than a disadvantage at the moment.
Addicted To Quack [dot] com; Dear Joevan, Develop motor skills. Love, ATQ.
by qrsouther on May 5, 2009 7:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Really
I hope Blount is good to go come fall, but dont you have to question a guy who cant keep him self in good shape with so much on the line? He has yet to prove that he is serious about working hard day in and day out. You dont think that these questions are going to come up during the combine next year and kill his draft stock? Yeah he is a game player, but how much better could he be if he really took his gifts seriously?
by ducksfan on May 5, 2009 11:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is what I was getting at.
No doubt he missed the winter due to the suspension, but don’t you think that you would do a little bit of hard work on your own? Perhaps that was part of the re-instatement, but if working out and conditioning was part of that, they didn’t set the bar very high. I am not trying to knock the kid, but from what I saw 5 feet in front of me last week, someone needs to light a fire under his ass and get him in the weight room. That person should be Blount.
May we hand you your taints on a silver platter...
by 071903 on May 6, 2009 1:49 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I too am bit concerned that Blount is already buying into his own hype. We all think he should be fine by fall camp, but only he can make that happen. We shall see.
I'm really tired of it not being football season.
by JConant on May 6, 2009 9:03 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You missed
Morgan Flint. JK
The blogger formerly know as OSU
by ConnorOSU on May 5, 2009 4:52 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Thurmond?
I like that the Third is not on the list but the second corner is. So I guess WT3 is just a rock and is who he is. I think he should play great but not get thrown too a lot, putting the pressure on the other guy. So i guess I answered my own musings. It will really help the ducks if they can all but leave Walter alone with the top WR and focus help else where, just not top ten important I guess.
Ducks Go!
RIP CITY!
by trumpetduck on May 5, 2009 4:56 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I had thoughts about this too
I think the more important person in that scenario has to be the other corner. WT3 will do just fine on his own, but teams will be forced to go the other way, thus the reasoning for the placement on the list.
May we hand you your taints on a silver platter...
by 071903 on May 5, 2009 6:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I voted for O-Line...
but I think that Chris Harper could turn into a VERY important Duck. I don’t think he will be as important as the others on this list, but should be somewhere in the discussion. In the Spring Game I saw that he was being utilized like Percy Harvin was at Florida. Harvin was a dangerous weapon in that offense and Harper has that athletic ability to be the same tool for Oregon. I really liked that he lined up in the slot, took a few handoffs and maybe something else in a similar formation in the future.
It may seem like he has not found his niche in the offense yet, but maybe that is his niche? Kelly said he is looking for ways to get the ball in Harper’s hands and having him as a RB/WR/Wildcat QB is a perfect way to disrupt an opposition’s defensive game plan.
May we hand you your taints on a silver platter...
by 071903 on May 5, 2009 6:47 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 




















