Why the Oregon running game will improve without Blount, at least in the short term
Oregon's rushing game last week was terrible, racking up a piddly 31 yards on 17 carries. While part of this was due to the inconsistent line play, a large part of these problems it had to do with the fact that the line and LeGarrette Blount just did not click, and did not work well with each other.
Blount is a runner that really needs to have a head of steam, when he hits the hole. When given that opportunity last season, he was spectacular. However, in those situations where he was given little room to maneuver (the Cal and USC games last year, and BSU last week), Blount floundered badly. He has proven that he has a lot of problems handling defensive penetration into the backfield.
Our young offensive line had issues, without a doubt. However, there were also openings, which Blount was unable to take advantage of because of his style of running. This season, we won't have the advantage of being able to wait until a decent sized hole opens up. Our lineman, at least in the early part of the year, will not be able to hold their blocks and long, and will let more defenders through. So when a hole does open up, we will need running backs that can take advantage of that.
I believe that LaMichael James and Kenjon Barner will have the speed to do that. Unfortunately, James only had two carries last game, so we must assume a lot, but let's take a look at the position he was in when he got ahold of the ball on the second offensive play last game:
When James got the ball, he was staring down two defenders, one who was beating his man, and one who was unblocked. Yet, he was able to split them with his speed. If Blount gets the ball, there is no way he turns that play into positive yardage. He would simply be too slow turning up the field. We will be seeing these sorts of situations a lot this season.
Over the next few games, while our line is still growing, we will be very dependent on the speed of the running backs, and it seems that this is exactly what we need right now.
However, despite this, losing Blount is still a large blow. I don't doubt that our line play will improve. We have one of the best line coaches in the country and we will see improvement. When this happens, we will miss Blount sorely. His running style was very different from any of our other running backs, and he can succeed when other backs can't, just as speedy backs have abilities he does not. One of the big advantages that Oregon had last year was the two back system that kept other teams off guard. Without this advantage moving forward, as we reach the latter parts of the football season, his absence could grow painfully obvious.
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I agree...
we will not have too much of a change of pace in the backfield anymore ( wish we still had chris harper!)…But the speed of our backs will surely help our o-line mesh into a single unit
Formerly Blount#9...
Cheese and rice! (I’m not cursing this week in honor of BYU’s victory over Oklahoma) That picture tells it all.
Right tackle getting smoked off the ball. What looks like the right guard and center actually facing each other while a defender occupies an inside gap unmolested. Nice double by the left guard and left tackle, assuming that was their assignment…there is a defender standing just off tackle ready to smack Masoli if he keeps, maybe the tackle should be stepping out to block that guy. What is Holland doing at the bottom, turning around to catch a pass on a run play? Or, did he miss a block on the guy who’s coming down on Masoli?
The beauty of all this…it’s all fixable. There’s a ton going wrong here, but it’s all fixable.
Last time I checked, there is no "Hall of Average." - Oregon Football Coach Chip Kelly
What is Holland doing at the bottom, turning around to catch a pass on a run play?
From what I’ve seen, there’s often a pass option for Masoli, in case he keeps it on a bad read keeper.
"It’s spelled E-L-F T-U-S-H"
I was wondering about that, but I thought the receiver usually camped on the line of scrimmage. You’re probably right.
Last time I checked, there is no "Hall of Average." - Oregon Football Coach Chip Kelly
Interesting Point
That’s an interesting perspective. Obviously our team is worse without Blount, but I think James will be able to step up. And because he’s coming in week 2, by the end of the season he’ll have quite a bit of experience.
I re-watched the Civil War a week or so ago
The O-line last year seemed to have their way in the last couple of games. They had a lot of pulled guards and even center to get the running game going. I haven’t reviewed the BSU game enough to see it, but is the inexperience in the O-line this year preventing them from that kind of scheme?
May we hand you your taints on a silver platter...
Very perceptive
Very perceptive. Great photo too. I’m thinking you’re right. Hoping so.
Last year I saw linemen pulling and blocking linebackers/DB’s. I wonder if that’s still in the game plan or, if it was, that Boise negated it somehow.
I feel that our new line had less to do with our anemic rushing than Bosie’s game plan. Cal’s D game plan is usually effective against us.
If there’s a way Coach Kelly will find it.
Go Ducks!!! Beat Perdue!
by 76'77GridironDuck on Sep 10, 2009 8:22 PM PDT reply actions

























