How Will Oregon Respond to Adversity?

Please Masoli, don't just be a flash in the pan!
College football is the only sport where you can have a must-win game in just the second week of the season. Well, that’s if you want any chance for a BCS bowl game, but that’s how it goes when there are 120 teams competing for ten spots. And unfortunately, the Ducks are stuck in that situation this weekend.
Oregon came into the season with substantial expectations, carrying the momentum from brilliant wins over Oregon State and Oklahoma State to finish the season. So dominant, were these wins, that national pundits were touting Jeremiah Masoli as a sleeper candidate for the Heisman, despite only throwing for 135 yards per game last season.
What I’m getting at, is that Oregon was banking on a player who basically only had two good games to be their leader this year. To be honest, I was not impressed with Masoli at all in 2008 until he blew up against the two OSU’s. I thought he tried to run the ball too much (east and west), made poor decisions (i.e. the Cal interception) and wasn’t the most accurate passer. There were definite flashes of excellence that foreshadowed his potential, like the touchdown pass to Jeffrey Maehl against Washington, and any one of the several times to bludgeoned a would-be tackler, but he lacked consistency.
Oregon fans were so eager and excited to buy into the Masoli kool-aid, that they subconsciously bit off more than they could chew for this season’s expectations.
So now where does that leave us for this season?
As horribly as the Ducks played against Boise State last Thursday, voters will look back at that game in November and see it as an 11 point loss to the #14 ranked team on the road. That really doesn’t sound so bad.
But before Oregon can think about having BCS aspirations again, Oregon has to take care of business at home against Purdue, and in a big way. Purdue is an ok team, nothing more, nothing less, but they carry the Big-10 brand with them to Autzen, and anytime you can beat a team from a BCS conference in non-conference play, it’s huge. So what the Ducks need to do is come out ready to play, and blast Purdue like this is biggest game of the season – because, well, it is.
After being so unprepared for Boise State, I think Chip Kelly can rally the troupes and move past the debacle that was last Thursday night.
Prediction: Oregon 38, Purdue 17
LaMichael James will go off in his first start at TB, rushing for over 100 yards and a pair of scores.
Masoli will improve, throwing for two scores and running in another, though I do expect him to give the ball away once or twice. He needs to be less careless with the ball.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or the Addicted To Quack Moderators. FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable Oregon fans.
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
like the touchdown pass to Chris Harper against Washington
Well, there was a beautiful touchdown pass to Chris Harper last year, but that was versus UCLA. In the Washington game there was also a beautiful touchdown pass, but that was to Maehl. Either way, I basically agree with the thesis of this read. Thanks for the input.
Addicted To Quack [dot] com; Six-hundred and ninety-four yards of total offense.
good catch
fixed.
The UO Sports Dude - www.keithabecker.wordpress.com
by UOSportsDude on Sep 11, 2009 7:04 PM PDT up reply actions
"if you want any chance for a BCS bowl game, but that’s how it goes when there are 120 teams competing for eight spots."
Aren’t there 10 BCS spots?
Rose
Sugar
Fiesta
Orange
+ BCSMNCG
Of all the stuff to comment on or debate, why does everyone decide to nitpick the small stuff?
The UO Sports Dude - www.keithabecker.wordpress.com
by UOSportsDude on Sep 11, 2009 8:38 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Not trying to nitpick
I think its important to get the numbers straight, especially with all the money, prestige, etc involved with making a BCS bowl. The pac-10 is consistently underrepresented in those games. we rarely see a second team. You’re right to think that this week is a must win game, but remember; a two-loss team has made the MNCG before.
as far as a debate, i don’t see an argument to make. we lost week one. masoli didn’t show up in winter-2008 form. we as fans are worried. the team needs to make a statement today against purdue. agree on all points.
Not trying to nitpick...
… but its should be it’s, etc should be etc., the pac in Pac-10 is capitalized, you didn’t capitalize we at the beginning of a sentence, as well as as (which also could have been indented because it was a new paragraph.) Also, I is always capitalized, as are proper names, i.e. Masoli, Purdue, etc.. But I agree on all points.
by WhenDUXattacK! on Sep 13, 2009 11:17 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Hahahahahaha
Rec’d.
Addicted To Quack [dot] com; Six-hundred and ninety-four yards of total offense.
I agree mostly. While I liked Masoli more than Roper, it was more because of what Masoli would do when Roper would not. (Throw deep. Option Keeper.) I gave Masoli the benefit of the doubt because he had only a few weeks at Oregon before he was asked to play. He`s had 1 F. 2 Ds. a few Bs. And 2 As. Last year we had a great Oline and RBs. Average performance from the QB was still a win. This year we need above average to great play at QB to win. If Masoli throws like he did against Arizona or toOSUs, we have a shot to smell roses. BSU, Cal, or USC… We struggle for a bowl.
"It’s spelled E-L-F T-U-S-H"
by JShufelt on Sep 12, 2009 7:47 AM PDT via mobile reply actions

by 






















