Morning Quack Fix: Ducks focus on tackling, look ahead to Utah.
Good morning Duck fans. It's amazing how much brighter the week looks after a win. Here's hoping I am feeling even better next Tuesday. After the jump a few videos, including an interview of Chip discussing the Utah Utes -- check it out.
- Moseley has some practice notes up from yesterday, in which there was a focus on both tackling technique and reducing penalties during special teams play. Moseley goes more in depth on the emphasis on tackling in today's Register-Guard article. On the injury front, Moseley notes that both Spencer Paysinger and T.J. Ward did not participate, though both are listed as starters for Saturday.
- George Schroeder has a column up today that discusses how the inconsistency of the early Oregon team has caused many to revise their preseason expectations. However, as Jared keeps pointing out, we have improved every half this season. Hopefully, we can put together a full game against Utah and deliver a performance that most of us were expecting heading into this year.
- Moseley also has a roundup of links ranking the Pac-10 after the first two weeks. As one might expect, Oregon is ranked no higher than fifth. Also included are link to stories on the next four Oregon opponents.
- Ted Miller thinks Oregon is still trying to find itself in 2009. And, considering that the Ducks are averaging just over 250 yards of offense per game, it's hard to argue. While Chip may argue that he's more concerned with points scored over yards, we won't be able to rely on our defense to contribute 17 points per game.
- Here's a Utah blog entry that discusses the early QB play for the Utes. The presumptive starter is Terrance Cain who received praise from coach Kyle Whittingham despite some struggles during the middle two quarters against San Jose State. However, Cain still finished with nearly 350 yards of total offense, including 94 yards on 20 rushes. Still, an inexperienced QB playing at Autzen? Hopefully our defense can have another big day. Lots of other notes on the depth chart for the Oregon game are included.
- The Duck baseball team started fall camp on Monday, and it sounds like they are eager to move on from (and improve upon) last year's 14-42 mark. Jeff Smith's blog entry also notes that the second phase of construction for PK Park is still on schedule to be finished prior to this year's home opener. Bob Clark also has a story in today's Register-Guard that notes how much more prepared the Ducks are during camp this year.
- Finally, don't forget to make your picks for week three of the Jersey Contest. And, Nebraska could really use some love in the first game -- only one poster out of 37 thinks they'll beat VaTech.
Go Ducks!
Here's a video interview of Chip talking Utah:
| Oregon Ducks Chip Kelly |
Also, from BusterSports, Nick Daschel discusses the games for Oregon and Oregon State this past weekend:
0 recs |
63 comments
|
Comments
I think normally I might be concerned about Oregon overlooking this game a little bit, but because of the slow start we are having I think they are going to be more focused than we might think. I just hope this doesn’t turn into another last years BSU game.
WE OWN THE BIG 10!
Actually we just sort of borrowed it.
by echris on Sep 15, 2009 8:17 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
how are you concerned that it will turn into the BSU game last year? Is there something specific that feels the same?
--Dominic, Addicted to Quack
Autzen Stadium is where great teams go to die." - J. Brady McCullough, The Michigan Daily.
by dvieira on Sep 15, 2009 9:15 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
just another mid major coming into Autzen is all I mean
WE OWN THE BIG 10!
Actually we just sort of borrowed it.
by echris on Sep 15, 2009 10:53 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I said I'm not concerned
When I said “they” I actually meant “we”
Yeah I just re-read my comment it it doesn’t make a whole lot of sense does it? That’s because it’s Tako-Tuesday already…is it not?
WE OWN THE BIG 10!
Actually we just sort of borrowed it.
by echris on Sep 15, 2009 11:03 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think so
We don’t have to break in a new QB this year and given that we aren’t exactly flying high, we’ll be fine.
I think this team will be ready to go Saturday.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
by skywaker9 on Sep 15, 2009 10:50 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah,
I don’t think anyone is looking past Utah anymore. It looks like their QB has stepped in well in replace of Brian Johnson. This will be a fun game to watch.
http://fourthdownand5.blogspot.com/ — a "playoff" blog
by socmaniam on Sep 15, 2009 8:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cleaning up the blog site request # 1
Any possibility of scouring some of the old BS U drivel /inanities? I’m slow to forget and quick to forgive and yet daily getting my ‘nose rubbed in it’ does not seem to be the timbre of this site, IMO.
by DONALDUCK on Sep 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I’m sorry, I don’t understand. How are our noses getting rubbed in something?
--Dominic, Addicted to Quack
Autzen Stadium is where great teams go to die." - J. Brady McCullough, The Michigan Daily.
by dvieira on Sep 15, 2009 9:16 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m totes in a world of confusion too.
So here’s a picture of Astronaut Commander Pancake.

"It’s spelled S-H-U-F-A-T-G-I-R-L-S"
by JShufelt on Sep 15, 2009 9:30 AM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
i like pancakes and space
Here is to moving on. Go Ducks!
by trumpetduck on Sep 15, 2009 10:01 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This makes more sense then Donald’s post, without question.
Now back to secretly rubbing his nose in, you know, stuff and junk and whatever…
by ArbyOSU on Sep 15, 2009 11:05 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Are those Bisquick pancakes? Cause if not, Houston, we have a problem.
I feel the need, the need...for speed!
by Gorbachav5 on Sep 15, 2009 12:58 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Yeah, wtf IS Houston's problem? Winning too many games?
by DONALDUCK on Sep 15, 2009 1:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Our mascot can beat up their mascot.
It's spelled "S-H-U-B-L-O-W-O-F-F"
by JShufelt on Sep 15, 2009 1:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The greatest posts of the week thus far
"I used to play sports. Then I realized you can buy trophies. Now I'm good at everything." - Demetri Martin
by haveasoda on Sep 15, 2009 1:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
off subject
does anyone know when they announce the game times which are currently listed as TBA? particularly the Oregon AT UCLA game Oct 10th. Planning on being in the LA area…
Life is about growth. People are not perfect when they're 21 years old. - Bill Walton
by NEP on Sep 15, 2009 11:16 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
About six days in advance
Or if not by Monday.
It depends on TV mainly.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
by skywaker9 on Sep 15, 2009 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks
i knew it was TV driven. i was hoping for a little earlier. planning a birthday 1500 miles away in 6 days will be fun.
Life is about growth. People are not perfect when they're 21 years old. - Bill Walton
by NEP on Sep 15, 2009 12:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nope
You might get a hint earlier, but on UCLA-Oregon probably not.
To give you an idea, I went to the Washington-UO game in Seattle two years back and the start time was announced Monday morning.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
by skywaker9 on Sep 15, 2009 12:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So apparently throwback Unis (from the Rosebowl) are going to be used for the Cal game
Should be interesting to see how they look in HD…
by ppilot on Sep 15, 2009 11:30 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Source?
"It’s spelled S-H-U-F-A-T-G-I-R-L-S"
by JShufelt on Sep 15, 2009 11:34 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Been brought up and confirmed on one of the other Sites
by ppilot on Sep 15, 2009 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Scout....normally I wouldn't relay information like this because it was on the paid board
But this seemed pretty harmless. Basically one of posters best friends (who interns in the athletic department) said that throwbacks were being brought out for the Cal game. This was confirmed by another poster, who said it would be the rosebowl uni’s minus a couple items.
by ppilot on Sep 15, 2009 11:57 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
While I am not familiar with the community at educk, I would not typically classify the postings of a few posters of a forum as confirmation.
That said, if this turns out to be true, I’d be all for it.
by ntrebon on Sep 15, 2009 12:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
While I wouldn't bet the house on this
I would definitely lean towards believing this, based on what I’ve seen in the past. A fair number of people in the AD and closely connected to it maintain accounts at educk and have made similar comment before.
by ppilot on Sep 15, 2009 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This was confirmed by another poster, who said it would be the rosebowl uni’s minus a couple items.
as in, minus Donald Duck since we don’t have permission to use him anymore
by echo31 on Sep 15, 2009 1:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
that makes sense, I guess I thought I had read once that we couldn’t in our logo anymore … my bad
by echo31 on Sep 15, 2009 1:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Someone can correct me if I’m wrong, but we just can’t sell anything out of state if it has Donald (or registered disney trademarks).
That’s one of the biggest reasons why the changed the logo, so they could have out-of-state marketing.
It's spelled "S-H-U-B-L-O-W-O-F-F"
by JShufelt on Sep 15, 2009 2:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought we had to pay a large sum to use his likeness.
Addicted To Quack [dot] com; Six-hundred and ninety-four yards of total offense.
by qrsouther on Sep 15, 2009 3:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
iirc, in addition to the instate-only sales, our slice of the profit was shaved a tiny bit, but I don’t think we had to pay any big licensing fee.
Note to mods: input goes off the page in replies when you get this far down in a thread. Box isn’t resizing properly. Damnit.
by grimc on Sep 15, 2009 3:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’ve noticed this, and will let the tech team know. Thanks.
--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
by jtlight on Sep 15, 2009 4:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's fine for me, the box resizing thing.
Though it has been a problem in the past.
Addicted To Quack [dot] com; Six-hundred and ninety-four yards of total offense.
by qrsouther on Sep 15, 2009 4:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I find that very hard to believe….
--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
by jtlight on Sep 15, 2009 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I dunno… I mean, they’re talking about it on other sites…
by ArbyOSU on Sep 15, 2009 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I concur
Less than two weeks out… I would there would have been an official announcement from the AD, with a link to UO Bookstore to purchase your own throwback.
But I’ve been wrong before.
"It amazes me that you understand (...) the number one play of what their offense is and what they do best, AND you still can't stop it!" - Craig James
by AcadianTraverse on Sep 15, 2009 12:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
There have been multiple situations where the uniform selection was kept under wraps
Remember the Grellow helmets and Jersey’s? I don’t think the all whites had much of an announcement either.
by ppilot on Sep 15, 2009 12:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
How long has it been since Cal has Rose Bowled?
by DONALDUCK on Sep 15, 2009 12:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
1959
38-12 loss to Iowa.
Last time I checked, there is no "Hall of Average." - Oregon Football Coach Chip Kelly
by JConant on Sep 15, 2009 12:56 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So, do you suppose it's intended to be a 'secret' so they won't 'throwback' at us?
Or will this be a ‘throwback’ winner-take-all-smack-down?
by DONALDUCK on Sep 15, 2009 1:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Those combos were part of the uniform news release at the beginning of the 06 season. The actual combinations were kept a secret until the games. But we had seen them before.
A more comparable example would be in 05 when the diamond plates were unveiled for the first time and last year when the team took the field in the wings for the first time. The AD did allude to the “new uniforms” before the Arizona game last year, though I don’t remember exactly how far in advance.
There’s no way for me to actually know until somethings confirmed by the school or I see them with my own eyes. However, if I was organizing things I would be promoting a “Throwback” game in advance to get the fans into it.
"It amazes me that you understand (...) the number one play of what their offense is and what they do best, AND you still can't stop it!" - Craig James
by AcadianTraverse on Sep 15, 2009 4:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The grellow?
There were rumors but nothing was confirmed until a couple weeks before the actual game. As for the whites and wings…….same situation, there was no formal announcement of changing the uniforms like the did at the beginning of this year.
by ppilot on Sep 15, 2009 4:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Uniform announcements
After some more research, we’re both partially right.
Here’s the link to the June 2006 press release on the new Jersey’s being put into full rotation. That’s Mr. Colvin in the all-whites, which debuted in 2007 at the track meet at Husky Stadium and the yellow helmets, which were first worn at the 2006 LV Bowl.
Debut of the wings against Arizona was just rumours last year (namely a great inside source on this very blog) and I couldn’t find anything about the debut of the diamond plate for the 2005 Civil War, so I doubt there was any advance notice on those either.
Thus I accept that your conclusion is sound. For special one-off uniform events (as would be the case for throw-backs) the school has not given any official indication to the fact. If they do take the field in the Rose Bowl jerseys I’ll be sure to re-acknowledge that you broke the story here.
"It amazes me that you understand (...) the number one play of what their offense is and what they do best, AND you still can't stop it!" - Craig James
by AcadianTraverse on Sep 16, 2009 12:26 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn't call it breaking a story if it does come true
As I don’t have a true source per se, just relaying information.
by ppilot on Sep 16, 2009 8:24 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh the lattest person to chime in says their are more like the Akili Smith
era uni’s than the Rosebowl
by ppilot on Sep 16, 2009 8:27 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would prefer the uniforms from 1998 over the Rose Bowl uniforms. Those Rose Bowl uniforms are just Packers uniforms. At least the Akili Smith/Ruben Droughns era uniforms were our own.
by echo31 on Sep 16, 2009 8:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
we just got new unis and have worn them twice
the timing just seems off. not to mention your source is not a source.
Here is to moving on. Go Ducks!
by trumpetduck on Sep 16, 2009 1:24 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
When have Oregon's uniform choices ever followed a logical pattern
by ppilot on Sep 16, 2009 8:26 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
always
They have been regularly updating the uniforms every few years, and there is no better college marketing department than ours, and our uniform changes have been well-times to keep us constantly on the national radar, i.e once everyone got used to the diamond plating, we started flying.
In regards to our program, throwbacks for the cal game would be a waste of an idea. if it were up to me, we’d see throwback sometime in the second half of the 2010 season, just as everyone is becoming accustomed to the wings and (hopefully) in a nationally televised game with BCS implications.
It's spelled "T-A-K-O-T-U-E-S-D-A-Y-S-!-!-!."
I support inroywetrust in his support of The VD Special in his support of me supporting Roger Kieschnick in his quest to becoming the best Kieschnick ever to play professional baseball.
by Takimoto on Sep 16, 2009 8:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Unfortunately everything you want is the complete opposite
of how Oregon debuts uniforms.
by ppilot on Sep 17, 2009 12:27 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
any credible source on when the snuggie uniform makes it's debut?
by Bill Musgrave on Sep 17, 2009 1:17 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
When Oregon beats USC, Pete Carroll has to wear one in the post game interview.
by DONALDUCK on Sep 17, 2009 10:07 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And that's not only credible........
that’s incredible!
by DONALDUCK on Sep 17, 2009 10:08 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
pete just might be the snuggie kind of guy
lots of hot cocoa, a good romance novel, and yatch rock
silly pete
by Bill Musgrave on Sep 17, 2009 5:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I really don't like playing huge games in newly unveiled uniforms/helmets.
Dunno why.
Addicted To Quack [dot] com; Six-hundred and ninety-four yards of total offense.
by qrsouther on Sep 17, 2009 2:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i like football
uniforms and all of the intricacies that can be discussed re: uniforms – meh, not so much
by Bill Musgrave on Sep 16, 2009 6:09 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Link to the Purdue game in case anybody wants to watch it again
by ppilot on Sep 15, 2009 1:30 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Actually a site where you can find the game to be exact
You have to register, though after perusing the amount of games available I might make this a weekly stop
by ppilot on Sep 15, 2009 1:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 



















