Who are you and what did you do with Jeremiah Masoli?
We all know there were many, many problems with the offense against Boise State. But I have to say, Jeremiah Masoli looked simply terrible. He looked absolutely nothing like the QB we saw through the latter part of last season. He was indecisive, inaccurate, and had bad pocket presence. Luckily, I feel that these things can be fixed, but Masoli doesn't have much time to get his head on straight.
I'm going to take a look at a few plays that I feel are indicative of Masoli's play. Honestly, there were a lot to chose from. But hopefully these will give you an idea of just what Masoli needs to do to improve.
Play 1:
We'll start with the first 3rd down conversion attempt of the game. It was 3rd and 4 near midfield. During the pre-snap lineup, it a simply look around would reveal that Jeff Maehl (at the top of the screen) was being closely covered 1-on-1 by Kyle Wilson, BSU's best cover corner. On the long side of the field, both Jamere Holland (far bottom) and Ed Dickson (just above him) were being very softly covered by their respective corners.
After the snap, Jeff Maehl proceeded to go straight down the field, and was unable to get any separation from Wilson. Unfortunately, Masoli continued to stare down Maehl this entire time, not even glancing toward the other side of the field, where both Dickson and Holland were nearing the first down marker while still being very loosely covered by their defenders.
In the final shot, we see Masoli throw the ball toward Maehl, a pass which ends up 5 yards out of bounds, while the entire left side of the field would have seen a fairly simple pass to achieve the first down. What's so frustrating about this play, is that this is a similar defense that we have seen our team run over and over again on 3rd and short situations, yet, the Ducks fail to take the first down that the defense is begging to give our team.
Unfortunately, Masoli showed an inability to look beyond his first option through most of the first half, though he did improve marginally as the game went on. It's also important to note that there were other plays where Masoli simply caved under pressure, looking the opposite of Kellen Moore. Again, improvement happened as the game went on, but Masoli's passing was very rough for much of the game.
Play 2:
However, Masoli's rushing was plagued by indecision. In the second example, we see a play that could become another staple of the Oregon offense. This occurred on the Duck's first touchdown drive of the game. Before the snap, LaMichael James is in motion, in what could become a sweep play to him.
This time though, instead of handing the ball off, Masoli likely seeing a push on the left side of the line, decides to keep the ball and run it himself.
As he runs up the field, the left side of the line actually gets a good push. Dickson, Weems, and Thran are moving up the field against 2 defenders, while Asper, Kaiser and Holmes are holding off the backside pressure. At this point, the play is set up for succes. The only player in a decent position to make a play is the BSU linebacker #52, Derrell Acrey. However, he is caught flat footed from moving to his left, and would have trouble making a play.
Unfortunately, for some reason, instead of going outside, Masoli stutter steps to the middle, and loses all of this momentum. You can see what this play may have done, as Weems is starting to break upfield.
At this point, the play is breaking down, Thran is losing his block while Acrey is moving into the now quickly closing hole. Masoli ends up gaining 2-3 yards on the play.
This time, the play was done in by indecision on the part of Masoli. There was a big opportunity on this play for success but Masoli did not hit the hole as it was opening. This is very unlike the Masoli we saw last season, who made the decision and then went straight up the field. And with an inexperienced line, any ball carrier will need to hit the hole with incredible speed. Indecision will simply not be an option.
Unfortunately, we'll see something like that again in the next play.
Play 3:
The final play may have been the most important of the game. This was the 4th down play which has received much criticism, as a field goal would have put Oregon within one possession of the Broncos. I don't criticize the call to go for it, though the execution of the play was poor. Oregon ran multiple times, with similar success each time. Oregon starts in a standard formation.
As soon as the play starts the line fails to push. And as BSU had done countless times, they had left both a DE and LB home on the end to watch Masoli.
Masoli then hands the ball off to Blount, who gets stopped for a loss again, as BSU has more men on the line and is set to stop the run.
While this was not a great play from the beginning, I am surprised that Masoli did not hold on to the ball himself. When he had done this earlier in the game, gains had been not great, but they had at least been positive. What surprises me about this, however, is that we saw last year, over and over again, Masoli take the ball even when a DE was there on that end, unblocked. While success on this play was not guaranteed, I think it's indicative of a lack of confidence that was seen throughout the game on his part. In a game where he needed to be decisive, he was not. This lack of confidence was seen in the passing game, where he didn't have good reads and relied on his first option for much of the game, while showing little pocket presence or awareness.
So where does this leave us? Luckily, I think that these mistakes seen my Masoli are more than fixable. We know the talent that he has, and he improved as the game went on. But his confidence must return. He must trust his instincts and just go, something that made him so great last season.
If he can regain this composure, he'll be just fine. If not, we could be in for a very long season.
13 recs |
41 comments
|
Comments
rec’d for great analysis
--Dominic, Addicted to Quack
Autzen Stadium is where great teams go to die." - J. Brady McCullough, The Michigan Daily.
+1
To go out and ruin somebody's dreams like that, it feels real good," Oregon receiver Jaison Williams.
Masoli was replaced with a indecisive robot
Clearly, Masoli was snatched away and replaced with an indecisive robot. It’s the only explanation for the two plays when he stood still in the pocket, then jumps sideways awkwardly, then threw the ball with all elbow. One was off-target incomplete, the other was an interception. Servos malfunctioned on those two plays, and whoever designed the Masoli robot forgot to add football knowledge to its A.I.
by keeerrrttt1 on Sep 7, 2009 9:15 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
That must be it!
I don’t know if I’ve ever seen a more bizarre move on the field than Masoli’s ‘robot hop’ before he threw the pick. Watching it live I yelled out loud “What the hell is he doing?” Maybe there was a bear nearby and he was standing still so it wouldn’t notice him? Maybe he figured “if I don’t move at all everybody will think I don’t have the ball, or maybe they’ll forget about me!”
Perhaps Masoli already knows that Costa will be leading us through the Pac-10 and he’s planning to reinvent himself with a signature dance move. I have no idea what was going on but I hope I never, ever see a Duck make that move again. It was so bad, even now (Monday) I can still see it when I close my eyes.
Someone told him that Boise State’s vision is based on movement, like a T-Rex.
I feel the need, the need...for speed!
by Gorbachav5 on Sep 7, 2009 9:15 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
Cool.
And it’s obviously true, as you can see Aaron Tevis not moving left until he changed direction. Too bad Tevis also become the intended receiver that same play.
"You know where i'm from, a little suspicion about one's true identity and motives is considered good manners."
-- Nale

I haven’t seen movement like this since Small Wonder episodes.
"You know where i'm from, a little suspicion about one's true identity and motives is considered good manners."
-- Nale
by Loque on Sep 7, 2009 5:11 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Great Points
Not to say any part of it was stellar, but I think the play of Masoli was the key factor is the offensive worries Thursday.
On a side note. WOW…we are actually talking about football again……….AWESOME!!
Wow, great post
Glaring examples of poor execution by Masoli and the O-line (although certainly more by Masoli) and poor play calling.
On play 2 what struck me is that virtually any other decision Masoli made would have been better than the one he actually made. If he just runs instead of stutter stepping, big gain. If he keeps the ball and cuts back to the right, decent gain. If he gives to James, big gain.
And play three was just a bad play call. I agree with the decision to go for it. 4th and 1 when you need a TD at some point vs a 40 yard FG from kickers who looked very poor at times in camp seems to indicate that going for it is a good idea. But the running game had been awful all day. Wasn’t this time for something different? A play action pass to either Maehl (if they wanted to go for the homerun) or the left side slot receiver (if they just wanted a couple yards for the first) would have completely fooled the defense. Masoli was indecisive, Kelly was bad, the o-line was weak.
That game was full of fail. At least it can only get better, right?
I feel the need, the need...for speed!
Missing the real problem
I really like the actual football analysis in this post. Most fans/bloggers have just ignored the facts and just shot off with whatever they felt about how the game with.
That said, you’re missing a huge part of the point. While Masoli may have looked indecisive, you completely ignore the fact that every single play, at least two receivers were completely lost.
Analyze the routes they were supposed to run, and look at the sloppy cuts and complete lack of focus by just about everyone but Maehl. At least last year you had three receivers that typically were in places Masoli was expecting them. At BSU though, Masoli’s “indecision” has a lot to do with not knowing where his receivers are.
Stop with the knee-jerk “bad play calling” “bad quarterback play” reaction that everyone is senselessly whining about.
Go Ducks.
How can Masoli even tell if receivers are running bad routes if he’s not even looking in their direction?
In the first half, there were some bad routes run (it did improve as the game went on), but there were many times where good routes were being run, and Masoli’s complete inability to survey the field caused them to go unnoticed.
I have a feeling that bad routes in combination with Masoli’s inability to find the open man led to further breakdown as that trust was lost in both parties.
--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
by jtlight on Sep 7, 2009 11:43 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
This ^
Look at play 1 again. Ed Dickson could have dropped trou and done a jig on the 48 yard line and Masoli wouldn’t have known it. Calling the receivers out for bad routes is one thing, but blaming the failure of the offense on it is a strawman.
I feel the need, the need...for speed!
Strawman, way to bring out the critical argument vocabulary :)
"I used to play sports. Then I realized you can buy trophies. Now I'm good at everything." - Demetri Martin
There has been a boatload of over-reactive posts to this unfortunate game
but this is not one of them. Posts like this are what make ATQ better than than the other blogs. Props to Jared for the effort, and rec for the insight.
Great analysis
I expected more out of Masoli, too.
I don't pretend to be an expert with the x's and o's...
but with my limited football acumen, I will point out that the correlation between oline experience and success was validated wtih both OU and UO. Two prolific offenses were plain pedestrian in the first week. I know that Bradford was out but OU has a very good running game and Bradford spent his entire time on his back until the shoulder was sprained.
Secondly, our 240 pound featured back was not in shape. He never got his shoulder facing north and south. I think he is much better in a “closer” role.
Lastly, the good news is that Purdue let a 3-9 MAC team from last year score 30+ at home. Our offense should get an opportunity to get going. I just hope that we can stop Purdue.
Part Two: (I don't pretend to be an expert with the x's and o's...)
It seemed like to me that the great instincts that he showed last year and the year before had been ‘taken away’ by an admonition: “If you let him run wild like he did last year, he’s gonna get hurt.”
It just seemed like he didn’t want to run with the ball. I’d have a hard time thinking that was fear. I be more inclined to think that, I don’t know exactly how to say it, but, he got ‘coached’ out of his greatest skill by past injuries.
Is it fixable? I sure as hell hope so. Otherwise, I got some tickets for sale cheap.
by DONALDUCK on Sep 7, 2009 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I wil be at every game no matter what transpires.
by BisonDucks on Sep 7, 2009 11:55 AM PDT up reply actions 3 recs
rec’d. I’ll see you at the tailgate
--Dominic, Addicted to Quack
Autzen Stadium is where great teams go to die." - J. Brady McCullough, The Michigan Daily.
We need Autzen to be as crazy as ever...
next week. I have no doubts that an opener at night will be crazy by default. However, we need to add some extra special spice to the environment. The last thing we want is a loss to Purdue with Utah and Cal coming to town.
Otherwise, I got some tickets for sale cheap.
LAME! Be a true fan a stick by your team through thick and thin.
by echo31 on Sep 7, 2009 1:21 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Otherwise, I got some tickets for sale cheap.
Weak.
Addicted To Quack [dot] com; Six-hundred and ninety-four yards of total offense.
by qrsouther on Sep 7, 2009 1:56 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I'll take those tickets!
I haven’t been to a game in years, and I’m sticking by my team.
Pubert Jones > Hedo
by rockingharder on Sep 7, 2009 4:23 PM PDT up reply actions
Purdue may have given up 32...
…But many of the defensive struggles are very fixable problems that I would anticipate being fixed, or at minimum, improved next week. I think next Saturday’s matchup has the potential to be a very exciting game. It will depend on how well Purdue’s mixed-bag team and new coaching staff gel in one of the more hostile college football environments. I’m looking forward to a great game.
Our biggest problem was our defensive line being gassed
Toledo attempted 68 passes on the day. Opelt almost exclusively used a 3-step drop and threw slants over the middle. He was able to do so because, at one point in the second half, we had three D-line starters in the locker room with dehydration. That forced our linebackers to play up and left the middle wide open. We also had a very poor day tackling. One Toledo touchdown would have been a erased but the officials ruled that an incompletion in the case of an interception cannot be reviewed. David Pender clearly had a pick for us, they called it incomplete, and they said we couldn’t review it.
On the plus side, the only reason we didn’t score 70 is that we had three tipped passes become interceptions and we had a botched 4th and 2 where our QB ran into his running back. Out kicker also bombed home a 59-yard field goal before halftime.
A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance
HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog
Thanks Jtlight, this must have taken a little time
"I used to play sports. Then I realized you can buy trophies. Now I'm good at everything." - Demetri Martin
Thanks Jared,
A rec for you and I will eat crow for when I said Masoli was not to blame.
Addicted To Quack [dot] com; Six-hundred and ninety-four yards of total offense.
Great post. Thanks for the analysis.
I knew Masoli looked off (to say the least), but this is a solid breakdown. I’d love to see more coverage like this on the Quack.
Pubert Jones > Hedo
I will do my best. It seems like I save these moments for only the truly awful games.
--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
Yeah Jared but it really helps us to make sense of it all
Thanks for re-living that shit and condensing it down for us to swallow.
Yes we will...not score very much
great analysis, thanks for putting in the time as many have said
my hope is that masoli, amongst others, was so hyped up for revenge and for the first game of the season that he just couldn’t relax, lost his head in a less noticeable style than LGB. all the mini-trash talk leading up to the game, this sort of thing… hoping we’re through that and he’ll get back to business sans hyperventilation level intensity.
we know the dude can play – pass reads, run reads, good arm, good wheels – he’s shown all of this. last year it took him a few games to get in the swing, obviously we were all hoping the extra experience and the end of the year would just roll on into this one.
i for one still think it’s coming.
Yeah. Great Post and pics. Lotsa fun to go with it with you.
Sorry to rile you yellow-billed Dudes and Doodettes about the cheap tickets. Somebody had to do something to look at what we’ve got rather than what we don’t got….
Now we just gotta do our part.
Thanks for making this kind of effort, Jared.
I watched the replay last night. Not quite as painful and definitely revealing. What I saw in the first half was a serious case of opening game on national TV in a hostile environment jitters – resulting in the tunnel vision and poor reads that Jared thoroughly discussed. That led to lost confidence as neither the passing game or running game proved productive. Then pressing too much. Then flat-out panic.
Masoli seemed to get it together in the third quarter, driving the team to a score with plenty of time. Then Holland dropped a big play. Shortly after, Masoli let his instincts take over, made a nice run and fumbled. All of the confidence and momentum disappeared right there.
I completely agree with Jared’s assertion that the problems he detailed can be fixed. I’m confident they will be. Where I’m left concerned is the psychological aspect which the Ducks seemed to fail so badly. What happens if the offense opens the Purdue game with a three-and-out? What if the Ducks go scoreless in the first quarter and fall behind a team they’ll be favored to beat? Hopefully, we won’t have to find out.
The challenge for the coaches this week goes beyond Xs and Os and execution and decision making. They’ll have to work on repairing the offense’s psyche. It must be fragile, if not entirely broken, at this point. I’ll do my little tiny part. I’ll be there Saturday night cheering those guys as loud as I can the moment they hit the Autzen turf. I know dvieira will be doing the same, and qrsouther, BisonDucks, DONALDDUCK, and, I think, even E-L-F-T-U-S-H, and lots of other ATQers. This team needs fan support and I am confident they’re going to get it.
This week it’s home cookin’ and at Autzen we serve it loud.
Last time I checked, there is no "Hall of Average." - Oregon Football Coach Chip Kelly
I'm late to comment, but great analysis.
Although I still think you’ve taken three plays out of context. The real culprit, at least to me, was that BSU controlled the line of scrimmage nearly the entire game on defense. They flat out beat our big men in the trenches. That will make any quarterback question their decisions, even if, on a few plays, they have more time. Masoli simply wasn’t comfortable back there, and I think it’s pretty clear why he wasn’t…our line needs to grow up…in a hurry.
Addicted To Quack. If you’re not into the whole brevity thing.



































