Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Clippers Need To Realize That Spurs Are The Anti-Grizzlies

Big things are expected from the Oregon offense, but can they get it done on the road?

Darron Thomas will face the biggest test as Oregon's QB. Will he exploit the USC defense?

The Oregon offense has been just about unstoppable this year. It's leading the country in points and yards, but a good amount of those points have come at home.

From a production standpoint, Oregon's offense has been significantly worse on the road. They average almost 200 total yards less per game when away from Autzen (462 ypg vs. 649 ypg), and have not been scoring at the rate they do at home. In 3 road games, the Oregon offense has scored 34, 28, and 36. That's nothing to scoff at, but far off their yearly averages. And while Oregon has been comfortably ahead in each road game, USC's defense, as depleted and inexperienced as they may be, still presents a considerable challenge.

I'm still feeling good about our chances of offensive success, but we're going to have to see each unit step up for the Ducks to stay on their offensive roll.

First, the success of the offense will rest on the offensive line. In two of the road games this year, the Oregon offensive line struggled, and struggled badly. Oregon's 3 road games have been the 3 worst rushing performances for the Ducks this year, and Arizona State held the Ducks to a mere 3.47 yards per rush. In road games, the Oregon offensive line simply did not open up the holes necessary for the Ducks to have sustained offensive success.

Star-divide

I honestly don't know why this is. There are many excuses we could make for why these performances have happened, but the simple fact is that the line hasn't gotten it done against average competition on the road. Now, we don't have a lot of reasons to think that this performance will continue. The line has progressed greatly in their home environment, dominating against both Stanford and UCLA.

But an ASU-like performance by the line will give the Oregon offense fits. If Oregon's offensive line gets a push and can run the ball on USC's front 7, then USC will be reeling all game long, just as they were last year. That will force them to bring in safety help to the box, and cause the cornerbacks think not just about covering their man, but making tackles when Oregon running backs break into the secondary. 

If the line cannot open those holes, then we'll see a lot of what we saw against ASU: runs for little to no gain, and a defense forcing Darron Thomas to throw. 

Luckily in this game, I feel our passing offense will be unleashed. Darron Thomas has shown the ability to stretch the field both horizontally and vertically with his arm, and the USC defense will still have considerable trouble containing the Oregon passing game.

If USC follows the ASU blueprint (which I anticipate), then they'll focus on stopping the run, and stopping the quick outside passes, and largely leave the middle of the field open, with their safeties vulnerable to big plays. If they drop back and try to cover the middle of the field (which is how Monte Kiffin schemed against Florida last year), then Oregon will bubble screen USC to death, like they did Cal last year.

I'm confident that Thomas will be up to this challenge if the game is put on his shoulders. He has been great under pressure, and you know that USC will try and bring the heat. Even without an unstoppable Oregon running game, Thomas has shown the ability to get the ball to the hands of his many playmakers, and USC doesn't have the ability to cover every single playmaker on the Oregon offense. Chip Kelly and Thomas will isolate and expose and weakness. But I am just not excited about the possibility of USC forcing Thomas into that situation. 

If Oregon runs the ball like they have at home, then I'm confident that Oregon will win the game by a comfortable margin. If the offensive line has a repeat performance of its other road performances, then strap in, because it's gonna go down to the wire.

Comment 45 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

At first I was like, “oooo! Jared’s gonna tell us why we’ve ‘struggled’ on the road!”

I honestly don’t know why this is.
Then I was like, “Awwwwww.”

That being said, I agree.

Addicted to Quack, the home of Tako Tuesdays

Welcome to the club, Cody Ross. You can stay at my house.

by Takimoto on Oct 28, 2010 12:42 PM PDT reply actions  

To make excuses for a minute here:

Two of our road games have been played in incredibly hot conditions. Which with our D-line rotating so many guys through and our O-line snapping the ball so quickly would logically effect the O-line worse than any other players on our team. In the WSU game I think we just had a let down game. It makes sense coming off a big win in front of the College Gameday set and then going to Pullman to play a team that is better than people gave them credit for to start the year but not good enough to actually concern any of the players on our team with losing the game. Just my $.02

by NICKPAPAGEORGIOTHEDUCK on Oct 28, 2010 12:47 PM PDT reply actions  

I agree with this.

The whole team seemed really flat and emotionless @ WSU. It looked like the PSU game, in that the offensive play-calling was really vanilla and they only doing enough to walk out of there with the ‘W’. Of course, the injury to Barner took some wind out of the sails too.

But the heat issue has to be a factor. The linemen are the biggest players on the field. I’m not saying they weren’t conditioned well, but those type of atmospheric conditions will hit bigger people a lot harder. The offensive line was keeping up with the pace they wanted to run, but the output was a lower quality result.

I have no concern for the offense as a whole. I don’t think U$C’s defense will hold Oregon’s offense from scoring. (Channelling my inner Madden here…) It will be a matter of which team’s defense holds the other’s offense from scoring more often.

It’s hard not to go with Oregon when you’re expecting a track meet.

i can't believe you survived on this blog --
by axemen23 on Sep 2, 2010 9:06 PM PDT

by 071903 on Oct 28, 2010 1:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Heat was an issue at ASU and UT...

…and let’s not forget the WSU game started out with Barner lying motionless on the field for several minutes after taking a horrific hit. That shook the whole team and the effect of witnessing that and fearing for their teammate’s health was clearly seen until later in the game.

The weather and player injuries aren’t variables anyone can control, but the Ducks have managed to play through them and still come out with a win.

by flashgordy on Oct 28, 2010 1:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

"clicking"

I think the UCLA game saw our O finally “click” and reach its full potential. I think from the pass side of things we really needed that game to show how balanced we are, and for DT to show how much he has.

I saw last week as the coming out, and hope/sense this week will be our validation.

Hoover: They confiscated everything, even the stuff we didn't steal!

by DamienS on Oct 28, 2010 1:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

We have to avoid the slow start

And that begins with the offense. When our offense clicks, it forces the opposing team to take chances and it erodes the opposing team’s confidence. On the road, it takes away the crowd effect.
IMO, if we start poorly like at UT and ASU and against Stanford, we will lose. And whether we start well, as correctly pointed out by this post, depends on whether the O-line wants to show up and play.

by westspec on Oct 28, 2010 1:17 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

Respectfully disagree

I don’t think it is absolutely necessary to have a fast start. Here are the reasons.
1. The team has experience being behind by double digits and have shown they can remain poised and come out on top.
2. We have “special” special teams that can give us field position.
3. We have a quick strike offense so we don’t need lots of time to score.
4. The crowds in away venues have not been a factor, and the Coliseum is less forboding.
5. The conditioning allows the offense to wear down the defense so that it is easier in the second half. Also USC doesn’t have the depth that they have had.

Now I don’t disagree that the game will be much easier if we can get a nice lead and cause USC to become more pass oriented.

I think the key factors for Oregon are:
1. The defense is able to slow down USC and limit them to field goals or punts on half their drives.
2. The “special” teams win the field position battle.
3. Oregon has no turnovers on their half of the field.

by scubaduck on Oct 28, 2010 1:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

1. Yes, we have experience from coming down from double digits, but we’re not at home and we’re playing a good team. Much more difficult to come back from a disastrous start.
2. We also have “special” special teams that muffs punts and kick returns leading to easy points for the other team (Furd, WSU, ASU)
3. Completely agree. But the Trojans have a great offense too.
4. I don’t know how you can say the UT crowd wasn’t a factor. USC will be the most hostile environment we have yet to play in. DT has only played in 1 real hostile environment.
5. Agreed.

by westspec on Oct 28, 2010 7:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

I agree

In addition to your points, it really helps me avoid adding gray hair.

by daisyduck on Oct 28, 2010 3:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

adding gray hair

adding? admitting to having?

Speed Endurance Talent is how Track Town USA plays football. Win The Day

by webfoot73 on Oct 28, 2010 6:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh I admit to it

but then go straight to my hairdresser to hide the evidence.

by daisyduck on Oct 29, 2010 12:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

To answer the question in short, yes.

In detail, hell yes.

"We don't feel pressure because we know what we're doing." - tChip Kelly

by Jayon on Oct 28, 2010 1:39 PM PDT reply actions  

Good analysis, J.

USC’s D line doesn’t have a ton of depth, so I think Oregon will eventually wear them down and be able to move the ball at will. But if our OL doesn’t perform well early, USC might get enough stops to take an early lead and make it interesting.

Addicted To Quack. If you’re not into the whole brevity thing.

by PaulSF on Oct 28, 2010 1:44 PM PDT reply actions  

HUH?

yes the yardage is down,however the UNSTOPPABLE DUCKS have never failed to score more than 42 points,maybe that includes d scores but in that case we scored without giving the o a chance to score or gain yardage! Go Ducks

by stephenado on Oct 28, 2010 2:38 PM PDT reply actions  

I think Oregon will either win big in a blow out, (most likely) or win by 10-14 points

USC defense is going to struggle against Oregon’s offense, their players have been very poor tacklers and are not good in space, while Chip and the Oregon offense excell at getting their playmakers into space where one on one tackles make or break the defense.

This game comes down to the defensive side of the ball for the Ducks. If they can get off the field on 3rd down’s, while playing the bend but don’t break rule they will win. USC can be scarey with Barkley and their talented recievers, but Oregon needs to plug the middle and not let USC run on them. Oregon has enough talent and the athletes in the secondary to force some pass breakups, which will result in getting USC into 2nd and long and 3rd and long where the Ducks defense is very good.

I expect the Ducks to score about their avg against USC so 50+, while USC could be anywhere from 21 to 35.

by usmcr3049 on Oct 28, 2010 2:42 PM PDT reply actions  

Simply put:

If the Ducks can’t go into the LA Coliseum as the top-ranked team in the nation against USC on national TV this Saturday and play with energy and confidence from the get-go, they don’t deserve the ranking.

by BigGreenWreckingMachine on Oct 28, 2010 3:00 PM PDT reply actions  

GENIUS

Axemen23 is a cat lady. - Brian

by Bill Musgrave on Oct 28, 2010 4:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

Chikin dinner

"If you can't copy 'em, don't imitate ''em."
YOGI BERRA

by Famous Duck on Oct 28, 2010 8:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

KC Joyner on ESPN.com

This Insider article from ESPN talks about this a little bit, specifically about how everyone is doubting the Ducks in this game and he doesn’t understand why. He talks about how USC going into the Cal game was giving up the highest yards per game average since the school began keeping records. He talks about how last year we used the short passing game so successfully against USC, and how their games against Stanford and Cal both show that those problems are still as apparent as ever. The he finishes with:

Add all these factors to how well Oregon has been playing of late, and it is hard to fathom why more people don’t seem to believe in the Ducks. If Chip Kelly can channel his inner Knute Rockne, he should be able to use this lack of respect as motivational fodder to fire up his troops to play at an even higher level.

If that happens, this game could end up as a repeat of the 47-20 thrashing the Ducks put on the Trojans last season.

In the Yell-O corner, with a 2009 conference record of 8 wins, 1 loss. The REIGNING, DEFENDING, UNDISPUTED Champions of the PAC 10. The Oregon Ducks!

by MarineCorpsDuck on Oct 28, 2010 3:13 PM PDT reply actions  

Joyner = genius

Good catch, MCDuck. Read him every week & the dude just flat knows his stuff. Film doesn’t lie & he breaks it down with the best of them.

I love football. I'm takin' that as a compliment.

by GrumpyJDH on Oct 28, 2010 9:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm looking forward to this one.

But I really don’t know how it will go.

Last year USC was 89th in 3rd down conversion percentage and scored 20 in Eugene. This year we’re 6th, and we’re at home. We’re going to put up points.

"I have a commanding voice." - Ed Orgeron

by RabbitSC on Oct 28, 2010 3:13 PM PDT reply actions  

It is an interesting matchup...

It’s hard to get a beat on this game. Too many questions about USC went unanwered in my opinion about the blowout against Cal. Was it a swandive or did SC make strides? Hard to say. There are lots of games were SC looked very mediocre.

by BisonDucks on Oct 28, 2010 3:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

That’s a little bit of cherry-picking, don’t you think? I mean last year our defense was 51st in preventing third down conversions. This year they’re 12th. But that’s only a tiny piece of the puzzle.

I think USC will probably put up around 30, maybe 35. Unless something goes really wrong, that won’t be enough.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Oct 28, 2010 4:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sure,

But it’s probably USC’s most significant offensive statistic right now. I would be very surprised if USC doesn’t put up 35 or more.

"I have a commanding voice." - Ed Orgeron

by RabbitSC on Oct 28, 2010 8:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

I would not. Oregon’s most significant offensive statistic is 55.1. And their most significant defensive statistic is 15.9. No team has been within a score of them in the 4th quarter. I think it will be close for most of the game, but I think Oregon’s depth will be too much for SC in the end.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Oct 28, 2010 11:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

This is Trojan analysis from Conquest Chronicles...

size matters on the dline, so they will get the push. Funny thing is they keep pointing towards tOSU but that dline was small(ish). Will USC’s dline size affect our run game?

by BisonDucks on Oct 28, 2010 3:13 PM PDT reply actions  

That's A-OK with me.

Ignore the fact that tOSU knew Masoli couldn’t beat people with his arm and focus on the size of defensive lines instead. If that’s what they want to focus on, I’m completely fine with it. Let ’em learn the hard way.

by BigGreenWreckingMachine on Oct 28, 2010 3:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Bad data?

In Oregon’s road games this season, Oregon has scored as follows:

Tennessee — 48
Arizona St — 42
WSU — 42

Which season are you quoting?

by gamedaytribe on Oct 28, 2010 3:15 PM PDT reply actions  

Pretty sure that's why he said "the offense scored X"

I mean listen, we’re sitting here talking about rankings, not a game, not a game, not a game, but we’re talking about rankings.

by HoodRiverDuck on Oct 28, 2010 3:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think...

Memorial Coliseum might need a 3rd digit.

by Ruprect on Oct 28, 2010 3:51 PM PDT reply actions  

Will the day be made happy like Arthur Fonzarelli?

"Hawaii doesn't win many games in the United States." -Lee Corso

by axemen23 on Oct 28, 2010 4:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hahaha

I’m hoping so, man.

by Ruprect on Oct 28, 2010 6:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

Longhorn fan here...

May the force be with you as you pummel that nepotistic coach and the USC Trojans into oblivion. I really have no hatred for USC, but Kiffin absolutely annoys the daylights out of me. I’m a Duck fan this year for the MNC. Please win ’em all the rest of the way.

Hook’em.

Hey, the system is not perfect. But, it's better than the one we had. Um, really? Joe Paterno led 4 undefeated teams under the old system that were not National Champions. With this "better" system, we've only had to endure a BCS controversy OR an inconclusive end to the following seasons: 1998, 2000, 2001, 2003, 2004, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009.

by Mulliganville on Oct 28, 2010 4:45 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

You are welcome...

and thank you. 1-9 NU is against the Horns as they head for “greener pastures.”

Hey, the system is not perfect. But, it's better than the one we had. Um, really? Joe Paterno led 4 undefeated teams under the old system that were not National Champions. With this "better" system, we've only had to endure a BCS controversy OR an inconclusive end to the following seasons: 1998, 2000, 2001, 2003, 2004, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009.

by Mulliganville on Oct 28, 2010 10:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Thanks, Kiffin seems to rub quite a few people that way

I’m expecting the Tennessee folks over here pretty soon.

Speed Endurance Talent is how Track Town USA plays football. Win The Day

by webfoot73 on Oct 28, 2010 6:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

A coach is an asshat if he just goes for two...

for the hell of it…moreover, this guy is just slimy.

Hey, the system is not perfect. But, it's better than the one we had. Um, really? Joe Paterno led 4 undefeated teams under the old system that were not National Champions. With this "better" system, we've only had to endure a BCS controversy OR an inconclusive end to the following seasons: 1998, 2000, 2001, 2003, 2004, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009.

by Mulliganville on Oct 28, 2010 10:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

In short, yeah.

"(Kelly's) got a veteran team that is the favorite to win the Pac-10. His choice of Thomas reflects only one belief: He’s our best QB today."-Ted Miller

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Oct 28, 2010 5:41 PM PDT reply actions  

We need an open letter to the OMB

Please… PLEASE play rocky top in the collisium.

by Quack Addict on Oct 29, 2010 12:26 AM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Addicted to Quack, SBN's Oregon Ducks blog and fan community.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Mostinteresting_small
Tako Tuesdays: The Music Thread
Small
Better video of DAT in 100m
2011-09-03_15-49-32_912_small
Giant Sports Weekend Open Thread
Atq-spoon-5_small
Miracle Wolf Scholarship Fund: Update
La_foto_small
Spring game online?
Small
Ducks Drafted and also picked up in Free agency
2011-09-03_15-49-32_912_small
------> REVISED: ATQ Spring Game Meet-Up 2012
Dog_in_tree_small
Duck football tied to Kennedy Assassination
Small
BREAKING NEWS: EXCLUSIVE TRANSCRIPT OF INTERNAL UO INVESTIGATION INTO MARIJUANA USE BY FOOTBALL PLAYERS
Small
Oregon Basketball Recruiting Chart

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Anthony Bennett picks UNLV over Oregon
Chip Kelly Scared
Here is this weeks video. Thanks ATQ, GO DUCKS!
All of DAT's races from Oregon Twilight.
BRING GAMEDAY BACK TO OREGON! VOTE!!!!
Our thoughts on the Spring Game start @ 44:43.  Thanks ATQ and GO DUCKS!
Poor Darron Thomas
Masoli the Eskimo
Bullpen Bagpipes, UO edition.
Baseball after the Spring Game = A great day for Duck Fans.  Thanks ATQ and GO DUCKS!

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

ATQ Twitter Feed


Managers

207873_1005773153454_1498651968_14034_9616_n_small David Piper

Pre_small ntrebon

Img_0525_small jtlight

Mostinteresting_small Takimoto

Domsicecream_small dvieira

Editors

Pettingzoo_small PaulSF

Atq-spoon-5_small Matt Daddy

Authors

Ryan__rusty_small jcgoducks

Small nds500