Oregon needs to eliminate the USC running game to Win the Day
The Oregon defense has been a bit uneven this year. They've had dominating performances and made plays at the biggest times, but they've also looked very vulnerable. But despite that, I'm feeling pretty good about the Oregon defenses chances against USC.
One of the things that is great about being a fan today is that we have access to video that we didn't have even 5 years ago, and sharing that video can happen with incredible ease, and with a bit of extra time, you can do some pretty great video editing. While I can't go into Matt Daddy levels of analysis, I do want to take a look at a play from the Stanford game, and show why I think the Oregon defense will be successful tomorrow.
The key for Oregon's defense tomorrow will be simple: stop the USC running game. To some degree, this is counterintuitive. Matt Barkley and the USC receivers have received just about all the attention leading up to tomorrow's game, and there is no doubt that USC presents the best combination of QB and receiver talent the Ducks have faced this year.
But when the Oregon defense knows what is coming, they are very tough to move against. There is a reason why Oregon is 3rd in the nation in interceptions, second in the nation in red zone defense, and 12th in the nation in 3rd down defense.
Nowhere is this more apparent than against Stanford. In the first half of the game, Stanford moved the ball almost at will on the ground, and the playbook was open. When an offense is working like that, any defense will have trouble, and Oregon was no exception. I used this play last week as an example of how Oregon needed to stop making mistakes, but this is a prime example of what an offense can do on 3rd and 1.
While Oregon had multiple mistakes on this, there is simply too much that the offense must take into account. The linebackers must worry about both run and pass, and that led to multiple big plays for Stanford.
The biggest shift in the game happened when the Oregon defense started to shut down the Stanford running game, putting the Cardinal into multiple 3rd down situations.
One play in particular stood out. Oregon had taken a 38-31 lead, and Oregon held Stanford to 2 yards on the first two plays of the drive, setting up a big 3rd and 8.
There are a few interesting keys for this play. First, Oregon only rush two men. Two of the linemen dropped to spy on the backfield, and only the ends were bringing pressure. Everyone else dropped into coverage. This type of varied attack shouldn't be a surprise. We've seen Oregon mix up their coverages a lot this season, and their blitzing schemes as well, and this combination has been absolutely devastating on 3rd and long.
The other key to this play is the coverage of the secondary. With no credible run threat to worry about, every receiver is covered, and most are covered by two defenders. There is deep help by the safeties, and no one has decent separation. Luck simply had nowhere to go with the ball, and even had pressure been more delayed, it's doubtful anything would have opened up.
Obviously, USC is not Stanford, and will present a different challenge to the Oregon defense. But this isn't the Oregon defense of 8 years ago, where we knew opposing teams were going to throw, and we could do nothing to stop it. This defense has some weaknesses, but they are exceptional in certain situations.
The key to Oregon's defensive success will be to force Matt Barkley into situations where the defense knows what is coming. USC is a great offense, but I believe that Oregon is a good enough defense to stop any one-dimensional offense, no matter how good their skill players.
While many pundits are expecting Matt Barkley to have a big game, if he is forced into situations where he'll need to make big plays, I think that the Oregon defense will win the day.
28 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Honestly, though,
WHO WANTS IT MORE?
I mean listen, we’re sitting here talking about rankings, not a game, not a game, not a game, but we’re talking about rankings.
by HoodRiverDuck on Oct 29, 2010 12:01 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
I think the Silver and Black (err, white) attack
being back in the Coliseum will be too much for the Trojans to handle…
That said, I am in full panic mode that the Belotti Era Ducks show and not the ones who have been taught to win the day. If Chip has fully instilled the mantra to the very depths of the player’s souls then they will have no issues taking it to the Trojans.
Ultimately this is about who the Ducks believing in, and playing too, who they are. This is not about who the Trojans used to be…
Both gold and muck come out of the same shaft...
FYI
The key for Oregon’s offense defense tomorrow will be simple: stop the USC running game.
"Hey, can you give us a little respect?" --Chip Kelly, during an interview with Erin Andrews
Nice work Jared
Thanks for the analysis!
It will be interesting to see how quickly we solve the USC running game and make adjustments – I hope it’s by the second quarter rather than the second half. Not that we couldn’t do it, but it’s harder to come from behind on the road.
I think Ohio State beat Oregon in much the same way
in the Rose Bowl last year. Ohio State took away Oregon’s passing game. I’ve never seen anyone break down how and the teevee broadcast was useless in terms of explaining it.
Oregon’s running game was still reasonably successful but was stopped often enough to keep the Oregon offense from executing in rhythm. Why Ohio State’s pass defense was so effective I have no idea. The stupid teevee people never addressed it and never showed any replays of the pass coverage.
And maybe pre-game expectations is the reason it wasn’t addressed. Oregon was expected to be a running team so they talked about the running game. But the running game was most effective with a credible pass threat. Take away the pass threat, the ancillary component of the offense, and the primary mode of the offense struggles.
So this… only in reverse against USC
my belief
Is that tOSU did a great job of taking away the first run and first pass read of Masoli. If Masoli had to go through any progressions whatsoever Oregon O was screwed. I can count on one hand how many times I saw Masoli make a progression throw over the middle or to a deep receiver last year. DT’s been way better at it.
Plus, tOSU had very good DE’s that could keep Masoli from busting out on one of his broken plays, and then the secondary wasn’t required to help on the outside so they could sit on the shorter routes or play the down a lot easier then having one eye in the backfield.
ATQ's #1 Double D fan
Addicted to Quack
by Matt Daddy on Oct 29, 2010 1:42 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
The collapsed on the running game pretty hard and force Masoli into situations where he’d have to throw the ball. But he just wanted effective at going through his reads and getting that done. There was many opportunities for him to pass, but OSU had a very strong gameplan, and he didn’t have the skill set to exploit it like Thomas did.
Todd McShay did a good job breaking it down, and you can see how they sold out to stop Masoli running the ball. But Masoli couldn’t often go past his first read before taking off with it, and tOSU knew that and exploited that.
--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
It was the exact opposite.
tOSU took away the RUN game and exposed Masoli’s weaknesses as a passer. JM was a heck of a gamer for the Ducks but he has one throw, which is flat and very hard and not especially accurate beyond 10 yards. tOSU was able to bring up their safeties and keep their LB’s up in the box.
by BigGreenWreckingMachine on Oct 29, 2010 6:00 PM PDT up reply actions
Yeah… I remember the run still working somewhat in the 2nd half and no passing game at all. There’s a kind of chicken-egg thing here. Whichever got put under stress first, Oregon could still run some against Ohio St., but couldn’t pass at all.
Thomas and the rest of the offense can do both now, run and pass.
Can Oregon stop the USC run game? I think in the 2nd half the answer is yes. Those big beefy down linemen without alot backing them up will start to get beat by the depth of the Oregon defense.
by encephalopath on Oct 29, 2010 8:36 PM PDT up reply actions
Strange parallel.
We suffer the same problems against the run at times that USC does: Lack of solid tackling.
As far as the offense goes, I’m very bullish about our O. DT brings a whole new dimension to our particular spread. He is a FAR better passer than JM, bringing touch in the screens, zip in the outs, and a beautiful, accurate, lofting deep ball. And Masoli, while he made his OPTION reads quickly and well, didn’t have the patience to “stand and deliver” as a passer; rather, he’d tuck and run if his first or second progression was covered.
Another thing about the O: The pace is quicker but the execution is actually tighter. I’m surprised more people don’t pick up on the fact that you don’t see many missed blocks, bad routes, botched reads or handoffs, bad snaps, etc. People should look past the pace and marvel at the execution.
by BigGreenWreckingMachine on Oct 29, 2010 8:44 PM PDT up reply actions
I’ve been thinking about why Thomas doesn’t get much recognition as a runner. I thinks it’s mostly because of the improved blocking by the receivers.
No one ever (or seldom) gets a shot at him in open space. He isn’t going 1 on 1 with linebackers the way Masoli did.
Thomas make the right reads and a DE is chasing him from behind. He either step out of bounds or a defender has to get off a receiver block to tackle him from the side. His running doesn’t look spectacular because he isn’t making flashy moves in the open field.
His running is safe, protected and effective. Those things don’t have highlight reel value, but high percentage runs from the QB is what helps the team win in the long run.
by encephalopath on Oct 29, 2010 9:10 PM PDT up reply actions
And I really don’t want my QB running 29 times a game like Auburn’s Newton did last week
by encephalopath on Oct 29, 2010 9:13 PM PDT up reply actions
Live to play another day.
I’m VERY relieve that DT doesn’t think he needs to lower the shoulder and seek contact the way Masoli does. He’s showing tremendous maturity in being his own man and doing what’s best for the team, and not trying to be DD or JM.
HEEHEEHEE and he has 2 years left. Muhahahahahahaha!
by BigGreenWreckingMachine on Oct 29, 2010 10:37 PM PDT up reply actions
DT is like DD in that way
If Dixon was short of the first down, he’d lower the shoulder and fight for it. If he was past marker, he’d make the smart play and step out. Very smart all around.
It always drove me nuts to see JM lower the shoulder when he was a yard past the marker— nothing to gain and possibly a lot to lose if he had ever gotten hurt.
"You could almost imagine Ducks coach Chip Kelly walking to midfield among the bloodied Bruins and shouting in his best gladiator voice, 'Are you not entertained?'" - Ted Miller
While there's not doubt that a QB trucking DB's when unecessary is not smart...
I would never say it drove me nuts, I loved that our QB was tougher than many of the guys trying to tackle him.
However, I’ll take DT’s (or even Costa’s) passing ability and what that adds to our offense, any day.
Axemen23 is a cat lady. - Brian
by Bill Musgrave on Oct 30, 2010 6:58 AM PDT up reply actions
I haven't noticed much of USC running
against decent teams. Hawaii, Minnesota, and Washington State are NOT included by any means.
IMO, Kiffin’s style is to unleash the deep ball repeatedly, get the other team into a huge hole, and go for two at any conceivable opportunity.
Beat U$C.
Trail Blazers atop the Northwest at 2-0!
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Oct 29, 2010 4:51 PM PDT reply actions
There’s one in Arlington, VA according to the Alumni site.
--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
I'm having the same feeling I had the week of Stanford.
I don't always derp, but when I derp I herp.
That game was a convincing win in the 2nd half… does that mean you’re feeling optimistic?
by encephalopath on Oct 29, 2010 8:29 PM PDT up reply actions
I feel like this one won't be particularly close
--Dave
Addicted to Quack, your friendly, neighborhood Oregon Ducks blog
by David Piper on Oct 29, 2010 10:53 PM PDT up reply actions
Does anyone know what section at the Coliseum is the visiting section?
I am wanting to buy tickets on StubHub, but want to know what section UO fans are in. Thanks.
by Cliff Harrising on Oct 30, 2010 1:02 AM PDT reply actions

























