Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: In Crunch Time, Spurs Don't Change Their Game

Tako Tuesdays: The 2010 Most Important List

A year ago, Tako Tuesdays was just a twinkle in my eye and I had to write actual information to get people to read my FanPosts, instead of posting some list of TV shows and watching the Internet throw up on the comments section.  A year ago, I was a Music Composition major staying up late writing crappy music that neither I nor my professors liked.  A year ago, I gave my list of the 10 most important Ducks for the upcoming football season.  The list looked like this:

10. Justin Roper (Oops.)
9. Casey Matthews
8. Will Tukuafu
7. Jeff Maehl/Ed Dickson
6. Talmadge Jackson III
5. LaMichael James
1D. The offensive line
1C. TJ Ward
1B. LeGarrette Blount
1A. Jeremiah Masoli

So it's a mixed bag of too high (TJ Ward), too low (LaMichael and Maehl/Dickson), and too disappointing (Blount).  I'll try and do better this year.  My list after the jump.

Star-divide

10. Darrion Weems

Here's where I explain why a non-starter is important.  First, he had a great spring, taking advantage of Carson York's injury to get some quality work in with the ones.  Second, Bo Thran can't be counted on to stay healthy the entire year, and he definitely can't be counted on to play a full game.  Weems is our Bo Thran health insurance plan, as well as our Carson York and Mark Asper insurance money; Thran is a better interior option than Ryan Clanton or Charlie Carmichael, and can slide inside to a guard spot.  There's no better problem than an overabundance of quality linemen, and Weems fits the bill perfectly.

9. Remene Alston, Lache Seastrunk, and Dontae Williams

LaMichael James will be LaMichael James.  He's a speedy luxury car, like a BMW M5 or an Audi S6.  Kenjon Barner is the Ferrari California that you just love to get out on the open road.  Losing LeGarrette Blount leaves us without a big truck that can run over and through anything.  If Remene Alston can get his off-field stuff in line, he's a capable power back.  If not, that leaves the two freshman to come in and immediately contribute.  Williams is listed at 200 pounds, Seastrunk at 190.  I'd love to see Dontae Williams bulk up to 225 or 230, and just run folks over. 

8. Jeff Maehl

He'll have help from DJ Davis, Lavasier Tuinei, the tight ends, and the rest of the receivers.  But with Ed Dickson gone, the Maehlman is now THE man in the Oregon receiving offense.  There isn't any more margin for error with his game: no more fumbles, no more drops.  If his season next year is the Arizona and Oregon State games from last year, we're in business. 

7. Talmadge Jackson III, along with the rest of the defensive backfield

TJ3 did a good-not-great job once he was elevated to #1 cornerback status last year.  When he's at his best, he's one of the better corners in the Pac-10.  When he's not, he's either getting handsy and drawing penalties or getting torched by James Rodgers.  As far as the other side goes, the competition remains wide open between Cliff Harris, Anthony Gildon, Scott Grady, Avery Patterson, and Chad Peppars, with an absolutely beautiful spring from true freshman Terence Mitchell that puts him in a great position to see significant time in the fall. 

6. David Paulson

Every time we needed a clutch first down, or a man open downfield on a broken play, Paulson was there.  Now he's the number one option, and he's gotta continue to be shifty.  He'll have support from Brandon Williams; if those two can play well and stay healthy, it leaves the option open to redshirt Curtis White.  In our offense, a tight end is the safety net, a guy we can rely on to be solid if the reads aren't going the right way.  Paulson fits the profile perfectly.

5. Rob Beard or Alejandro Maldonado

Morgan Flint was a pleasant surprise for the last two years, a little guy who was money in the bank from inside 35 years yards for us.  With the aggressive style that Chip Kelly brings, that's all we need.  We don't kick on 4th and 7 from the 37; we go for it.  We know Rob Beard has more than enough leg; if he doesn't improve his accuracy more than he already has, expect to see Maldonado come into fall camp and challenge for the starting spot. We will definitely get to see Maldonado against New Mexico State, as Beard will be serving a one-game suspension for his role in a drunken fight.

4. Kenjon Barner

LaMichael James, by himself, gives us a good offense.  LMJ, with good quarterback play, gives us a great offense.  Kenjon Barner on top of all of that makes us unstoppable.  His skillset is perfect for a showcase role in our offense, and his return skills make him all the more important.  Without him, we lose the Rose Bowl by 20, and OSU gets the ball back in the fourth quarter.  He is what will make the 2010 Oregon football team unique from any other.  With LaMichael James out for the New Mexico State game, Kenjon gets to show us he can be an every down back.

3. Jordan Holmes

The center is the catalyst.  All timings with the zone read start with a good snap.  Jordan Holmes played exceptionally well last year, and his success sets us up nicely to contend for another Pac-10 title.  If he gets hurt, we'll have to hope for great play from senior Max Forer in order to run our offense.  Great play from Holmes makes everybody's job easier, and if he does his job right, we won't notice him.  And I'm okay with not noticing him.  Big ups to JConant for pointing out that I missed Holmes in last year's list.  You were right then and you're still right now.

2. LaMichael James

We saw it firsthand last year; it's not easy to start the season on the road in an unfamiliar environment.  LaGarrette Blount couldn't do it.  Jeremiah Masoli couldn't do it.  With his one game suspension against NMSU UNM, LaMichael James is gonna have to do it this year at Tennessee. That being said, he's the most electric playmaker the Ducks have seen at running back in a long time.  And he's a redshirt sophomore.  These next few years are gonna be fun.

1. Nate Costa or Darron Thomas

What, you were expecting something surprising?  If our starting quarterback plays well, we will win.  If not, we we'll be a middle of the pack team.  Look at Cal last year.  Talented team, who became merely league average with underwhelming quarterback play.  If Darron Thomas doesn't play markedly better than Nate Costa in fall camp, I think Costa has to open the season as the starter.  He knows the offense better than anyone but Chip Kelly, and he can make the throws. 

Keg Stickers!

Did anyone do anything Keg Sticker-worthy this week? I'm giving Dave one for his Media Saturday.  Thanks man, I needed that.

Matt Daddy - 5
Bill Musgrave - 5
Addicted to Quack - 5
Gorbachav5 - 4
JonathanPDX - 3
JShufelt - 3
Takimoto - 3
axemen23 - 2
trumpetduck - 2
AllSaintsDay - 2
CaDuck - 1
ntrebon - 1
HoodRiverDuck - 1
QuackinAK - 1
jtlight - 1
benzduck - 1
qrsouther - 1
echo31 - 1
scudderfan - 1
Mrs. Gorby - 1
MiracleWolf - 1
keeerrrttt - 1
DuckFanAndy - 1
dannyoneil94 - 1
hazmat5793 - 1

 

And for a discussion topic? Ummmm, pizza.  Chicago or New York-style? What toppings? Best pizza you've ever had?

Poll
Who'd I leave out of the Top 10?
Kenny Rowe
55 votes
Casey Matthews
10 votes
Eddie Pleasant
31 votes
Jackson Rice
8 votes
Jeremiah Masoli
26 votes
Brandon Bair
20 votes
Spencer Paysinger
18 votes
Other
11 votes

179 votes | Poll has closed

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or the Addicted To Quack Moderators. FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable Oregon fans.

Comment 51 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I chose other. I think John Boyett is a key figure in the secondary

--Dominic, Addicted to Quack

Autzen Stadium is where great teams go to die." - J. Brady McCullough, The Michigan Daily.

by dvieira on May 10, 2010 10:37 PM PDT reply actions  

Might I also say, excellent use of tags this week

--Dominic, Addicted to Quack

Autzen Stadium is where great teams go to die." - J. Brady McCullough, The Michigan Daily.

by dvieira on May 10, 2010 10:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

You missed Brandon Bair by a large margin

In fact nobody from the D-line, not even Rowe? That’s just a damn shame. If the revamped O-line was top 5 last year the revamped D-line has to be top 5 this year. Here’s the reason why.

With Aliotti’s 3-4 zone blitz scheme, the defense is very vulnerable to the power run game (cough… Stanford). Even the BSU game you could argue was let down by miscommunication between the D line and LB’s, and confusion on gaps and assignments.

I tell you that to tell you this. We have one guy coming back from the D-line, Brandon Bair. It’s going to up to him to communicate the defense to the 2 new starters and set the tone for the guys coming in. Plus, he’s going to need to play solid in the middle if we have any chance of holding teams to 2nd and 3rd and long as they try and run it down our “fast, not very” big defense.

Putting produce in your beer is just plain porn.
Addicted to Quack

by Matt Daddy on May 10, 2010 10:41 PM PDT reply actions  

Exactly

D-line is the one position group I am genuinely concerned about going into the upcoming season. Ohio St pushed us around, simple as that. I think we will continue to struggle against teams who play that similar style offensively. Being able to get to the QB on 3rd and long is one thing, but we will have problems with smash-mouth offenses who pound the football (cough…stanford). Indeed, Bair is the key. Edge rushing shouldn’t be a problem, with Kenny Rowe about. Oregon needs to get a little more physical and nasty on the interior, and that starts with coach Az, and Bair showing some senior leadership to motivate the new starters

I am the MuffinMan

by dannyoneil94 on May 11, 2010 12:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

If it helps you any

the D-Line was the last thing I cut from the top 10.

They call him Rags. Where he goes, no-hitters follow.
Addicted to Quack, the home of Tako Tuesdays

by Takimoto on May 11, 2010 5:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

Morgan Flint was a pleasant surprise for the last two years, a little guy who was money in the bank from inside 35 years for us.

Tako, I’m pretty sure all our current players are inside 35 years.

[em] this sig for rent [/em]

by benzduck on May 10, 2010 11:40 PM PDT reply actions  

Oops. Good catch.

They call him Rags. Where he goes, no-hitters follow.
Addicted to Quack, the home of Tako Tuesdays

by Takimoto on May 11, 2010 5:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think Maehl moves up a few spots, and I think he already was the go to guy in the air last year.

I think we’re throwing more next year due to the QB personnel, and I think this guy was already our money target, led us in receptions, yards, and TD catches (tied with Dickson for TD catches). He got way too much crap last year for one bad game and was otherwise one of the best receivers in the Pac-10. Money hands and far better speed and yards after catch than he is given credit for.

I also think the entire D is going to be a key, if we improve on all three D fronts a little bit as is the talk, then this team gets hard to beat.

Weird that you have QB at the number one spot, though, that doesn’t seem important.

I am not a Communist, a Communist's lawn would never look this good.

by Bill Musgrave on May 11, 2010 12:16 AM PDT reply actions  

I went with Spencer Paysinger, although it’s really a toss up between him and Casey Matthews, and here’s why.

I think our offense is going to be pretty much what it was last year. Explosive against anything less than a stellar defense, with the chance to have a huge game even against above average defenses. But I think they’ll be prone to a bad game or two if Costhomas/Thomcosta can’t find his (its?) rhythm.

In that case, the defense is going to have to win us a game. I’m pretty much in agreement with Matt Daddy above, except I think it’s the LBs who are going to have to step up. Our DBs are solid overall, but given that the wealth of talent is in younger, more inconsistent players, I think hoping for a game-changing secondary is a bit over-reaching. They’ll be good, and make a few great plays, but won’t be a shutdown unit.

And I think that’s similar to our D-line. Let’s face it, no one on the D-line is really equipped to handle a power running attack, and a big O-line is going to have their way for the most part. The D-line will be solid and make some great speed plays, but won’t surprise anyone.

That leaves the middle. I think it’s going to fall on the two senior linebackers to have great seasons. More specifically, I think Matthews and Paysinger are going to have to play a couple monster games where they steal a win for us. I don’t think it’s going to be enough for those two guys to just blend into a solid-to-good defense. I think they’re going to need to be in-your-face studs in big games next season.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on May 11, 2010 12:50 AM PDT reply actions  

i agree with this … the LBers NEED to stop the intermediate passing game and the run game … the middle LB is the QB of the defense, and Casey matthews needs to have a great Senior year at that position

by echo31 on May 11, 2010 10:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

They did a great job of that last year, and I see that continuing.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on May 11, 2010 10:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

yes, but at times, Matthews seemed to disappear for a whole game … no more of that, I want to hear his name called often

by echo31 on May 11, 2010 10:20 AM PDT up reply actions  

This is what I saw too. I didn’t hear Matthews or Paysinger’s name called nearly enough. I thought Pleasant had a very good season, but of course he’s moving out of the LB corps. I think all three losses last season could have been avoided with better LB play (note: please don’t read that as me laying the blame completely on them – there is plenty to go around).

We expected a LOT out of Matthews last year. And only slightly less from Paysinger. They were solid most games, but they didn’t have that breakout year we were hoping for. If one of those two had stepped up and really made plays against either Stanford or OSU, I think we win those games. Against Stanford, we knew the D-line was undersized and was going to get pushed around, but we hoped that our stud LBs would stop the bleeding. They just couldn’t do it. Against OSU, we knew that Pryor would make make linemen miss and escape the pocket, but we hoped that the LBs would contain the damage. Too often, that didn’t happen.

Again, please don’t read this as laying disproportionate blame on those two guys. Tons of other things could have happened to turn those games around. I think the main point is that they were relatively quiet most games (in a good way, mostly), but we were hoping to see them stand out as stars of the defense. And I can see that scenario cropping up again this season. The offense sputters a bit, the D-line gets pushed around, the d-backs are inexperienced because of an injury or two, and it’s up to the senior guys in the middle to put the team on their shoulders for a game. Yes, it’s a lot to lay on them, but I get the sense from their interviews that they WANT that responsibility.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on May 11, 2010 10:35 AM PDT up reply actions   2 recs

Very well said. I agree with all of this. Rec’d!

Putting produce in your beer is just plain porn.
Addicted to Quack

by Matt Daddy on May 11, 2010 11:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

you said what I think better than I could have said it … we can’t expect our small D-Line to be run stuffers, only to engage the O-Line in order to allow our LBers to fill the gaps

by echo31 on May 11, 2010 12:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

I’m going with Chip Kelly and Mark Helfrich as two of the Most Important Ducks this season. It’s up to those two to pick a quarterback and fit our complex system to that guy. We’ve seen Coach Kelly do amazing things with quarterbacks before, but this year it’s a whole new situation with much more pressure. We’re Defending Pac-10 Champions now.

Everything we do on offense flows when the QB is comfortable and it’s up to those two guys to put a game plan together that keeps him comfortable. Dixon and Masoli were both so good in part because the game plan built on their strengths, through misdirection and outside speed (Dixon) or quick reads and fearless runs up the middle (Masoli).

I’m excited to see Costa and Thomas step up and earn the job with good play, but it’s on the coaches to give them a system that turns that good play into wins.

By the way, have you guys noticed the photo of Chip on the GoDucks page? I think we should petition to have it replaced with The Stare.

by JonathanPDX on May 11, 2010 1:47 AM PDT reply actions  

Hate to nit-pick...

…but it’s New Mexico, not New Mexico State. Sorry.

As for the assessments, I like your thinking. I voted Eddie Pleasant though, if for no other reason than I’m excited to see his position change.

Lol and that photo of Chip is goofy. I agree, The Stare should be his official picture.

by jcolomy on May 11, 2010 1:49 AM PDT reply actions  

Damnit. I’m not good at the whole “get things right” thing this week. I think what I did was combine New Mexico and Portland State into one big super school that still sucks at football.

They call him Rags. Where he goes, no-hitters follow.
Addicted to Quack, the home of Tako Tuesdays

by Takimoto on May 11, 2010 5:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

I’m not good at the whole "get things right"

That’s why you need me telling you how to live your life.

Putting produce in your beer is just plain porn.
Addicted to Quack

by Matt Daddy on May 11, 2010 5:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

DON’T TELL ME HOW TO LIVE MY LIFE MATT DADDY!

They call him Rags. Where he goes, no-hitters follow.
Addicted to Quack, the home of Tako Tuesdays

by Takimoto on May 11, 2010 5:16 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Why do you hate the defense Tako? Why?

Putting produce in your beer is just plain porn.
Addicted to Quack

by Matt Daddy on May 11, 2010 10:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think you should have included Pleasant…his transition to safety is going to be key.

Welcome to Nashville, LeGarrette. Also, I love the Jay-Hey Kid.

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on May 11, 2010 5:30 AM PDT reply actions  

he did say something about TJ3 and "the other members of the backfield"

but I’m not sure it’s as big a deal as people think. Sure if it works out, it’s awesome. but if injuries hit the LBs or if Pleasant gets burned early he’ll move back to LB and Javes Lewis or Marvin Johnson can step in there.

Half the wheels, twice the alibi.

by axemen23 on May 11, 2010 7:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

I agree with not having Pleasant on the list

We have seen over the last few years that while having the big hitting enforcer at rover is nice, very very nice, it is not the key to our secondary and can not be our strongest position. Chung was great, but Harper made that secondary what it was. Then he left and Chung was still great but we got burned because TJ just could not cover. Then TJ moves to rover and Boyett steps in and the secondary and TJ’s play improves. Sure Pleasant is going to make a lot of plays and be a big part of our defense, but I have him as the 4th most important guy in the DBs (out of 4.)

Axemen also make a good point about depth in the secondary, and the whole back seven for what its worth. It will be interesting to see how role evolve because of injury and how guy are playing. Just so many good players in those groups.

"The code word for going on two might be, you know, "Mickelson,’’ because he always comes in second – stuff like that.'’

by trumpetduck on May 11, 2010 11:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

Michael Clay.

Mark my words, he will develop into a beast thi season.

Self-anointed President of the Kenjon Barner fan club.

by CaDuck on May 11, 2010 7:09 AM PDT reply actions  

He developed into a beast this spring.

Hello, running backs everywhere. Meet Mr. Clay, Mr. Matthews, and Mr. Paysinger.

Scary for them.

Welcome to Nashville, LeGarrette. Also, I love the Jay-Hey Kid.

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on May 11, 2010 1:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Punting is winning

and I think you know who I voted for.

by HoodRiverDuck on May 11, 2010 7:12 AM PDT reply actions  

Punting: the attrition warfare of football.

They call him Rags. Where he goes, no-hitters follow.
Addicted to Quack, the home of Tako Tuesdays

by Takimoto on May 11, 2010 7:16 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I think we all know who I voted for too.

But wait! Psyche! I actually voted for Kenny Rowe. Don’t tell Spencer.

by daisyduck on May 11, 2010 8:12 AM PDT reply actions  

Well the poll is about importance and not good looks. So way to vote with your head and not with your…um…nevermind.

They call him Rags. Where he goes, no-hitters follow.
Addicted to Quack, the home of Tako Tuesdays

by Takimoto on May 11, 2010 10:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

So, linebackers aren't important?

I ask because we have a ton of game experience behind the line, and two seniors with a lot of starts behind them.

I’m a big believer in senior leadership as the key to success for a team. And good LB play is always critical. When the linebackers are great, it’s Gang Green all over again. When they aren’t, we’re giving up lots of slants and bubble screens and chasing guys all over the field.

I can’t make a logical argument that Darion Weems is going to be more important to this team than either Casey Matthews or Spencer Paysinger. Or Clay. Or Littlejohn. Or Lokombo, etc.

So, I voted “other”.

[em] this sig for rent [/em]

by benzduck on May 11, 2010 9:28 AM PDT reply actions  

By “other” I meant “the third linebacker”, whoever gets the job.

[em] this sig for rent [/em]

by benzduck on May 11, 2010 9:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

I’m in agreement with the LB thing, although, as stated above, I really think it’s going to have to be Matthews and/or Paysinger who step up. We’re going to need them to carry the defense a couple times this season, and their leadership on that side of the ball is going to be vital.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on May 11, 2010 9:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

If Paysinger / Mitchell / Whoever can step up this year the way Moretti / Mitchell / Mallard did back in ‘01, we’ll be more than fine.

[em] this sig for rent [/em]

by benzduck on May 11, 2010 11:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

10. Jeff Maehl – He’s been key in our offense. Jeff Maehl’s role will be key to opening up the passing game. Even if his production numbers our down, hopefully he can demand more attention from defenses.

9. Kenjon Barner – Besides being the Tesla Coil to LMJ’s electricity, he’s also the one that will shorten our starting position.

8. Bo Thran – The QB has to put faith in his receiver’s that he’ll catch the ball. He has to have faith that the Running Back has control when giving up the ball in the mesh. But more than either of those, he has to have faith that his blindside is being blocked.

7. Casey Matthews – Linebackers are deep, but the area we are probably thinest on defense is still the defensive tackles. Casey Matthews needs to be a force, and lay down the law down the middle. Iso runs, off tackle, holes 2, 4, 3, 5. That’s his responsibility. The runs down the middle stops with Casey.

6. David Paulson – I hate the term. Hate it, but Paulson had the appearance to be “clutch” (Ugh… I hate that term). Our 3rd and long conversion rate was horrid last year, but I’m sure if you look at the 3rd and long conversions we did make, you’ll likely see Paulson’s name there. Now that we’ll have a QB that can peer over Tim Taylor’s fence, I suspect we’ll get better production from the TE, despite losing the talent of Dickson.

5. The QB – Its an important position, but with the talent we have surrounding the quarterback, he isn’t going to be “the key” to the offense. Costa or Thomas – it honestly won’t matter. We’ll be able to find success off of the other players. It reminds me of going into the ’08 season. We just need a B- performance out of our QB, not A+. If we get an A+ performance out of our QB, we go to the national championship game.

4. Jordan Holmes
The offense starts here. Bad snaps throw off either the timing of the plays, or it can completely give up our possessions. Good snaps go completely unnoticed. Then there is being the anchor for the offensive line, and with how Kelly likes to pull the center out, Holmes will also be asked to be the lead blocker many times. Subpar performance from Holmes can end up causing chaos for the entire offense..

3. Kenny Rowe – The DUEbacker! He’s going to be a major factor into the success and failure of the entire pass defense. Either dropping back into playing zone, covering the backfield, or blitzing from an upright, or pass rushing as a DE, he’s going to have an influence on most passing plays. Ultimately, his job will be to get the QBs in trouble. Time is the offense’s 12th man. Kenny Rowe will have to destroy time itself.

2. John Boyett – He had a bigger role than just playing center field. He somehow had a knack for not biting on Play Action (Ward!), and still closed the distance and made plays near the line when the ball was handed off. He reminds me of Chung in the way that he always, somehow, is in on the play, and like Matthew Harper. Always in position to make the interception that sealed the victory. Between Rowe and Boyett, I feel like we are giving TJ3 and our young CBs a good situation to find success against the passing defense.

1. LaMichael James – Oh yes, most definitely! The biggest reason why I’m not worried about our offense slowing down is LMJ. Masoli was great to have in contrast to James, but TheMichael was the reason we bounced back from Boise State and made it to the Rose Bowl. The holes the OL needs to open up are tremendously smaller with a back like LMJ. (Anybody remember him squeezing underneath a USC player that was being blocked?) Without James, I start to have anxiety for the 2010 season.

its spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-A-L-I-T-T-L-E-I-L-L-L-A-T-E-L-Y"

by JShufelt on May 11, 2010 10:03 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

rec'd for effort

And for having LMJ #1.

Also, I think that Bair and Boyett are the two most important players on the defense. We don’t have anyone else like Bair, and he will really need to anchor that defensive line. Rowe is great, but I feel that his production would be much more easily replaced than Bair.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on May 11, 2010 10:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

We don’t have anyone else like Bair

Yet. Ricky Heimuli can not show up to camp early enough, in my opinion.

Putting produce in your beer is just plain porn.
Addicted to Quack

by Matt Daddy on May 11, 2010 10:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don’t see him being like Bair though. He may be, but he also may be too inexperienced to be much more than a strong body in the middle.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on May 11, 2010 10:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed.

Heimuli will be much more of a traditional DT than Bair is.

Self-anointed President of the Kenjon Barner fan club.

by CaDuck on May 11, 2010 3:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Huh. Intelligent football talk @ ATQ

I must have clicked on the wrong blog this morning, can you guys point me to the Homoerotic Beer and Baseball Teams I Don’t Care About blog on SBN?

by HoodRiverDuck on May 11, 2010 10:34 AM PDT reply actions  

Isn’t that Blazersedge?

Go Lakers!

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on May 11, 2010 10:37 AM PDT up reply actions  

Does it bug the hell out of anyone else that Blazersedge is one word? Is there a story behind that?

They call him Rags. Where he goes, no-hitters follow.
Addicted to Quack, the home of Tako Tuesdays

by Takimoto on May 11, 2010 10:38 AM PDT up reply actions  

And on a Tako Tuesday of all things…

its spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-A-L-I-T-T-L-E-I-L-L-L-A-T-E-L-Y"

by JShufelt on May 11, 2010 10:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

And for a discussion topic? Ummmm, pizza. Chicago or New York-style? What toppings? Best pizza you’ve ever had?

You can talk about what beer goes best with what pizza! Or just do whatever the hell you want, it’s not like this is my column.

They call him Rags. Where he goes, no-hitters follow.
Addicted to Quack, the home of Tako Tuesdays

by Takimoto on May 11, 2010 11:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

You know what I’d like to see as a discussion topic for a Tako Tuesday? Best comic strip.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on May 11, 2010 11:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

Best comic strip.

Isn’t that already Tako Tuedays?

Putting produce in your beer is just plain porn.
Addicted to Quack

by Matt Daddy on May 11, 2010 11:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

Tako does look pretty funny when he’s doing a strip tease, but that wasn’t really what I meant.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on May 11, 2010 11:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

You know, I might even contend that Paulson is underrated on this list. I think that between LMJ runs, AfterBarner runs, Maehl catches, etc., we forgot last year just how crucial Ed Dickson was in our offense. He did so much for us throughout the season, and the main thing that we remember him for is his catch against Arizona to send the game into overtime with 6 seconds left.

It’s easy to forget just how many intermediate level catches and plays he made to gain chunks of yardage that were so crucial in some of the long drives that we had last year. We can only hope that Paulson can fill Dickson’s shoes as a reliable pass-catcher that just seemed to do his job consistently.

Welcome to Nashville, LeGarrette. Also, I love the Jay-Hey Kid.

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on May 11, 2010 2:09 PM PDT reply actions  

I like John Boyett

He’s like Brian Russell, but not crappy.

by Brian Floyd on May 12, 2010 11:17 AM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Addicted to Quack, SBN's Oregon Ducks blog and fan community.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

2011-09-03_15-49-32_912_small
Weekend Preview for May 18-20
Mostinteresting_small
Tako Tuesdays: The Music Thread
Small
Better video of DAT in 100m
2011-09-03_15-49-32_912_small
Giant Sports Weekend Open Thread
Atq-spoon-5_small
Miracle Wolf Scholarship Fund: Update
La_foto_small
Spring game online?
Small
Ducks Drafted and also picked up in Free agency
2011-09-03_15-49-32_912_small
------> REVISED: ATQ Spring Game Meet-Up 2012
Dog_in_tree_small
Duck football tied to Kennedy Assassination
Small
BREAKING NEWS: EXCLUSIVE TRANSCRIPT OF INTERNAL UO INVESTIGATION INTO MARIJUANA USE BY FOOTBALL PLAYERS

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Here is this weeks video with plenty of discussion on the changes for the BCS.  Thanks ATQ and GO Ducks!
Anthony Bennett picks UNLV over Oregon
Chip Kelly Scared
Here is this weeks video. Thanks ATQ, GO DUCKS!
All of DAT's races from Oregon Twilight.
BRING GAMEDAY BACK TO OREGON! VOTE!!!!
Our thoughts on the Spring Game start @ 44:43.  Thanks ATQ and GO DUCKS!
Poor Darron Thomas
Masoli the Eskimo
Bullpen Bagpipes, UO edition.

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

ATQ Twitter Feed


Managers

207873_1005773153454_1498651968_14034_9616_n_small David Piper

Pre_small ntrebon

Img_0525_small jtlight

Mostinteresting_small Takimoto

Domsicecream_small dvieira

Editors

Pettingzoo_small PaulSF

Atq-spoon-5_small Matt Daddy

Authors

Ryan__rusty_small jcgoducks

Small nds500