Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Don't Blame Wes Welker

2010 Oregon Football Preview :: New Mexico Lobos

Part one in a series on Oregon's 2010 season opponents

P6z4ixzedy0cpvfkjs7r8943y_medium 

12:30 PM PST :: September 4, 2010 :: Autzen Stadium

Opponent New Mexico
Nickname Lobos
Location Albuquerque, NM
Enrollment 27,304
Head Coach Mike Locksley (1-11)
Stadium University Stadium (39,224) : natural grass
2009 Record 1-11, (1-7 Mountain West)
Starters Returning 5 Offense : 6 Defense
Base Offense No-huddle Spread
Base Defense 4-3
Blogs The Lobo Lair, Mountain West Connection
Newspapers Albuquerque Journal, New Mexico Daily Lobo

Star-divide

Top Returners

Category Player
Rushing Desmond Dennis :: 78 Rushes : 427 Yards : 3 TD
Passing B.R. Holbrook :: 19/34 : 170 Yards : 1 TD : 2 INT
Receiving Ty Kirk :: 35 Receptions : 418 Yards : 2TD
Tackles Carmen Messina :: 81 Solo : 82 Assist : 163 Total
Sacks Jonathan Rainey :: 9 Solo : 1 Assit : 9.5 Total : 93 Yards
Interceptions Nathan Enriquez :: 2 INT : 0 Yards : 0 TD

 

This is a series that looked a whole lot better when Oregon scheduled it.  Under previous head coach Rocky Long, New Mexico achieved unparalled success.  They were the only real team in the Mountain West outside of the big three, and Long had them in bowl games in five of his final seven seasons, a great accomplishment for a team that, before he got there, hadn't been to a bowl since 1961.  However, his inability to break into the top three in the conference was the reason he cited when he resigned after the '08 season, and the school brought in Mike Locksley, a longtime Ron Zook assistant who, like the Zooker, is known for being a flashy recruiter but has questionable pedigree on the actual coaching part of the game.

Locksley went for a complete overhaul of the system.  He ditched Long's more traditional system in favor of a pass heavy spread.  Keep that in mind when looking an New Mexico's horrid season last year, as we have seen at Michigan how hard it is to switch to that system without the players.  He also switched the defense, from a 3-3-5 to a 4-3.  As a result, both the offense and defense were among the worst in the nation, both on a total and per play basis.  Being the second year in the system, the team should be better almost by default.  However, they'll also likely be starting freshmen at both center and quarterback, who will have the privilege of getting their introduction to college football at Autzen.  While it wasn't quite scheduled this way, its pretty much the complete opposite of last year's opener.

2009 Offensive Statistics 

Statistic New Mexico Oregon
Pass Offense 215.08 (63) 180.31 (98)
Rush Offense 100.25 (110) 231.69 (6)
Total Offense 315.33 (103) 412.00 (33)
Scorng Offense 16.33 (113) 36.08 (8)
Pass Efficiency 105.87 (112) 128.03 (59)
Sacks Allowed 3.42 (115) 1.00 (10)
3rd Down Conversion % 30.11 (117) 35.12 (95)
Yards/Play 4.3 (110) 6.0 (24)
Points/Play 0.225 (114) 0.522 (6)

 

Let me sum it up for you this way:  one of the worst offensive teams in the country last year is going to roll into Autzen with freshmen at both quarterback and center, try to air the ball out with no huddle, probably not be very successful in doing so, and give Chip Kelly more possession to work with.  In all actuality, RS sophomore BR Holbrook, who saw limited action in five games as a freshman last season, was on top of the depth chart after spring ball.  However, it is speculated that Locksley will want one of "his" guys to have the keys to the offense going forward, and two candidates emerge in freshmen Darain "Stump" Godfrey and true frosh Tarean Austin, a 3 star recruit from Florida who was rated the #20 dual threat quarterback recruit in the nation last year.  Whether Holbrook, Godfrey, or Austin wins that competition, the net result will be the same--he'll be entering Autzen for the first real playing time of his college career.  Just by having guys who compliment the system, the numbers should be better almost by default this season, but it will take some time for that to bear out.  Its not going to be evident by the first game of the year.

Unfortunately for the Lobos, it doesn't appear that the offensive line will be much help.  That they only return two starters may not be the worst thing in the world, as they averaged only 3.3 yards per rush and gave up an embarrassingly bad 3.42 sacks per game, despite running most plays out of the shotgun.  Oh, and one of those losses is the MWC all first team center, who will likely be replaced by a redshirt freshman.  Like the freshman quarterbacks, center Dillon Farrell is thought of highly, but he still a freshman making his first start at Autzen.  Some experienced career backups will fill out the right side of the line, while the left side returns.  This group will almost certainly be better in the second year of the new system, but they have a long way to go to be considered respectable.  I have a good feeling that New Mexico's quarterback will get to know Kenny Rowe very, very well.

New Mexico loses two of their three starting wideouts, but return four guys who caught 20 or more balls last season, including sophomore Ty Kirk, who was the best freshman receiver in the conference last season with 36 catches and two scores.  He's probably the most potent receiver they have, but they may spread it around to six or seven different guys over the course of the game, including the tight end, who caught 17 passes last year.  The running back situation is actually in decent shape, as UNM returns their top four rushers from last season, with Desmond Dennis being the biggest weapon at 5.5 yards/carry, and James Wright, who was the starter two seasons ago under Long before landing in Locksley's doghouse, though ultimately regaining the job late in the year.  That said, none of these guys had more than 78 attempts or 454 yards last season.  I would expect to see them try and run the ball a bit early against Oregon and try to take some of the pressure off their new QB, but they'll likely find themselves behind early and will have to make a decision on whether to start airing it out, which is more consistent with their offensive philosophy anyways.

Oregon by no means has a great defensive line, but they should be able to push this weaker offensive line around a bit, getting pressure on the young QB and forcing him to make bad decisions.  Their receivers are decent, but Oregon's secondary has played against much better, not to mention plays against a much better spread every week in practice.  New Mexico will make some plays, but I have doubts that they can do so with any consistency.  I expect that the Ducks' will hold them to a very low scoring first half, though the final score may not reflect that if the Lobos can put up a couple of scores in garbage time.  It does seem likely that New Mexico's style of no huddle will allow Oregon more time with the ball then we would typically see from a more orthodox opponent.

2009 Defensive Statistics

Statistic New Mexico Oregon
Pass Defense 253.67 (105) 207.62 (44)
Rush Defense 165.00 (83) 128.69 (42)
Total Defense 418.67 (100) 336.31 (35)
Scoring Defense 35.92 (113) 23.77 (51)
Pass Efficiency Defense 155.59 (112) 112.30 (25)
Tackles for Loss 6.08 (45) 6.31 (40)
Opponent 3rd Down % 47.98 (115) 37.91 (51)
Turnover Margin -0.50 (97) +0.15 (51)
Yards/Play Allowed 5.6 (75) 4.4 (12)
Points/Play Allowed 0.481 (105) 0.311 (28)

 

If New Mexico's offense was epically bad last season, the defense wasn't far behind.  With a no huddle offense, your defense is on the field a lot, your total stats can be misleading as you play far more plays than anyone else.  You see this in Oregon's defensive numbers, where the total stats are pretty pedestrian and in the middle of the pack.  Then you look at the Ducks' fantastic per play numbers and realize that it was the best defense in the conference, they just played a whole hell of a lot more than anybody else.   Well, the rate stats don't vouch for the Lobo defense.  Giving up almost six yards and half a point per play, its a pretty terrible unit as well.

That said, a lot of their defensive troubles can be attributed to an awful back seven.  Their defensive line was pretty good last year, as they allowed only 3.9 yards/rush (46th in the nation) and had 23 sacks from this unit.  Three of the front four return, including end Jonathan Rainey.  As only a sophomore last season, Rainey was second team all-MWC and had a cool 9.5 sacks.  They also welcome two highy regarded Illinois transfers, Reggie Ellis and Ugo Uzodinma, in addition to 4* freshman from Florida Calvin Smith.  This was a pretty good D-Line last year, and are better and deeper this year.  Its the one unit on the team that could give Oregon problems.  Fortunately, the Ducks have one of the best offensive lines in the nation to take care of it.  But there will be times this game where the Oregon QB does face some pressure, and may see the turf.

They also return 1st team all-MWC middle linebacker Carmen Messina, who led all of college football in tackles with a whopping 162.  However, they lost both of their outside guys.  Outside of Messina, this unit is perilously thin on experience, as their depth chart is loaded with guys who have less than ten career tackles.  Being so bad last year, this is again a unit that should be better almost by default, but that won't manifest itself in game one.  The secondary was really torched last year, as their 253 passing yards/game given up attests to.  They return both CBs, who should be better, but replace both their safeties, again with very little experience.  While I would expect that Oregon will run the majority of this game, look for the Ducks to try and exploit this secondary early, further loosening up that defense and giving the running backs even more room. 

2009 Special Teams Statistics 

Statistic New Mexico Oregon
Kick Returns 19.17 (108) 24.91 (10)
Punt Returns 3.58 (115) 12.00 (27)
Kickoff Returns Against 23.55 (98) 20.85 (42)
Punt Returns Against 9.47 (66) 6.83 (36)

 

As you can see, New Mexico neither returns nor defends kicks very well, which is not surprising given the lack of depth on the roster.  Oregon should have the decided advantage in the return game.  New Mexico has a new punter this season, freshman Ben Skaer, who figures to see a lot of action.  Kicker James Aho returns for the Lobos.  He had a fantastic freshman season two years ago, but regressed severely last year and is looking to regain his form.  His career long is 48, but his comfortable range is inside of 42.  For Oregon, regardless of who wins the kicking competition, Alejandro Maldonado will be kicking this game as Rob Beard serves his suspension.  While we don't know how Maldonado will do, if this game comes down his leg, his performance is the least of our concerns.

Final Analysis

New Mexico will be a much more challenging opponent when we visit Albuquerque in 2012.  That said, this is a team in transition right now, and a pretty bad one at that.  I'll bluntly say that it would take a complete catastrophe for Oregon to lose this game.  I think the Lobos will feel good if they can keep it relatively close for two or three quarters and force Oregon to play their starters for most of the game.  If you're Oregon, you want a scenario where the drama is over by halftime, and you're able to play the backups a lot in the second half, keeping everyone healthy and having everyone firing on all cylinders for the Tennessee game.  New Mexico strength, the defensive line, is opposed by arguably our biggest strength, and their offensive style is one that should give our offense a ton of chances to put the ball in the end zone.

Poll
What will be the result of the Oregon/New Mexico game?
15+ point Oregon win
849 votes
7-14 point Oregon win
42 votes
<7 point Oregon win
7 votes
<7 point New Mexico win
6 votes
7-14 point New Mexico win
2 votes
15+ point New Mexico win
13 votes

919 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 81 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Even with no LMJ

The only question in this one should be how long the starters have to play.

Blowout.

"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely

by skywaker9 on Jul 27, 2010 8:31 AM PDT reply actions  

This one of the few games,

In which I am looking foward to watching the backups play (hopefully after a first half blowout). We should hopefully see a lot of Josh Huff, Seastrunk, etc… in the late third and the fourth quarter.

Self-anointed President of the Kenjon Barner fan club.

by CaDuck on Jul 27, 2010 9:01 AM PDT reply actions  

I just don’t see how Seastrunk doesn’t redshirt this year unless injuries happen

by echo31 on Jul 27, 2010 1:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don’t see a 5 star recruit redshirting, even with our depth.

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Jul 27, 2010 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

I guess I just don’t see the sense of entitlement that a 5 star supposedly gives you

by echo31 on Jul 27, 2010 1:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

i think williams could be redshirted

he doesn’t have amazing speed but has characteristics similar to remene alston, i don’t see the coaches using five running backs.
seastrunk on the other hand should play. when a guy is as good as he is and as fast as he is, kelly will find a way to get him on the field. if a back displays excellent hands, he could see some slot time to run jet sweeps, motion options, and catch some passes.

by jcgoducks on Jul 27, 2010 3:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hands were one of the knocks on Seastrunk. He would apparently make really difficult catches, but he had stone hands with simple catches. Very J-Will sounding.

I’m sure that’s somethign they’ll work on.

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Jul 27, 2010 3:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Maybe LMJ can help him out with this.

Ha ha! I crack me up.

[em] this sig for rent [/em]

by benzduck on Jul 27, 2010 6:22 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

flagged for making me scream.

Official officer of the office of official blasphemy. Where what you say works 60% of the time, every time.

by axemen23 on Jul 27, 2010 6:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

i kind of mean if a back in general displays good hands then he could get some more slot time. i wasn’t aware that was the knock on lache, not even bubble screens?

by jcgoducks on Jul 27, 2010 8:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Just throw it in really bad locations, and he’ll catch it.

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Jul 27, 2010 11:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

It isn’t a matter of entitlement. It’s that you want to get your big impact play makers on the field.
Very rarely do 5 star players actually red shirt.

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Jul 27, 2010 2:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

If our recruiting uptrend continues

I think we will see a big drop in the number of red shirts. You just don’t sit those big players. Imagine JStew sitting a year, it would never happen.

Go Ducks.....Ducks Go!!!!!

by trumpetduck on Jul 27, 2010 2:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

They also can go to the NFL after their Sophomore year if they redshirt. So, that’s another reason why you don’t usually redshirt great recruits – get at least 3 years out of them.

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Jul 27, 2010 2:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wouldn’t it make sense to give an extra year between Barner and LMJ to Seastrunk now? Especially considering the number of guys we have that can run mop up duty if need be (Alston, Shinaba).

I understand not wanting to keep talent like him on the sidelines, but what does one year of running mop up duty add versus an extra year after LMJ and barner are gone?

ATQ's #1 HRD Fan
Addicted to Quack

by Matt Daddy on Jul 27, 2010 2:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

It isn’t a guaranteed extra year. He can go to the NFL after his Sophomore (RS) year.

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Jul 27, 2010 2:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

He could, yes. But unless he just blows people away he won’t even be starting with LMJ in place (unless he goes to the NFL). Hell, if he’s better than LMJ to start, this is an entirely different conversation.

I just think with LMJ, and Barner you have to try and red-shirt Seastrunk to potentially get that extra year out of him.

ATQ's #1 HRD Fan
Addicted to Quack

by Matt Daddy on Jul 27, 2010 2:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

I really doubt that happens. Barner will not really be playing traditional running back, and I think that Seastrunk and Williams will be pushing for playing time over Alston.

I think that both will see the field against New Mexico.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Jul 27, 2010 2:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

As long as LMJ is playing, I don’t see Barner playing much in the traditional RB role.

While he’ll be the 2nd RB on the depth chart, I don’t think that means he’ll be the first to take over for James when he’s tired or they are limiting his rushes.

Mop-up duty, I would guess he’s probably sitting on the bench too. Why risk that injury?

Also, it is very possible to split time at RB and leave for the NFL early. It nearly happened with Blount. It happened with LenDale White and Reggie Bush. You don’t need to be the starter to show you’re an NFL caliber back.

Some NFL teams prefer getting RBs as early as possible, because their NFL career is often shorter than any other position.

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Jul 27, 2010 2:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

I got to see Maldonado get off some punts yesterday @ Pape' Field

        Impressive. High, way high spirals with nice turnover, average about 50 yards

Also, Hronis has the nicest shotgun snap I have EVER seen; quick motion, firm delivers, consistent height

"If you can't copy 'em, don't imitate ''em."
YOGI BERRA

by Famous Duck on Jul 27, 2010 9:22 AM PDT reply actions  

The Stats for New Mexico are eye poppingly bad

Say what you mean, and say it mean. - Clint Ruin

by QuackinAK on Jul 27, 2010 9:42 AM PDT reply actions  

are the 2 votes for a NW win somebody misreading, or do we have some wishful thinking lobos fans?

"I used to play sports. Then I realized you can buy trophies. Now I'm good at everything." - Demetri Martin

by haveasoda on Jul 27, 2010 10:01 AM PDT reply actions  

or Fusky fans

--Dave

Addicted to Quack, your friendly, neighborhood Oregon Ducks blog

by David Piper on Jul 27, 2010 10:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

Fuskies are openminded

Dog, wolf…second chances prove amorality, second chances show compassion…it’s all the same.

by grimc on Jul 27, 2010 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

My primary desire for this game is to see Costa (or Thomas, if he gets the job) get into a rhythm. I’m okay if they struggle in the first quarter and Barner winds up taking it to the house three times. But I’d really like to see a crisp passing game emerge in the middle quarters just to get some confidence and chemistry with the WRs before heading to Tennessee.

Obviously Kelly still has to coach to win the game within the bounds of good sportsmanship. I just hope that includes getting the passing game off the ground early.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Jul 27, 2010 10:30 AM PDT reply actions  

I just hope to see crisp and efficient blocking,

From the linemen, tight ends, and receivers. In other words, the exact opposite of what we saw against BSU. If we block well, things will be a whole lot easier for Costa against Tennessee.

Self-anointed President of the Kenjon Barner fan club.

by CaDuck on Jul 27, 2010 10:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

I have no problem with our backups going in, up 42 points, and throwing TDs. If it were our starters? Then that is in poor taste.

That’s why I thought Bellotti was being a little bit of a bitch in the ‘08 USC game. Let’s see what the backups can do! Just because they are in, is not an excuse to stop playing defense.

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Jul 27, 2010 10:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

I guess my main worry is that our passing game struggles early, but our running game/special teams/defense is so good that we still go up big. Then Kelly pulls the starters, as he should, and they do what they do. But our starting QB will have left the game without really getting a good rhythm going.

Let’s face it, we should win this game with you or me playing QB. But I’d like Costa or Thomas feeling pretty good about their role in the passing game going into Rocky Top.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Jul 27, 2010 11:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

If we are up by six TDs, I’ll bet you a case of throwback Mountain Dew that the last Oregon pass will have been thrown.

[em] this sig for rent [/em]

by benzduck on Jul 27, 2010 6:19 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

If we're up by 6 TDs i'll be giving my cousin shit all the way home.

Official officer of the office of official blasphemy. Where what you say works 60% of the time, every time.

by axemen23 on Jul 27, 2010 6:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

I’m sure. They want to end the game at that point. I’m just saying I don’t have a problem with tossing some TDs if you have your backups in.

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Jul 27, 2010 11:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

The Spread

Will most likely be in the mid 20’s, maybe even break 30. -15 is a super lock!

I can get you a toe by three o'clock this afternoon.

by KyleC on Jul 27, 2010 10:52 AM PDT reply actions  

i think the spread will be around -24

however, vegas might decide to not even allow the game to be bet on, like many wsu games.

by jcgoducks on Jul 27, 2010 3:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

Normally they'll allow spread bets

they won’t slap a money line on this one though.

by B Money on Jul 27, 2010 11:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

No-huddle Spread Clinic

I think the main question is how long will the game last with both teams running the no-huddle offense? Could we see a game less than 3 hours?

Great preview, can’t freaking wait for the season to start

Anyone can be cool but being awesome takes practice

by moatman on Jul 27, 2010 12:22 PM PDT reply actions  

We’ll see a lot of snaps.

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Jul 27, 2010 12:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

What do you think our first play of the season will be? The easy money would be the zone read, a Barner dive play, or quick slants to get Costa in rhythm. But I think back to 2007 and how Dixon would come out with the deep ball in our first series, and how the running game was so much more open after a deep shot to J. Williams. Does Costa have the arm to bring back that strategy?

by JonathanPDX on Jul 27, 2010 2:35 PM PDT reply actions  

Bubble/Tunnel screen.

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Jul 27, 2010 2:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

Touchdown.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Jul 27, 2010 2:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

unless we kick first, then it will be a kickoff by Beard

by echo31 on Jul 27, 2010 3:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

We’ve tend to kick off first. Crowd is there, and into it – as opposed to the second half when they would rather drink a couple more beers until 8 minutes left in the 3rd quarter.

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Jul 27, 2010 3:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

But if we don’t kick, then kickoff return.

by grimc on Jul 27, 2010 3:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

i would say there’s about a 50% chance of that being true

by echo31 on Jul 27, 2010 3:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Most teams elect to receive. Oregon tends to elect to kick.

I’d say 80% chance we kick.

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Jul 27, 2010 3:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

But NM, a huge underdog, will probably elect to defer so they could start the 2nd half with the ball (and an assumed hole to try and climb out of).

Kickoff return.

by grimc on Jul 27, 2010 3:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Bubble Screen.

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Jul 27, 2010 3:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think so as well.

Chip Kelly is my shepherd, there is nothing I shall want.

by qrsouther on Jul 27, 2010 7:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think I remember someone telling me that for the last five years the Bavers first play of the season has been a PA deep bomb. I wouldn’t be surprised if we’ve thrown a bubble screen the last 3 or so years for our first play.

by runfast on Jul 27, 2010 7:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

speaking of

i’m back in full force. i was in bend playing a golf tournament, and would sporadically check on ATQ on my friend’s Wii

Official officer of the office of official blasphemy. Where what you say works 60% of the time, every time.

by axemen23 on Jul 27, 2010 5:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm going to bet that you're secretly bummed

that hours have passed and nobody’s made a crack about you checking something out on your friend’s Wii.

by grimc on Jul 27, 2010 8:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

nope

the website is ADDICTEDtoquack. I might as well be the logo.

Official officer of the office of official blasphemy. Where what you say works 60% of the time, every time.

by axemen23 on Jul 27, 2010 8:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

End-around to Tuinei from Barner out of the wild duck. 70 yd TD. Mark it down.

It worked on the PS3..

[em] this sig for rent [/em]

by benzduck on Jul 27, 2010 6:14 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

I can guarantee 100% that it won't be a kickoff by Beard

as he’s suspended for this game.

--Dave

Addicted to Quack, your friendly, neighborhood Oregon Ducks blog

by David Piper on Jul 27, 2010 4:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

You never know with Chip Kelly

He’s always giving his starters special treatment. I’ve read about it on the internet.

by grimc on Jul 27, 2010 4:13 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I heard he never even mentioned the Golf Cart Incident. It’s a cover up!

by JonathanPDX on Jul 27, 2010 4:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hahaha

Rec’d

Self-anointed President of the Kenjon Barner fan club.

by CaDuck on Jul 27, 2010 5:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Masoli is kicking off then?

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Jul 27, 2010 4:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

how did I forget this?

by echo31 on Jul 27, 2010 9:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Probably because it's really insignificant.

Chip Kelly is my shepherd, there is nothing I shall want.

by qrsouther on Jul 27, 2010 9:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

this

--Dave

Addicted to Quack, your friendly, neighborhood Oregon Ducks blog

by David Piper on Jul 27, 2010 10:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

They have over 27,000 students?

I had no idea there were that many people in NMex.

[em] this sig for rent [/em]

by benzduck on Jul 27, 2010 6:09 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

They have drive-thru liquor stores

I’m surprised Tako didn’t go there for Grad School.

Official officer of the office of official blasphemy. Where what you say works 60% of the time, every time.

by axemen23 on Jul 27, 2010 6:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

There’s still time.

They call him Rags. Where he goes, no-hitters follow.
Addicted to Quack, the home of Tako Tuesdays

by Takimoto on Jul 28, 2010 12:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

Interestingly, over half the population of New Mexico is employed by the federal government.

The O is the new U

by jcolomy on Jul 27, 2010 9:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

This makes for a good Bill Richardson fat joke.

Chip Kelly is my shepherd, there is nothing I shall want.

by qrsouther on Jul 27, 2010 10:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hahaha

Self-anointed President of the Kenjon Barner fan club.

by CaDuck on Jul 28, 2010 10:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think that the offense may start out slow, and a 3-3 tie at the end of the first quarter may have some people nervous. After that, however, I see the offensive start hitting its stride and blowing out the Lobos 41-6.

AtQ's Resident Baseball Purist.

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Jul 27, 2010 8:06 PM PDT reply actions  

unrelated to the thread

TQA8, did you confirm the online dynasty for ncaa?

by jcgoducks on Jul 27, 2010 8:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

I just got back home from an 11 day trip and I won’t have access to my Xbox until tomorrow. I will try to do it for you tomorrow.

Sorry about the inconvenience.

AtQ's Resident Baseball Purist.

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Jul 27, 2010 8:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

its fine dawg

we’re still waiting for dingdongdynasty too.

by jcgoducks on Jul 27, 2010 8:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Dawg? Do I look like a UWDP poster to you?

AtQ's Resident Baseball Purist.

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Jul 27, 2010 8:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

oh, a duck v huskie joke, i get it, it’s funny

by jcgoducks on Jul 27, 2010 8:41 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

so we should be good to go now?

Official officer of the office of official blasphemy. Where what you say works 60% of the time, every time.

by axemen23 on Jul 28, 2010 2:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

My EA server was all messed up. I regulated it last night.

GOOD TO GO!

"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington...like Jonathan Stewart, and Dennis Dixon."

by mackjones23 on Jul 28, 2010 8:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Addicted to Quack, SBN's Oregon Ducks blog and fan community.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
So you just signed a bunch of blue chip recruits...

Recent FanPosts

Square_envelope_electric_purple-p121411710380622431j65uf_400_small
To Whom It May Concern
Sarah_b-day_small
A bit disappointed today
Angryduck_small
benzduck's Trivia Contest #1
Small
If Kelly Goes to the NFL, Who Would Oregon Hire?
Small
Darron Thomas' Surprise Decision to Bolt for NFL Should Be Celebrated, Not Scorned
Bns_small
The Ducks can learn from the New England Patriots.
120103_oregon_rose_bowl_tb_small
The Three Musketeers... Wait, they're Quarterbacks? Where's Darron? PANIC!
Angryduck_small
A Lexicon of Expert Darron Thomas Departure Invective
Duk3_small
An ode to Darron Thomas

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

ATQ Twitter Feed


Managers

207873_1005773153454_1498651968_14034_9616_n_small David Piper

Pre_small ntrebon

Img_0525_small jtlight

Mostinteresting_small Takimoto

Domsicecream_small dvieira

Editors

Pettingzoo_small PaulSF

Atq-spoon-5_small Matt Daddy

Authors

Ryan__rusty_small jcgoducks

N679617597_457761_5158_small kanders4

Small nds500