2010 Oregon Football Preview :: Stanford Cardinal
Part five in a series on Oregon's 2010 season opponents
Part 1: New Mexico | Part 2: Tennessee | Part 3: Portland State | Part 4: Arizona State
8:15 PM PST :: October 2, 2010 :: Autzen Stadium
| Opponent | Stanford |
| Nickname | Cardinal |
| Location | Palo Alto, CA |
| Enrollment | 15,319 |
| Head Coach | Jim Harbaugh (17-20) |
| Stadium | Stanford Stadium (50,000) : natural grass |
| 2009 Record | 8-5, (6-3 Pac 10) |
| Starters Returning | 8 Offense : 8 Defense |
| Base Offense | Pro-style |
| Base Defense | 3-4 |
| Blogs | none |
| Newspapers | The Stanford Daily, San Francisco Chronicle |
Top Returners
| Category | Player |
| Rushing | Andrew Luck :: 61 Rushes : 418 Yards : 2 TD |
| Passing | Andrew Luck :: 162/288 : 2575 Yards : 13 TD : 4 INT |
| Receiving | Ryan Whalen :: 57 Receptions : 926 Yards : 4 TD |
| Tackles | Delano Howell :: 78 Total |
| Sacks | Thomas Keiser :: 9 Total |
| Interceptions | Delano Howell, Richard Sherman :: 2 INT |
Stanford comes to town for the fifth game of the season, and we finally see a team that should provide the Ducks with a challenge. This was the one conference team that gave Oregon all kinds of problems last season, as they physically manhandled Oregon from the opening kickoff. They surprised many people last season, finishing in a tie for second in the conference, and were picked fourth in the media poll this season.
They have one of the best coaches in the conference in Jim Harbaugh. While they lose Toby Gerhart, they return a whole myriad of options offensively to the one offense in the conference that was statistically better than Oregon last season. And while they return eight starters on defense as well, there is a lot of evidence to suggest that it was an extremely lucky defense last season. Stanford should be a good team again this season, but how much production they get in place of Gerhart and whether the defense has improved any appreciable amount will determine whether Stanford will contend for a conference crown, or be heading to Vegas for the holidays.
2009 Offensive Statistics
| Statistic | Stanford | Oregon |
| Pass Offense | 209.38 (70) | 180.31 (98) |
| Rush Offense | 218.23 (11) | 231.69 (6) |
| Total Offense | 427.62 (19) | 412.00 (33) |
| Scorng Offense | 35.46 (11) | 36.08 (8) |
| Pass Efficiency | 139.58 (30) | 128.03 (59) |
| Sacks Allowed | 0.54 (2) | 1.00 (10) |
| 3rd Down Conversion % | 44.59 (23) | 35.12 (95) |
| Yards/Play | 6.5 (8) | 6.0 (24) |
| Points/Play | 0.539 (4) | 0.522 (6) |
Stanford's offense was scary good last season, and we saw their blueprint in the Cardinal's offensive domination of the contest last year. A big, physical offensive line that pushed our smaller defensive line around, a physically punishing Toby Gerhart plowing through those holes, and arguably the best QB in the conference, Andrew Luck, throwing beautifully accurate passes to take advantage of one-on-one coverage in the secondary. So dominant of a performance was it offensively, that Oregon scored 42 points but was never really in the game.
Luck returns as the quarterback, and last year's performance is even more impressive when you remember that he was a redshirt freshman. His 56.2 completion % is lower than I thought it would be, but the 13/4 TD/INT ratio tells you a lot about his decision making. He throws a beautiful ball, and is fairly mobile for a pro-style QB (418 yards last season). He also had a lot of help last season. That big, physical offensive line only gave up half a sack a game last season, and Gerhart took enormous pressure of the young Texan.
Four starters return on that offensive line, where right tackle is the only new starter, where first team all Pac-10 tackle Chris Marinelli is being replaced, likely by senior Derek Hall. Phil Steele calls this the best offensive line in the Pac-10, and all four returning starters make his preseason Pac-10 teams. After seeing what this unit did to the Oregon defensive line last season, its hard to disagree with him.
They return both starters at wide receiver, where Ryan Whalen and Chris Owusu combined for 94 receptions and well over 1500 yards Tight end Coby Fleener also caught 21 balls last year, and they have some talented underclassmen waiting in the wings. At these three positions, the offense will be solid again.
However, there are big question marks at running back, where two sophomores, Stepfan Taylor and Tyler Gaffney, are competiting for the starting job. Both are power backs in the Gerhart mode, though neither are quite as big. Whoever wins the job will put up big numbers, its almost guaranteed with the offensive line and quarterback that they have. But they won't put up Gerhart type numbers, and on the whole, and it will be interesting to see what affect that has on the offense. Also, former starting fullback Owen Marecic is switching to linebacker full time this season, so it will be interesting to see how he is replaced at that position.
2009 Defensive Statistics
| Statistic | Stanford | Oregon |
| Pass Defense | 264.77 (110) | 207.62 (44) |
| Rush Defense | 137.92 (55) | 128.69 (42) |
| Total Defense | 402.69 (90) | 336.31 (35) |
| Scoring Defense | 26.54 (69) | 23.77 (51) |
| Pass Efficiency Defense | 139.61 (98) | 112.30 (25) |
| Tackles for Loss | 4.46 (108) | 6.31 (40) |
| Opponent 3rd Down % | 42.94 (95) | 37.91 (51) |
| Turnover Margin | 0.00 (60) | +0.15 (51) |
| Yards/Play Allowed | 5.6 (75) | 4.4 (12) |
| Points/Play Allowed | 5.8 (90) | 0.311 (28) |
This was not a very good defense last season. Neither their total nor per play stats inspire much confidence. The secondary was swiss cheese, the defensive line underwhelming. And while being ranked #69 in scoring defense is hardly good, there is significant evidence to suggest that they were incredibly lucky to be ranked even that high. They switch from a 4-3 to a 3-4 defense in hope of playing to their strength at linebacker this season.
Guard Sione Fua is the only returning starter on the line of the 3-4 Stanford defense. The 307 pounder was honorable mention all-conference last season. Experienced backups will fill in the two end spots on the line, but this is a mediocre D-line that the Oregon offensive line should be able to handle.
The linebacking corps is the best unit on the defense. They return three starters, plus move former starting fullback Owen Marecic to one of the inside spot. Thomas Keiser was first team all Pac-10 on the outside and had nine sacks last season. They have a lot of depth on this unit, and the switch to a 3-4 should help thier pass defense tremendously (though possibly at the expense of their rush defense, which would certainly work in our favor).
If there is one knock on Harbaugh, its that the secondary has gotten progressively worse every season he's been the coach. They return three starters, but none of them are terribly good. The switch to a 3-4 should help, but this is a secondary you can pick on.
2009 Special Teams Statistics
| Statistic | Stanford | Oregon |
| Kick Returns | 27.53 (3) | 24.91 (10) |
| Punt Returns | 7.63 (77) | 12.00 (27) |
| Kickoff Returns Against | 19.79 (22) | 20.85 (42) |
| Punt Returns Against | 6.83 (T-36) | 6.83 (T-36) |
Like Oregon, Stanford has very good special teams. Based on last year's stats, the return games are a wash, and should provide no advantage for either side. However, we saw last year that Chris Owusu is one of the most dangerous return men in the confernece. They return both their kicker and punter. Kicker Nate Whitaker and went 16-22 with a long of 54. Punter David Green was inconsistent last season, but finished with an average of 40 ypp.
Final Analysis
Stanford is the one team in the conference that can match Oregon's defense point for point. And there is no reason to to expect another shootout this season. However, there are things that give me hope that this season's game will be different. The young Oregon defense is a year older with few significant losses. Toby Gerhart is nowhere to be found. Whoever wins Oregon's starting QB job should be more of a passing threat to pick on Stanford's weak secondary, and the game is at Autzen, where we should have a significant advantage. But this is going to be a physical game, and Oregon is going to have to show more tough and grit than they did last season. This should be very close.
32 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I am very interested to see what this Stanford team will be like this season,
I expect them to have some trouble early in the season now that they no longer have a Rhinoceros of Death running the ball 40 times a game and opening up great passing lanes downfield. But I’m sure that the Harbaugh brand of tough football will be pretty effective by the halfway point of the season. I envision the Ducks being able to win the 1 on 1 battles with receivers outside and beating Stanford by 10.
Self-anointed President of the Kenjon Barner fan club.
Does anyone know why the super late start?
Never heard of a game starting so late out on a west coast site…
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
But they don't usually air it that late
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
Usually… but they would always prefer a football game than never-ending repeating hours of sports center.
it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"
See the infamous Wisconsin-Hawaii game from last season
Kickoff was around midnight midwest time. That’s a bit much to ask…
Wisconsin destroyed Hawaii, but it was still a very, very late game…
My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
Fire KP! He forgot to turn off injuries in dynasty mode. - by Norsktroll on BlazersEdge
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 12, 2010 3:41 PM PDT up reply actions
But that was in Hawaii
2 hours earlier
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
3 hours earlier
still unpleasant. I think the game ended around 1 in the morning…
My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
Fire KP! He forgot to turn off injuries in dynasty mode. - by Norsktroll on BlazersEdge
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 12, 2010 3:56 PM PDT up reply actions
Hawaii is 4 hours earlier than the Central time zone
Say what you mean, and say it mean. - Clint Ruin
It was still not fun when the bowl invites came out...
Because despite trashing Hawaii, Wisconsin went to Orlando. They turned Miami inside out for three and a half quarters…
My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
Fire KP! He forgot to turn off injuries in dynasty mode. - by Norsktroll on BlazersEdge
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 16, 2010 5:21 PM PDT up reply actions
this is the game that scares the living daylights out of me.
"Our expectations are to win every game we play. I don’t know if that’s ever going to happen .... but no one ever rises to low expectations." --Chip Kelly
Every year
this is the game I dread. Ever since 2001-02, when that 49-42 home loss was the one game I got to attend all season. Even though we beat them every year after that up until last year’s kick in the gut, I still dread Stanford week more than any other.
axemen23: the human vuvuzela
by HoodRiverDuck on Aug 12, 2010 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions
For some reason this game doesn't worry me
We’ll have 4 warm up games coming into this one. 2 of those games will be against patsies that should allow our offense to work out some kinks and let our defense rest. The other 2 will test our offense, but not our defense, and even if our O struggles we should be able to win that game.
Then we get to come into this game, with a well rested defense, at home for our first Pac 10 game (where Autzen is going to be crazy, considering it starts so late) against a team that is going to rely heavily on their QB to win the game for them… in a crazy Autzen stadium.
Add to all that, this game is a retribution game for a lot of guys from last year that are still on the team and I’m feeling pretty confident.
Hey Daisy, git me anudder one!
Addicted to Quack
Skeptical w/out Gerhart
I know Andrew Luck is great and their offensive line is tough and seasoned, but Gerhart was just such a beast. I don’t expect Oregon to dominate in this game—it will still take a complete performance to beat Stanford, but I just don’t see Stanford having a repeat performance without Gerhart.
It’s true their OL paved the way for Toby, but his most impressive highlights (and biggest gains) came from him shrugging off LBs and DBs. He was just an absolutely fantastic football player.
Ditto. I definitely like our chances when they don’t have Gerhart. Not saying that we’re an overwhelming favorite or anything — but I feel like we’re at least a 50/50.
The U of O: Where idle hands are the devil's workshop.
by ProbablyMonty on Aug 12, 2010 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions
oh, we're more than a 50/50
I think we’re something like 60/40 or 65/35 for this game
--Dave
Addicted to Quack, your friendly, neighborhood Oregon Ducks blog
That could well be, and I’ll agree with you pending three things:
1) Declaration of a new QB
2) Said QB taking a few snaps
3) Said snaps not resulting in turnovers (lest I dig my own eyes out with a melon scoop)
If those check out, then yeah, we’re better than 50/50.
The U of O: Where idle hands are the devil's workshop.
by ProbablyMonty on Aug 12, 2010 8:37 PM PDT up reply actions
I just love the start time for this one.
In all seriousness, this game worries me. Mostly because of Luck.
AtQ's Resident Baseball Purist.
by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Aug 12, 2010 1:46 PM PDT reply actions
He should no longer have the luxury of one on one coverage every single play...
You know, just to argue for the hell of it.
Self-anointed President of the Kenjon Barner fan club.
I don't think that we're going to be out-coached this year.....
Kelly HATES to lose and last year, Harbaugh had the luxury of an extra week to prepare and he brought some surprises….won’t happen this year….USC follows Oregon into Palo Alto and Stanford could have 3 losses by their bye week which follows USC.
I expect that UCLA will give them one helluva game (and I don’t root for UCLA but in week two, they stand to be pretty tough)… then The Tree gets Wake Forest at home, f and then Stanford has to go to Notre Dame…not much time to surprise the Ducks.
Oregon by 24.
"If you can't copy 'em, don't imitate ''em."
YOGI BERRA
I am most worried about Cal.
They have no expectations, which means they could be good. Not to mention, we have to play down there (is Cal playing their home games in AT&T park this season or next season?). Playing Cal in their crumbling stadium has given us trouble in recent memory.
Self-anointed President of the Kenjon Barner fan club.
Next season. We have to play at Memorial.
AtQ's Resident Baseball Purist.
by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Aug 12, 2010 3:49 PM PDT up reply actions
This might be the one game I see live this year, so I’m excited. I can only imagine how crazy Autzen is going to be.
I’m worried about Luck and their big O-line but I don’t know if they have a running back who can do what Gerhart did last year. He was so damn good, not just big but surprisingly fast. I think some of those 12-20 yard runs turn into 5 yard runs this year, and over the course of a game that means less points or more pressure on Luck to throw on 3rd and 6 instead of hand if off on 3rd and 2.
If we can throw the ball and our backfield is healthy I think we can outscore them. The question is whether they’ll be balanced enough to let Luck do his thing. If they can’t run he’s going to have a hell of a time getting in rhythm, especially when we force half a dozen false starts.
Masoli gives us the chance to compare and contrast
I’ve thought about this a lot and when I was watching a video of Ole Miss practice it seemed so… lackadaisical (sp?) and it sparked an interesting question
Kelly always talks about how fast the team practices and how many reps they get in (something like 3x the usual team if I remember his boasts correctly). I wonder if this is really true, and if Masoli has ever commented on it. Probably not, not wise to come to a school that brought you in after your mistakes and start saying to the media “these guys are lazy in practice”…but it’s still interesting to consider
It’s at Autzen. We’ll win by a few.
They call him Rags. Where he goes, no-hitters follow.
Addicted to Quack, the home of Tako Tuesdays
Yep,
But at that point, our QB situation was hardly settled. That was a few games prior to Masoli settling down and getting the hang of things.
Self-anointed President of the Kenjon Barner fan club.
Yeah, we lost the turnover battle 4-1 that day. That was the biggest reason for the close score.
--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
That was probably about 65% bad Masoli, 35% good Masoli, the infamous “he was booed then lead the team to a comeback win” game.
Ah yes, that pissed me off so much.
I can’t remember another time the Oregon crowd booed our own team, and I certainly can’t remember another time we booed a specific player.
At that point I was also thinking “I like this masoli kid, tough as nails, quick, and we’ve given him like 4 games to go from 5th string to starter, looks to me like he could turn into something.”
Later on, I thought, “I like this Masoli kid, I wish he wouldn’t steal from fraternities”.
The rest of the off season can get the fuck off my lawn.
by Bill Musgrave on Aug 13, 2010 4:55 AM PDT up reply actions

by 

















