2010 Oregon Football Preview :: UCLA Bruins
Part 7 in a series on Oregon's 2010 season opponents
Part 1: New Mexico | Part 2: Tennessee | Part 3: Portland State | Part 4: Arizona State | Part 5: Stanford | Part 6: Washington State

6:00 PM PST :: October 21, 2010 :: Autzen Stadium
| Opponent | UCLA |
| Nickname | Bruins |
| Location | Los Angeles, CA |
| Enrollment | 38,476 |
| Head Coach | Rick Neuheisel (11-14 at UCLA, 77-44 overall) |
| Stadium | Rose Bowl (91,136) : natural grass |
| 2009 Record | 7-6, (3-6 Pac 10) |
| Starters Returning | 8 Offense : 5 Defense |
| Base Offense | Pistol |
| Base Defense | 4-3 |
| Blogs | Bruins Nation |
| Newspapers | Los Angeles Times, The Daily Bruin |
Top Returners
| Category | Player |
| Rushing | Jonathan Franklin :: 126 Rushes : 566 Yards : 5 TD |
| Passing | Kevin Prince :: 173/308 : 2050 Yards : 8 TD : 8 INT |
| Receiving | Nelson Rosario :: 42 Receptions : 723 Yards : 2 TD |
| Tackles | Akeem Ayres :: 79 total |
| Sacks | Akeem Ayres :: 6 total |
| Interceptions | Rahim Moore :: 10 INT |
The Pac-10's perennial underachiever, UCLA has been largely irrelevant for the better part of a decade. The mediocrity that got Karl Dorrell fired has continued unimpeded into year three of the Rick Neuheisel era, spurred largely by the lack of a quarterback with a pulse and a mediocre offensive line. Despite having Neuheisel and Norm Chow on the coaching staff, widely regarded as two of the greatest offensive minds in football, UCLA makes the switch to a pistol offense in an attempt to revive a stagnant run game and take some pressure off the passing game. And there are reasons to think that the offense will be much better this season. While the defense should remain stout, they lose some big names and only return five starters. Somewhat of a drop off should be expected.
2009 Offensive Statistics
| Statistic | UCLA | Oregon |
| Pass Offense | 222.77 (52) | 180.31 (98) |
| Rush Offense | 114.62 (97) | 231.69 (6) |
| Total Offense | 337.38 (88) | 412.00 (33) |
| Scoring Offense | 22.0 (94) | 36.08 (8) |
| Pass Efficiency | 113.86 (101) | 128.03 (59) |
| Sacks Allowed | 2.23 (74) | 1.00 (10) |
| 3rd Down Conversion % | 34.05 (101) | 35.12 (95) |
| Yards/Play | 5.0 (83) | 6.0 (24) |
Offensively, UCLA has been a mess ever since Cade McNown graduated in the late '90s. Kevin Prince, who started 11 games as a freshman last season, returns as the starter. He had some impressive numbers, passing for over 2000 yards, including three 300 yard passing games. He needs to improve on his 56% completion percentage, but maturity should help a bunch. While nobody would mistake him for Jeremiah Masoli, he does have enough mobility that he could be successful running the pistol. Going into this season with Prince as the starter could be the best QB situation the Bruins have had in quite some time.
The running game is a different story. UCLA returns five of their top six rushers, but nobody had over 566 yards last seso, nor better than a 4.5 average. Jonathan Franklin returns as the starter, but nothing I saw from him last year struck me as extraordinary. The offensive line returns four of five starters, but for a bad unit that failed to open up holes for that 97th ranked rushing game, and allowed well over two sacks a game. The offensive switch is no wonder--they have to up these numbers or their offense will continue to be the most anemic in the conference this side of Pullman.
They do return two very good receivers, as Nelson Rosario and Taylor Embree had over 40 receptions and 600 yards each last year. However, everyone else on this unit with any experience is gone.
I expect UCLA to improve offensively with the philosophy switch and with 8 returning starters. However, improvement from their bad numbers is nothing to crow home about. Their offensive line is not going to push anyone around. Unless they are a markedly better running team this year, they are going to be forced to put the ball into the air. And, while they can do that, Oregon's secondary isn't going to let them get away with that for an entire game if they're not having to help out tremendously with the run game as well.
2009 Defensive Statistics
| Statistic | UCLA | Oregon |
| Pass Defense | 142.77 (59) | 207.62 (44) |
| Rush Defense | 191.23 (28) | 128.69 (42) |
| Total Defense | 334.00 (32) | 336.31 (35) |
| Scoring Defense | 21.23 (27) | 23.77 (51) |
| Pass Efficiency Defense | 118.99 (41) | 112.30 (25) |
| Tackles for Loss | 8.15 (5) | 6.31 (40) |
| Opponent 3rd Down % | 33.15 (18) | 37.91 (51) |
| Turnover Margin | +0.46 (26) | +0.15 (51) |
| Yards/Play Allowed | 5.0 (40) | 4.4 (12) |
For as mediocre as UCLA has been the last few years, their defense has actually been pretty good. That said, they lose a lot of talent (Brian Price, Reggie Carter, Kyle and Korey Bosworth, Alterraun Verner). Those are huge, huge names to lose in one year. The front four has three new starters, including freshman Owa Odighizuwa. They also return only one linebacker, although Akeem Ayers is one of the best linebackers in the nation. Both of these units are talented, but ultimately untested. However, that inexperience shouldn't be too much of a factor by the time we play them in game 7. Its hard to get a read on how good these units will be at this early juncture. But UCLA has a reputation of good defenses recently.
The secondary will be very good, returning three starters, including Rahim Moore, who had a whopping ten interceptions last season and is one of the best defensive backs in the courntry. I expect teams to try and run a lot of UCLA, opting to try and take advantage of the inexperienced front seven as opposed to the loaded back four. While we'll be the best running team UCLA faces all year, seeing these performances should give you a good indication of how much they may be able to slow Oregon down.
2009 Special Teams Statistics
| Statistic | UCLA | Oregon |
| Kick Returns | 23.75 (26) | 24.91 (10) |
| Punt Returns | 9.09 (57) | 12.00 (27) |
| Kickoff Returns Against | 24.80 (113) | 20.85 (42) |
| Punt Returns Against | 7.39 (43) | 6.83 (T-36) |
The return stats are all over the map, so I wouldn't put much stock into them for this season. Kicker Kai Forbath was the Groza winner last year, and with a long of 53, everything is in his range. Punter Jeff locke had a solid freshman season last year.
Final Analysis UCLA should be somewhat better on offense, and somewhat worse on defense. For a group that only won three Pac-10 games last year, that's not good enough. They can't roll into Autzen and score enough points to keep up with Oregon.
51 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think we’re going to blow UCLA out of the water. I expect the pistol to be a disaster, at least this season.
AtQ's Resident Baseball Purist.
by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Aug 18, 2010 2:22 PM PDT reply actions
I think UCLA’s solid defense will keep it close. Close enough for me to be worried. But ultimately, they just won’t have enough consistent firepower to beat the Ducks in Autzen.
Defending maligned chants since 2009
I think UCLA’s defense is going to be WAY down this year. All of that talent that they lost can’t be overlooked.
AtQ's Resident Baseball Purist.
by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Aug 18, 2010 2:32 PM PDT up reply actions
With their recruiting, they will likely just reload on defense. I think they are good enough to keep them in any game on their schedule, but not good enough offensively to actually get a W.
Oregon wins by 14.
it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-T-H-E-N-E-E-D-T-O-I-N-V-I-T-E-T-H-O-S-E-G-U-Y-S"
Yeah, just like USC “reloaded” last year.
AtQ's Resident Baseball Purist.
by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Aug 18, 2010 2:37 PM PDT up reply actions
Really? That’s your counter-argument?
it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-T-H-E-N-E-E-D-T-O-I-N-V-I-T-E-T-H-O-S-E-G-U-Y-S"
Sorry… That was rude of me. I’m pissy today.
it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-T-H-E-N-E-E-D-T-O-I-N-V-I-T-E-T-H-O-S-E-G-U-Y-S"
No offense taken. Mine was intended as more of a smartass remark than anything serious.
AtQ's Resident Baseball Purist.
by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Aug 18, 2010 4:36 PM PDT up reply actions
Just joined this community. And the above interchange is why. It is respectful. It is good communication. Looking forward to this type of exchange. May it always be this way on this website.
Welcome NC.
We loose our minds from time to time but you are right for the most part, good peoples here.
Oh, and football season is 16 days away… it gets better.
OMG, daisy thinks I'm a furking ruhturd.
by Bill Musgrave on Aug 18, 2010 8:52 PM PDT up reply actions
If you joined the site because of a conversation between Shufelt and myself, God love your poor soul.
Welcome to the site!
AtQ's Resident Baseball Purist.
by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Aug 18, 2010 8:53 PM PDT up reply actions
From your handle, I take it you are in Tenn. Going to the game on 11 Sept? Our whole family from NC will be there. How about some pregame refreshment?
I think there will probably be a tailgate composed of people from the site that you are welcome to attend. I’m 16, so a pregame “drink” with you wouldn’t be happening. Haha.
AtQ's Resident Baseball Purist.
by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Aug 19, 2010 7:43 PM PDT up reply actions
They also kept a bunch and added back. Their defense isn’t going to be as good as it was last year, but I don’t think our offense is going to be as good either. It took some great special teams play to beat them last year with basically the same offense.
Also, USC’s defense was still solid last year, which is the same point I made about UCLA’s defense, so I’m not sure I understand your rebuttal.
Defending maligned chants since 2009
I would like to counter-argue your rebuttal by arguing that your rebuttal is poorly argued.
Hoover: They confiscated everything, even the stuff we didn't steal!
Allow me to insert an ad hominem attack here, followed by a nonsequitur, move to a straw man, and then close with several other logical fallacies that have fancy names only internet nerds will understand.
axemen23: the human vuvuzela
by HoodRiverDuck on Aug 18, 2010 3:28 PM PDT up reply actions
My favorite is the “ad hoc ergo propter hoc.” I also like “begging the question,” mostly because a vast majority of people don’t use it properly.
Defending maligned chants since 2009
Q.E.D. UCLA still sucks!
(quod erat demonstrandum)
Hoover: They confiscated everything, even the stuff we didn't steal!
Actually, it’s post hoc ergo propter hoc . If you’re going to nerd up, at least get it right.
And remember: Illegitimi non carborundum.
Average Score Since 2004: Oregon 42 Washington 17
All hail the Lord of the Nerds!
Homestretch, I mean, like, I can put up with anything for like 20 days. I think.
by Bill Musgrave on Aug 18, 2010 6:17 PM PDT up reply actions
<img src=“”http://www.toothpastefordinner.com/020408/how-do-you-keep-a-nerd-busy.gif"/>"/>
Average Score Since 2004: Oregon 42 Washington 17
Exactly. This phrase is commonly misused when the intent is to say “You have to ask yourself …” or such like.
It seems as though using those words makes sense within a certain context. Which is why most people do it (and why that vast majority who misuse the phrase know exactly what the other person is saying when it’s misused.. “begging the question” whether it’s actually being misused at all, if both sides understand the intent).
I need another beer.
Average Score Since 2004: Oregon 42 Washington 17
Can we just make a weekly thread for the grammar nazi's to circle jerk?
Kthxbye
"Our expectations are to win every game we play. I don’t know if that’s ever going to happen .... but no one ever rises to low expectations." --Chip Kelly
I'm going to assume that your apostrophe fail was intentional, because I really am trying to see the good in you.
I’m going to assume that your apostrophe fail was intentional, because I really am trying to see the good in you.

Average Score Since 2004: Oregon 42 Washington 17
Hear that?
I think Dave just got banned from BruinsNation
"Our expectations are to win every game we play. I don’t know if that’s ever going to happen .... but no one ever rises to low expectations." --Chip Kelly
Yeah, I think that his first line really did him in.
The Pac-10’s perennial underachiever, UCLA has been largely irrelevant for the better part of a decade
Self-anointed President of the Kenjon Barner fan club.
Interesting. I always thought Cal was the Pac-10's perennial underachiever.
At least UCLA has been to a Rose Bowl or two in the last 50 years.
Average Score Since 2004: Oregon 42 Washington 17
Both excellent choices.
A compare / contrast:
Bob Toledo / Tom Holmoe
Discuss.
Homestretch, I mean, like, I can put up with anything for like 20 days. I think.
by Bill Musgrave on Aug 18, 2010 6:19 PM PDT up reply actions
Any way I look at it, it's a wash.
Job “Performance”
Holmoe’s only coaching accomplishment was to make Steve Mariucci look brilliant in retrospect.
Toledo, on the other hand, managed to literally run the Pacific program out of business, and appears to be on his way to repeating the feat at Tulane.
Advantage: Toledo.
Hair

Advantage: Toledo.
Jewelry
Toledo has a Cotton Bowl ring and whatever they give you for losing a Rose Bowl.
Holmoe has three Super Bowl rings.
Advantage: Holmoe.
Work Environment
Holmoe has to live and work in Salt Lake City.
Toledo gets to live and work in New Orleans.
Advantage: Toledo
Average Score Since 2004: Oregon 42 Washington 17
I like Toledo for the honors.
Not so much because his overall body of work is worse than Holmoe’s, it’s not.
I just like how he coached himself out of victories specifically against us.
OMG, daisy thinks I'm a furking ruhturd.
by Bill Musgrave on Aug 19, 2010 5:24 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I also like the fact that he was partially responsible for one of Wisconsin's three Rose Bowl wins.
The 1999 Rose Bowl, better known as UCLA’s defense collapsing against Ron Dayne…
My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
"Right, a ball of hot flaming gas that collapses upon itself." -Doctor Sheldon Cooper from The Big Bang Theory
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 19, 2010 9:15 PM PDT up reply actions
Yes, the King of Collapse.
It seems like we’ve come up with a tile for Toledo to take with him.
OMG, daisy thinks I'm a furking ruhturd.
by Bill Musgrave on Aug 20, 2010 10:30 PM PDT up reply actions
It's kind of scary to think that that UCLA team was one Miami touchdown
away from the National Title…
Wisconsin, the “worst team ever to play in a Rose Bowl”, according to the esteemed Craig James, promptly knocked off the Bruins. Cade McNown hasn’t been the same since…
My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
"Right, a ball of hot flaming gas that collapses upon itself." -Doctor Sheldon Cooper from The Big Bang Theory
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 21, 2010 3:35 AM PDT up reply actions
Chris Ault’s pistol system will probably not go well in transition unless they can get the timing down, which I believe is quite different. This is a duel threat qb system as well. I don’t watch the UCLA games much, but I don’t remember this being a particular strength. I think that will get destroyed in Autzen.
If anyone is curious, Nevada and Cal are matched up this year. Nevada while definitely being from a much weaker conference, knows this system better than anyone and they had 3 1,000+yrd rushers last season. Could be interesting…or they could score 0 like they did against ND last year.
I think that the Oregon defense will dominate UCLA's offense.
Yes, UCLA returns 8 starters on offense. But Oregon returns the majority of a defense that shut down most of these same Bruins (and only allowed 3 offensive points). Mid-way through the first season of using the pistol offense, they may still be figuring things out. Meanwhile, the Duck defense will be on year two of the 3-4 scheme, which means they should be more refined, rather than in transition. The game will also be at Autzen this year, which could be a tiny factor…
I predict a Duck win by 14-21 points, but I don’t think it will feel as close as the score indicates.
There is a very good chance this happens,
Until UCLA can get any QB play to speak of, our defense will dominate them again. I don’t see Prince or Brehaut developing into a solid QB by midway through this season. I expect another low scoring game (by UO standards, of course).
Self-anointed President of the Kenjon Barner fan club.
Wait, why did you list Bruins Nation as a UCLA blog? I thought it was a negatively-slanted USC blog.
AtQ's Resident Baseball Purist.
by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Aug 18, 2010 8:45 PM PDT reply actions
Solid D but horrible QB play/lack of playmakers
Akeem Ayers and that other guy with all the picks are First-team All Pac-10 caliber guys (maybe even All-American?) but UCLA hasn’t had an outstanding QB since Troy Aikman (Cade was ok). During UCLA’s last two seasons, whenever a drive ended in a punt or turnover, you can see Coach Rick getting in Prince’s face, and you can read his lips: “What were you thinking/doing?”
Someone can maybe help me out here, but I also can’t name a single skill position player on their team, and it’s not just because I don’t follow UCLA football. They don’t have any scary Mercedes Lewis or Deshaun Foster types on thos team. They just don’t.
I don't think UCLA has a lack of playmakers
… their WR corps is among the top two or three units in the Pac 10. The QB may or may not become a stud, but has more experience than whatever route Oregon goes with and was considered a stud recruit when he was brought in a few years ago. The big issue for them, obviously, is the state of their O-line which has already lost four starters to injury/ineligibility/mormon missions so far this off-season. You guys will crush them.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.

by 




















