Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: 2011 In Extreme Home Runs

2010 Oregon Football Preview :: UCLA Bruins

Part 7 in a series on Oregon's 2010 season opponents

Part 1:  New Mexico | Part 2: Tennessee | Part 3: Portland State | Part 4: Arizona State | Part 5: Stanford | Part 6: Washington State

 6:00 PM PST :: October 21, 2010 :: Autzen Stadium

Opponent UCLA
Nickname Bruins
Location Los Angeles, CA
Enrollment 38,476
Head Coach Rick Neuheisel (11-14 at UCLA, 77-44 overall)
Stadium Rose Bowl (91,136) : natural grass
2009 Record 7-6, (3-6 Pac 10)
Starters Returning 8 Offense : 5 Defense
Base Offense Pistol
Base Defense 4-3
Blogs Bruins Nation
Newspapers Los Angeles Times, The Daily Bruin

Star-divide

Top Returners

Category Player
Rushing Jonathan Franklin :: 126 Rushes : 566 Yards : 5 TD
Passing Kevin Prince :: 173/308 : 2050 Yards : 8 TD : 8 INT
Receiving Nelson Rosario :: 42 Receptions : 723 Yards : 2 TD
Tackles Akeem Ayres :: 79 total
Sacks Akeem Ayres :: 6 total
Interceptions Rahim Moore :: 10 INT

 

 The Pac-10's perennial underachiever, UCLA has been largely irrelevant for the better part of a decade.  The mediocrity that got Karl Dorrell fired has continued unimpeded into year three of the Rick Neuheisel era, spurred largely by the lack of a quarterback with a pulse and a mediocre offensive line.  Despite having Neuheisel and Norm Chow on the coaching staff, widely regarded as two of the greatest offensive minds in football, UCLA makes the switch to a pistol offense in an attempt to revive a stagnant run game and take some pressure off the passing game.  And there are reasons to think that the offense will be much better this season.  While the defense should remain stout, they lose some big names and only return five starters.  Somewhat of a drop off should be expected.


2009 Offensive Statistics 

Statistic UCLA Oregon
Pass Offense 222.77 (52) 180.31 (98)
Rush Offense 114.62 (97) 231.69 (6)
Total Offense 337.38 (88) 412.00 (33)
Scoring Offense 22.0 (94) 36.08 (8)
Pass Efficiency 113.86 (101) 128.03 (59)
Sacks Allowed 2.23 (74) 1.00 (10)
3rd Down Conversion % 34.05 (101) 35.12 (95)
Yards/Play 5.0 (83) 6.0 (24)

 


Offensively, UCLA has been a mess ever since Cade McNown graduated in the late '90s.  Kevin Prince, who started 11 games as a freshman last season, returns as the starter.  He had some impressive numbers, passing for over 2000 yards, including three 300 yard passing games.  He needs to improve on his 56% completion percentage, but maturity should help a bunch.  While nobody would mistake him for Jeremiah Masoli, he does have enough mobility that he could be successful running the pistol.  Going into this season with Prince as the starter could be the best QB situation the Bruins have had in quite some time.

The running game is a different story.  UCLA returns five of their top six rushers, but nobody had over 566 yards last seso, nor better than a 4.5 average.  Jonathan Franklin returns as the starter, but nothing I saw from him last year struck me as extraordinary.  The offensive line returns four of five starters, but for a bad unit that failed to open up holes for that 97th ranked rushing game, and allowed well over two sacks a game.  The offensive switch is no wonder--they have to up these numbers or their offense will continue to be the most anemic in the conference this side of Pullman.

They do return two very good receivers, as Nelson Rosario and Taylor Embree had over 40 receptions and 600 yards each last year.  However, everyone else on this unit with any experience is gone.

I expect UCLA to improve offensively with the philosophy switch and with 8 returning starters.  However, improvement from their bad numbers is nothing to crow home about.  Their offensive line is not going to push anyone around.  Unless they are a markedly better running team this year, they are going to be forced to put the ball into the air.  And, while they can do that, Oregon's secondary isn't going to let them get away with that for an entire game if they're not having to help out tremendously with the run game as well.

 

2009 Defensive Statistics

 

 

Statistic UCLA Oregon
Pass Defense 142.77 (59) 207.62 (44)
Rush Defense 191.23 (28) 128.69 (42)
Total Defense 334.00 (32) 336.31 (35)
Scoring Defense 21.23 (27) 23.77 (51)
Pass Efficiency Defense 118.99 (41) 112.30 (25)
Tackles for Loss 8.15 (5) 6.31 (40)
Opponent 3rd Down % 33.15 (18) 37.91 (51)
Turnover Margin +0.46 (26) +0.15 (51)
Yards/Play Allowed 5.0 (40) 4.4 (12)

 

For as mediocre as UCLA has been the last few years, their defense has actually been pretty good.  That said, they lose a lot of talent (Brian Price, Reggie Carter, Kyle and Korey Bosworth, Alterraun Verner).  Those are huge, huge names to lose in one year.  The front four has three new starters, including freshman Owa Odighizuwa.  They also return only one linebacker, although Akeem Ayers is one of the best linebackers in the nation.  Both of these units are talented, but ultimately untested.  However, that inexperience shouldn't be too much of a factor by the time we play them in game 7.  Its hard to get a read on how good these units will be at this early juncture.  But UCLA has a reputation of good defenses recently.

The secondary will be very good, returning three starters, including Rahim Moore, who had a whopping ten interceptions last season and is one of the best defensive backs in the courntry.  I expect teams to try and run a lot of UCLA, opting to try and take advantage of the inexperienced front seven as opposed to the loaded back four.  While we'll be the best running team UCLA faces all year, seeing these performances should give you a good indication of how much they may be able to slow Oregon down.

2009 Special Teams Statistics 

Statistic UCLA Oregon
Kick Returns 23.75 (26) 24.91 (10)
Punt Returns 9.09 (57) 12.00 (27)
Kickoff Returns Against 24.80 (113) 20.85 (42)
Punt Returns Against 7.39 (43) 6.83 (T-36)

The return stats are all over the map, so I wouldn't put much stock into them for this season. Kicker Kai Forbath was the Groza winner last year, and with a long of 53, everything is in his range. Punter Jeff locke had a solid freshman season last year.

Final Analysis UCLA should be somewhat better on offense, and somewhat worse on defense. For a group that only won three Pac-10 games last year, that's not good enough. They can't roll into Autzen and score enough points to keep up with Oregon.

Poll
What will be the result of the Oregon/UCLA game?
Oregon 21+ point win
75 votes
Oregon 10-21 point win
222 votes
Oregon <10 point win
64 votes
UCLA win
55 votes

416 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 51 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I think we’re going to blow UCLA out of the water. I expect the pistol to be a disaster, at least this season.

AtQ's Resident Baseball Purist.

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Aug 18, 2010 2:22 PM PDT reply actions  

I think UCLA’s solid defense will keep it close. Close enough for me to be worried. But ultimately, they just won’t have enough consistent firepower to beat the Ducks in Autzen.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Aug 18, 2010 2:27 PM PDT reply actions  

I think UCLA’s defense is going to be WAY down this year. All of that talent that they lost can’t be overlooked.

AtQ's Resident Baseball Purist.

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Aug 18, 2010 2:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

With their recruiting, they will likely just reload on defense. I think they are good enough to keep them in any game on their schedule, but not good enough offensively to actually get a W.

Oregon wins by 14.

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-T-H-E-N-E-E-D-T-O-I-N-V-I-T-E-T-H-O-S-E-G-U-Y-S"

by JShufelt on Aug 18, 2010 2:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, just like USC “reloaded” last year.

AtQ's Resident Baseball Purist.

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Aug 18, 2010 2:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

Really? That’s your counter-argument?

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-T-H-E-N-E-E-D-T-O-I-N-V-I-T-E-T-H-O-S-E-G-U-Y-S"

by JShufelt on Aug 18, 2010 2:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sorry… That was rude of me. I’m pissy today.

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-T-H-E-N-E-E-D-T-O-I-N-V-I-T-E-T-H-O-S-E-G-U-Y-S"

by JShufelt on Aug 18, 2010 3:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

No offense taken. Mine was intended as more of a smartass remark than anything serious.

AtQ's Resident Baseball Purist.

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Aug 18, 2010 4:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Just joined this community. And the above interchange is why. It is respectful. It is good communication. Looking forward to this type of exchange. May it always be this way on this website.

by NCDuck1 on Aug 18, 2010 8:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

Welcome NC.

We loose our minds from time to time but you are right for the most part, good peoples here.

Oh, and football season is 16 days away… it gets better.

OMG, daisy thinks I'm a furking ruhturd.

by Bill Musgrave on Aug 18, 2010 8:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

If you joined the site because of a conversation between Shufelt and myself, God love your poor soul.

Welcome to the site!

AtQ's Resident Baseball Purist.

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Aug 18, 2010 8:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

From your handle, I take it you are in Tenn. Going to the game on 11 Sept? Our whole family from NC will be there. How about some pregame refreshment?

by NCDuck1 on Aug 18, 2010 9:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think there will probably be a tailgate composed of people from the site that you are welcome to attend. I’m 16, so a pregame “drink” with you wouldn’t be happening. Haha.

AtQ's Resident Baseball Purist.

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Aug 19, 2010 7:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

May it always be this way on this website.

It generally is, until axemen23 starts getting worked up about something..

Average Score Since 2004: Oregon 42 Washington 17

by benzduck on Aug 18, 2010 10:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

They also kept a bunch and added back. Their defense isn’t going to be as good as it was last year, but I don’t think our offense is going to be as good either. It took some great special teams play to beat them last year with basically the same offense.

Also, USC’s defense was still solid last year, which is the same point I made about UCLA’s defense, so I’m not sure I understand your rebuttal.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Aug 18, 2010 2:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

I would like to counter-argue your rebuttal by arguing that your rebuttal is poorly argued.

Hoover: They confiscated everything, even the stuff we didn't steal!

by DamienS on Aug 18, 2010 3:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

My favorite is the “ad hoc ergo propter hoc.” I also like “begging the question,” mostly because a vast majority of people don’t use it properly.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Aug 18, 2010 3:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Q.E.D. UCLA still sucks!

(quod erat demonstrandum)

Hoover: They confiscated everything, even the stuff we didn't steal!

by DamienS on Aug 18, 2010 5:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

Actually, it’s post hoc ergo propter hoc . If you’re going to nerd up, at least get it right.

And remember: Illegitimi non carborundum.

Average Score Since 2004: Oregon 42 Washington 17

by benzduck on Aug 18, 2010 5:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

All hail the Lord of the Nerds!

Homestretch, I mean, like, I can put up with anything for like 20 days. I think.

by Bill Musgrave on Aug 18, 2010 6:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

<img src=“”http://www.toothpastefordinner.com/020408/how-do-you-keep-a-nerd-busy.gif"/>"/>

Average Score Since 2004: Oregon 42 Washington 17

by benzduck on Aug 18, 2010 10:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well, that didn't work, let's try again..

Average Score Since 2004: Oregon 42 Washington 17

by benzduck on Aug 18, 2010 10:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ha! Of course I would forget the actual Latin term. I stand corrected.

And yeah, “begging the question” should be used when someone begins an argument with a premise that isn’t necessarily true.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Aug 19, 2010 9:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

Exactly. This phrase is commonly misused when the intent is to say “You have to ask yourself …” or such like.

It seems as though using those words makes sense within a certain context. Which is why most people do it (and why that vast majority who misuse the phrase know exactly what the other person is saying when it’s misused.. “begging the question” whether it’s actually being misused at all, if both sides understand the intent).

I need another beer.

Average Score Since 2004: Oregon 42 Washington 17

by benzduck on Aug 18, 2010 10:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Can we just make a weekly thread for the grammar nazi's to circle jerk?

Kthxbye

"Our expectations are to win every game we play. I don’t know if that’s ever going to happen .... but no one ever rises to low expectations." --Chip Kelly

by axemen23 on Aug 18, 2010 10:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm going to assume that your apostrophe fail was intentional, because I really am trying to see the good in you.

I’m going to assume that your apostrophe fail was intentional, because I really am trying to see the good in you.

Average Score Since 2004: Oregon 42 Washington 17

by benzduck on Aug 18, 2010 10:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh god… That picture is too much!

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-T-H-E-N-E-E-D-T-O-I-N-V-I-T-E-T-H-O-S-E-G-U-Y-S"

by JShufelt on Aug 19, 2010 8:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

Hear that?

I think Dave just got banned from BruinsNation

"Our expectations are to win every game we play. I don’t know if that’s ever going to happen .... but no one ever rises to low expectations." --Chip Kelly

by axemen23 on Aug 18, 2010 2:28 PM PDT reply actions  

Yeah, I think that his first line really did him in.
The Pac-10’s perennial underachiever, UCLA has been largely irrelevant for the better part of a decade

Self-anointed President of the Kenjon Barner fan club.

by CaDuck on Aug 18, 2010 4:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Interesting. I always thought Cal was the Pac-10's perennial underachiever.

At least UCLA has been to a Rose Bowl or two in the last 50 years.

Average Score Since 2004: Oregon 42 Washington 17

by benzduck on Aug 18, 2010 5:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Both excellent choices.

A compare / contrast:

Bob Toledo / Tom Holmoe

Discuss.

Homestretch, I mean, like, I can put up with anything for like 20 days. I think.

by Bill Musgrave on Aug 18, 2010 6:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

Any way I look at it, it's a wash.

Job “Performance”
Holmoe’s only coaching accomplishment was to make Steve Mariucci look brilliant in retrospect.
Toledo, on the other hand, managed to literally run the Pacific program out of business, and appears to be on his way to repeating the feat at Tulane.
Advantage: Toledo.

Hair


Advantage: Toledo.

Jewelry
Toledo has a Cotton Bowl ring and whatever they give you for losing a Rose Bowl.
Holmoe has three Super Bowl rings.
Advantage: Holmoe.

Work Environment
Holmoe has to live and work in Salt Lake City.
Toledo gets to live and work in New Orleans.
Advantage: Toledo

Average Score Since 2004: Oregon 42 Washington 17

by benzduck on Aug 18, 2010 10:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

I like Toledo for the honors.

Not so much because his overall body of work is worse than Holmoe’s, it’s not.

I just like how he coached himself out of victories specifically against us.

OMG, daisy thinks I'm a furking ruhturd.

by Bill Musgrave on Aug 19, 2010 5:24 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

I also like the fact that he was partially responsible for one of Wisconsin's three Rose Bowl wins.

The 1999 Rose Bowl, better known as UCLA’s defense collapsing against Ron Dayne…

My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
"Right, a ball of hot flaming gas that collapses upon itself." -Doctor Sheldon Cooper from The Big Bang Theory

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 19, 2010 9:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yes, the King of Collapse.

It seems like we’ve come up with a tile for Toledo to take with him.

OMG, daisy thinks I'm a furking ruhturd.

by Bill Musgrave on Aug 20, 2010 10:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's kind of scary to think that that UCLA team was one Miami touchdown

away from the National Title…

Wisconsin, the “worst team ever to play in a Rose Bowl”, according to the esteemed Craig James, promptly knocked off the Bruins. Cade McNown hasn’t been the same since…

My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
"Right, a ball of hot flaming gas that collapses upon itself." -Doctor Sheldon Cooper from The Big Bang Theory

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 21, 2010 3:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

Chris Ault’s pistol system will probably not go well in transition unless they can get the timing down, which I believe is quite different. This is a duel threat qb system as well. I don’t watch the UCLA games much, but I don’t remember this being a particular strength. I think that will get destroyed in Autzen.

If anyone is curious, Nevada and Cal are matched up this year. Nevada while definitely being from a much weaker conference, knows this system better than anyone and they had 3 1,000+yrd rushers last season. Could be interesting…or they could score 0 like they did against ND last year.

by DuckProfessor on Aug 18, 2010 5:46 PM PDT reply actions  

Chris Ault > Rick Neuheisel

I feel like I should say something smart.

by Jayon on Aug 18, 2010 9:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think that the Oregon defense will dominate UCLA's offense.

Yes, UCLA returns 8 starters on offense. But Oregon returns the majority of a defense that shut down most of these same Bruins (and only allowed 3 offensive points). Mid-way through the first season of using the pistol offense, they may still be figuring things out. Meanwhile, the Duck defense will be on year two of the 3-4 scheme, which means they should be more refined, rather than in transition. The game will also be at Autzen this year, which could be a tiny factor…

I predict a Duck win by 14-21 points, but I don’t think it will feel as close as the score indicates.

by AKDuck on Aug 18, 2010 7:52 PM PDT reply actions  

There is a very good chance this happens,

Until UCLA can get any QB play to speak of, our defense will dominate them again. I don’t see Prince or Brehaut developing into a solid QB by midway through this season. I expect another low scoring game (by UO standards, of course).

Self-anointed President of the Kenjon Barner fan club.

by CaDuck on Aug 18, 2010 9:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I think it takes great QB play to beat the Ducks. If you look at the games we lost or narrowly won, the opposing teams all had very good to great quarterbacks…Moore, Luck, Foles, Canfield, Pryor (sorry Locker!). Prince or Brehaut << all of those guys.

by AKDuck on Aug 18, 2010 9:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wait, why did you list Bruins Nation as a UCLA blog? I thought it was a negatively-slanted USC blog.

AtQ's Resident Baseball Purist.

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Aug 18, 2010 8:45 PM PDT reply actions  

haha! Funny but true.

by runfast on Aug 18, 2010 10:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Banned!

Damn, my eyeball tastes good.

by Gekko Mojo on Aug 21, 2010 11:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Solid D but horrible QB play/lack of playmakers

Akeem Ayers and that other guy with all the picks are First-team All Pac-10 caliber guys (maybe even All-American?) but UCLA hasn’t had an outstanding QB since Troy Aikman (Cade was ok). During UCLA’s last two seasons, whenever a drive ended in a punt or turnover, you can see Coach Rick getting in Prince’s face, and you can read his lips: “What were you thinking/doing?”

Someone can maybe help me out here, but I also can’t name a single skill position player on their team, and it’s not just because I don’t follow UCLA football. They don’t have any scary Mercedes Lewis or Deshaun Foster types on thos team. They just don’t.

by Duck91 on Aug 19, 2010 8:35 AM PDT reply actions  

I don't think UCLA has a lack of playmakers

… their WR corps is among the top two or three units in the Pac 10. The QB may or may not become a stud, but has more experience than whatever route Oregon goes with and was considered a stud recruit when he was brought in a few years ago. The big issue for them, obviously, is the state of their O-line which has already lost four starters to injury/ineligibility/mormon missions so far this off-season. You guys will crush them.

Damn, my eyeball tastes good.

by Gekko Mojo on Aug 23, 2010 7:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Addicted to Quack, SBN's Oregon Ducks blog and fan community.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
So you just signed a bunch of blue chip recruits...

Recent FanPosts

Mostinteresting_small
ATQ Fantasy Baseball 2012
Square_envelope_electric_purple-p121411710380622431j65uf_400_small
To Whom It May Concern
Sarah_b-day_small
A bit disappointed today
Angryduck_small
benzduck's Trivia Contest #1
Small
If Kelly Goes to the NFL, Who Would Oregon Hire?
Small
Darron Thomas' Surprise Decision to Bolt for NFL Should Be Celebrated, Not Scorned
Bns_small
The Ducks can learn from the New England Patriots.
120103_oregon_rose_bowl_tb_small
The Three Musketeers... Wait, they're Quarterbacks? Where's Darron? PANIC!
Angryduck_small
A Lexicon of Expert Darron Thomas Departure Invective

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

ATQ Twitter Feed


Managers

207873_1005773153454_1498651968_14034_9616_n_small David Piper

Pre_small ntrebon

Img_0525_small jtlight

Mostinteresting_small Takimoto

Domsicecream_small dvieira

Editors

Pettingzoo_small PaulSF

Atq-spoon-5_small Matt Daddy

Authors

Ryan__rusty_small jcgoducks

N679617597_457761_5158_small kanders4

Small nds500