Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Heating Up: Miami Evens Series; LeBron, Wade Take Charge

The Fish Report: How Oregon Beats Auburn

 

What are the strategies that will bring the National Championship to Oregon?  What are the two major keys to success for Oregon in our biggest game ever?  Giving an opinion on something this big makes me feel like a Seer, but in my business as a Financial Advisor we are warned that, “if you make your living gazing into a Crystal Ball,--be prepared to eat Glass on occasion.”  My prognostications come from viewing a different Crystal Ball, a Crystal Football from a great distance, which is the National Championship Trophy.  I would like to think that my upcoming assertions are plausible enough to keep me from such a “cutting edge” meal, and I believe that when I’m finished here—we will agree that this will be the most entertaining National Championship Game ever.

Star-divide

OFFENSE:

The Spread Offense is designed to widen the field of play and attack inside, outside, and downfield through the passing element.  In the case of the Auburn defense, I am very impressed with their interior Defensive Line run-stuffing abilities.  Most say that the matchup of this interior defense stopping LaMichael James from running Inside Zone Reads is the premier amusement to this game.  By contrast I almost concede the middle of the LOS to Auburn since we have the easier areas to attack in their flanks, (sidelines) and downfield via our passing assault.  The Tigers are a great team, but two of the three sections on the field are very vulnerable to our offense.  We need to storm these two sections and run inside enough to keep Auburn honest defending the Inside Zone Read.

Many of our formations line up near the nucleus of players near the center of the field whereas I would like to see more formations that Spread the defense from sideline to sideline.  In the Oregon State game we saw a “Tailback-Twin” formation that had WRs and both our tailbacks on the very edge of both sidelines.  This left only two defenders each side with a deep Free Safety trying to help out, thus a quick pass to the Tailback could bring an open field one-on-one juke opportunity against a CB or Safety.  It also left only six defenders in the middle of the field and against our five blockers and a Zone Read of a DE—this meant we have five-on-five for inside running plays.  Formations like this puts extreme pressure on the defenders in the box to keep the RB there, and on the outside defenders to hem in ball carrier.  When we want to pass downfield, or run inside—Spread them out further!

In our usual formations we can run wide on Auburn because they DO run a rigid 4-3 defense; they don’t have four LB/DE/SS Cal type speed defenders hovering over three monster interior DL, hence it is actually easier to contain the D-Line in the box against a 4-3 and run outside.  I like the solution revealed in the Arizona game of pinning or sealing the DE and OLB on one side with pulling OG and OTs and running outside of the box.  The key block is the TE blocking down on the DE and we have a superb track record of Paulson and Williams executing it.  I like the usual sweeps, but the Outside Zone Read should be a staple in this game to run around the tough interior 4-3 defense of the Tigers.  When they react to pulling OL, then utilize the WR Double-Team we saw in the Oregon State game, where the flanker and TE block the OLB, with the flanker then peeling off to nail the Free Safety going by.  It’s amazing how the same play can be successful by mixing up the blocking schemes.

When we run our Outside Zone Read and place the RB to the right at the beginning of the play, it is a signal to the defense that we are running the OZR to the left, hence they tighten their defense in that direction.  It is then that QB Darron Thomas and the RB should take off to the right in a Speed Double-Option that catches them off guard.  As the Auburn D-Line gets jumpy about moving to the outside after the snap from so many OZRs it then becomes time to run a Triple Option threatening the outside Double-Option one way, with an Inside Zone Read to LaMichael James the other direction.  That is when LMJ can pop for the big touchdown runs as the defense becomes so conscious of defending their flanks.  The LSU game for Auburn demonstrated that a good running opponent QB (Jefferson) can exploit this Tiger defense on occasion, so let DT run the Zone Read with some carries of his own.

This game will be unusual offensively because this is one time we WANT them to pack the box; their weakness is outside run plays and downfield defending the pass, thus the more in the box; the fewer defenders elsewhere which will create more opportunities in the Auburn areas of weakness.  Frequently when the Tigers line up in their 4-3, they will have a LB covering a slot or flanker so we have real speed matchups that favor us when we pass the ball.  Their corners give a huge cushion, thus I would throw slants and Bubble passes to the sidelines, which also continues to test their propensity to miss open field tackles.  (Huff and Maehl are one hip move from scoring in these situations)

Coach Kelly has shown new plays nearly every game, and recently he was quoted stating that, “our big thing is when we add something new, which we have, (for this NC game) then you have to take something out.”  Something new could be a variation on what we’re already doing within the game plan.  For example, when we run the WR Double-Team block mentioned earlier, we might have the flanker peel off downfield and not at the FS to block him.  We saw a similar play off the Bubble pass earlier in the year against Arizona State and Stanford where the blocking WR took off downfield after feigning to block the DB.  While I’m guessing as to what the new plays are, it is evident that SOMETHING new will emerge since we had closed Bowl practices to spectators, media, and even parents.

DEFENSE:      

How do you stop Cam Newton?  You don’t, as I believe they will score over forty points on us.  I admire, no, check that—I LOVE what they do on offense and how their Offensive Coordinator-Spread Offense Guru Gus Malzahn alters his scheme to emphasize the skill sets his players have. Both Auburn and Oregon have defenses that like to force you into a “dink-and-dunk” thirteen play drive down the field.  However with Oregon playing twenty five Ducks on defense—it actually works in our favor if they continue this strategy in this game when the Tigers are on defense.  (More on that in a minute)

Specific plays to watch for?  That nasty OZR they run with a pulling guard that inevitably ends up with Cam running inside is their Bread-and-Butter; we MUST react quickly when a guard pulls to get another LB over to even out the numbers on their playside.  We have safeties and backside DEs that can watch for the counter, but we must help our 235 lb. LBs against their 300+ lb. pulling guards or it’s a long night.

When they passed the ball in recent games, I noted how Cam’s passes frequently have flat trajectories, and his release point is about six inches above him or at seven feet.  We have blocked more passes this year than many years combined and players like Bair (6’7”) and Hart (6’6”) will have their chances.  I noticed how many times Newton would have only three rushing him, yet he would take off and get a first down running it in spite of the long yardage needed.  I suggest sending three as usual in 3rd and long, but retaining former WR, now LB Spencer Paysinger as a Spy, or even Kenny Rowe on occasion to prevent being “Pryoritized” like last year.  Since our downfield coverage will be a second longer than most SEC teams, I would use a delayed blitz more often with Matthews or Eddie Pleasant.  Most of all I would mix up the defenses repeatedly as a moment of hesitation is the same as being a moment slow in speed.  If anyone can put together a confusing set of defenses to read—it is our Defensive Coordinator, Nick Aliotti, who has coached a ton of big games in his career.

The TWO MAJOR KEYS to this Game:

I have read dozens of previews to this game and yet none have mentioned the most unique element to this game that will result in the most unusual outcome.  Everyone knows that Oregon runs a FAST No-Huddle Offense, but viewing Auburn games showed me their ability to run as fast or almost as fast a No-Huddle Offense as Oregon when they wanted to.  Sometimes when they got on a roll they were zipping from one play to another and generating errors from the opponent in less than ten seconds per play.  We will have, for the first time, two No-Huddle teams facing each other in the NC game.  Both teams will have more possessions to score than they ever have in any game they’ve played! This game will have more three-and-outs, more turnovers, and more scoring than ever before.  Against UCLA—we scored sixty points in only twenty minutes of possessions; imagine the points when we increase the play count?  Both teams believe they will win with eighty plays, and while our season average is 79 plays a game, (versus 71 for Stanford for example) it would not be a stretch for both teams to have nearly ninety plays apiece in this game with both running the No-Huddle Offense.  Arizona State had NINETY NINE plays against us because we scored so quickly in that game!  While both teams will have some rust to knock off before the offenses are clicking, the good news is that both teams will do it faster

The second major key to this game was an area that I personally was critical of at the beginning of the season.  Chip announced that he would be playing a second platoon on defense as often as the starters because the skill level was so comparable and to “wear down the offenses.”  I had never heard of this concept, because it is the defense that has to defeat blocks and then run make the tackle play-after-play.  They naturally expend more energy than the blockers on offense, and as I saw second platoon freshman and Redshirt Freshman D-Linemen get fooled and backup LBs take bad angles which gave up too much easy yardage—I became a bit more critical of this strategy with the personnel.  Yet as the season continued these inexperienced players improved and began to make plays of their own and by the Civil War game were responsible for stops and turnovers as if they were the starters.  Chip did this initially to overcome the TOP or Time of Possession problem our offense puts our defense into, but it has turned into a huge overlooked factor in this National Championship Game.

When you have this many more possessions for each team, the consequence is that both offenses and the Auburn defense will be fatigued going into the fourth quarter like never before, but it will NOT be true for the Oregon defense.  Due to the rotation of former starters or young guns who have earned their stripes on the second platoon, we will have a defense that is MUCH fresher than anything Auburn can put on the field.  We are fifth in the nation at Red-Zone defense, and it will be better yet as the NC game wears on.  We are the best FBS team in the nation at creating turnovers; how many will be created by extreme fatigue from all the possessions in this game?  In the fourth quarter our alternating defense WILL makes stops and turnovers, and hence be the deciding factor in this game as the Tiger defense is running on fumes.

There is NOTHING Auburn can do to counter this.  Coach Malzahn wrote a book on the No-Huddle, and I don’t think he’s going to ball-control his high octane offense and risk knocking it out of sync or allowing Oregon to outscore them even with fewer possessions.  As you know, nearly half of our scoring drives are under two and half minutes and less than five plays, and we won’t need as many points if Coach Chizik decides to ball-control.  On the other hand he can’t play normal and watch his defense fade as I predict, and he cannot begin to play secondary reserves when the starters give up too many points as it is.  While the Tigers have excellent depth on the defensive line, they have nearly no reserves that they can rely upon in the area of their weakness, the defensive backs.   If they start playing the back-ups, then Oregon will detect this and attack them immediately, thus amplifying the problem.  Truly, there is no solution to this for Auburn.

Oregon Defensive Tackle Brandon Bair stated recently that it takes TWO YEARS to develop the physical and mental stamina to play and practice like no other team in America does.  It is not something the Tigers can install in the Bowl season.  The best position for Auburn to be in is to have a twenty one point lead going into the fourth quarter, for anything less than that assures that Oregon will make the stops/turnovers and rapid drives to catch them.  For the Ducks—we want to stay in striking range until we make stops and pull away in the fourth quarter.

So, a game of celebrated offenses and individual Offensive leaders will be decided upon by a second platoon defense?

Yes, and with all the possessions, skills on this field and fatigue that will create mistakes-—I will not be surprised to see a 58-48 Oregon victory.  After the game ends we will see that I won’t be eating glass, but watching as Darron Thomas gazes into the Crystal Football, and drinks in the thrill that comes from holding the Trophy aloft as National Champions!

We Love our Ducks.

FishDuck

Charles Fischer   fishduck83@gmail.com

 

 

 


This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or the Addicted To Quack Moderators. FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable Oregon fans.

Comment 43 comments  |  12 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Let me be the first to rec this.

Another great writeup.

They once showed a clip of the Oregon offense to the French. The French decided to surrender, just to be on the safe side.

by QuackQuackAttack on Jan 2, 2011 2:07 PM PST reply actions  

I believe we will win...

If we give up 48 points and we score 49 or more. I’m a genius, BTW.

by pete592 on Jan 2, 2011 3:23 PM PST reply actions  

So if we're down, keep the comeback hope alive!

Not that we didn’t already know that though. :)

by Gargen on Jan 2, 2011 3:24 PM PST reply actions  

You know you do quality work when your write ups are 3 of the 4 recd posts.

However I am not so sure that we will win if we allow over 40 points either. Unless they top it in garbage time I am confident that if we top 40 first we will of already been ahead by a strong margin.

"We will not settle for average, we will strive for greatness." Chip Kelly

by Duck_In_NC on Jan 2, 2011 3:27 PM PST reply actions  

Guys...look. I know it's hard to believe....

Forty eight points and we win? After watching Auburn, watching us, thinking about the huge number of plays that both teams will have….I had to ask myself honestly—what is the score?

Twice I came up with that one. I’ve wanted to change to avoid the “wacko” label, but it is what I sincerely believe, and I haven’t predicted a score this high ever.

We will trail Auburn for three and a half quarters and overtake them at the end with Defensive plays creating turnovers or a short stop that allows the huge number.

We’ve seen how soon Oregon can score, and I’m sold on how quick Auburn can as well.

It’s just my opinion,….someone has to take the high number!

FishDuck

by FishDuck on Jan 2, 2011 3:39 PM PST reply actions  

How much of a factor did you consider

the tendency for both teams to start out slow? Many a first half has been viewed by anxious Duck and Tiger fans in which the opposing team appears to have the upper hand, if only because the “high-octane offense” hasn’t been as marvelous as expected. Auburn’s had its fair share of close 2nd half scrapes, and the Ducks don’t really whip the blur offense into gear before they establish a comfortable rhythm.

What I’m wondering is: what’s the possibility of both offenses being somewhat impotent before half-time adjustments, and we wind up with a confusing score to start the 3rd quarter; say, 14-17. I don’t doubt the potential of a high-scoring game, but both teams have been shown to stumble out of the opening gates.

BCS stands for Boise Can Suck it. I am naturally a proud supporter of the current BCS system.

by Brass-billed on Jan 2, 2011 8:43 PM PST up reply actions  

"While both teams will have some rust to knock off before the offenses are clicking, the good news is that both teams will do it faster. "

I addressed it obliquely, but at 2,400 words…couldn’t elaborate further. Both teams will NOT be scoring out of the gate, but once the play count gets up…look out.

FishDuck

by FishDuck on Jan 2, 2011 8:57 PM PST reply actions  

I think that the whore ego will be lucky to score 20 on us

surprising revelations will come out after the game as to how the Ducks practiced

fig newton will fall hard and often the fig tree will fall like bad fruit he doesn’t stand a chance

you saw it here first

"If you can't copy 'em, don't imitate ''em."
YOGI BERRA

by Famous Duck on Jan 2, 2011 11:09 PM PST reply actions  

If Auburn scores 20 points or less, I will personally blow him in the locker room after the game.

"(Kelly's) got a veteran team that is the favorite to win the Pac-10. His choice of Thomas reflects only one belief: He’s our best QB today."-Ted Miller....I'd say Chip made an alright decision.

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Jan 2, 2011 11:17 PM PST up reply actions  

if he gets more we will have blown coverage?

in any event, blows are covered

Speed Endurance Talent is how Track Town USA plays football. WWWWWWWWWWWWin The Day

by webfoot73 on Jan 3, 2011 7:15 AM PST up reply actions  

Personally? What other kind of blowing could you do for him? Digitally?

He was only five-foot-three but girls could not resist his stare... Chip Kelly never got called an asshole.

by qrsouther on Jan 3, 2011 12:09 PM PST up reply actions  

So, what else is new?

"If you can't copy 'em, don't imitate ''em."
YOGI BERRA

by Famous Duck on Jan 3, 2011 1:02 PM PST up reply actions  

TQA, you were 2 seconds away from Cam all o'er your face.

BCS stands for Boise Can Suck it. I am naturally a proud supporter of the current BCS system.

by Brass-billed on Jan 12, 2011 11:53 PM PST up reply actions  

Thiis post sucks...

but I will say that Whore Ego is great.

"We do not play the Little Sisters of the Poor." - president of "the" Ohio State University.

by BisonDucks on Jan 2, 2011 11:21 PM PST up reply actions   2 recs

This is right on the Money!

I have really appreciated your analysis FishDuck. This is another great post.

Best news is Auburn has already recognized and admitted this. They decided they will rotate in their Freshman. But they are not worried, because they got a chance to play their Frosh in the SEC Tile game against SC after it was a blow-out and they are now ready to play in the NC and go against our small and not that fast O-line and tackle that small, fast (but not any faster than AUB) dude. LaMike.

Can’t wait to see a Frosh with 12 snaps of experiece out of HS coming off a Mark Asper block and then tackling LaMike. That last minute strategy will work well.

Defensively we’ve been preparing for this game since we lost the Rose Bowl. Chip saw how his offense.. especially when ineffective, put too much pressure on the defense. Even if we were scoring…the other offense had the ball too long and our defense was tired and unable to make plays towards the end of the game. He started with JC recruits and frosh recruits and and put them into the game plan starting in fall. Those who could keep up with the pace and tempo… would play in the game in order to keep fresh.

Yes the tv time-out will have never been longer, but FishDuck is right. There will have never been more offensive play EVER in a football game. The game may have something like 225 plays. Probably an all time record. It WILL BE about conditioning and it will be about attrition. We have been accounting for that for 53 weeks and Auburn about 6 (end of SEC game).

As much as I would like it to be a blow out….. it will be a high scoring thriller… ending with the Ducks out executing Auburn when they are tired in the fouth Q.

by Grateful_D_420 on Jan 3, 2011 12:23 AM PST reply actions  

spy vrs spy

we, of course are the white spy because we are the away team.

How much does a spy reduce production? What has been tried against us in that reguard this year? LMJ? DT?

Our spy on Cam would probably be worth more to us than their spy on any of our players because he is a larger part of their offense.

Speed Endurance Talent is how Track Town USA plays football. WWWWWWWWWWWWin The Day

by webfoot73 on Jan 3, 2011 7:35 AM PST reply actions  

webfoot73...to clarify...

I advocate using a spy on 2nd or 3rd and long, but not all game. That is not something we have done all season, thus the confusion with assignments and coverages could hurt us more than help us if we run a Spy all the time.

FishDuck

by FishDuck on Jan 3, 2011 8:27 AM PST reply actions  

Thanks

Do you think they will play us straight or try to spy DT or LMJ at times?

Speed Endurance Talent is how Track Town USA plays football. WWWWWWWWWWWWin The Day

by webfoot73 on Jan 5, 2011 8:22 AM PST up reply actions  

My money is playing straight

Our front 7 will be able to contain the run and force throws, which is where we are the most vulnerable anyway. The goal will be to make you one dimensional. We’ve succeeded in that in varying degrees throughout the year.

by SEC Supremacist on Jan 5, 2011 8:35 AM PST up reply actions  

Anyone else

see that “undersized” TCU defense stop that “massive” offensive line of Wisconsin over and over again in the Rose Bowl? And here I thought they would just be squashed.

by usmcr3049 on Jan 3, 2011 11:08 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

Now, see, the funny thing here

is that TCU didn’t stop jack shit. Every time a Wisky runner punched it up the gut, it was 5 or six yards, easy. What we didn’t really account for was how miserable Wisconsin’s pass defense was. All of TCU’s drives went like this:
1) Inside own 30, take 2-3 plays to pick up first down.
2) Long bomb by Dalton to ridiculously open receiver way the hell downfield. Now @ Wisky’s 20.
3) ????
4) Profit.

It was like the Stanford game. The Badgers had a very reliable, successful running game, but had to abandon it because of how quickly TCU could eat up the yards through the air.

Also, terrible, terrible coaching decisions. Most notably, the decision to PASS for the 2-pt. conversion. You’ve got a honking big line and three powerful backs!! WHY WOULD YOU NOT RUN IT?!?!?

BCS stands for Boise Can Suck it. I am naturally a proud supporter of the current BCS system.

by Brass-billed on Jan 5, 2011 7:48 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm not going to say

that TCU won because Wisconsin didn’t run enough. TCU won that game, because they took advantage of the wisconsin defense, more than Wisconsin’s offense was able to take advantage of TCU’s defense.

The point I was making is that, before that game most pundits were predicting a blow out for wisconsin, because TCU wouldn’t be able to handle their size. But watching the game, that didn’t seem to matter that much.

by usmcr3049 on Jan 7, 2011 8:49 AM PST up reply actions  

Wisconsin had a lot of successful runs, but it was only a matter of time before TCU got a stop. Speed beats size very frequently, and when it does, it gets opposing offenses into bad situations.

I expect similar situations on Monday.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Jan 7, 2011 11:02 AM PST up reply actions  

What about Mr. Newton tiring?

When each offense gets over 80 snaps in the game, what do you thing the possibility is that Newton will begin to show signs of fatigue? So much of the Auburn defense depends on him. If, as you predict, each team runs over 90 plays, Newton will be doing alot of running.

Oregon will keep substituting in fresh running backs at that point in the game. What percentage of it’s sack total did Oregon get in the 4th quarter? And if an unusually high number of plays are run, will the same thing happen in the NCG?

by encephalopath on Jan 3, 2011 4:53 PM PST reply actions  

Unless I'm mistaken,

Auburn only reached 80 plays once, although that’s what their goal was. And again unless I’m mistaken, the Ducks averaged 80 plays or thereabout.

"Beavers? We ain't got no Beavers. We don't need no Beavers! I don't have to show you any stinkin' Beavers!"

by BigGreenWreckingMachine on Jan 3, 2011 10:52 PM PST up reply actions  

Fatigue factor is overblown....

These “kids” are playing in the BCS title game….they will have electricity coursing through them they will be so jacked on adrenaline. I don’t expect any of the playmakers on offense to get “tired”, winded at times maybe, but not fatigued. They haven’t played in a game in weeks, will have had plenty of rest and time to recharge their batteries. They will feel it the next day, but they will be able to run 200 plays if they need to.

That being said, I guarantee you neither team gets to 80 plays. Auburn is not going to let this be a track meet and I don’t see Oregon getting 10 or more possessions of 8+ plays.

Col.Angus may be rough, Col.Angus may not smell like a bed of roses, but deep down Col.Angus is very sweet. If I overstay my welcome, just tap me on the head!!

by Col.Angus on Jan 4, 2011 12:59 PM PST up reply actions  

This is something I've seen you cite here

and at TET. Adrenaline doesn’t juice you up for 4 hours. If anything it pumps you up for a good half an hour and then lets you down, leaving your body worn out and overused. I don’t claim to know how this game is going to go, but I’m pretty sure the assertion that adrenaline will keep you going for four hours isn’t going to hold up.

If under normal circumstances Oregon would wear Cam and Auburn down, adrenaline will only accelerate that process.

Taxes don't kill jobs.

by shenanigans on Jan 4, 2011 3:26 PM PST up reply actions   2 recs

Idk...

players get tired from the grind, the contact, the short bursts. Newton doesn’t suffer from most of that. He jukes LBs, throws off Corner blitzes, and runs like he’s gliding on air, not the fast explosion of speed like we see from LaMike. I’m watched a few of their closer games, and not once did he look run down.

BCS stands for Boise Can Suck it. I am naturally a proud supporter of the current BCS system.

by Brass-billed on Jan 5, 2011 7:51 PM PST up reply actions  

When the bear jumps your back, nothing you do can stop it...

all you can do is hang on and hope it’s enough

Speed Endurance Talent is how Track Town USA plays football. WWWWWWWWWWWWin The Day

by webfoot73 on Jan 5, 2011 8:33 AM PST up reply actions  

I generally try to avoid giving you any feedback after the shit storm that ensued a few months back, but can you please use a jump in your fanposts? I’m not trying to be a jerk, it just makes your posts super long on the main fanposts page.

In the Yell-O corner, with a 2009 conference record of 8 wins, 1 loss. The REIGNING, DEFENDING, UNDISPUTED Champions of the PAC 10. The Oregon Ducks!

by MarineCorpsDuck on Jan 4, 2011 5:53 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

Good idea.

I added one for you on this one FishDuck.

Addicted to Quack, home of Bill Musgrave, the best ever.
Welcome to the club, Cody Ross. You can stay at my house.

by Takimoto on Jan 4, 2011 9:40 AM PST up reply actions  

Wow, that was paralysis of analysis...

Kudos to you Fishduck, you have put in as much time as one of the coaches it looks like.
What will ultimately tell the tale of this game is how well you are able to do what you DON’T do well. I see a lot of analysis of what you do well and how you expect to exploit Auburn’s gasping-for- breath defense BUT what you fail to recognize is that with over a month to prepare for this game Auburn will be ready for all your zone reads. It is a well known fact that teams that run a successful read option offense often struggle in bowl games when a team has ample opportunity to prepare for the vagueries that such an offense presents. Ga Tech is a prime example that I’m accutely aware of. I’m not saying we’re shutting you down, and I’m not saying you are Ga Tech. You guys are much better than Ga Tech, but Ga Tech’s usually explosive offense (when Nesbitt was at the helm, prior to injury) this year and last got exposed in bowl games. You also fail to acknowledge we have the personnel to closely mimic your offense in practice…..and the ability to run up tempo to get ready for “The Blurr”.
Please remember….they will have had a MONTH to get ready for this. This isn’t going to be Stanford coming off a road game at Notre Dame with four practices to prepare. This works both ways of course, but I think you are WAY overplaying the value of the “The Blur”, mainly because it HAS been very effective and therefore will be the primary tool we try to take away from you. I will be very surprised if this game plays out like a pinball machine on meth. You are incorrect when you assume that Malzhan is unwilling to throttle back to play keep away. We did it against UGA and Kentucky and in other games where we needed to rest the D and keep a dangerous offensive team off the field. Your best chance at perpetuating The Blur will be take away our running lanes and make us pass the ball. I suspect that is the plan anyway but few teams have succeeded in defending the pass against us….and as far as batting down Cam’s passes at the line….I don’t think I have seen that done once this year….but there is always a first.
If you do succeed in making this a tit for tat game where you run 80+ plays, and have us running all over the field, I will agree that you win. I think you will equally agree that we aren’t going to allow that. I know that you think we don’t have a choice but you greatly underestimate our defense, something I don’t think Chip Kelly will be dumb enough to do.
I will readily admit that if you are able to run your offense and dictate the pace of attack, I find it unlikely that Auburn will win for the numerous examples you chose to provide. That being said, you aren’t going to get the chance to score 50+ points. If you do, we will have utterly failed in our game plan and it will be a blow out. If this is a well played game, which I expect, I think the first team to 30 points wins. Chizik is a great defensive tacticitian and he will have a plan to slow you down. Ted Roof is the DC but Chizik will definitely be involved in this game plan. Remember that Chizik helmed the Auburn defense that went undeafeted in ‘04 and the Texas squad that went undefeated in ’05 before taking over undermanned Iowa State. We don’t have a great defense but we play great at times and I will be very surprised if they are overmatched by your offense and run off the field as you seem to think they will be.
Of course, our defense was supposedly overmatched in every game we played and yet in every game they came up with big stops and big turnovers. I understand why you’re overconfident and with your offense you have a right to be, but don’t be surprised if the guys you play on Monday look nothing like the team you saw in the statsheets .. . because they won’t be.

Col.Angus may be rough, Col.Angus may not smell like a bed of roses, but deep down Col.Angus is very sweet. If I overstay my welcome, just tap me on the head!!

by Col.Angus on Jan 4, 2011 12:28 PM PST reply actions  

      “If you do (score 50+ points,) we will have utterly failed in our game plan and it will be a blow out.”

Mark it down.

"If you can't copy 'em, don't imitate ''em."
YOGI BERRA

by Famous Duck on Jan 4, 2011 4:24 PM PST up reply actions  

You read that post!

"We do not play the Little Sisters of the Poor." - president of "the" Ohio State University.

by BisonDucks on Jan 5, 2011 12:15 PM PST up reply actions  

Of course....I have a Mac and even That post was presentable.

"If you can't copy 'em, don't imitate ''em."
YOGI BERRA

by Famous Duck on Jan 5, 2011 2:57 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

just a helpful hint — putting some white space in your posts will be kind to your readers. That much dense text with no formatting and white space makes it very hard to read fast. The internet is not kind to eyeballs.

Oregon loves you, Chip Kelly!

by gamedaytribe on Jan 4, 2011 4:53 PM PST up reply actions  

Some valid points

minus the serious zinger that FishDuck laid down…

But I have to echo others in asking you to please double-space your paragraphs. Thanks, Colonel!

It's kind of hard to rally around a math class. -- Bear Bryant

by MacDuck on Jan 5, 2011 4:00 PM PST up reply actions  

I got a few beefs,, ANGUS...

“BUT what you fail to recognize is that with over a month to prepare for this game Auburn will be ready for all your zone reads. It is a well known fact that teams that run a successful read option offense often struggle in bowl games.”

Col. Angus….you lost any credibility with me right off the bat with those two sentences. Florida won two NCs running their Spread Offense….and I got a really big secret for you. You run Zone Reads too! In fact it is what your ENTIRE OFFENSE is based around. You run Inside Zone Read plays, Outside Zone Read plays where you read the backside DE or DT as we do. You run an Outside Zone Read where you read the playside DE or DT and you pull a guard creating huge inside running lanes which have turned this play into your MAJOR inside running play. Then—you run superb play-action passes off these plays….AS OREGON DOES.

The teams are nearly mirror images in terms of offense although obviously the players are quite different. BTW…I assure you that Malzahn WILL run the No-Huddle; why? He wrote the damn book on it! (Look it up..he published a book on the No-Huddle offense and it was a major reason for his success this year.)

It’s pretty damn sad when I gotta educate a fan about his own team…….

FishDuck

by FishDuck on Jan 4, 2011 5:31 PM PST reply actions   2 recs

Since we've gone to the zone read...

we won the sunbowl, the holiday bowl and lost in the Rosebowl. That loss had more to do with us not being able to get tOSU off the field on defense than any problems with the zone read. I guess I need to research zone read teams in the playoffs.

"We do not play the Little Sisters of the Poor." - president of "the" Ohio State University.

by BisonDucks on Jan 5, 2011 12:18 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Addicted to Quack, SBN's Oregon Ducks blog and fan community.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

2011-09-03_15-49-32_912_small
Weekend Preview for May 18-20
Mostinteresting_small
Tako Tuesdays: The Music Thread
Small
Better video of DAT in 100m
2011-09-03_15-49-32_912_small
Giant Sports Weekend Open Thread
Atq-spoon-5_small
Miracle Wolf Scholarship Fund: Update
La_foto_small
Spring game online?
Small
Ducks Drafted and also picked up in Free agency
2011-09-03_15-49-32_912_small
------> REVISED: ATQ Spring Game Meet-Up 2012
Dog_in_tree_small
Duck football tied to Kennedy Assassination
Small
BREAKING NEWS: EXCLUSIVE TRANSCRIPT OF INTERNAL UO INVESTIGATION INTO MARIJUANA USE BY FOOTBALL PLAYERS

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Here is this weeks video with plenty of discussion on the changes for the BCS.  Thanks ATQ and GO Ducks!
Anthony Bennett picks UNLV over Oregon
Chip Kelly Scared
Here is this weeks video. Thanks ATQ, GO DUCKS!
All of DAT's races from Oregon Twilight.
BRING GAMEDAY BACK TO OREGON! VOTE!!!!
Our thoughts on the Spring Game start @ 44:43.  Thanks ATQ and GO DUCKS!
Poor Darron Thomas
Masoli the Eskimo
Bullpen Bagpipes, UO edition.

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

ATQ Twitter Feed


Managers

207873_1005773153454_1498651968_14034_9616_n_small David Piper

Pre_small ntrebon

Img_0525_small jtlight

Mostinteresting_small Takimoto

Domsicecream_small dvieira

Editors

Pettingzoo_small PaulSF

Atq-spoon-5_small Matt Daddy

Authors

Ryan__rusty_small jcgoducks

Small nds500