Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Why We're Skeptical Of LeBron James

ATQ Blogpoll: Where does Oregon stand in the national picture?

Chip Kelly doesn't care about where the Ducks rank nationally. He's more concerned with creating fake QB controversies.

I was talking to ntrebon yesterday about where the Ducks stand in the national picture. While I think Oregon's a legitimate top 10 team this season, he expressed doubt that Oregon is at that level. I think that there are a lot of Duck fans that share that sentiment. With Oregon losing to both LSU and Auburn in the past year and on the biggest stages possible, the Ducks have faltered.

But the way things are breaking in college football, there is a large drop-off between the top 7 and the rest of the country. I think that teams like Stanford, Oregon, and Oklahoma have their flaws, but they are all far superior to teams like Arkansas, Clemson, and South Carolina. 

In this week's poll, I have the Ducks at #6, just like the other polls. Watching this team, it doesn't necessarily feel like a team that should be ranked that high, until you start comparing the Ducks to the rest of the semi-contenders. There are a lot of flawed teams near the top of the rankings, and the Ducks are one of them.

As far as the BCS picture goes, the Ducks have a shot at getting back to the title game, but my bet is that it will come down to the LSU/Alabama and Oklahoma/Oklahoma State winners. We're in for a fun next few weeks as these teams fight for the conference championships.

The full poll is after the jump. Leave your comments on the poll, as well as your thoughts on where the Ducks sit nationally. GO DUCKS!

Star-divide

Comment 116 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I'm not sure that the top 7 is the line where the big drop off occurs

I think you have the top 4 in that first echelon because they simply haven’t lost yet and they have each been challenged. Then you have teams 5 – 12 (minus the gamecocks) who could all beat each other at any time on any field. After that, it gets pretty muddled. Some of the teams 12-25 are going to get better as the season goes and the wheels will fall off of some of the others (injuries are usually a factor).

Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
@chrislandon

by Gekko Mojo on Oct 30, 2011 5:02 PM PDT reply actions  

I think there’s a line after 2, and another line after 7. It’s easy to rank those teams for now, but all those teams are not on the same level as LSU and Bama.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Oct 30, 2011 5:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Top 2 then

I really don’t know about ok st. It seems like folks are under rating them if that’s possible for a team ranked 3.
After that I don’t think folks give Oregon enough credit for how they played against lsu. DAT I’m his first college game had a couple bad fumbles but remember LSU on,y drove the field once on our D. You absolutely have to give them credit for forcing the turnovers but that game was much closer than folks seem to remember.

Stanford is right up there with Oregon in my mind as is Oklahoma. Boise state is difficult because of SoS concerns. Just looking at their resume their best win is Georgia and while that’s improving the SEC isn’t particularly deep this year so those wins aren’t all that great. Oklahoma got hit with a motivated team who took their shot when Oklahma was looking past them. No doubt they have secondary concerns, just like Oregon, but that offense is quite good.

I think ok st probably wins out and goes against lsu. But I’m certainly not putting any money on it. I think Oregon beats Stanford as their run d has looked pretty porous and that’s going to be a real issue for them. Also I’m a huge homer.

As far as losses to auburn and LSU go, until there are >40 losses I’m not going to consider it statistically significant (also we’re getting better o line recruits and that’s what I thought the issue was n both games).

by builds character on Oct 30, 2011 5:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wisconsin lost to Mich State and Ohio State

Michigan has only lost to Mich State. Bad as both have looked at various stages, I’d have to rank Michigan over Wisconsin at this point, personally.

Oregon loves you, Chip Kelly!

by gamedaytribe on Oct 30, 2011 5:27 PM PDT reply actions  

From a Michigander's perspective...

MSU absolutely dismantled UM, the same way they did last season (which began the Wolverine’s decline). The Spartans showed the country how to handle Robinson’s one-pony-trick routine. The Wolverines haven’t had a lot of competition, really. Beating Purdue, or Central/Western Michigan does not make you elite. The Badger’s defense is superior to UM, and in a game, I’m going with the red.

by Jaseface on Oct 30, 2011 5:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Complete crap that we're behind Arkansas, who has barely beaten Vandy and Ole Miss the past 2 weeks.

I’d even argue that we deserve to be above Oklahoma. What the hell does beating Kansas State prove? Here’s a hint-K-State isn’t actually a great team. They lost to freaking Texas Tech, who proceeded to get blown out by Iowa State.

"I don't do well with pain medicine."

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Oct 30, 2011 5:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's the computer component for you.

At least Oregon’s SOS picks up considerably starting this week.

Somewhere, somehow, a Duck is watching you.

by omb on Oct 30, 2011 5:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

BCS policy.

Oregon loves you, Chip Kelly!

by gamedaytribe on Oct 30, 2011 5:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

To argue FOR that policy,

a straight MOV would reward ROTSing DBs like B. Bielema. Though they could totally tweak it for diminishing returns after a threshold for blowouts.

Somewhere, somehow, a Duck is watching you.

by omb on Oct 30, 2011 5:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Agree.

Oregon loves you, Chip Kelly!

by gamedaytribe on Oct 30, 2011 5:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

Im probably the only one, but

Can you please explain this

ROTSing DBs like B. Bielema

"Last time I checked, there is no ‘Hall of Average.’ " Chip Kelly

by PondJunky on Oct 30, 2011 5:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Running Over the Slant Defensive Backs.

"I don't do well with pain medicine."

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Oct 30, 2011 5:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

And I just HAD to take the Saints today.

/stillbitter.

Somewhere, somehow, a Duck is watching you.

by omb on Oct 30, 2011 5:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

Thank you.

But I’m still confused. I’m going to need someone to break it down Barney style

"Last time I checked, there is no ‘Hall of Average.’ " Chip Kelly

by PondJunky on Oct 30, 2011 5:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think he meant Running Up the Score douchebags like Bret Bielema.

"I don't do well with pain medicine."

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Oct 30, 2011 5:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

Thanks.

"Last time I checked, there is no ‘Hall of Average.’ " Chip Kelly

by PondJunky on Oct 30, 2011 5:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

BCS Stands for

Bullshit Crappy-ass System

ssshhh....

by OregOnDucks on Oct 30, 2011 7:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

But the human polls do take MOV into account

so it makes sense to leave it out of the computers. They would tend to really overemphasize it.

The "Beano Cook" of ATQ.

by benzduck on Oct 30, 2011 6:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

of course we deserve to be ahead of Oklahoma

Our resumes are fairly similar, except we lost at a neutral site to the best team in the country, and they lost, AT HOME, to a 30 point underdog that got routed at home by Iowa State the next week.

--Dave

Addicted to Quack, your friendly, neighborhood Oregon Ducks blog

by David Piper on Oct 30, 2011 5:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well, technically, their best win is stronger than ours (@ #14 K-State versus #19 Arizona State).

Kansas State will continue to plummet after they get smacked again by Oklahoma State next week, though.

"I don't do well with pain medicine."

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Oct 30, 2011 5:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's a damn joke

We are 6th in Harris, 6th in coaches but frikken 13th by the retarded computers!!!! our only loss is against the number one team.

AAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!

ONE NATION UNDER AL

RIP Mr Davis 1929 - 2011

by Ozraider on Oct 30, 2011 8:11 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

I agree, Jared

Oregon is a very good team, but they have a lot of flaws that they didn’t have last year.

I would rather win a Rose Bowl (and no matter who we would potentially play, we would have a great shot at winnng that one), than lose the Natty again. But the Okie/Oklahoma State winner will be over us. Deservedly so if it were to be the Pokes, not sure if it were OU.

--Dave

Addicted to Quack, your friendly, neighborhood Oregon Ducks blog

by David Piper on Oct 30, 2011 5:31 PM PDT reply actions  

If Oregon beats Stanford to finish 12-1, and OU beats toOSU to finish 11-1,

They both have really good arguments. Undefeated toOSU is a very easy call. With OU, Neither really has a resume edge, especially considering who OU lost to. But whichever OK school wins, you’re right, they probably both go. If anything, if teams are equal, OU helps the BCS avoid either a rematch with LSU, or sending a team ahead of LSU who LSU beat in the regular season.

Somewhere, somehow, a Duck is watching you.

by omb on Oct 30, 2011 5:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't think OU has a great argument over any one loss team

when their one loss was at home to a 30 point underdog. A championship worthy team simply doesn’t lose that game, period.

--Dave

Addicted to Quack, your friendly, neighborhood Oregon Ducks blog

by David Piper on Oct 30, 2011 5:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Rose Bowl

this is what Im talking about! I want us to get there and absolutely demolish whoever we would play. I dont want to play LSU again or have to face Bama. Were a young and talented team and will have another shot at the Natty down the road.

by OfficerCosta on Oct 30, 2011 7:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well yes

If the options are 1) Win a Rose Bowl or 2) lose a NCG then yes I want to win the Rose Bowl. But there’s no guaranteed outcome. I, in my humble opinion, would want to go up against the best and beat the best. I think we have as good as chance to beat LSU/Bama or the Big 12 champion as anybody. If there’s a chance, I want to take it.

by INducktrination on Oct 30, 2011 7:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don’t believe we can beat LSU or BAMA. If you can geive me areason to think differently I’m all ears.

by OfficerCosta on Oct 30, 2011 8:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

Do you believe Oklahoma will? Oklahoma State? fBSU? Should we just crown the winner of LSU/Bama the BCS winner after next Saturday? I think we can beat LSU or Bama. Any given Saturday if you will. We played LSU a lot closer than anyone else has, and now we’ve added lots of game experience to our young members. Will we be favored? Hell no. Fuck, I’ll be full on PANICed for the game. But I think it’s possible. Our loss to LSU has as much to do with them shutting down our run game, as it does our idiocy with ball protection (Barner on the punt return, DAT x2)

If there’s a chance, then I want to take it.

by INducktrination on Oct 30, 2011 8:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

I can give 110 reasons (yards in penalties) and 4 other reasons (stupid turnovers)

The Ducks outgained LSU and could do so again. If they remove the dumb mistakes they could beat either LSU or Bama in the fashion that they should beat either of those teams. Both of those teams are very disciplined, but if the ducks play with some discipline they beat either of those teams.

Come along now, Cabot!

by JIDuck97 on Oct 30, 2011 8:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

Can someone explain how beating Vandy by 3 is better than beating WSU by 15, enough so to jump a spot?

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Oct 30, 2011 5:32 PM PDT reply actions  

Whatever. Doesn't matter. What does though is this.

HAPPY I HATE wASHINGTON WEEK!

FUCK-YOU-wASH-ING-TON (clap-clap-clapclapclap_

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Oct 30, 2011 5:34 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Foles damn near beat 'em last night...

Bummer they didn’t, but it’s nice that the ‘fans’ will be all the more amped and therefore have further to fall into a depression when Oregon runs over ’em next Saturday night.

by ConfofChamps on Oct 30, 2011 5:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

If you think the voters don't consider it you're very naive.

Only the computers are prohibited from using it in their formulae.

The "Beano Cook" of ATQ.

by benzduck on Oct 30, 2011 6:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

Scott Wolf:

Shut up.

Thanks.

"I don't do well with pain medicine."

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Oct 30, 2011 5:36 PM PDT reply actions  

Real question.

Which division is better – Pac-12 South, or SEC East?

Somewhere, somehow, a Duck is watching you.

by omb on Oct 30, 2011 5:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hmm...

South Carolina/Arizona State
Georgia/USC
Florida/UCLA
Vanderbilt/Utah
Tennessee/Arizona
Kentucky/Colorado

I think all of those would be pretty good games. I’d probably give the slight advantage to the Pac-12 South, though.

Or would I? I think each conference would win 3 in those matchups. I dunno. Ask me something easier.

"I don't do well with pain medicine."

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Oct 30, 2011 5:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

Looking at that, I honestly see 4-2 for the Pac, with ASU and USC wins.

Of course, I don’t know if the North could do better than 2-4 against the SEC West.

Somewhere, somehow, a Duck is watching you.

by omb on Oct 30, 2011 6:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

3-3

I’d give ASU, USC and UA the wins. UCLA with a maybe: Florida is such a crappy overrated team whose going to go bowling despite beating nobody (thanks SEC 8 game conference schedule) but it’s still a weasal team.

by INducktrination on Oct 30, 2011 7:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

Being objective....

SEC East. Though not by a large margin.

by Jaseface on Oct 30, 2011 6:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Coin toss.

The "Beano Cook" of ATQ.

by benzduck on Oct 30, 2011 6:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

Indeed.

Oregon loves you, Chip Kelly!

by gamedaytribe on Oct 30, 2011 6:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well done.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Oct 30, 2011 10:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Our average computer ranking is 13

"Last time I checked, there is no ‘Hall of Average.’ " Chip Kelly

by PondJunky on Oct 30, 2011 5:43 PM PDT reply actions  

I'm going to have to disagree.

Light beer is light beer. And that Dr. Pepper dance party is hardly one-of-a-kind.

Somewhere, somehow, a Duck is watching you.

by omb on Oct 30, 2011 5:59 PM PDT reply actions  

Losing to Auburn and LSU is not a good argument that the Ducks have faultered.

They are definitely two of the top teams of the last two years. Their sloppy play against WSU, on the hand, is. They are a top ten team, just probably not top tier this year.

by 22blazer on Oct 30, 2011 6:21 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

Not that the first half was good

But Oregon under Kelly has consistently played close first halves and blown out the other team in the second half.

by builds character on Oct 30, 2011 6:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

no it isn't

find me a team that hasn’t played poorly in an easy win this year… you don’t downgrade a team for winning by two TD’s… that is just stupid.

Now- LOSING to a 30 point underdog at home- that is something you should get downgraded for.

by Duckfreak on Oct 30, 2011 6:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Don't be silly!

No top tier team would ever lose to that big of an underdog.

"It's not about style. It's about winning the game. That's it." - Chip Kelly

by Duckfanatic10 on Oct 30, 2011 10:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

especially when they're playing at home!

Hollywood thinks you’re nuts!

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Oct 30, 2011 10:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Biggest game of Oregon's season was Illinois vs ASU

if Oregon ends up winning out. 2 wins over a legit top 10 and 11-2 (only losses both to Oregon), and a legit top 5 Stanford who finished 11-1 (only loss to Oregon)…

If ASU beats Illinois- I think Oregon controls their own destiny for the BCS right now outside of Okie State. As it is- it seems like Oklahoma, Okie State, Bama all will finish ahead of Oregon if they finish with one loss.

by Duckfreak on Oct 30, 2011 6:32 PM PDT reply actions  

I don't think we are not an NCG caliber team.

Okie State is playing way above us right now with a top 10 SOS, Bama and LSU are just that. Rose Bowl or Alamo is where I think we’re heading and where I think we could compete.

Hoover: They confiscated everything, even the stuff we didn't steal!

by DamienS on Oct 30, 2011 6:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

Apologies on the syntax.

Hoover: They confiscated everything, even the stuff we didn't steal!

by DamienS on Oct 30, 2011 6:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Okie State is a mirage

just like Oklahoma. Oregon would have a very good shot at either team. LSU and Bama have a talent edge… Okie State gave up 500+ yards on Saturday- Oregon would give them a lot to deal with and quite likely would be favored in the game.

by Duckfreak on Oct 30, 2011 6:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

I assume you have been watching there games, OSU will beat OU and remind me of us last year.

As for the “if it wasn’t for” well sure but LSU had just as many of those and they won, end of story. So, all I’m saying is we have some big areas of improvement now add a younger DB lineup and this stretch is gonna be hard.

Love my ducks but not homer.

Hoover: They confiscated everything, even the stuff we didn't steal!

by DamienS on Oct 30, 2011 6:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Do you know what OSU's best win is at this point?

Texas. A very average Texas team. They barely beat both Texas and A&M. Their SOS is BS.

by KitIsh on Oct 30, 2011 6:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

Just based on straight-up quality...rank the top ten teams in America. Do not, for instance, penalize Boise for not playing anyone.

1. LSU
2. Alabama
3. Oklahoma State
4. Oklahoma
5. Stanford
6. Oregon
7. Boise State
8. Arkansas
9. Nebraska
10. Clemson

That was hard. There aren’t really that many great teams this year.

"I don't do well with pain medicine."

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Oct 30, 2011 6:41 PM PDT reply actions  

stop drinking the kool-aid

sec is really good- and top heavy. both teams are stacked… big 12 is a fraud- find me a non conference win worth a thing… FSU?

Stanford is a better team then Okie State or Okie- I’ll let you know how Oregon stacks up w/ Stanord in 2 weeks

by Duckfreak on Oct 30, 2011 6:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

I find 3-6 nearly interchangeable.

"I don't do well with pain medicine."

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Oct 30, 2011 6:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

What we anticipating the line to be against UW?

I really hate Washington. I can’t think of the national landscape.

"I love Oregon's obsolete recruiting report on an unhealthy level. Just more proof how balla Chip Kelly really is." Dr. Saturday

by BisonDucks on Oct 30, 2011 6:45 PM PDT reply actions  

Surprisingly large.

I would not bet, because I never bet Duck games ATS, but a double digit home dog in conference play is often a very good play.

The "Beano Cook" of ATQ.

by benzduck on Oct 30, 2011 7:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Firstly, TWDS

second, All Terrain Snowmen?

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Oct 30, 2011 8:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wow...

"I love Oregon's obsolete recruiting report on an unhealthy level. Just more proof how balla Chip Kelly really is." Dr. Saturday

by BisonDucks on Oct 30, 2011 6:52 PM PDT reply actions  

reply fail.

"I love Oregon's obsolete recruiting report on an unhealthy level. Just more proof how balla Chip Kelly really is." Dr. Saturday

by BisonDucks on Oct 30, 2011 6:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

Are we as good as last year

I agree with those who don’t see us in the same class as last year’s team. One way of thinking about it is this—what do we do better this year than last year? What do we do worse? Thanks to DeAnthony, our RBs are even better (who thought this was possible). Our punting and kick coverage has been great. But that’s about it. QB has not improved. WRs are vastly worse. TE is the same. OL is maybe the same, maybe slightly worse. DBs are worse. LBs are not bad certainly but not as good as last year’s senior laden group. DL is probably slightly worse.

In short, I think we are going to scorch Washington, but I worry greatly about both Stanford and USC.

by eloomis20 on Oct 30, 2011 7:11 PM PDT reply actions  

I think we have about an 85% chance of beating Washington, a 70% chance of beating USC, and a 50% chance of beating Stanford.

"I don't do well with pain medicine."

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Oct 30, 2011 7:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

My head says these are all correct.

Though all three scare the hell out of me.

Somewhere, somehow, a Duck is watching you.

by omb on Oct 30, 2011 7:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

i think the defense has to do with

the fact we aren’t making that many plays this year

how many fumbles have we forced?

GO DUCKS

by Pie on Oct 30, 2011 7:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

Stanford lost more from last year

it’s tough to compare year to year. I think Bennett is a defnite upgrade as the #2 to an injured Nate Costa- and a freshman named Bennett we are trying to redshirt.

Blowing off DAT- as not that important is a mistake. Kid scores at least 2 TD’s every game… It makes a major impact. Receiver is the biggest problem- and the closest guy to filling Maehl’s shoes has been DAT himself in some games… Huge drop-off from Tuinei being the #3 to the #1…

Defense- I don’t think we are as good. Cliff Harris, Bair, Rowe, Spitty P, Matthews, TJack III, thats a lot of very important cogs to replace…

Having said that- does that mean we can’t beat Stanford? Or win 2 Pac-12 home games? Kelly’s never lost a game at Autzen. Oregon has a very good shot in all 4 games- will be favored by 2 TD’s or more in 3 out of 4 games left…

by Duckfreak on Oct 30, 2011 7:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

Remember that awesome tackle that De’Anthony made in punt coverage as a gunner yesterday? His impact is being felt in so many different facets of the game-the running game, the passing game, the return unit, and punt coverage.

"I don't do well with pain medicine."

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Oct 30, 2011 7:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

The most important thing about LMJ coming back

Will be it allows DAT to go back to being pretty much a full time receiver

by KitIsh on Oct 30, 2011 7:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

He has nearly identical receiving and rushing yardage totals this year. I’m fine with him being a hybrid of the two.

"I don't do well with pain medicine."

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Oct 30, 2011 7:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

Who was predicting preseason that he would be our leading receiver after 8 games?

Though given the numbers involved, that really is just a huge indictment of the rest of our receiving corp.

Somewhere, somehow, a Duck is watching you.

by omb on Oct 30, 2011 7:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

Huff is the biggest disappointment for me

I know this is his injury but I think we’re a much better team when he’s healthy.

by builds character on Oct 30, 2011 7:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

He's exceeded by expectations by so much it's almost insane.

I wasn’t thinking that a 5’9" 165 pound guy with a lot of speed was just going to come into our offense and have a giant impact.

I really underestimated his capabilities and his understanding of the offense, which is something that Chip loves to talk about when it comes to De’Anthony.

"I don't do well with pain medicine."

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Oct 30, 2011 7:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah but we have Barner and LMJ to run it at RB

We need DAT at receiver as he’s the only consistently explosive one we have.

by KitIsh on Oct 30, 2011 8:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

Barnes not injured

But James got fat. So you’re right it’s probably a wash without DAT.

by builds character on Oct 30, 2011 7:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

What sucks?

We’re partly fucked by how our fellow 12 Pac members have fared. The Big 12 went something like 26-2 in OOC play. That’s amazing. How’d the Pac do? OAC lost to Sac. St. UA lost to Ok. St. ASU lost to Illinois. WSU lost to San Diego St. UCLA lost to Texas AND Houston. Colorado to Hawaii. asington to Nebraska, and struggled to eastern ashington and hawaii.

All that shit is coming back to bite us in the ass. The computers hate the Pac-12. And they rightly should. But you match us against anyone and we are in that game. I wish their was a playoff, because we could beat OU or Okie. St if we play our game. And if anyone is going to knock off the best SEC team, I want that to be us damnit!

by INducktrination on Oct 30, 2011 8:04 PM PDT reply actions  

Let's not forget

Oregon had a chance to do some good for the conference as well, and we couldn’t. Granted, our competition was vastly superior to the rest of everyone else’s, but I think we take a share of the blame on this issue.

Autzen Stadium: "The stadium with an L.A. face, but an Oakland Booty, if you will." -Spencer Hall

by ProbablyMonty on Oct 30, 2011 8:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed

We’d control our own destiny had we won that game. But assuming Ok. St loses, and no one gives fBSU the opportunity, we’re stuck in an argument of who the best 1-loss team in the country is to face the LSU/Bama winner (and arguably that will be the loser of that game!)

by INducktrination on Oct 30, 2011 8:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

My reaction to the BlogPoll

Jeeeeeez, Wisconsin seems really high. They should clearly be ranked below… um…

/looks at teams below

Carry on, then.

Autzen Stadium: "The stadium with an L.A. face, but an Oakland Booty, if you will." -Spencer Hall

by ProbablyMonty on Oct 30, 2011 8:12 PM PDT reply actions  

Could be worse. At least Grassu knows that the QB is always in the shotgun...

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Oct 30, 2011 9:39 PM PDT reply actions  

Found on espn.com:

- posted in their “stats” blog last Thursday:

The Oregon Ducks have scored 30 or more points in each of their past 25 home games. That is the longest streak in the AP Poll era (since 1936) and one of two active streaks longer than 20 games (TCU, 24 straight). No other team in the AP Poll era has had a streak of at least 20 such games. Good news for Oregon: This week’s opponent, the Washington State Cougars, are allowing 30.4 PPG this season. The next longest such streak after Oregon & TCU? Oklahoma (19 games from 2006-09).

The "Beano Cook" of ATQ.

by benzduck on Oct 30, 2011 9:58 PM PDT reply actions  

Mr. Kelly I would like to shake your hand and buy you a beer!

Hoover: They confiscated everything, even the stuff we didn't steal!

by DamienS on Oct 30, 2011 10:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

+1

ONE NATION UNDER AL

RIP Mr Davis 1929 - 2011

by Ozraider on Oct 31, 2011 1:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

That's not on ESPN!

some “MrBenzduck” guy on the twitters said it before you posted here!

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Oct 30, 2011 10:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Late to the party on this thought, but

I was sitting near the endzone when DAT did the quadruple crossover on that hapless Coug defender. He was coming right at me and pretty much all of section 18 had their collective jaw a gape in awe. I’m still miffed end zone angle highlight didn’t make the SC top ten.

by AtticusDuck on Oct 30, 2011 10:32 PM PDT reply actions  

I was there too

On the other side of the same end zone. So I had a great view of him juking that guy out. It was jaw dropping for sure. And when he ran his kickoff return back for a touchdown he came into the endzone right in front of me.

by NinjaDuck on Oct 31, 2011 8:07 AM PDT reply actions  

I was there above you, Section 26, WC row.

"What you are entrusted to do as a coach is to create an environment where your players have a chance to be successful." CHIP KELLY

by Famous Duck on Oct 31, 2011 9:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Addicted to Quack, SBN's Oregon Ducks blog and fan community.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

2011-09-03_15-49-32_912_small
Weekend Preview for May 18-20
Mostinteresting_small
Tako Tuesdays: The Music Thread
Small
Better video of DAT in 100m
2011-09-03_15-49-32_912_small
Giant Sports Weekend Open Thread
Atq-spoon-5_small
Miracle Wolf Scholarship Fund: Update
La_foto_small
Spring game online?
Small
Ducks Drafted and also picked up in Free agency
2011-09-03_15-49-32_912_small
------> REVISED: ATQ Spring Game Meet-Up 2012
Dog_in_tree_small
Duck football tied to Kennedy Assassination
Small
BREAKING NEWS: EXCLUSIVE TRANSCRIPT OF INTERNAL UO INVESTIGATION INTO MARIJUANA USE BY FOOTBALL PLAYERS

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Here is this weeks video with plenty of discussion on the changes for the BCS.  Thanks ATQ and GO Ducks!
Anthony Bennett picks UNLV over Oregon
Chip Kelly Scared
Here is this weeks video. Thanks ATQ, GO DUCKS!
All of DAT's races from Oregon Twilight.
BRING GAMEDAY BACK TO OREGON! VOTE!!!!
Our thoughts on the Spring Game start @ 44:43.  Thanks ATQ and GO DUCKS!
Poor Darron Thomas
Masoli the Eskimo
Bullpen Bagpipes, UO edition.

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

ATQ Twitter Feed


Managers

207873_1005773153454_1498651968_14034_9616_n_small David Piper

Pre_small ntrebon

Img_0525_small jtlight

Mostinteresting_small Takimoto

Domsicecream_small dvieira

Editors

Pettingzoo_small PaulSF

Atq-spoon-5_small Matt Daddy

Authors

Ryan__rusty_small jcgoducks

Small nds500