Shufelt CPU Rankings - Week 5
The ever changing landscape of college football. It's part of what makes it exciting. Just when you think you know everything, Clemson runs off with 3 top-25 wins in a row. Just as you peg LSU with being the best team in the country, Alabama makes a statement win against conference east favorite, Florida. But does that mean Alabama has the best resume this year?
Computer Poll Top 25 Resumes - Week 5
| Rank | Team | Record | VoW Avg | VoW Delta | Rank Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alabama | (5-0) | 3.694 | 0.782 | ↑ 2 |
| 2 | Boise State | (4-0) | 3.113 | 0.308 | ↑ 2 |
| 3 | Stanford | (4-0) | 3.079 | 0.412 | ↑ 2 |
| 4 | Oklahoma | (4-0) | 2.956 | 0.346 | ↑ 2 |
| 5 | Oklahoma State | (4-0) | 2.914 | -0.001 | ↓ 3 |
| 6 | LSU | (5-0) | 2.770 | -0.192 | ↓ 5 |
| 7 | Michigan | (5-0) | 2.732 | 0.380 | ↔ 0 |
| 8 | Notre Dame | (3-2) | 2.295 | 0.516 | ↑ 5 |
| 9 | Texas | (4-0) | 2.282 | 0.380 | ↑ 2 |
| 10 | Texas A&M | (2-1) | 2.147 | 0.250 | ↑ 2 |
| 11 | Georgia Tech | (5-0) | 1.884 | 0.190 | ↑ 4 |
| 12 | Florida | (4-1) | 1.764 | -0.253 | ↓ 3 |
| 13 | Wisconsin | (5-0) | 1.743 | 0.844 | ↑ 14 |
| 14 | Oregon | (3-1) | 1.679 | -0.084 | ↔ 0 |
| 15 | Clemson | (5-0) | 1.508 | 1.135 | ↑ 26 |
| 16 | South Florida | (4-1) | 1.267 | -0.910 | ↓ 8 |
| 17 | South Carolina | (4-1) | 1.241 | -0.662 | ↓ 7 |
| 18 | West Virginia | (4-1) | 1.221 | 0.845 | ↑ 22 |
| 19 | Rutgers | (3-1) | 1.214 | 0.289 | ↑ 6 |
| 20 | North Carolina | (4-1) | 1.199 | 0.326 | ↑ 8 |
| 21 | Illinois | (5-0) | 1.127 | 0.021 | ↔ 0 |
| 22 | Nebraska | (4-1) | 1.119 | -0.355 | ↓ 6 |
| 23 | Houston | (5-0) | 1.102 | 0.164 | ↑ 1 |
| 24 | Tennessee | (3-1) | 1.094 | -0.047 | ↓ 4 |
| 25 | Cincinnati | (4-1) | 1.075 | 0.462 | ↑ 6 |
Dropped: Penn State, Baylor, Virginia Tech, Arizona State, Temple
LSU didn't have any problems with their competition, but they didn't get over the bar they set for themselves. The result is some shifting around the top. Oklahoma State's resume score was hardly impacted from the bye week, but all the other top teams improved on their score.
Big improvements within the top 25 are Clemson, Wisconsin and West Virginia, the ones on a bit of a free fall were South Florida and South Carolina after they notched their losses.
Flavor of the Week Award
This is awarded to the team that has the best win of the week. This is generally given to a team that has a solid win against a good team.
| Team (Team VAvg) | Opp (Team VAvg) | Score | VoW |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama (3.895) | @ Florida (2.017) | W 38-10 | 6.257 |
| Clemson (2.111) | @ Virginia Tech (1.858) | W 23-3 | 5.244 |
| Toledo (0.403) | @ Temple (1.404) | W 36-13 | 5.225 |
| Wisconsin (3.759) | vs. Nebraska (1.591) | W 48-17 | 4.457 |
| Pittsburgh (0.64) | vs. South Florida (1.947) | W 44-17 | 4.447 |
Alabama's win over Florida so far is the most impressive to-date, and it isn't really even close. If they didn't play this week, it would have been Clemson over Virginia Tech - and the only win that would have been close would have been Toledo over Temple. After that? If you sensed the pattern, you would have guessed the 4th most impressive win to date would have been Wisconsin over Nebraska. And that pattern continues through with Pitt over USF. All 5 of these games would have been "the most impressive win" so far, and Alabama's win was head and shoulders above everyone else.
Bitter Sweet Award
This is awarded to the team that the most disastrous win of the week. This is generally given to the team that played close against a bad team.
| Team (Team VAvg) | Opp (Team VAvg) | Score | VoW |
|---|---|---|---|
| Troy (-0.815) | vs. UAB (-2.544) | W 24-23 | -2.347 |
| Maryland (0.256) | vs. Towson (-4.643) | W 28-3 | -1.859 |
| Middle Tennessee (-1.194) | vs. Memphis (-2.75) | W 38-31 | -1.824 |
| Virginia (0.399) | vs. Idaho (-1.703) | W 21-20 | -1.753 |
| Arkansas State (0.985) | @ Western Kentucky (-3.296) | W 26-22 | -1.510 |
A pretty boring slate of games, to be honest. I don't think any of these really registered on anyone's radar. Troy's squeaker win over UAB is pretty bad. UAB is currently ranked 117th in my rankings.
No Shame in Losing Award
This is awarded to the team that had the most respectable loss of the week. This is generally given to the team that played well against a good team.
| Team (Team VAvg) | Opp (Team VAvg) | Score | VoW |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas A&M (0.511) | vs. Arkansas (1.481) | L 38-42 | 0.997 |
| Northwestern (0.906) | @ Illinois (1.618) | L 35-38 | 0.963 |
| UCLA (-0.815) | @ Stanford (4.163) | L 19-45 | 0.943 |
| Nevada (-0.868) | @ Boise State (3.19) | L 10-30 | 0.895 |
| Baylor (1.886) | @ Kansas State (1.9) | L 35-36 | 0.789 |
Is Texas A&M cursed? Two games with big halftime leads and a total collapse in the second half for two weeks in a row. Fortunately for ATM, it was against a good Arkansas team, and they walked out with a net-win as they actually improved on their resume despite the loss.
Facepalm Award
This is awarded to the team that really should be embarrassed for their loss. This is generally given to the team that played poorly against a bad team.
| Team (Team VAvg) | Opp (Team VAvg) | Score | VoW |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tulane (-0.732) | @ Army (-0.618) | L 6-45 | -4.199 |
| Temple (1.404) | vs. Toledo (0.403) | L 13-36 | -4.057 |
| Fresno State (-0.257) | vs. Ole Miss (-0.57) | L 28-38 | -3.986 |
| New Mexico (-3.605) | vs. New Mexico State (-0.023) | L 28-42 | -3.690 |
| Louisiana Tech (-1.334) | vs. Hawaii (1.262) | L 26-44 | -3.398 |
GO BLACK KNIGHTS! Okay - so, Army isn't a great team. But Tulane sure made them look like one, and that's what counts.
Conference Rankings
Conference resume strength, sorted by VoW Avg.
| Rank | Conference | Team VAvg | Opp VAvg | VoW Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Big 12 - (32-8) | 1.633 | -0.453 | 1.039 |
| 2 | SEC - (41-17) | 1.203 | -0.214 | 0.803 |
| 3 | Big East - (25-13) | 1.102 | -0.743 | 0.219 |
| 4 | Big Ten - (39-18) | 1.149 | -0.780 | 0.210 |
| 5 | Pac-12 - (31-23) | 0.636 | -0.279 | 0.201 |
| 6 | Independent - (10-9) | 0.331 | 0.265 | 0.191 |
| 7 | ACC - (36-20) | 0.863 | -0.610 | -0.025 |
| 8 | MWC - (20-15) | 0.157 | -0.658 | -0.754 |
| 9 | C-USA - (26-30) | -0.368 | -0.336 | -0.782 |
| 10 | WAC - (13-25) | -0.449 | -0.295 | -0.877 |
| 11 | MAC - (28-36) | -0.378 | -0.392 | -0.915 |
| 12 | Sun Belt - (15-25) | -1.111 | -0.142 | -1.372 |
Despite the ADs of the Big 12 scrambling to apply epoxy in Dan Beebe's created fault-lines, they're still shown to be the best conference so far. It's really them and the SEC, everyone else is kind of "meh" until you get to the Non-AQ conferences, who are really bad.
Pac-12 Conference Rankings
| Rank | Team | Team VAvg | Opp VAvg | VoW Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stanford - (4-0) | 4.163 | -0.880 | 3.079 |
| 2 | Oregon - (3-1) | 2.546 | -0.979 | 1.679 |
| 3 | Washington - (4-1) | 0.995 | 0.125 | 0.644 |
| 4 | Arizona State - (4-1) | 1.653 | -0.803 | 0.613 |
| 5 | UCLA - (2-3) | -0.815 | 1.371 | 0.317 |
| 6 | California - (3-1) | 1.750 | -1.342 | 0.315 |
| 7 | Washington State - (3-1) | 2.076 | -1.823 | 0.269 |
| 8 | USC - (4-1) | 0.547 | -0.406 | -0.049 |
| 9 | Utah - (2-2) | 0.664 | -0.892 | -0.209 |
| 10 | Colorado - (1-4) | -1.463 | 1.166 | -0.876 |
| 11 | Arizona - (1-4) | -1.920 | 1.129 | -0.891 |
| 12 | Oregon State - (0-4) | -2.561 | -0.011 | -2.474 |
Stanford, Oregon - every one else - and then Oregon State. Arizona hasn't quite had the numbers to make up for their schedule yet, but we'll get to see if they really belong this low or not soon.
Pat Hill Award
These schools have so far had the most difficult opponents, according to their VAvg. This isn't always indicative of always playing great opponents, but playing opponents that have had a high Team Value, like explosive, high octane, high-winning opponents.
| Rank | Team (Record) | Conference | Opp VAvg |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nevada - (1-3) | WAC | 2.055 |
| 2 | Rice - (1-3) | C-USA | 1.614 |
| 3 | Notre Dame - (3-2) | Independent | 1.532 |
| 4 | Florida Atlantic - (0-4) | Sun Belt | 1.514 |
| 5 | UCLA - (2-3) | Pac-12 | 1.371 |
| 6 | Marshall - (2-3) | C-USA | 1.288 |
| 7 | Texas A&M - (2-2) | Big 12 | 1.232 |
| 8 | Tulsa - (2-3) | C-USA | 1.201 |
| 9 | Colorado - (1-4) | Pac-12 | 1.166 |
| 10 | Arizona - (1-4) | Pac-12 | 1.129 |
Nevada's schedule has been quite rough when you look at it. Boise State, Texas Tech, Oregon. Their only gimme win so far has been San Jose State. That's not an easy slate. Oddly enough, San Jose State is also UCLA's first win too. Their schedule hasn't been too kind either.
Bill Snyder Award
These schools have so far had the easiest opponents, according to their VAvg. This isn't always indicative of always playing the weakest opponents, but playing opponents that have had a low Team Value, like low scoring teams that find themselves losing more than winning.
| Rank | Team (Record) | Conference | Opp VAvg |
|---|---|---|---|
| 120 | Texas Tech - (4-0) | Big 12 | -2.548 |
| 119 | Colorado State - (3-2) | MWC | -2.076 |
| 118 | Houston - (5-0) | C-USA | -1.938 |
| 117 | Washington State - (3-1) | Pac-12 | -1.823 |
| 116 | Louisville - (2-2) | Big East | -1.808 |
| 115 | Southern Miss - (4-1) | C-USA | -1.781 |
| 114 | Hawaii - (3-2) | WAC | -1.777 |
| 113 | Wake Forest - (3-1) | ACC | -1.753 |
| 112 | Wisconsin - (5-0) | Big Ten | -1.707 |
| 111 | Tulane - (2-3) | C-USA | -1.706 |
Texas Tech is riding this one out. We get our first showing of a sub-.500 team in here too. Welcome, Tulane. Your schedule sucks!
Games to Watch/Stream/TiVo/"Acquire"
These are this week's match-ups that have a high VoW Avg and also has a small disparity between the two teams.
| Team (Team VAvg) | Opp (Team VAvg) | Team VAvg Diff | Team VAvg Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas (3.05) | vs. Oklahoma (3.039) | 0.011 | 3.045 |
| Oregon (2.546) | vs. California (1.75) | 0.797 | 2.148 |
| Penn State (1.546) | vs. Iowa (1.518) | 0.027 | 1.532 |
| Kansas State (1.9) | vs. Missouri (1.027) | 0.874 | 1.463 |
| Wake Forest (1.689) | vs. Florida State (1.133) | 0.557 | 1.411 |
Red River Rivalry is slated to be a close game. We'll get to see if Texas has rebounded and if Oklahoma is what everyone has pinned them to be. This game could tell a lot about the Big-12 overall, too.
Cal's visit to Autzen could also end up being a good game, but there is a little more discrepancy between the two teams than Texas and Oklahoma.
Games to Watch During a Root Canal
These are this week's matchups with the largest discrepancies between the two. They are projected to be pretty big blowouts. I removed all the FBS vs FCS teams.
| Team (Team VAvg) | Opp (Team VAvg) | Team VAvg Diff | Team VAvg Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford (4.163) | vs. Colorado (-1.463) | 5.627 | 1.350 |
| Houston (2.959) | vs. East Carolina (-1.964) | 4.923 | 0.497 |
| Oklahoma State (3.033) | vs. Kansas (-1.076) | 4.110 | 0.978 |
| Clemson (2.111) | vs. Boston College (-1.511) | 3.622 | 0.300 |
| Boise State (3.19) | @ Fresno State (-0.257) | 3.447 | 1.467 |
Here we go. Clemson has all the momentum and an inferior opponent is visiting Death Valley. Everyone is going to have them picked to win. Isn't this where they usually lose?
About the Rankings
- It has a memory. It will remember what happened in Week 1. Team A may look bad Week 1, but in Week 6, they don't look so bad.
- That means the values are dynamic. To take an example from 2010, Boise State squeaked by a highly ranked Virginia Tech team. The next week, Virginia Tech lost to James Madison. Boise State's close call to Virginia Tech does not look NEARLY as impressive now. They still ended up finishing up strong. Week 1 scores will actually change dynamically based upon results, not just Week 1, but every week of college football.
- Style points matter. This includes the margin of victory. Nobody is impressed when you pull of a 1 point squeaker to Saint Mary’s school of the blind. But everyone would be impressed when Alabama is beaten 35-0. MOV matters, but it has diminishing returns. The point difference between winning by 50 and winning by 70 is practically infinitesimal.
- There has been a bonus for shutting a team out, however, I lowered the base amount for this bonus, and added an additional formula that raises and lowers the bonus based upon the quality of the opponent. You will always get extra points for shutting a team out, but you won't get as much against a really bad team, however you can potentially earn MORE than before if you shutout a good team.
- There is no pride in playing an FCS team.
- Location has a small influence on the scoring. A slight penalty for the home team, and a slight bonus for the visiting team. Neutral fields cancel each other out.
- There are bonus points for winning, and penalties for losing. This isn't a significant part of the formula, but it is factored.
- There are three main values. (There are several formulas that make up these values, but I am going to try and simplify it). A score of 0 is neither good nor bad.
- Team Avg (Team Average); This is simply your team’s performance in a game based upon a formula I’ve made up.
- Opp Avg (Opponent Average); This is an aggregated value of your opponent's Team Average.
- VoW Avg (Value of Win Average.); This is the resume score. Good team vs. Good team will = Great ; Bad team vs. bad team = Awful
- I’ll also be putting up a number next to each extra curricular awards. This is the VoW, (Value of Win). It is a score that factors in the Team's performance vs. their Opponent's resume. A team with a large win vs. a great team will result in a great VoW.
- I can make the numbers simple for you to understand. Negative is bad, positive is good. The further the number is from 0, the more extreme it is. -5 is bad, +5 is good. 0 represents neither good nor bad. This is applicable to all the scores you'll see.
- You get points for playing well against good teams, win or lose. You'll get more for beating good teams, but there is no shame for losing to a good team - as long as it is actually a good team. If you're 4-0, but it's all against FCS teams and the New Mexicos, you'll probably have a decent Team Avg, but your Opp Avg is going to make an embarrassment out of your team.
- Prior to week 1, ALL FBS teams are equal. Previous years have no influence on the rankings.
- There are no bonus or penalty points for being in or absent in a BCS conference.
- A team's opponent's opponent's opponent's opponent's (potentiality infinite) score has influence on a team's perception. Meaning: Texas Tech's (Who played New Mexico, who played Oregon) score will influence Oregon's score.
- You now probably know more about my computer rankings than the ones that actually influence the BCS.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or the Addicted To Quack Moderators. FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable Oregon fans.
23 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Zona's schedule has been beyond BRUTAL. They've lost to respectable teams better than them.
I don’t think it can be inferred that they’re worse than UCLA, Colorado, Utah, or even WSU. That’s the only really off thing here…
Oregon loves you, Chip Kelly!
That’s your conception though. This is treating every team as equals at the beginning of the season and going off of existing results only.
I agree, Arizona’s schedule has been extremely brutal. But that’s only half of the formula. The other half is actual performance, which UCLA, Colorado, Utah, and WSU have out done.
It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck
Or is it INCEPTION?
Conspiracy, fire the Shufelt.
Euler's #1 fan
by Bill Musgrave on Oct 4, 2011 10:41 PM PDT up reply actions
Of course it is. And each person’s idea of what rankings are, is different. The only thing with this is that with a computer, it’s blind to exceptions and consistent with whatever bias is placed.
The same measurements that say “Alabama is great”, are the same ones that say “Arizona is not great”.
It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck
Your poll really hates Clemson despite them beating 2 quality opponents.
"And like lambs to the slaughter, the Braves take the field."- Skip Caray
by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Oct 4, 2011 5:35 PM PDT reply actions
2 quality opponents is only 2/5ths of Clemson’s resume. They still have Troy and a bad showing against FCS team Wofford as another 2/5ths.
That 8 point win over Wofford is really nagging them down. While every voter has forgotten about that, these rankings have not.
It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck
One addition:
The poll has a memory. So, it should be possible to revisit earlier games and revise their value, right? I’d like to see a rolling list of the value of all Oregon’s games. Now that LSU is looking really good, what’s the value of that game to Oregon according the the Shufelt poll? Does the Nevada win look better since they played a (relatively) close game with Boise? How bad is OAC’s loss to Sacramento State NOW?
STATEMENT! STATEMENT! STATEMENT!
Good luck, I'm still waiting for the Shufelt to make me a cup of coffee.
Lazy Shufelt, it’s not like there’s any work in this thing, just push a button and voila, right?
Euler's #1 fan
by Bill Musgrave on Oct 5, 2011 10:22 PM PDT up reply actions
It has.
There’s been a cup of fresh, hot coffee made every morning, just for you. Unfortunately, it’s in Oregon.
It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck
See, worthless. The Shuflelt needs to transport the coffee here.
Should have ice in it though, I’m not drinkin no hot coffee, no way no how right now.
Euler's #1 fan
by Bill Musgrave on Oct 6, 2011 12:42 PM PDT up reply actions
Indeed, that is entirely accurate. I’ll put that info together sometime this morning for you.
It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck
Here you go.
It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck
You should add a bowl peredictions
Just for the top 10 bowls or something. And maybe a predictions section where you predict top 25 matchups based on your rankings :)
Quack Quack Bitches!
I would like to have some sort of predictions or projections, but as it is – it takes well over 2 hours every week to do all this. Adding more predictive elements would probably double that.
When I get more time to try and streamline the inputting and outputting of data, I would like to take the time to move on to more of that sort of thing.
I might do one giant bowl season post after the championship week.
It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck
You should use these rankings at the end of the season
to pick all your games in the Bowl Mania contest at the end of the year. See how you do.
"the putz from that UO blog, Matt Daddy" - Steve Tannen
The Daily Faberian
I did that last year.
It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck
And how did you do?
"You could almost imagine Ducks coach Chip Kelly walking to midfield among the bloodied Bruins and shouting in his best gladiator voice, 'Are you not entertained?'" - Ted Miller
If you're adding functions, focus on the coffee transportation first.
WORK HARDER
Euler's #1 fan
by Bill Musgrave on Oct 6, 2011 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions

by 


















