Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Strikeforce: Cormier vs. Barnett Fight Video Highlights

Quack Fix: Previewing USC and wrapping up the Stanford win

What a game this weekend.  One more win and the Ducks will wrap up a spot in the inaugural Pac-12 championship game.  On to the quack. 

Don't forget to check out the videos after the jump.

Go Ducks!

Star-divide

 


Comment 318 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

The Pac 12 GOTC is on ESPN right now.

"What the hell was that?"
"Spaceball One, they've gone to plaid!"

by QuackinAK on Nov 15, 2011 7:32 AM PST reply actions  

Whatched it this morning before heading to work

What a fun game to watch.

I’m not making a bold prediction, but we believe we can win every football game.----Chip Kelly

by F'n Duck on Nov 15, 2011 7:36 AM PST up reply actions  

I bought mine.

I don’t know what the rest of these guys are doing.

Autzen Stadium: "The stadium with an L.A. face, but an Oakland Booty, if you will." -Spencer Hall

by ProbablyMonty on Nov 15, 2011 9:22 AM PST up reply actions  

I'm pretty excited, because I just found a website with a bunch of Oregon Ducks videos.

Alas, I have to work, so it’ll have to wait until I get home.

Lots o’ Ducks Videos here.

"What the hell was that?"
"Spaceball One, they've gone to plaid!"

by QuackinAK on Nov 15, 2011 8:02 AM PST reply actions  

Jason Peterson had a good Chip Kelly rant

On 750 the Game this morning as he was subbing for Chad Doing on the MSP. Great rant about how much of the criticism of Chip Kelly is ridiculous. He ranged pretty far from the media griping about closed practices to the can’t win the big game BS. That was my favorite part.

Of the 5 losses that Chip has had as a 3 year HC (and 31 wins so far I might add), how is it that none of pundits who bring up the “can’t win the big game” BS ever point out that 3 of those losses came to teams that NO ONE ELSE BEAT EITHER. Boise St in 2009, Auburn in 2010 were undefeated, and so far 2011 LSU hasn’t lost yet.

The only times Oregon has lost to a team that wasn’t undefeated, was a Jim Harbaugh coached Stanford team led by a guy named Andrew Luck (perhaps you’ve heard of him?), and a pretty good tOSU football team.

by NinjaDuck on Nov 15, 2011 8:13 AM PST reply actions  

Yeah, that's incredible. These are the teams he has lost to with final records.

Stanford 2009 (8-5)
tOSU 2009 (11-2)
BSU 2009 (14-0)
Auburn 2010 (14-0)
LSU 2011 (10-0)

Now with mustache guarantee!

by HoodRiverDuck on Nov 15, 2011 8:27 AM PST up reply actions  

And that Stanford team had Toby Gerhart on it too.

Along with Andrew Luck, they also got very, very lucky that day. Everything went their way and little went ours. tOSU also played their best game of the season against us (Pryor, Sanzenbacher, Posie, etc all had their best games; and I don’t think it was because our D was bad, they just had good days).

The “can’t win the big one thing” was like a baton that was unfairly passed to us by Coach Tressel and his buckeyes when they beat us. I don’t think it is something that really applies to us. The other thing is that Ohio St had been flat out dominated in a couple of those big games. Oregon has yet to look like an inferior team to any opponent since Chip took over as head coach. We’ve lost, but we have not been dominated. Not even close.

by NICKPAPAGEORGIOTHEDUCK on Nov 15, 2011 11:43 AM PST up reply actions  

I think it applies to us until we win a big game.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 15, 2011 12:16 PM PST up reply actions  

On the road at #4 Stanford doesn't count?

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 15, 2011 12:18 PM PST up reply actions  

Exactly

Its like the definition of “big game” changes and only applies to big games Oregon loses and not big games Oregon wins. Beating Stanford at home last year and on the road this year were both big games. Beating an SEC team on the road was a big game even if Tennessee is down. Beating USC in 2009 and last year were both big games. Beating the Beavs with the Rose Bowl on the line two years ago was a big game. Beating Arizona two years ago in double OT, also with the Rose Bowl on the line, was a big game.

Its funny how those games never seem to qualify as “big” games.

by NinjaDuck on Nov 15, 2011 2:41 PM PST up reply actions  

Ehhhhh…I define big games as bigger than that. I was using big game as equivocal to BCS bowl.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 15, 2011 2:48 PM PST up reply actions  

Co-signing here

Many of the games NinjaDuck mentioned were big games for the team and the program, but the “cant win the big one” tag that Nick mentioned has more to do with national attention. To shake it, the team is going to have to win a game against a highly ranked out of conference opponent that’s had time to prepare, as that’s what’s proven to be the only downfall of this team in taking the next step.

Who needs normal sleep patterns?

by AcadianTraverse on Nov 15, 2011 2:56 PM PST up reply actions  

Have we proven ourselves able to handle when they don’t have time to prepare?

"This season of Ole Miss football is a reminder to talk to your family now about what to do if you're in a persistent vegetative state." ~@celebrityhottub

by AllSaintsDay on Nov 15, 2011 3:04 PM PST up reply actions  

Funny how national detractors choose to ignore that argument isn’t it?

I hope Spencer Hall’s “Don’t play 3rd quarters with Oregon, ever.” catches on in some other circles.

Who needs normal sleep patterns?

by AcadianTraverse on Nov 15, 2011 3:14 PM PST up reply actions  

I like that bit

But I do agree that we have not won (in Chip Kelly era) a signature elite win — that is beating a BCS Bowl Opponent, or a top-five ooc opponent.

I would normally have ranked Stanford in that if Stanford had beaten an elite team themselves (I’m all about transitive properties), but Stanford was very suspect, having played a pitiful schedule. We had already beaten them to start with.

i.e.

We’ve proven ourselves King of the PAC-12 beyond question. Outside of that, we have not done well against national elite.

Oregon loves you, Chip Kelly!

by gamedaytribe on Nov 15, 2011 3:45 PM PST up reply actions  

And in games played at normal speed. The big games have so many long time outs, it is much harder for a tempo team to play their normal game.

Speed Endurance Talent is how Track Town USA plays football. Win The Day

by webfoot73 on Nov 15, 2011 7:25 PM PST up reply actions  

I've got this penny, and I've flipped it twice. It came up tails both times.

Man, it sucks that my coin can never come up heads.

Autzen Stadium: "The stadium with an L.A. face, but an Oakland Booty, if you will." -Spencer Hall

by ProbablyMonty on Nov 15, 2011 5:24 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Chip Kelly has lost control of Monty’s penny!

by DuckUntilDeath on Nov 15, 2011 5:25 PM PST up reply actions  

Not a math joke per se,

although I am researching probability theory, which was the inspiration for that part of my name.

Autzen Stadium: "The stadium with an L.A. face, but an Oakland Booty, if you will." -Spencer Hall

by ProbablyMonty on Nov 15, 2011 5:30 PM PST up reply actions  

It was Probably Monty’s penny. I’m not sure it actually is though.

It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck

by JShufelt on Nov 16, 2011 8:12 AM PST up reply actions  

Any relation to that Monty at U$C? The Fool Monte?

"What you are entrusted to do as a coach is to create an environment where your players have a chance to be successful." CHIP KELLY

by Famous Duck on Nov 16, 2011 6:36 PM PST up reply actions  

This would have been funnier

if I’d have said “can never come up heads in big flips.”

Autzen Stadium: "The stadium with an L.A. face, but an Oakland Booty, if you will." -Spencer Hall

by ProbablyMonty on Nov 15, 2011 5:31 PM PST up reply actions  

So…winning BCS bowl games is completely luck? I’m not saying there’ NO luck involved – there’s luck involved in every sporting event. But it certainly isn’t completely luck. And that small sample size thing is bogus as well. This is football. The entire season is a small sample size.

I love Kelly. I’m very glad he’s our coach. But he’s 0-2 in BCS bowls, and an additional 0-1 (0-2 if you want to count Boise in 09) against elite schools from other conferences. I don’t know why that is; maybe it’s the extra prep time thing. But I’d love to see him shed that label. Because right now, it’s deserved.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 15, 2011 11:05 PM PST up reply actions  

Why would Boise count, but not Stanford?

It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck

by JShufelt on Nov 16, 2011 8:13 AM PST up reply actions  

Because Stanford isn’t an elite school from another conference. That’s the knock on Kelly – that he’s fine within the Pac 10/12, but can’t win the big OOC games.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 16, 2011 9:54 AM PST up reply actions  

The conference v. non-conference distinctions just seems really arbitrary to me.

I think that Stanford was, both this year and last year, a better team than several of the OOC games we lost (tOSU, and quite likely Boise). Yet they don’t count, and it’s a reason I just don’t buy.

Autzen Stadium: "The stadium with an L.A. face, but an Oakland Booty, if you will." -Spencer Hall

by ProbablyMonty on Nov 16, 2011 11:25 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Agreed

It reminds me of Red’s speech in “Shawshank Redemption”:

“I know what you think it means, sonny. To me it’s just a made up word. A politician’s word, so young fellas like yourself can wear a suit and a tie, and have a job….”

A “big game” is whatever they think it is, OOC or not.

by DuckUntilDeath on Nov 16, 2011 12:06 PM PST up reply actions  

In that case, this debate is silly, because my definition of big game is different than yours. But it’s a pretty common concept around the college football world that out of conference games take on a bigger meaning because of their rarity. Those are the games when you can break out of transitive property hell and actually prove something. I only buy that to a certain extent, but still, it would be nice to win one.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 16, 2011 1:46 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm not trying to sound too Kelly-esque (ala "face-less opponent") here, but I think every game is a big game.

You can only do your best to prepare. If players think the game is too big for them, they’re right.

What you call “luck,” I call variables outside of your control (weather, gravity, physics, crappy refereeing, etc.). How you play the ball is more important than how it bounces.

We didn’t respect the hoerses as an opponent and it bit us in the arse. Pryor had the game of his life in the Rose Bowl. The Natty was one of the best football games I’ve ever seen. We lost on a shitty, shitty call and because we didn’t have the ball last. I was (and still am) incredibly proud of how we played. LSU was a derp-fest. It happens. These are kids. Kids aren’t perfect. I admire their ability to spring back up after making big mistakes.

I’m not a fan of the “extended time to prepare” argument, since we also have the same time to prepare. Also, we do more than just out-scheme an opponent.

There’s a lot here I’m responding to that you didn’t say-so, sorry for that.

by DuckUntilDeath on Nov 16, 2011 2:55 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Your best post ever. I not just becuz I agree (and I do.) This post exudes passion..

"What you are entrusted to do as a coach is to create an environment where your players have a chance to be successful." CHIP KELLY

by Famous Duck on Nov 16, 2011 6:40 PM PST up reply actions  

And not..

Anyhow, good work, passion, experience and intelligence.

"What you are entrusted to do as a coach is to create an environment where your players have a chance to be successful." CHIP KELLY

by Famous Duck on Nov 16, 2011 6:41 PM PST up reply actions  

The weather forecast is looking promising in Eugene this Saturday.

"I don't do well with pain medicine."

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Nov 15, 2011 8:15 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

Predicting the weather more than 3 days out is a fool's game.

"What the hell was that?"
"Spaceball One, they've gone to plaid!"

by QuackinAK on Nov 15, 2011 8:24 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

How was that arctic hurricane? as awful as predicted?

by sacduxnutz on Nov 15, 2011 9:07 AM PST up reply actions  

It got pretty bad

But nobody was hurt. There’s some pretty cool footage from Little Diomede Island that is pretty impressive. On a side note, that’s Russia in the distance, which can be seen from someone’s back yard.

"What the hell was that?"
"Spaceball One, they've gone to plaid!"

by QuackinAK on Nov 15, 2011 12:39 PM PST up reply actions  

OR snow rules

In the big cities, it only snows when they fail to predict it.

So no snow…

"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely

by skywaker9 on Nov 15, 2011 10:42 AM PST up reply actions  

TonyDiFrancisco Tony Di Francisco
Early forecast for Oregon-USC game is Rain/Snow showers with a low of 28 degrees

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 15, 2011 11:07 AM PST up reply actions  

It may not rain in Autzen...

…But I guess we’ll find out if it snows.

by NinjaDuck on Nov 15, 2011 11:09 AM PST up reply actions  

that’s great recruiting weather

Speed Endurance Talent is how Track Town USA plays football. Win The Day

by webfoot73 on Nov 15, 2011 7:28 PM PST up reply actions  

Chalk up another loss for the Huskies!

"I don't do well with pain medicine."

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Nov 15, 2011 9:06 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Yeah I’m pretty pissed about that too, I haven’t watched Whitney(even though I like her on Chelsea Lately) because the commercials make it seem like it’s a lame show. They should of benched that or The Office since I read it sucks without Steve Carell. At least they kept Parks & Rec on

by The Legend on Nov 15, 2011 10:00 AM PST up reply actions  

I am actually enjoying the Office this season more than I have in two years. Steve Carell was good, but the show got too over the top the last few seasons with his character. Or maybe it was that they were doing the same stuff and it got old.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 15, 2011 10:42 AM PST up reply actions  

Wow! Interesting.

The Office has been much worse in my opinion, but it’s good to know there are dissenters out there. (Seriously.)

Autzen Stadium: "The stadium with an L.A. face, but an Oakland Booty, if you will." -Spencer Hall

by ProbablyMonty on Nov 15, 2011 10:45 AM PST up reply actions  

Objectively speaking, the show is probably “worse” from an acting and story standpoint. But my particular thing when I watch sitcoms is that I can’t stand when they make me feel embarrassed for the characters in them. Steve Carell’s character did so many stupid, embarrassing things that it made me feel uncomfortable. It stopped being funny and became painful. It seemed that this was a lot worse than it had been in earlier seasons.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 15, 2011 11:17 AM PST up reply actions  

Me too

I’m with you all the way. I can’t watch the Office, couldn’t stand the Tom Green show on MTV back in the day, nor can I watch Jackass, nor Borat. Anytime the Daily Show, or Colbert do that kind of comedy it annoys me. I hate comedy where the humor is based of embarrasment or making fun of people how don’t know they are being made fun of.

I can’t stand that stuff.

by NinjaDuck on Nov 15, 2011 12:09 PM PST up reply actions  

So… you don’t like my jokes.

Well, you don’t have to watch my TV show! So Pthththththt!

It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck

by JShufelt on Nov 15, 2011 4:04 PM PST up reply actions  

You apparently haven't watched the original BBC version of The Office.

The whole point of that version is David Brent (“Michael Scott”) being the most cringe-worthy person on the face of the planet.

Ducks GOOOOD. Fuskies BAAAAAD.

by BigGreenWreckingMachine on Nov 15, 2011 12:16 PM PST up reply actions  

I have not. I really don’t like cringing during sitcoms.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 15, 2011 12:18 PM PST up reply actions  

I loved that show for many years

but sometimes I actually had to turn the channel.

ATQ's #1 fan of ATQ Guys

by daisyduck on Nov 15, 2011 3:29 PM PST up reply actions  

Definitely one to watch with others

It’s much more fun to be shocked at the discomfort and experience it with someone else than to cringe at the screen by yourself.

Save the sappy, sorta-good sitcoms for that

"If you type two spaces after a period, you're doing it wrong."

by joelor on Nov 15, 2011 3:36 PM PST up reply actions  

So. Painful.

I don’t have HBO, but got Season One for Christmas a few years back. I sat through it once, thought it was brilliant, and never wanted to sit through another episode.

Now with mustache guarantee!

by HoodRiverDuck on Nov 15, 2011 3:54 PM PST up reply actions  

Actually The Office is better than it was the past couple of years.

Carrell had turned “Michael Scott” into a caricature by the end (other than the last couple episodes, in which he was great). “Robert California” was the right way to go, resisting the urge to replicate Michael Scott and instead introducing his polar opposite.

Ducks GOOOOD. Fuskies BAAAAAD.

by BigGreenWreckingMachine on Nov 15, 2011 11:10 AM PST up reply actions  

I'm with you here

Last week I fell off the couch when Dwight grabbed Jim’s crotch.

Michael Jackson: A million dollars. You feel me? Holla!

by Babablockhead on Nov 15, 2011 12:14 PM PST up reply actions  

IAWTP

The "Beano Cook" of ATQ.

by benzduck on Nov 15, 2011 5:30 PM PST up reply actions  

I Almost Want Tajaun Porter?

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 15, 2011 6:08 PM PST up reply actions  

I Actually Wet The Pan

It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck

by JShufelt on Nov 16, 2011 8:14 AM PST up reply actions  

I'm not a big fan of Community, I'll admit.

It’s not bad, but it’s very “meh” for me.

Keeping Whitney on air, while taking Community off, is an outrageously egregious programming error. This is the kind of stuff that, were I to actually hold stock in NBC, would make me strongly rethink that decision.

Autzen Stadium: "The stadium with an L.A. face, but an Oakland Booty, if you will." -Spencer Hall

by ProbablyMonty on Nov 15, 2011 10:06 AM PST up reply actions  

I'm sure Whitney makes more money for the network

but it’s just hard for me to see past how unwatchably bad the show is. A network that carries this type of terrible, cater-to-the-masses programming (COUGH COUGH CBS COUGH) may well make more money, but I don’t want them to dumb down our culture by using my money, if that makes sense.

Autzen Stadium: "The stadium with an L.A. face, but an Oakland Booty, if you will." -Spencer Hall

by ProbablyMonty on Nov 15, 2011 12:02 PM PST up reply actions  

It has a higher rating, but that doesn’t account for the fact that it’s losing about 1/3 of the office viewers, even though it has no competition in the 9:30 time slot. So it’s not even necessarily making more money. It’s just as big (if not bigger) of a ratings flop than Community.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Nov 15, 2011 12:07 PM PST up reply actions  

Don't watch it then.

I certainly don’t. Remember, the TV-watching masses are responsible for everything related to “Two And A Half Men.” Yeesh.

Ducks GOOOOD. Fuskies BAAAAAD.

by BigGreenWreckingMachine on Nov 15, 2011 12:18 PM PST up reply actions  

Oh, don't worry.

I definitely don’t watch it.

Autzen Stadium: "The stadium with an L.A. face, but an Oakland Booty, if you will." -Spencer Hall

by ProbablyMonty on Nov 15, 2011 1:14 PM PST up reply actions  

I actually like Whitney.

My relationship status is exactly the same as the main couple on the show, so it’s topical to me personally. I get why it isn’t widely well-received though.

Addicted to Quack, #1 Oregon blog among female Duck fans, including the ageless and ever-radiant daisyduck.

by Takimoto on Nov 15, 2011 4:07 PM PST up reply actions  

We've been watching Whitney, too.

And every week we have a debate about whether to delete it from the auto-DVR.

Another show we tried this year was “Up All Night” because Christina Applegate is (well, used to be) hot and Will Arnett is awesome. Unfortunately the show is unwatchable.

Michael Jackson: A million dollars. You feel me? Holla!

by Babablockhead on Nov 15, 2011 4:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Disagree

The first two episodes were shit, so my wife and I gave up on it. Then we were bored and checked it out On Demand, and it’s a good show besides those first two episodes.

I know where I come from, and when you always have in mind where you come from the rest will be easy. I think the rest will be easy.

-- M. Rivera

by GMan83201 on Nov 15, 2011 4:31 PM PST up reply actions  

OK,

Maybe we’ll give it another try. Thanks!

Michael Jackson: A million dollars. You feel me? Holla!

by Babablockhead on Nov 15, 2011 4:37 PM PST up reply actions  

The series follows Whitney Cummings, as she portrays a fictionalized version of herself, and her very supportive live-in boyfriend. Even though the two have decided that they will not commit to marriage, she does question how committed they are in their 3-year relationship and tries to go as far to prove a point; she begins to fear what she sees as “relationship boredom” and worries what will happen next that could possibly end her relationship. Because of what she sees and hears around her involving other relationships, she decides to use unconventional methods to keep the romantic flames glowing with the help of her close friends.

link

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 15, 2011 6:01 PM PST up reply actions  

Never had a desire to watch either

Maybe I’m missing out, but I doubt it.

My parents believed in me.

by flyduckfly on Nov 15, 2011 6:03 PM PST up reply actions  

We're not as good as we were?

Hmm Okay… This is terrible for us, seeing as this is the best SC team that has ever played.

by win_the_day on Nov 15, 2011 9:03 AM PST reply actions  

To be fair

We’ve already lost more games this year than we had at this point last year

But you are all the smartest, funniest, most handsome bitches on all the internets.~DaisyDuck 11.2.11

by Quack Addict on Nov 15, 2011 9:21 AM PST up reply actions  

If we manage to win out the rest of the season including bowl game

We’ll have more wins than any other team in Oregon football history

by Jonathan Wright on Nov 15, 2011 11:19 AM PST up reply actions  

I was thinking about this today

If we’d kept our OOC game with Utah, and somehow met Ucla in the P12CG, we’d have beaten all 11 teams in the conference in a single year. That would have been impressive.

"the putz from that UO blog, Matt Daddy" - Steve Tannen
The Daily Faberian

by Matt Daddy on Nov 15, 2011 11:45 AM PST up reply actions  

We smoked it all +

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 15, 2011 11:57 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Stanford

I thought Stanford got a little too cute with the longer grass, seemed to work against them more than us. Anyone think they will try that again in the future.

by 44 Desert Eagle on Nov 15, 2011 9:36 AM PST reply actions  

They'll keep trying it

And honestly, there’s precedent for it sucking; it did hurt Oregon in the NCG.

But I also think that we got used to it there and learned what to do about it. And it won’t hurt us again all that much.

That is something I think these Ducks and Kelly do better than almost anyone – a strategy that works once is going to be mitigated fairly quickly. The Ducks are like the Borg in that respect. Sure, they’ll get hit a couple times but then they’ll adapt, and it won’t work. Most adaptations happen in a game, often by the first half.

by kalon on Nov 15, 2011 10:03 AM PST up reply actions  

WE ARE THE DUCKS.

YOU WILL BE ASSIMILATED.

WE WILL ADD YOUR SCHEMATIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL DISTINCTIONS TO OUR OWN.

YOUR RECRUITS WILL ADAPT TO SERVE US.

RESISTANCE IS FUTILE.

Autzen Stadium: "The stadium with an L.A. face, but an Oakland Booty, if you will." -Spencer Hall

by ProbablyMonty on Nov 15, 2011 10:09 AM PST up reply actions   2 recs

I had the biggest crush on him

when I was like 10 yrs old.

ATQ's #1 fan of ATQ Guys

by daisyduck on Nov 15, 2011 11:08 AM PST up reply actions  

me too

Oregon loves you, Chip Kelly!

by gamedaytribe on Nov 15, 2011 6:04 PM PST up reply actions  

Hesaasum.

Invented that baby carrying sling too.

Euler's #1 fan

by Bill Musgrave on Nov 15, 2011 6:16 PM PST up reply actions  

It worked in the NCG because it was new turf

So it was slippery as hell.

"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely

by skywaker9 on Nov 15, 2011 10:43 AM PST up reply actions  

It was interesting to see LaMike

Do spin moves instead of planting a foot and cutting on the farm. Did it several times on one play if memory serves…

Both gold and muck come out of the same shaft...

by Fishdude on Nov 15, 2011 1:54 PM PST up reply actions  

Thanks for Quack!

Good stuff today :)

Go Ducks!

ssshhh....

by OregOnDucks on Nov 15, 2011 9:56 AM PST reply actions  

I am glad that you linked to the story about temporary seating at Autzen.

I drove by there on Sunday, and couldn’t figure out what the scaffolding on the north side was supposed to be for.

I'm super thanks for asking! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPNna_f4P4Y

by CaDuck on Nov 15, 2011 11:22 AM PST reply actions  

Matt Barkley

Has a Cliff Harris mouth without any of charm or moxie to back it up. He just comes of looking dim…like a dumb blonde, as much as I hate to say it.

ATQ's #1 fan of ATQ Guys

by daisyduck on Nov 15, 2011 11:39 AM PST reply actions  

Has there ever been a game

Under Chip Kelly’s tenure that the fans felt that the team was “unprepared” for a game?

The fact I can’t even think of one at the top of my head just shows how great Chip Kelly has been the past three years.

While I was typing the Boise State comes to mind, but I think it had a lot to do with Boise being a great team (pains me to say it) than our team being unprepared.

by skyo12 on Nov 15, 2011 12:15 PM PST reply actions  

Stanford ’09?

"I don't do well with pain medicine."

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Nov 15, 2011 12:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Do you think we were prepared defensively?

"I don't do well with pain medicine."

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Nov 15, 2011 12:20 PM PST up reply actions  

They flat out made some awesome plays lol

That’s the way I remember it… and Masoli starting REALLY slow.

by skyo12 on Nov 15, 2011 12:29 PM PST up reply actions  

I don’t know if there was anything we could have done to prepare better defensively.

It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck

by JShufelt on Nov 15, 2011 4:07 PM PST up reply actions  

Our team was unprepared for that game, on both sides of the ball.

They were riding high on USC, and did not practice well that week, or play well during the game. Yeah, give Stanford credit, they exploited the weaknesses, but that was not a well-prepared Oregon team.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Nov 15, 2011 12:34 PM PST up reply actions  

Yep, exactly.

"I don't do well with pain medicine."

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Nov 15, 2011 12:35 PM PST up reply actions  

I do remember Chip mentioning

There was only one bad week of practice since he’s been a HC and it was for that game. Probably a combination of us being a bit unprepared and Stanford playing lights out.

by skyo12 on Nov 15, 2011 12:51 PM PST up reply actions  

Our defense was sure prepared for Boise State.

They played brilliantly that night.

Maybe the next most prominent example was the Rose Bowl in 2010? Our defense played decently well (yet still allowed the best game of Terrelle Pryor’s career), but our offense seemingly looked lost against their size the entire game. Masoli had one of those "I forgot how to pass the football’ games.

All in all, we were just flat out beat by a physical Ohio State team. I doubt anybody knows if preparation had anything to do with that.

I'm super thanks for asking! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPNna_f4P4Y

by CaDuck on Nov 15, 2011 12:20 PM PST up reply actions  

Pryor's "best game of his career...."

…consisted of him throwing up ill-advised passes and his receivers managing to out-jump our DB’s for them. I still can’t believe his luck that day.

Ducks GOOOOD. Fuskies BAAAAAD.

by BigGreenWreckingMachine on Nov 15, 2011 12:22 PM PST up reply actions  

Pretty much, but it still happened.

He was able to scramble for a first down far too many times on a third and long. It seemed like this happened at least once per drive. I do put that on the defense.

I'm super thanks for asking! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPNna_f4P4Y

by CaDuck on Nov 15, 2011 12:23 PM PST up reply actions  

I think that has nothing to do with preparation, and everything to do with the fact that bringing down a QB that tall, fast, and strong is incredibly difficult. He was throwing off Kenny Rowe like he was a rag doll.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Nov 15, 2011 12:37 PM PST up reply actions  

That begs this question…

Was our team that limited Cam Newton to 64 yards on 22 carriers last year more physically stout than the previous year’s defense, or were they better prepared against him than they were for Pryor?

"I don't do well with pain medicine."

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Nov 15, 2011 12:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Both.

It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck

by JShufelt on Nov 15, 2011 4:08 PM PST up reply actions  

Right.

There is no doubt that he is an athletic anomaly. But his freakish athleticism by no means assures that he is unstoppable on every damn third and long.

I'm super thanks for asking! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPNna_f4P4Y

by CaDuck on Nov 15, 2011 3:12 PM PST up reply actions  

Masoli was Masoli in that game. Oregon was prepared, but Ohio State prepared just as well, and exploited out offensive limitations with Masoli as QB.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Nov 15, 2011 12:36 PM PST up reply actions  

Boise State is the one that pops in my head. There are a lot of extenuating circumstances (the main one being that it was Chip’s first game as head coach), but I don’t think the game plan in that game was very good. I also don’t think the coaching staff had a very good game last year against Auburn.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 15, 2011 12:21 PM PST up reply actions  

Hard to say.

Sometimes a loss is just a loss.

Ducks GOOOOD. Fuskies BAAAAAD.

by BigGreenWreckingMachine on Nov 15, 2011 12:22 PM PST up reply actions  

That’s how I treat the Rose Bowl and Stanford ’09. Sometimes, you just get beat. In the Rose Bowl, Pryor went off. Against Stanford, our defense played terribly.

Against Boise and Auburn, I think we were too slow to adjust and adapt the game plan.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 15, 2011 1:00 PM PST up reply actions  

Boise

Boise, Boise, Boise.

We ran OZRs 5 yards in the end zone with Blount. We never looked comfortable in offense at any point.

WE DID NOT PLAY LAMICHAEL JAMES ONCE.

Defensively we played lights out, but our offense looked confused as hell and so did Kelly.

by kalon on Nov 15, 2011 12:31 PM PST up reply actions  

LaMichael had a few carries.

"I don't do well with pain medicine."

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Nov 15, 2011 12:33 PM PST up reply actions  

Really?

Thought it was Crenshaw.

And huh – looking at the box score you’re right. 2 Carries, 22 yards:
http://espn.go.com/ncf/boxscore?gameId=292460068

Blount had 8 though. In retrospect that was way too many by comparison.

by kalon on Nov 15, 2011 12:34 PM PST up reply actions  

What did you expect though?

Masoli made bad decisions all night and Blount was a proven starter coming off a record setting year in terms of rushing TDs.

Just be glad he went bonkers and threw that punch that propelled LMJ’s career.

by skyo12 on Nov 15, 2011 12:36 PM PST up reply actions  

Blount

I never thought of Blount as a starter. He was the guy they put in after the D got tired of chasing JJ around. JJ sure was fun to watch,esp. the 08 Civil War

by 44 Desert Eagle on Nov 15, 2011 12:41 PM PST up reply actions  

The dude was a nut case

But he was a beast when given enough carries. His clinching TD run at AZ and the last TD rush during the Holiday Bowl when he was dragging a couple guys into the end zone AFTER hurdling a defender comes to mind.

by skyo12 on Nov 15, 2011 12:44 PM PST up reply actions  

Blount was great

but he was great as a change of pace back. You can’t feature him, especially on a team that’s built on speed.

But you needed both aspects – the speed and the power. And against BSU, we needed the speed more than anything.

by kalon on Nov 15, 2011 12:45 PM PST up reply actions  

Our Oline got blown up a lot during that game too

So I can’t say with confidence that running LMJ more would have changed the outcome that much.

Blount’s the featured back in the NFL right now so I don’t really see him as a “change of pace” back.

by skyo12 on Nov 15, 2011 12:48 PM PST up reply actions  

The NFL isn't the same as the Kelly offense

I’m not saying Blount isn’t good ,but what he is is not fast. He couldn’t hit the edges, and LMJ can.

One of the reasons that we lost was because we had almost no explosive plays and almost no good runs on first and second down. The Kelly offense still struggles with that now, but back then forcing Masoli into a passing down was very, very dicey. And a big reason for that was that our IZRs and OZRs simply got blown up every time because by the time Blount made his cut there were guys in his face.

He had 8 carries for -5 yards with a long of 10. That means 7 carries went for -15 yards in total. That’s what killed us. Make those even non-negative plays and we’re sustaining drives and getting better field position.

Another way to put it is this: knowing what we do now about how great LMJ is, can you reasonably state that running him more would be a bad plan?

by kalon on Nov 15, 2011 12:56 PM PST up reply actions  

He could have definitely improved the run game a bit...

But fBSU was just that good on Defense that year and Masoli was just that horrible that game. I was just saying it’s hard to say that LMJ playing more would have affected the outcome of that game by that much.

I get your point though.

by skyo12 on Nov 15, 2011 12:59 PM PST up reply actions  

Blount

Never was that big on him.
In the 09 Utah game when James started coming on, I had an “expert” behind me and he kept telling his friend that Chip needs to run “this and that”. I wanted to tell him to shut up, or to go down and tell Chip how to run his team. lol
James was starting to get the ball and getting good runs, I was yelling “give him the ball again” over and over. Kid worked out all right

by 44 Desert Eagle on Nov 15, 2011 1:03 PM PST up reply actions  

As a person, who knows

But as a player, I thought the dude was a stud

This and This

by skyo12 on Nov 15, 2011 1:11 PM PST up reply actions  

The gameplan for that game was awful. James should have had the ball way more, especially on flysweeps. BSU did not have the speed to handle him outside.

That one was really on the coaching staff, though that’s sort of understandable. That was the first game Chip was calling plays from the sidelines, and I think it took a couple games for everything to come together from a playcalling standpoint.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Nov 15, 2011 12:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, I get it too

There are lots of reasons for it to be bad. Kelly’s first game as a head coach, lots of new coaches in general, BSU is a hard place to play, etc. It’s telling that Aliotti’s plan was pretty much spot on as far as stopping BSU (only TCU did better against them, and TCU had a monster defense) but our offense was just confused as hell.

And running Blount in OZRs when they’re beating our line off the snap is just pain mixed with more pain.

I think BSU’s a game like LSU was this year; if we got to play them again at the end of the year it’s a totally different story.

by kalon on Nov 15, 2011 12:44 PM PST up reply actions  

Again, it's funny

At the time I was so very, very angry at Kelly. Angry at him for the embarrassment of the football program, angry at him for showing how unprepared we were, angry at him for not being able to rein in the emotions and how he handled Blount. I was angrier about the Duck football program than I can remember ever being – even after that horrible season where we lost to Indiana at the start of the season on the road. This made me downright miserable.

But Kelly won me over with the check sent to the guy who went to the game.

by kalon on Nov 15, 2011 12:47 PM PST up reply actions  

Boise in 2009 by a mile....

I’ve heard from a couple different people that coaches weren’t on the same page and after the game the coaches had a pretty intense meeting to figure out what the hell happened.

by ppilot on Nov 15, 2011 12:38 PM PST up reply actions  

Purdue and Utah 2009

   We came away with wins but those two games following the Boise game sure were ugly and dysfunctional. I don’t know what happened in those games, weather the players wern’t prepared or what. Maybe it was just a transition phase between new systems, but I was seriously concerned about Oregon’s future after the first three weeks of the season. Weather could be made an excuse for Utah, but Purdue out played us in that game.

by FlaDuck on Nov 15, 2011 12:58 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah

I remember the big wins in 2009 (Cal, UW, Arizona and USC) but I always seem to forget that the start of the season made us look fairly mortal. We got outplayed and bailed out by luck and by special teams against Purdue, and I don’t even know what the deal was against Utah. I guess that’s why 42-3 was so surprising against Cal; up until that point we looked basically meh as hell and that was charitable, and then we go out and destroy a team that was our nemesis for so long?

Craziness.

I think part of it was getting used to the post-Blount world. Barner and LMJ weren’t the feature backs to start the season and LMJ was a redshirt freshman. It was clear that he was pretty special but I think it took a while for Kelly to make him the guy (or for LMJ to get that he was the guy). And Masoli – I really liked him, but he was inconsistent. Very inconsistent.

by kalon on Nov 15, 2011 1:05 PM PST up reply actions  

I agree

Masoli never was much of a down field passer.

by 44 Desert Eagle on Nov 15, 2011 1:09 PM PST up reply actions  

He had his moments though. He looked great against USC and Cal that year.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 15, 2011 1:24 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm in complete agreement here

The three out of conference games to open the 09 season were struggles. The team did not seem to be on the same page until Utah, and was still trying to right itself while having to answer Blount-punch questions. But once they got to conference play, things clicked.

Who needs normal sleep patterns?

by AcadianTraverse on Nov 15, 2011 3:03 PM PST up reply actions  

The Cal game in 2009 was the turning point of the program. That seems to be when they finally bought into what Kelly was saying in terms of preparation, and saw the dividends on the field.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Nov 15, 2011 3:05 PM PST up reply actions  

Oh man, I totally forgot about that. What a disaster that was.

Knowing what has unfolded over the past couple years, it’s really interesting to go back and read this article.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Nov 15, 2011 5:45 PM PST up reply actions  

goose bumps...

I love Chip Kelly

"the putz from that UO blog, Matt Daddy" - Steve Tannen
The Daily Faberian

by Matt Daddy on Nov 15, 2011 7:27 PM PST up reply actions  

The line about "buying into it" is my favorite.

It’s just so clear that toward the end of his third year, the players totally do.

(And also, Cliff Harris is there.)

Autzen Stadium: "The stadium with an L.A. face, but an Oakland Booty, if you will." -Spencer Hall

by ProbablyMonty on Nov 15, 2011 7:34 PM PST up reply actions  

Where did you find this?

"I don't do well with pain medicine."

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Nov 15, 2011 8:05 PM PST up reply actions  

It was in the thing that Jared linked.

Autzen Stadium: "The stadium with an L.A. face, but an Oakland Booty, if you will." -Spencer Hall

by ProbablyMonty on Nov 15, 2011 8:09 PM PST up reply actions  

I feel ready for battle!

It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck

by JShufelt on Nov 16, 2011 8:16 AM PST up reply actions  

Reminds me of the scaffolding seats that are always behind Goss Stadium in Corvallis.

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 15, 2011 1:23 PM PST up reply actions  

this.

But you are all the smartest, funniest, most handsome bitches on all the internets.~DaisyDuck 11.2.11

by Quack Addict on Nov 15, 2011 1:25 PM PST up reply actions  

No doubt

Some drunk fool (5:00pm kick off!!) is going to fall off the top of those things for certain. Maybe the SRO on top comes with carabiners and ropes.

ATQ's #1 fan of ATQ Guys

by daisyduck on Nov 15, 2011 2:32 PM PST up reply actions  

and a spotter.

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 15, 2011 2:32 PM PST up reply actions  

Maybe they'll have a guy

with a breathalyzer standing in front of the stairs leading up to the top.

ATQ's #1 fan of ATQ Guys

by daisyduck on Nov 15, 2011 2:35 PM PST up reply actions  

If they don't have them on the Space Needle

they won’t have them there.

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 15, 2011 3:26 PM PST up reply actions  

I totally want to watch a game from up there in the cold snowy air.

If Shufelt JPDX and I didn’t die in the rafters of Husky Stadium, we wont die there.

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 15, 2011 1:29 PM PST up reply actions  

There aren’t any stairs or ladders to get up there. You have to be dropped in via Giant Eagle. You can pay $50 extra to be given a ride by Gwaihir the Windlord himself.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 15, 2011 1:27 PM PST up reply actions  

Giant Eagle?

"I don't do well with pain medicine."

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Nov 15, 2011 1:29 PM PST up reply actions  

This is what I thought of

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 15, 2011 1:29 PM PST up reply actions  

Sigh…forgive them Tolkien. They know not what they do.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 15, 2011 1:31 PM PST up reply actions   2 recs

o

Now with mustache guarantee!

by HoodRiverDuck on Nov 15, 2011 1:34 PM PST up reply actions  

To quote Book-A-Minute

Frodo The Ring has been destroyed, but now we will die in Mordor.
Sam Buck up, Master Frodo.
(A bunch of feathered DEUS EX MACHINAS[sic] come out of NOWHERE and save EVERYBODY.)

THE END

"This season of Ole Miss football is a reminder to talk to your family now about what to do if you're in a persistent vegetative state." ~@celebrityhottub

by AllSaintsDay on Nov 15, 2011 2:21 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

/threadover

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 15, 2011 2:23 PM PST up reply actions  

Why is the thread over?

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 15, 2011 2:25 PM PST up reply actions  

We've obviously just gone through the entire LOTR series in a minute.

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 15, 2011 2:26 PM PST up reply actions  

Which about fits the attention span of kids these days. Actually, a minute might be generous.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 15, 2011 2:32 PM PST up reply actions  

HEY! I TAKE OFFENSE TO THA...

SQUIRREL!!!

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 15, 2011 2:33 PM PST up reply actions  

Oh sweet mother of god

^ NERD ALERT ^
l l
l l
l l
l l
l l
l l

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 15, 2011 2:41 PM PST up reply actions  

And lets not forget the rescue of the body of Fingolfin

by Thorondor, lord of eagles, following Fingolfin’s defeat at the hands of Morgoth before the gates of Angband.

Somewhere, somehow, a Duck is watching you.

by omb on Nov 15, 2011 2:42 PM PST up reply actions  

This is a great point.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 15, 2011 2:47 PM PST up reply actions  

I love the Silmarillion

Been ages since I read it though. Nice references there.

by NinjaDuck on Nov 15, 2011 2:56 PM PST up reply actions  

You know, I would complain about the book I’m reading now, but then I look at this and realize that it could be way worse.

Sorry Gorby, omb, and everyone else-it’s just not my thing.

"I don't do well with pain medicine."

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Nov 15, 2011 2:58 PM PST up reply actions  

No one’s perfect. Although if what omb said above turned you off, attention spans are even shorter than I thought. There are so many great stories in The Silmarillion, and Unfinished Tales, and The Children of Hurin…I can understand Tolkien’s writing style not being everyone’s thing. That’s unfortunate, but it’s not surprising. But if you can adapt to his style, his stories are amazing.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 15, 2011 3:01 PM PST up reply actions  

I read all of the History of Middle Earth series,

and a good way through the History of the Lord of the Rings section before I went off to serious school and ran out of time, and I loved it. But I would recommend them to pretty much no one that I know.

Somewhere, somehow, a Duck is watching you.

by omb on Nov 15, 2011 3:03 PM PST up reply actions  

I have not yet gotten to the History of Middle Earth. I will at some point.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 15, 2011 3:05 PM PST up reply actions  

Had to read the Hobbit in 6th grade

And I’ve tried LOR once or twice but I couldn’t get into it. I guess I’m not really into the fantasy genre.

ATQ's #1 fan of ATQ Guys

by daisyduck on Nov 15, 2011 3:04 PM PST up reply actions  

I wouldn't simply decry Tolkein-dislike as an attention span problem.

This is coming as a fan of the books and the movies. I tried some other Middle Earth stuff, and was turned off quickly. For a lot of reasons. One, it’s more like reading nonfiction work about a fictional place. Two, pages of extended verse are not my thing for the same reason musicals are not my thing. Add the fact that said verse is often in one of say, three or four made-up languages, and you’re going to turn off a significant portion of your audience.

Now with mustache guarantee!

by HoodRiverDuck on Nov 15, 2011 3:16 PM PST up reply actions  

WE'RE PLAYING USC IN 5 DAYS

STOP FOCUSING ON MMORPG GAME-STYLE NOVELS AND PANIC!!!

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 15, 2011 3:18 PM PST up reply actions  

"mmorpg game-style novels"?

“MMORPG GAME-STYLE NOVELS”?
What the hell is the world coming to? LAWN. OFF. NOW.

Somewhere, somehow, a Duck is watching you.

by omb on Nov 15, 2011 3:31 PM PST up reply actions  

YOU AREN'T MY MUSGRAVE

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 15, 2011 3:35 PM PST up reply actions  

Life imitating art imitating life?

OR HAVE YOU SIMPLY BEEN BODYSPRAYED?

Now with mustache guarantee!

by HoodRiverDuck on Nov 15, 2011 3:48 PM PST up reply actions  

I was being more facetious with that attention span comment than anything. And I’m actually with you on a lot of the verse/poetry stuff. It’s not my thing. I power through it because I love the story-telling so much, and it’s an important part of the story-telling.

I do, however, love the history part of the Silmarillion, including the creation mythology and how the Valar and Maiar shaped the world. And as a minor etymology nerd, I love that he developed his own languages. My wife and I own a book about the linguistical construction of elven languages. Fascinating stuff, to me.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 15, 2011 3:24 PM PST up reply actions  

I definitely understand the appeal.

I just like my fiction more, umm…fictitious? I don’t really even like historical fiction.

In fact, there are actually very few fantasy novels I have liked. Hobbit/LOTR and Earthsea Cycle are the only two series that really jump out as favorites (unless you count Harry Potter).

Now with mustache guarantee!

by HoodRiverDuck on Nov 15, 2011 3:53 PM PST up reply actions  

This is me too. I liked the Hobbit okay, didn’t really like LOTR, but loved Harry Potter (which, before you have a heart attack Gorby, I realize is totally different). But come to think of it, I don’t really read a ton of fiction. Just a little bit, and never fantasy.

ATQ's #1 fan of ATQ Guys

by daisyduck on Nov 15, 2011 4:13 PM PST up reply actions  

In what sense? You don’t understand his popularity? Or you don’t understand his writing?

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 15, 2011 3:06 PM PST up reply actions  

I understand it...

But I don’t like it.

It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck

by JShufelt on Nov 15, 2011 4:26 PM PST up reply actions  

I love Tolkien but nonetheless this.

"This season of Ole Miss football is a reminder to talk to your family now about what to do if you're in a persistent vegetative state." ~@celebrityhottub

by AllSaintsDay on Nov 15, 2011 3:06 PM PST up reply actions  

What?

I just said “sic” because they improperly pluralized deus ex machina as deus ex machinas (“god from the machines”) instead of dei ex machina(“gods from the machine”), or possibly, thought probably not here, dei ex machinas (“gods from the machines”).

"This season of Ole Miss football is a reminder to talk to your family now about what to do if you're in a persistent vegetative state." ~@celebrityhottub

by AllSaintsDay on Nov 15, 2011 3:01 PM PST up reply actions  

Hey, we're all friends here.

Those context-ignorant bastards over at Book-A-Minute, on the other hand…

Somewhere, somehow, a Duck is watching you.

by omb on Nov 15, 2011 3:05 PM PST up reply actions  

finished adwd right after it came out

Although u consumed it like crack the story advanced about 200 pages worth in 1000. Not a boring book despite nothing happening.
To sidetrack to SF I just finished rereading The Mote in God’s Eye, which is still fantastic, one if the best encounter books ever

by OregonNYC on Nov 15, 2011 8:14 PM PST via iPhone app up reply actions  

So, anybody read George RR Martin? How do you think the TV series compared to Game of Thrones? Have you finished Dance With Dragons yet? I’m almost done with it. Then I guess I’ll have to wait another seven years to find out what happens next.

by JonathanPDX on Nov 15, 2011 5:20 PM PST up reply actions  

Yep

Up through ADWD.

TV series is excellent and a great adaptation. Most of the changes made are still awesome. Actors are spot on. Plus hey, lots of tits.

ADWD is better than Feast but not as good as the first three books. Hopefully GRRM will get off his ass and finish sometime before the heat death of the universe.

by kalon on Nov 15, 2011 5:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, I’m really hoping the next book is better. From what he’s said, Martin didn’t even want to write AFFC or ADWD. He was originally just going to skip ahead two years to the next book, but found himself having to explain what happened in the interim and so just wrote the books anyway. Definitely not as good as the first three.

The show was very good. If they cut the budget, it could go downhill, since there’s going to be a lot of battles and dragons that will require a crapload of extras and CGI in the next season. But given the success of the first season, I’m optimistic. The adaptation was very good, in that it followed the books closely but deviated where necessary.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 15, 2011 11:12 PM PST up reply actions  

This is not deus ex machina in the same way the crystal skull wasn’t one either.

It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck

by JShufelt on Nov 15, 2011 4:20 PM PST up reply actions  

Lord of the Rings refers to Sonic, right?

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 15, 2011 1:43 PM PST up reply actions  

Fox! Get this guy off me!

"Fuck you UW. How many days since you last beat us?" -skywaker9

by QuackQuackAttack on Nov 15, 2011 7:20 PM PST up reply actions  

that picture does not show the finished product

by echo31 on Nov 15, 2011 1:37 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, I realize that. I don’t have many excuses to make Gwaihir references.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 15, 2011 1:46 PM PST up reply actions  

Those things hardly seem worth it.

Yes they will pay for themselves, yet they dont look like they can seat more than a few dozen people each.

If we are putting up death-scaffolding that we have deemed cost-efficient just to cram a few more people into Autzen, why not just hit up the boosters for cash and expand?

I'm super thanks for asking! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPNna_f4P4Y

by CaDuck on Nov 15, 2011 3:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah seriously

The fact that we’re now putting in scaffolding like this lends some strong support to the argument that Autzen should be expanded.

by KitIsh on Nov 15, 2011 3:30 PM PST up reply actions  

It is called

proof of concept…if it works we either see more or a strong push for expansion. I think they are playing around and seeing what works, before they start drafting up plans for the expanded north side.

by DCDuck on Nov 15, 2011 3:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Uh, I know it never rains at Autzen Stadium, but it looks like they are preparing for high flood waters. Are we raising the whole stadium up on poles, or just the suites?

by JonathanPDX on Nov 15, 2011 3:24 PM PST up reply actions  

wait...

people will be standing on those? Holy shit that looks retarded and completley unsafe.

by OfficerCosta on Nov 15, 2011 3:47 PM PST up reply actions  

I hope it doesn’t snow, and if it doesn’t it doesn’t snow much.

It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck

by JShufelt on Nov 15, 2011 4:35 PM PST up reply actions  

Started the tailgating a few days early, Shu?

I wouldn’t mind some snow, but I really, really hope all the passes are clear. That’s the disadvantage of driving north…we may not have to worry about Salem traffic, but we have three/four mountains to go over that just might be nasty. Really, really, really hoping my flight to Disneyland is able to get out with no problems at 5 AM Sunday morning, too. Booooy, am I going to be tired, but whoo!

We’d better win on Saturday, if for no reason that I’ve packed nothing but Duck gear to wear for the three days in the parks, and I really would like to be gloating when I see the USC fans, not the other way around.

Got the shoes. Got the jersey. And finally, got football. Go Ducks.

(Good call, Daisy)

by lovemyducks81 on Nov 15, 2011 4:43 PM PST up reply actions  

Sorry. I should have been clearer. Those structures look decent for a crowd of people to stand on. They don’t look decent for a crowd of people and 3-4 inches of snow on top of it.

It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck

by JShufelt on Nov 16, 2011 8:19 AM PST up reply actions  

I knew what you meant.

At least, I think you meant “I hope it doesn’t snow, and if it does it doesn’t snow much.” Just a lot of "doesn’t"s in there. I’m definitely interested to see how the dang things look when they’re all done, because right now…well, they just look like large pieces of scaffolding.

Got the shoes. Got the jersey. And finally, got football. Go Ducks.

(Good call, Daisy)

by lovemyducks81 on Nov 16, 2011 7:02 PM PST up reply actions  

They are supposed to be like the ones they had at Hayward for the Olympic Trials. If so, the one that I was in was rock solid.

There was a wrap around tarp sort of plastic that kept out noise and weather. Food was served, we got there early and played cards with teenagers, never would’ve guessed that the base was ‘scaffolding’ because it was so solid. One reason for the great stability probably was that tongue and groove floor covered by rolled rugs was bolted into the cross beams.
  And, as I read it, the SRO crowd won’t be on top and snow won’t either (unless it snow a LOT during the game.) But the SROs will have to be in front of the structure because there are many cross braces underneath, not to mention, intense liability issues. Never-the-less, I’m staying in the mouth of aisle 26. Hope to see you.

"What you are entrusted to do as a coach is to create an environment where your players have a chance to be successful." CHIP KELLY

by Famous Duck on Nov 16, 2011 7:20 PM PST up reply actions  

S-H-U-F-E-L-T-C-H-I-L-L-Y

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 15, 2011 8:36 PM PST up reply actions  

Lots of spotlights. And smoke.

"What you are entrusted to do as a coach is to create an environment where your players have a chance to be successful." CHIP KELLY

by Famous Duck on Nov 16, 2011 6:46 PM PST up reply actions  

The original, British one right?

Because that was frickin creepy.

My parents believed in me.

by flyduckfly on Nov 15, 2011 5:58 PM PST up reply actions  

Looks like it will be cold up there

by 44 Desert Eagle on Nov 15, 2011 1:29 PM PST reply actions  

This top 100 overall and 4* RB has vaulted Oregon into his top 3 all of a sudden. I’d take him.

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 15, 2011 1:44 PM PST reply actions  

Heh

Last year I said how DAT was great but I wish we wouldn’t overload on RBs so much and it causes problems (like Seastrunk getting antsy).

Needless to say, I’ve changed my mind. Go get the good talent.

Plus I would think RBs would love to come to Oregon. LMJ is a human highlight reel on ESPN, and it’s not like Barner and DAT haven’t shown off. The last 4 years have been great for RBs coming out of Oregon. Even Blount’s playing after being undrafted.

by kalon on Nov 15, 2011 2:12 PM PST up reply actions  

I would think this is a great year to recruit a stud RB or two, given that they won’t have to compete with LMJ for playing time.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 15, 2011 2:18 PM PST up reply actions  

No, but

They’ll have to compete with Tra Carson and DAT. And that’s a tough act to follow. That should scare the pants off of teams; having a double IZR look with DAT and Tra where they can run the outside pitch to DAT, an IZR to Tra or vice versa?

Yeesh.

But still, will miss LMJ.

by kalon on Nov 15, 2011 2:37 PM PST up reply actions  

I don’t see that as an issue. DAT came here despite supposedly competing with LMJ, Barner, Seastrunk, etc. for playing time. A great RB will get playing time next season, or will red shirt and get a ton of playing time the season after that.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 15, 2011 2:39 PM PST up reply actions  

DAT could easily be gone after two more years.

Next year, in the regular RB rotation, a good recruit shouldn’t be any lower than #3 behind Barner and Carson. And that would be as a true freshman. The next year Barner’s gone. It seems that even with what seems like an amazing backfield, there should be a lot of opportunity for a star recruit to get in the mix right away.

Somewhere, somehow, a Duck is watching you.

by omb on Nov 15, 2011 2:48 PM PST up reply actions  

He's a power back.

We aren’t used to those.

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 15, 2011 3:05 PM PST up reply actions  

We keep saying that because that's what he was recruited to be, but he certainly falls down easily for a "power back."

I’m not saying he sucks, I just see an awful lot of Andre Crenshaw about him but just with a heavier body.

Things like that.

by qrsouther on Nov 15, 2011 3:27 PM PST up reply actions  

falls forward every time.

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 15, 2011 3:28 PM PST up reply actions  

I think we're all used to seeing the complete package that is LaFatty McFatterson

Once Tra improves his decision making confidence (i.e. picking a hole and drilling it), he will do fine. He’s just used to waiting for a hole to open up before hitting it.

by DuckUntilDeath on Nov 15, 2011 4:10 PM PST up reply actions  

… Really?

It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck

by JShufelt on Nov 15, 2011 4:32 PM PST up reply actions  

Really. I'm surprised at how easily he gets knocked down when he has a huge hole in front of him.

Usually “power backs” are supposed to be the ones breaking tackles and taking people with them. Sure he’s big-shouldered, and he “falls forward” I guess, but I don’t see him being our top back any time soon. If he is, he needs to hit holes much quicker and get better balance. Otherwise, he doesn’t seem to have very good speed and he hasn’t shown particularly good tackle breaking ability.

He definitely has room and the time to improve, so I hope he takes advantage of the weightroom and Gary Campbell.

Things like that.

by qrsouther on Nov 15, 2011 4:42 PM PST up reply actions  

I think I'm willing to give him the "true freshman who hardly plays"

benefit of the doubt. If he’s still only getting a few yards here and there after a year in the system and some more playing time, then I’ll be a little more skeptical of his ability.

Got the shoes. Got the jersey. And finally, got football. Go Ducks.

(Good call, Daisy)

by lovemyducks81 on Nov 15, 2011 4:44 PM PST up reply actions  

This

Also, can you point to specific plays you feel he didn’t do his job? Also, we see “giant holes” form from a different vantage point. Perhaps you are only seeing the hole after it develops? I’m not an expert, but perhaps, like those who accuse DT of making poor reads (i.e. the hole Tra chose was the better choice and/or the “giant hole” only opened up because Tra went elsewhere).

by DuckUntilDeath on Nov 15, 2011 5:04 PM PST up reply actions  

I just don’t think we’ve seen him play much, and when we have, it’s been behind 3rd string linemen.

He’s been serviceable when he’s ran the ball, and most of the plays he has been in, he’s been sort of a fullback-type role.

I’m not sure what other expectations there are for him.

It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck

by JShufelt on Nov 16, 2011 8:25 AM PST up reply actions  

This...

or when the we are grinding the clock and call dive plays to him with nine men in the box.

by The Graduate on Nov 16, 2011 9:13 AM PST up reply actions  

Huh?

How are we “overloaded” on RBs? We’re playing 2 RS juniors, one of whom will be leaving early, and 2 true freshmen. Did we seem “overloaded” when LMJ sat for 2 games? Seemed thin, is what we seemed. And who cares if Lache was “getting antsy?” Dude didn’t learn the system, plain and simple.

Ducks GOOOOD. Fuskies BAAAAAD.

by BigGreenWreckingMachine on Nov 15, 2011 3:57 PM PST up reply actions  

True

But at the time, we had 4 players that were apparently very good RBs (LMJ, Barner, Lache and Tra Carson) and then some backups to them just in case. Barner’s a starting RB for almost every team in the country. Carson was highly recruited, and Lache was a 5-star recruit. At the time we didn’t realize how bad Lache would be or how he wouldn’t catch on, and our depth at that point was insane.

And honestly I do think that our depth looked pretty amazing against Colorado and WSU. We didn’t play as well, but we certainly weren’t sidelined. We even had a backup QB and still managed to win fairly handily.

At the end of the day the original point – and one I’ll stand by – is this: there are only 4 years of college. Kids want a chance to play. High school coaches remember what teams give their kids chances to play – and what teams don’t. Recruiters in conference remember it too. The more that a team starts acting like Alabama, where they’ll overrecruit and then cut, the harder it is to get people to commit.

by kalon on Nov 15, 2011 4:04 PM PST up reply actions  

Yes, I actually think we are slightly thin at RB

We will have 3 scholarship RBs next year if no one signs. Though I assume that will not be the case.

by eloomis20 on Nov 15, 2011 5:17 PM PST up reply actions  

Kindle Fire. Got mine in the mail today.

Initial thoughts are, I like it a lot. Great way to consume media (books, music, Amazon Prime), really easy to use. Definitely not an iPad killer but more an alternative to a iPad that’s geared toward the media-centric crowd.

"the putz from that UO blog, Matt Daddy" - Steve Tannen
The Daily Faberian

by Matt Daddy on Nov 15, 2011 2:28 PM PST reply actions  

I put this article (with an interview following it) in my Read It Later that seems to sum it up pretty well, but I’ve only skimmed so far.

"This season of Ole Miss football is a reminder to talk to your family now about what to do if you're in a persistent vegetative state." ~@celebrityhottub

by AllSaintsDay on Nov 15, 2011 2:31 PM PST up reply actions  

Don't you have an iPad too?

And/or a smartphone?

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 15, 2011 2:32 PM PST up reply actions  

I don’t have either. I’m thinking this may be my first venture into this type of device.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 15, 2011 2:33 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, that’s a huge point in its favor.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 15, 2011 2:40 PM PST up reply actions  

If you like reading books

(especially with the Kindle Lending Library now… FREE BOOKS) and like music and are not picky about getting free TV shows to watch (1 month of free Amazon Prime will let you know if you like it or not). I highly recommend it. My wife who is tech deficient picked the thing up 15 minutes after I had it set up and she was zooming around playing with it, shopping for books, looking at the web, going Amazon (god help me), and really enjoyed it.

I’m sure the App market will exponentially grow with this too, given Amazon’s App store and the 1 free App per day thing. I recommend it for the media consumption. If you’re looking for a good email tool, calendaring, and work piece, don’t get it. But that’s what I have my computer and phone for.

"the putz from that UO blog, Matt Daddy" - Steve Tannen
The Daily Faberian

by Matt Daddy on Nov 15, 2011 2:53 PM PST up reply actions  

Okay, so maybe the price point isn’t so great.

"I don't do well with pain medicine."

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Nov 15, 2011 2:55 PM PST up reply actions  

No the price point is great

90% of what people use the iPad for they could easily use the Fire for and save $300+. Obviously the iPad is more robust (even though a lot of the specs are the same) and larger in size, but again, I wouldn’t use an iPad very often because I need things the iPad can’t do. What I want an iPad for the Fire does just fine (so far… we’ll see).

"the putz from that UO blog, Matt Daddy" - Steve Tannen
The Daily Faberian

by Matt Daddy on Nov 15, 2011 3:00 PM PST up reply actions  

I was just making a joke about your wife shopping online.

"I don't do well with pain medicine."

by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Nov 15, 2011 3:00 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, but my iPad is so shiny. (Also I use a lot of things that I think aren’t Fire-able)

"This season of Ole Miss football is a reminder to talk to your family now about what to do if you're in a persistent vegetative state." ~@celebrityhottub

by AllSaintsDay on Nov 15, 2011 3:03 PM PST up reply actions  

Twitter? MLB TV?

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 15, 2011 3:06 PM PST up reply actions  

I’d think that Fire can do Twitter, and maybe MLB.tv. I have lots of math-y stuff and LOTS of deeper games. I’d imagine the ability to TeX is not on Amazon’s priority list for a media-focused device.

"This season of Ole Miss football is a reminder to talk to your family now about what to do if you're in a persistent vegetative state." ~@celebrityhottub

by AllSaintsDay on Nov 15, 2011 3:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Definitely does twitter

haven’t looked for MLB.tv because, well it’s MLB.

"the putz from that UO blog, Matt Daddy" - Steve Tannen
The Daily Faberian

by Matt Daddy on Nov 15, 2011 3:21 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm hoping they come out with a Fire

that is the size of the Kindle DX. I think I’d buy that. Might buy one anyway, but I’d definitely go for a slightly larger one.

ATQ's #1 fan of ATQ Guys

by daisyduck on Nov 15, 2011 3:06 PM PST up reply actions  

You could just go for the gusto

and buy this

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 15, 2011 3:07 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm not sure

if that would fit in my handbag.

ATQ's #1 fan of ATQ Guys

by daisyduck on Nov 15, 2011 3:09 PM PST up reply actions  

Your a girl, you obviously have the space.

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 15, 2011 3:12 PM PST up reply actions  

Here’s a really good review that goes over what it can and cant do.

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 15, 2011 3:15 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm a much bigger fan of Amazon now that I have student-prime (basically all the prime features except streaming video for free for 1 year with your .edu address)

Now if they’d get some sort of web service/app for the Kindle Lending Library (like say $10 a year), I’d be all for it.

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 15, 2011 2:58 PM PST up reply actions  

We do a ton of stuff on Amazon, and have been trying to justify the expense of an e-reader for awhile. The addition of streaming shows and movies, plus apps for the kids (even if it’s not the same giant library of them that the ipad offers) is a pretty nice deal. And at less than half the price of the ipad.

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 15, 2011 3:03 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't think the app disparity will last very long

There will be a ton of people that will flock to the Fire, and like I’ve said the apps people do use (Angry Birds, Netflix, Quickoffice, Facebook, Twitter, etc) are all right there when you turn the thing on. Plus, if you’re an avid Droid guy like myself and have been getting apps from the Amazon App store for a while, all the ones you’ve downloaded are available to you as soon as you turn your Fire on (which was nice, because I have some paid apps I got for free from Amazon and didn’t want to have to pay for them on my Fire).

Lastly, I really like the way the media just simply integrates into the device. Flipping back and forth from Music to games to web to books is just really easy. And shopping for new stuff isn’t difficult either. Plus… it’s Amazon so there is endless shopping.

"the putz from that UO blog, Matt Daddy" - Steve Tannen
The Daily Faberian

by Matt Daddy on Nov 15, 2011 3:26 PM PST up reply actions  

Bingo. I was so happy to get the Quickoffice pro for free yesterday.
Plus, if you’re an avid Droid guy like myself and have been getting apps from the Amazon App store for a while

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 15, 2011 3:28 PM PST up reply actions  

FYI

I absolutely love my Acer Iconia A500. 10.1" screen. 32GB, dual core, nvidia, etc. Wifi only. Android Honeycomb. Basically the same thing as a Galaxy 10.1 but slightly heavier. But I got it from Costco for $350 instead of spending significantly more for the Galaxy plus a monthly fee for a freaking data plan. I just tether my phone if I need data somewhere that doesn’t have wifi. I highly recommend it for anyone who is looking for a tablet but wants an Android and doesn’t want to spend much money on the device or a data plan.

by MarineCorpsDuck on Nov 15, 2011 3:34 PM PST up reply actions  

It looked like it would hurt my eyes.

I’m wanting one with eink.

It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck

by JShufelt on Nov 15, 2011 4:34 PM PST up reply actions  

No eink

That’s pretty much it. It does a ton more though. My wife is in bed watching The Tudors right now on it. Really good apps, easy to use web browser, decent email app and contacts app and really user friendly. I highly recommend to anyone either looking to get into the smart phone/tablet market because of the price point, or anyone (like me) that just wants a really good media tool.

"the putz from that UO blog, Matt Daddy" - Steve Tannen
The Daily Faberian

by Matt Daddy on Nov 15, 2011 10:26 PM PST up reply actions  

Plus, I can't wait till someone hacks it

and give me all the other things I really want to do with it

"the putz from that UO blog, Matt Daddy" - Steve Tannen
The Daily Faberian

by Matt Daddy on Nov 15, 2011 10:29 PM PST up reply actions  

What couldn't you do on a higher-tech smartphone/laptop that you wanted a Kindle Fire for?

I.E. what got you looking at Tablets?

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 16, 2011 12:13 AM PST up reply actions  

So

If your wife is in bed, what are you still doing on AtQ?

by DuckUntilDeath on Nov 16, 2011 12:12 PM PST up reply actions  

Thank you Uncle Phil!
Prehmmr Matt Prehm
Damyean Dotson talking about why he signed with Oregon, " Matt Arena was incredible. I think it’s better than some NBA buildings."

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 15, 2011 3:22 PM PST reply actions  

Not sure if this should end up in a Fanpost, but I had a great time in Mexico AND got to watch the Ducks win!

I was really down before boarding the plane to Mexico. It just so happens, of all places, the flight we boarded to Mexico at SFO originated in PDX! JEEZ! Stab me in the heart, why don’t you! Many were clad in Duck gear. I we exchanged pleasantries, but I was sad I wasn’t going to the game.

At the resort, I met a bunch of Duck fans poolside. We decided to walking over to a local sports bar (Shooters) to watch the game. There were logos all around the bar with names of visitors who paid $25 to have their name painted above or below the logo. Worst omen ever: I sat facing the fusky logo. Unfortunately, all the other TVs were designated for hockey (the bar is owned by Canadian expats) or the Pacquiao vs Marquez fight.

I really wanted my name painted on the wall, but I noticed there was only one name painted for each logo. This seemed a tad weird. I wasn’t about to drop cash, just to have my name painted over in a week! In all fairness, this may be a completely false assumption. Regardless, ten beers, an order of fish & chips (with spicy, “Mexican” tartar sauce), two bottles of water and a generous tip set me back all of $31. I had an awesome time!

The next day, people I hadn’t even met wer shouting my name, approaching me, offering glad tidings and shaking my hand. I was really confused; ten Negro Modelos in 7 hours is a lot (for me), but I wasn’t drunk enough to not remember meeting people. Initially, I thought my vuvzela, Duck lips and foam “O” hands may have made me the most famous Duck fan in all Los Cabos, Mexico. As it turns out, my family told some people wearing Duck gear about me. It was a ton of fun!

The pelicans I saw on my scuba diving excursion were that much funnier. Oh, and of course I plugged www.addictedtoquack.com all weekend long!

by DuckUntilDeath on Nov 15, 2011 4:02 PM PST reply actions  

This Northern Illinois-Ball State game

might have zero implications for all of you, but hear me out.

I joined a pool with two buddies where 53 guys each put in $50. At the beginning of the season, every team gets a “price” and you get $10M to spend on any 8 teams. You’re stuck with the same 8 teams all season long.

Teams accrue points for wins, scoring points, pitching shutouts, scoring upsets, big passing/rushing days, etc, and lose points for the opposites of those things.

My eight teams were Oregon, Boise State, Oklahoma State, Wisconsin, TCU, Houston, Hawaii, and Southern Mississippi. A friend picked those same exact teams, except Northern Illinois in place of Southern Miss. The guy running the pool said he’d never seen anything like it before.

We laughed about it once the season started, but as those 9 teams started to rack up crazy points, we both rose to the top of the leaderboard, where we stand alone, him #1 and me #2, with a (probably) insurmountable lead over the red place team going into the last few weeks. The league winner gets about $850, and the second place finisher gets about $375, so there’s a lot riding on this for the both of us.

So our scores all season long have been 87.5% tethered together; the only variation coming from the difference between Northern Illinois and Southern Miss. Southern Miss was leading for most of the season, but the insane 63-60 NIU win put my friend on top for now.

So now I’m sitting here obsessing over a Ball State-Northern Illinois gamecast with hundreds of dollars hanging in the balance.

Thanks, sports gambling!

by Twith on Nov 15, 2011 5:48 PM PST reply actions  

“red place team” should say “third place team”

what a weird typo

by Twith on Nov 15, 2011 5:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Northern Illinois wins, 41-38

tough break, buddeh. But at least you still made $325!

15-yard penalty for my avatar. /Pereira'd

by Brass-billed on Nov 15, 2011 11:41 PM PST up reply actions  

I hope this isn't some sort of secondary violation

but Duck players are promoting someone’s clothing line, and posing in their gear on Facebook. I guess as long as they were not compensated (not even a free T-shirt) it shouldn’t be an issue, but can college players endorse things?

https://www.facebook.com/pages/RTY/198026393566838

My parents believed in me.

by flyduckfly on Nov 15, 2011 6:02 PM PST reply actions  

I think that as long as they make no earnings from it that it's fine

At least that’s what I hope. Otherwise you get kids being sued for saying they like Call of Duty or something along those lines.

by kalon on Nov 15, 2011 6:05 PM PST up reply actions  

I wouldn't worry about it

especially if they weren’t compensated, it’ll just show up on one of those lists down the road.

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 15, 2011 6:06 PM PST up reply actions  

Might not be the real KJB

I’m FB friends with an LMJ account. Prolly not the real LMJ.

by DuckUntilDeath on Nov 16, 2011 12:17 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm friends with Bill Musgrave.

Addicted to Quack, #1 Oregon blog among female Duck fans, including the ageless and ever-radiant daisyduck.

by Takimoto on Nov 17, 2011 7:08 AM PST up reply actions  

No prob bro, that was my 5:43 AM sense of humor, and thus a slight on me not a slight on you.

However, I hereby decree that “I didn’t mean to bodyspray” shall henceforth be a thing.

Euler's #1 fan

by Bill Musgrave on Nov 17, 2011 10:06 PM PST up reply actions  

Whatcha want, sugar buns?

I got some PBR chillin’ for ya.

Addicted to Quack, #1 Oregon blog among female Duck fans, including the ageless and ever-radiant daisyduck.

by Takimoto on Nov 18, 2011 4:57 PM PST up reply actions  

I have a quesiton for Daniel Tosh

is he wearing a 2010 Darron Thomas jersey, or a 2011 Josh Huff jersey?

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 15, 2011 6:15 PM PST reply actions  

Tuesday Recap

Typical Duck football talk. First we started off with an extensive review of the NBC prime time line up, and then moved into some Lord of the Rings memes and finally into Tech Talk about smart phones and tablets.

Good show today guys!

by DCDuck on Nov 16, 2011 5:01 AM PST reply actions  

Really, it’s just a giant mask for the huge level of PANIC!™ that we all feel about the upcoming game.

For some reason, I’m more worried about SC than I have been about any game since LSU (yes, more than Stanford).

Defending maligned chants since 2009

by Gorbachav5 on Nov 16, 2011 9:57 AM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Addicted to Quack, SBN's Oregon Ducks blog and fan community.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

2011-09-03_15-49-32_912_small
Weekend Preview for May 18-20
Mostinteresting_small
Tako Tuesdays: The Music Thread
Small
Better video of DAT in 100m
2011-09-03_15-49-32_912_small
Giant Sports Weekend Open Thread
Atq-spoon-5_small
Miracle Wolf Scholarship Fund: Update
La_foto_small
Spring game online?
Small
Ducks Drafted and also picked up in Free agency
2011-09-03_15-49-32_912_small
------> REVISED: ATQ Spring Game Meet-Up 2012
Dog_in_tree_small
Duck football tied to Kennedy Assassination
Small
BREAKING NEWS: EXCLUSIVE TRANSCRIPT OF INTERNAL UO INVESTIGATION INTO MARIJUANA USE BY FOOTBALL PLAYERS

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Here is this weeks video with plenty of discussion on the changes for the BCS.  Thanks ATQ and GO Ducks!
Anthony Bennett picks UNLV over Oregon
Chip Kelly Scared
Here is this weeks video. Thanks ATQ, GO DUCKS!
All of DAT's races from Oregon Twilight.
BRING GAMEDAY BACK TO OREGON! VOTE!!!!
Our thoughts on the Spring Game start @ 44:43.  Thanks ATQ and GO DUCKS!
Poor Darron Thomas
Masoli the Eskimo
Bullpen Bagpipes, UO edition.

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

ATQ Twitter Feed


Managers

207873_1005773153454_1498651968_14034_9616_n_small David Piper

Pre_small ntrebon

Img_0525_small jtlight

Mostinteresting_small Takimoto

Domsicecream_small dvieira

Editors

Pettingzoo_small PaulSF

Atq-spoon-5_small Matt Daddy

Authors

Ryan__rusty_small jcgoducks

Small nds500