Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

Quack Fix: Ducks get back to practice and Tony Woods travels to Nebraska

As many have said since Saturday night, the Ducks still have a ton to play for this season.  I have no doubts that they will come out prepared and looking to erase the memory of the USC game on Saturday.

Go Ducks!

Comment 244 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Why's the bebier wearing a ducks glove?

But you are all the smartest, funniest, most handsome bitches on all the internets.~DaisyDuck 11.2.11

by Quack Addict on Nov 22, 2011 10:14 AM PST up reply actions  

Eddie Pleasant is taking the helmet as a souvenir.

Autzen Stadium: "The stadium with an L.A. face, but an Oakland Booty, if you will." -Spencer Hall

by ProbablyMonty on Nov 22, 2011 10:21 AM PST up reply actions  

Are we becoming tOSU?
As many have said since Saturday night, the Ducks still have a ton to play for this season.

I know we are all bummed out about losing, but the chance to lock up our division with a pasting of former rival the Bavers, hosting the first PAC12 CG and the opportunity to go the the Rose Bowl seems like a pretty damn nice consolation prize.

by OregonNYC on Nov 22, 2011 7:17 AM PST reply actions  

No, but we're taking players from them.

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 22, 2011 11:30 AM PST up reply actions  

I like me a 6'5" receiver

185 pounds is pretty skinny, though.

--Dave

Addicted to Quack, your friendly, neighborhood Oregon Ducks blog

by David Piper on Nov 22, 2011 7:40 AM PST up reply actions  

That's what I thought...

But the article lists him as 6’4" and 205lbs.

Both gold and muck come out of the same shaft...

by Fishdude on Nov 22, 2011 7:41 AM PST up reply actions  

Everywhere else ha him listed at 185 or 187 but that’s the hometown paper so maybe they’re more up to date

by The Legend on Nov 22, 2011 8:10 AM PST up reply actions  

Yeah,

That means he is 6’ 3" and about 185.

I remember some high school tape of DeAnthony listed him at 5’11" and 185. Hahaha.

I'm super thanks for asking! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPNna_f4P4Y

by CaDuck on Nov 22, 2011 10:57 AM PST up reply actions  

LT V2?

It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck

by JShufelt on Nov 22, 2011 8:39 AM PST up reply actions  

That's weird how the article is about two players named Washington and Stanford

who committed to Ohio State and Oregon.

Autzen Stadium: "The stadium with an L.A. face, but an Oakland Booty, if you will." -Spencer Hall

by ProbablyMonty on Nov 22, 2011 7:51 AM PST up reply actions  

Absolutely huge pickup.

We need a big receiver that can both stretch the field and maul undersized DB’s. He has a ridiculous offer sheet, schools such as Alabama, Miami, Michigan, Notre Dame, Ohio State, Auburn, Florida, etc… all offered him.

Here is a quick youtube link of some highlights. Just ignore the 1980’s-status flaming footballs and the ridiculous music.

I'm super thanks for asking! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPNna_f4P4Y

by CaDuck on Nov 22, 2011 11:02 AM PST up reply actions  

Awsome.

Just one question. Can he catch a screen pass?

"the putz from that UO blog, Matt Daddy" - Steve Tannen
The Daily Faberian

by Matt Daddy on Nov 22, 2011 1:12 PM PST up reply actions  

/toosoon

FYI, you show up and we lose. Think about that.

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 22, 2011 2:05 PM PST up reply actions  

He is an Oregon commit.

I’m pretty sure that all but guarantees that he cant catch easy screen/slant passes, but will inexplicably catch every terribly thrown pass.

I'm super thanks for asking! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPNna_f4P4Y

by CaDuck on Nov 22, 2011 2:57 PM PST up reply actions  

I've been sick so forgive me if this has been said already the past couple days...

But the RG has taken the stance that Chip’s decision not to take the TOs because it goes with our strategy was the correct decision. I bring it up here because, as Moseley tweeted, they got killed all Summer as duck haters and are now being called homers for not criticizing Chip (ahh the old “if you disagree with me you are clearly a homer and Tako dates high school JV cheerleaders” defense). Moseley had a great exchange with Canzano too. Canzano tweeted that USC still has the better talent, but that Oregon has the better system. Moseley replied, “which is exactly why you don’t take those late TOs”.

by MarineCorpsDuck on Nov 22, 2011 7:28 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

I think they should have called a timeout after Kenjon ran for 9 yards and there was still over 30 seconds left. As far as the “USC has more talent” argument, that Kenjon run was right after a USC timeout. I don’t think it would have made a significant difference in terms of helping USC catch their breath. When you’ve been run ragged for a quarter, a timeout won’t do much.

The biggest problem was that the team looked totally lost in the last 35 seconds. Throws to the flat, false starts. They went from moving down the field, doing their normal thing, which was good. And then they faced a situation they haven’t all year, and were like, uhhh, holy crap, what do we do now.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Nov 22, 2011 7:41 AM PST up reply actions  

I don't think it was about breath so much

As keeping them from getting mentally off balance and not giving them time to set up their defense. Also, there were only a one or two places I think where a timeout may have helped. That last drive was doing a pretty good job of getting people out of bounds or getting first downs which stops the clock anyway.

In hindsight, it may have been better if Tuinei had not gotten that two point conversion, then Chip would have had to go for the touchdown. I don’t think he played for the field goal, but I think he had that in the back of his mind as a fallback and it affected his playcalling. If it was touchdown or bust, I think it would have changed things.

by NinjaDuck on Nov 22, 2011 7:50 AM PST up reply actions  

IMO, the main place it would have helped was when Kenjon went down on the 9 yard run with just over 30 seconds left.

After that play, the Ducks netted 3 yards. We could have run 2 more zone reads and called time outs and had significantly more yards and gotten into a far better field goal position.

The whole argument that Chip shouldn’t have called time outs is based on the idea that the only reason Oregon was moving the ball is that USC was finally worn out/tired/whatever. And frankly, I find that bullshit. Oregon was finally executing. When Oregon executed their game plan, USC could not stop them effectively. USC did a great job defensively, but Oregon stopped themselves far more than USC did. IMO, a time out does not change execution on that drive. It didn’t when USC had called a time out.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Nov 22, 2011 9:17 AM PST up reply actions  

Yeah this is my stance on the late game situation as well

Definitely did not look organized, something a NC participant shouldn’t have problems with.

by ppilot on Nov 22, 2011 9:25 AM PST up reply actions  

Rob was definitley a little testy in that exchange

While it’s true that a timeout could help the USC defense get set, it’s also true that it helps the Oregon offense get set.

I think we could have benefited from obviously more time on the clock, but making sure we had the correct play call, and/or doing the “check with me” after they assess the defense.

There’s a difference between playing fast and hurrying. At the end there, I think the players were feeling the pressure of the dwindling clock, confusion about why no timeout was called, and ended up hurrying instead of simply playing fast. That led to the mistakes/poor decisions at the end.

My parents believed in me.

by flyduckfly on Nov 22, 2011 9:35 AM PST up reply actions  

What Rob (and many others) seems to be forgetting

Is that USC had just called a time out, and we still ran for 9 yards.

Also, in the last two years, I don’t believe the Ducks have been in one true two-minute drill with the game on the line. That showed in this game, in both the execution, and the coaching.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Nov 22, 2011 9:40 AM PST up reply actions  

Arizona would count, OSU would not. That was not a two minute drill, just a clock killing drive.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Nov 22, 2011 11:33 AM PST up reply actions  

And in Arizona's case

We took two timeouts – one on Arizona’s drive and once on ours.

by kalon on Nov 22, 2011 12:18 PM PST up reply actions  

I think Chip knows what other people consider "standard clock management."

He also knows other people don’t go for it on 4th down in their own territory in the first half with a lead, don’t try onside kicks in the 2nd quarter, don’t try for 2 unless absolutely necessary, etc. I would love for him to have taken a time out, but I understand what he was trying to do in the context of “Chip being Chip.” The problem with Chip is that his giant balls come with…a giant ego and an abundance of stubbornness.

Ducks GOOOOD. Fuskies BAAAAAD.

by BigGreenWreckingMachine on Nov 22, 2011 12:26 PM PST up reply actions  

Which is why he called timeouts in 2009 in the same kind of situation

But hey, it’s okay. Chip being Chip apparently means Chip not being Chip. Or Chip being Chipp.

by kalon on Nov 22, 2011 12:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Sigh.

I get it. You want him to do the same thing in every situation based on what everyone else does and if he decides to change his mind he’s not being himself. Is that right?

Ducks GOOOOD. Fuskies BAAAAAD.

by BigGreenWreckingMachine on Nov 22, 2011 12:52 PM PST up reply actions  

And I get it

You want him to be this mystery wrapped in an enigma with a creamy filling, and if he does or doesn’t do something then it is beyond our mortal ken.

But the excuse that it’s just Chip Being Chip when Chip has done exactly what some of us are grousing about is pretty silly.

by kalon on Nov 22, 2011 2:51 PM PST up reply actions  

Incorrect.

What is silly is to expect him to coach as if by some script chiseled in stone and to expect any coach not to coach a game based on the opponent and the situation directly at hand.

Ducks GOOOOD. Fuskies BAAAAAD.

by BigGreenWreckingMachine on Nov 22, 2011 3:03 PM PST up reply actions  

So you can show me a situation where someone did this then?

You say that it was bad to expect him to take timeouts and offer an explanation that is not backed up by anything other than your interpretation. You then justify it by him being a ‘different’ coach. When evidence emerges that indicates he’s not that different after all you state that you don’t know.

So really, you don’t know any better, but are willing to defend a bad decision because you believe there must be a good reason for it. And that’s just not reasonable.

I am willing to believe that Kelly had a good reason for what he did – but I’m also willing to accept that the reasoning behind that might not be perfect. Kelly isn’t infallible.

Another way to ask this: if you think this was the right choice and the right thing to do, you can surely find a situation like this where Kelly did this exact thing, no?

by kalon on Nov 22, 2011 3:11 PM PST up reply actions  

How long does this argument have to go on?

Seriously guys, it’s been four days now. It’s the freaking internet and my Z finger is tired of skimming through this shit.

Now with mustache guarantee!

by HoodRiverDuck on Nov 22, 2011 3:26 PM PST up reply actions  

PC > APPLE!

It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck

by JShufelt on Nov 22, 2011 4:30 PM PST up reply actions  

LINUX > BOTH!!!

The "Beano Cook" of ATQ

by benzduck on Nov 22, 2011 5:29 PM PST up reply actions  

Yep.

End of argument.

"the putz from that UO blog, Matt Daddy" - Steve Tannen
The Daily Faberian

by Matt Daddy on Nov 22, 2011 5:31 PM PST up reply actions  

AIX in a landslide.

Or Solaris. Nah, BeOS. NetBSD>>>FreeBSD!

What do they have in common? Turning my hair prematurely gray. Of course, that might just be the (l)users.

Ducks GOOOOD. Fuskies BAAAAAD.

by BigGreenWreckingMachine on Nov 22, 2011 5:59 PM PST up reply actions  

NURD.

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 22, 2011 6:50 PM PST up reply actions  

When did PC become synonymous with Microsoft?

It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck

by JShufelt on Nov 22, 2011 6:33 PM PST up reply actions  

When IBM released the original IBM Personal Computer (PC)C in '81.

PC was a marketing gadget. The computer itself had a model number which I don’t remember.

Ducks GOOOOD. Fuskies BAAAAAD.

by BigGreenWreckingMachine on Nov 22, 2011 6:39 PM PST up reply actions  

IBM =/= Microsoft

It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck

by JShufelt on Nov 23, 2011 7:36 AM PST up reply actions  

For about 6 months.

The use of non-proprietary and commodity architectures and technologies meant their dominant market position lasted less than a year before Compaq (don’t remember if they were Compaq at that time) reverse-engineered the IBM bios and started selling clones. That’s also the way Mike Dell got his start, selling them out of the back of his van. The name “PC” stuck (because “PC-compatible” isn’t as catchy) and there you have it.

Ducks GOOOOD. Fuskies BAAAAAD.

by BigGreenWreckingMachine on Nov 23, 2011 11:13 AM PST up reply actions  

I guess I’ve always considered PCs as a non-proprietary computer, regardless what OS was installed.

It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck

by JShufelt on Nov 23, 2011 11:31 AM PST up reply actions  

The IBM PC became the "standard."

It was supposed to be proprietary because the only way you could boot into DOS was via the “IBM ROM-BIOS” which WAS proprietary. The reason they otherwise used standard architecture was to get the product out quickly and on the cheap. And Bill Gates, smarty pants that he is, specifically had it drawn into the IBM contract that he could develop and sell DOS to anyone who wanted it. So IBM doubled-down on their stupidity.

Ducks GOOOOD. Fuskies BAAAAAD.

by BigGreenWreckingMachine on Nov 23, 2011 11:45 AM PST up reply actions  

I conceded it might not have been the best idea days ago.

My entire point wasn’t to defend him but to at least try to understand his thinking in this particular situation. Sheesh.

Ducks GOOOOD. Fuskies BAAAAAD.

by BigGreenWreckingMachine on Nov 22, 2011 3:33 PM PST up reply actions  

How many chaps could a chip chap chap if a chip chap could chap chip?

Terrible I know but I’m too tired to care.

Typing on autopilot.

You all shall suffer from it.

Euler's #1 fan

by Bill Musgrave on Nov 22, 2011 1:52 PM PST up reply actions  

Chipacabra

I like it. He is the Chipacabra.

Euler's #1 fan

by Bill Musgrave on Nov 22, 2011 2:00 PM PST up reply actions   2 recs

This.

Photoshop monkeys….GO!

by BigMacDuck on Nov 22, 2011 2:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Ah yes, the mythical beast that cannot win big games.

The only one who can rid the world of the ferocious Chipacabra is St. Mike. BRING BACK BELLOTTI!

by DuckUntilDeath on Nov 22, 2011 2:20 PM PST up reply actions  

JAKE RODRIGUES NOW

AND I MEAN NOW

Now with mustache guarantee!

by HoodRiverDuck on Nov 22, 2011 2:23 PM PST up reply actions  

Injury Fail.

Rodrigues just broke his leg/ankle/something in his last game. Don’t think that would work out so well…

/amimissingthejoke?

by BigMacDuck on Nov 22, 2011 2:28 PM PST up reply actions  

/thatwaspartofthejoke

I heard separated his ankle. I have a ton of family in Rocklin, too, they verify that that dude is the bomb.

Now with mustache guarantee!

by HoodRiverDuck on Nov 22, 2011 2:31 PM PST up reply actions  

Looking at his stats

Seems to be running the ball quite a bit in that offense, usually seeing the most carries on his team, decent but not great completion percentage. Maybe in 2-3 years when my kids are old enough, I’ll take them to their first duck game with Jake at the helm. /excited

by BigMacDuck on Nov 22, 2011 2:37 PM PST up reply actions  

You need more beer.

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 22, 2011 2:23 PM PST up reply actions  

I don’t know what you’re trying to say. Chip shouldn’t let outside factors influence him either way, whether that be going with the crowd, or going against the crowd just for the sake of going against it.

His job is to make decisions that put his team in a position to win, and this was one case where he made a mistake just like the team did. This has absolutely nothing to do with “Chip being Chip.”

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Nov 22, 2011 1:18 PM PST up reply actions  

I mean, it makes sense.

JV cheerleaders have less self-esteem.

Addicted to Quack, #1 Oregon blog among female Duck fans, including the ageless and ever-radiant daisyduck.

by Takimoto on Nov 22, 2011 2:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Forgive the typos and poor grammar

Trying to type quickly and work at the same time. :)

by NinjaDuck on Nov 22, 2011 7:51 AM PST reply actions  

Rumblin', bumblin' and stumblin'!

Both gold and muck come out of the same shaft...

by Fishdude on Nov 22, 2011 9:27 AM PST up reply actions  

I forgot how freaking large he is

and how well he can cut for a man his size.

My parents believed in me.

by flyduckfly on Nov 22, 2011 9:37 AM PST up reply actions  

I watched it a couple times

And realized he owned Clay Matthews comin in for the stop when he went through the line. Had to replay to confirm

You are not a beautiful and unique snowflake -Tyler Durden

by Odd-duck86 on Nov 22, 2011 10:38 AM PST up reply actions  

I think he's gotten bigger since leaving Oregon

"What the hell was that?"
"Spaceball One, they've gone to plaid!"

by QuackinAK on Nov 22, 2011 7:48 PM PST up reply actions  

Badass

Hoping Tra Carson can become a successful power back for us.
Some people have said he is not living up to the hype so far.

I think reason for that is because every time he has seen a large number of carries we have been up by a lot and running the clock down. Basically telling the other team to stack the boxes because the run is coming 99.99% of the time.

Happy for Blount! Good run. Beast!

ssshhh....

by OregOnDucks on Nov 22, 2011 9:24 AM PST up reply actions  

What hype? Tra was very much a diamond in the rough guy

Give Carson an offseason of training and he will look a lot better

by ppilot on Nov 22, 2011 9:26 AM PST up reply actions  

It's hard to measure when you're up against a freak like DAT

Freshmen 98.8% of the time don’t contribute at all in the first two years they’re at college. When they’re redshirt sophmores, Juniors and seniors kids will often explode onto the scene. Take Stuckey and Clay this year, last year they contributed, but have both really come on this year, making plays and dominating. Guys like Nagata, JStew, Grassu and DAT don’t just come around every day. I think that Tra has great potential but lets not get ahead of ourselves. The company he keeps is greatness and I think in time he’ll fit right in.

But you are all the smartest, funniest, most handsome bitches on all the internets.~DaisyDuck 11.2.11

by Quack Addict on Nov 22, 2011 10:20 AM PST up reply actions  

I am confident he will

The few loads he has carried he has done a good job.
Sometimes they got a shoe string tackle on him that would have gone to he house.

Perfect back for the 1-4 yard ones. Bulk, power. with more work and coaching he will be a fine back.

ssshhh....

by OregOnDucks on Nov 22, 2011 11:00 AM PST up reply actions  

He has power

but he needs to work on his explosiveness. Right now he seems to kind of run like a rock rolling downhill, gradually picking up speed as he goes along. If Radcliffe can help him accelerate to near his top speed by the time he hits the hole, he’ll be a load.

by k_dubious on Nov 22, 2011 1:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Did I miss something?

I thought we had to win this Saturday to secure our place in the Pac12 Championship game. Yet I received an email from the Pac12 yesterday telling me that my tickets have shipped. Are they counting chicks before the hatching?

ATQ's #1 fan of ATQ Guys

by daisyduck on Nov 22, 2011 9:44 AM PST reply actions  

The email I received also stated that these tickets were only valid if the Pac-12 Championship game was played at Autzen stadium. I think they are just making sure that everyone has tickets in hand by next Friday. If we don’t make it to the game, then I guess they just wasted a ton of money on printing tickets and postage.

by Pelhament on Nov 22, 2011 9:51 AM PST up reply actions  

Huh, I didn't notice that small print part

Yes, that would be a giant waste of money if it doesn’t pan out. But I suppose they’ve got to feel pretty good about their chances it will all work out fine.

ATQ's #1 fan of ATQ Guys

by daisyduck on Nov 22, 2011 9:55 AM PST up reply actions  

This must be correct

because my e-tix have not been sent to me and they said they would only if the game were hosted at Autzen Stadium.

My parents believed in me.

by flyduckfly on Nov 22, 2011 10:46 AM PST up reply actions  

nope

and we wouldn’t miss him as much if Gildon was still in there. Seriously I think Gildon is our best corner, it hurt not having him in there for USC.

But you are all the smartest, funniest, most handsome bitches on all the internets.~DaisyDuck 11.2.11

by Quack Addict on Nov 22, 2011 10:22 AM PST up reply actions  

Agreed

which is why C*nz*no’s article blaming the USC loss on Harris drives me crazy. You could write virtually the same article, substitute Lewis for Harris, and be as accurate (and relevant).

Lewis’s decision making ability isn’t significantly better than Harris’s. Lewis was picked up as a UFA by the Chiefs but there’s no record of him having played in any games or even being on the scout team. He just disappeared.

IIRC Lewis left Oregon because he was worried about getting PT this season. Ironic, isn’t it?

The "Beano Cook" of ATQ

by benzduck on Nov 22, 2011 10:41 AM PST up reply actions  

I don't read anything Cazano writes

I figured if nobody did he would be out of a job.
Ignore him.

ssshhh....

by OregOnDucks on Nov 22, 2011 10:58 AM PST up reply actions   2 recs

smh
ESPN_Pac12blog ESPN_Pac12blog
Oregon State coach Mike Riley named Cal’s Isi Sofele when asked to name best RB in Pac-12. Plays LaMike on Saturday.

--Dave

Addicted to Quack, your friendly, neighborhood Oregon Ducks blog

by David Piper on Nov 22, 2011 10:41 AM PST reply actions  

...Right.

Coach Riley is so dumb, everyone knows that the best back in the Pac-12 is Chris Polk.

Seriously, if this is any indication of how he evaluates talent, the Beavers should have a 3-9 record for all eternity.

I'm super thanks for asking! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPNna_f4P4Y

by CaDuck on Nov 22, 2011 11:15 AM PST up reply actions  

When are you taking down the Barkley avatar?

/doesn’twanttolookathimanymore

"What the hell was that?"
"Spaceball One, they've gone to plaid!"

by QuackinAK on Nov 22, 2011 8:04 PM PST up reply actions  

yeah no kidding

You should have changed to Ryan Katz already

"the putz from that UO blog, Matt Daddy" - Steve Tannen
The Daily Faberian

by Matt Daddy on Nov 22, 2011 8:26 PM PST up reply actions  

C'mon now,

He has already been benched, I dont think he deserves any more ill-will.

Oh, and f**k avatars.

I'm super thanks for asking! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPNna_f4P4Y

by CaDuck on Nov 22, 2011 8:28 PM PST up reply actions  

Quitter

"the putz from that UO blog, Matt Daddy" - Steve Tannen
The Daily Faberian

by Matt Daddy on Nov 22, 2011 8:33 PM PST up reply actions  

Your banhammer is tingling.

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 22, 2011 8:37 PM PST up reply actions  

This one (Barkeley) was the most blatant failure to date.

The magic is lost.

It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck

by JShufelt on Nov 23, 2011 7:37 AM PST up reply actions  

This is true

This superstition has been proven absolutely false. I think CaDuck is off the hook for the weekly changing of avatars.
But come on, that doesn’t mean we have to stare at that disco dancing princess all week right? You need to change it on last time CaDuck.

ATQ's #1 fan of ATQ Guys

by daisyduck on Nov 23, 2011 8:44 AM PST up reply actions  

Fuck avatars.

I'm super thanks for asking! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPNna_f4P4Y

by CaDuck on Nov 22, 2011 8:28 PM PST up reply actions  

This is their recruiter-in-chief.

It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck

by JShufelt on Nov 22, 2011 11:41 AM PST up reply actions  

Blah, phslerch... choking on my own rage here.

Has the man never heard of Chris Polk?

Somewhere, somehow, a Duck is watching you.

by omb on Nov 22, 2011 9:45 PM PST up reply actions  

This needs more discussion: the Apple Cup is SO IMPORTANT THIS YEAR.

It’ll determine the 4th and 5th best teams in the PNW.

UO, OSU > WSU by virtue of win
UO, OSU > UW by virtue of win
PSU > OSU by virtue of Sac State transitivity.
UO > OSU as soon as we win by nine touchdowns on Saturday.

So it’ll be
UO
PSU
OSU
UW or WSU

Now with mustache guarantee!

by HoodRiverDuck on Nov 22, 2011 11:10 AM PST reply actions  

In other words, GO FUCKING COUGS.

If UW’s comeback year results in them being the 5th best team in the PNW this year, well then, nothing left to do but smile, smile, smile.

Now with mustache guarantee!

by HoodRiverDuck on Nov 22, 2011 11:12 AM PST up reply actions  

fBSU

"What the hell was that?"
"Spaceball One, they've gone to plaid!"

by QuackinAK on Nov 22, 2011 8:05 PM PST up reply actions  

This is my favorite part (emphasis mine)
A lot of people instinctively see what’s going on at Oregon and say it’s unfair. They have a point. That was my first reaction, too. It’s unfair for billionaires to control the direction of universities, unfair for college kids to be exploited for billion-dollar marketing schemes, and unfair for a university to house what certainly feels a lot like a pro football team.

But then I thought, isn’t that the same as anywhere else in college football? The system’s been strained more than ever in the past ten years, and as the profit opportunities multiply, competition for recruits and facilities will only intensify, schools will be more to desperate to appease donors, and tension between ideals and financial realities will get worse. Uniforms and otherwise, eventually they’ll all look like Oregon.

Oregon’s just the most transparent about it all.

Now with mustache guarantee!

by HoodRiverDuck on Nov 22, 2011 11:33 AM PST up reply actions  

I agree.

It is always fun to read an outsider’s opinion of the program.

I'm super thanks for asking! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPNna_f4P4Y

by CaDuck on Nov 22, 2011 11:44 AM PST up reply actions  

He did get dinged up pretty bad.

He was lying on the turf for a little while at some point. I’m sure that he wasnt all that close to 100 percent in the second half of the game.

I'm super thanks for asking! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPNna_f4P4Y

by CaDuck on Nov 22, 2011 11:38 AM PST up reply actions  

So...

Is LMJ hurting his draft status by coming back this year?

by ursula on Nov 22, 2011 11:39 AM PST up reply actions  

I dont know anything about what goes on behind the draft.

All that I can say is, if I were a NFL GM that was worried about a player his size getting killed in the NFL, the injuries this season wouldn’t be particularly reassuring.

I'm super thanks for asking! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPNna_f4P4Y

by CaDuck on Nov 22, 2011 11:43 AM PST up reply actions  

I think he's giving it his all, but playing two weeks after a dislocated elbow is clearly having an effect

I’ve said is all over this forum the past few days, but his tendency to spin prior to contact belies his confidence in his elbow and perhaps the brace’s ability to protect his elbow.

I went back and watched his fumble (on a USC highlight clip…ewww) and he was barely touched. He spun (again) in the middle of a crowd, and Uko grabbed him around the waist, grazing the ball in the process. It was barely a hit that dislodged the ball.

I think he is (understandably) concerned about protecting his elbow and his ability to secure the rock. He’s a warrior, but I have no qualms about handing over the duties to Barner if necessary for the good of the team.

My parents believed in me.

by flyduckfly on Nov 22, 2011 11:55 AM PST up reply actions  

Right on cue:
LMJ on whether defenders have targeted his elbow: “100 percent yes. It happens all the time. And if I was a defender, I would too.”

My parents believed in me.

by flyduckfly on Nov 22, 2011 11:57 AM PST up reply actions  

He's not running scared.

He’s favoring the elbow. Enough with the hyperbole.

Ducks GOOOOD. Fuskies BAAAAAD.

by BigGreenWreckingMachine on Nov 22, 2011 11:58 AM PST up reply actions   2 recs

Thank you

The amount of hyperbole on this board is out of control. Literally every single comment contains absurd amounts of exaggeration.

Just read them. Read them. And tell me that people aren’t posting while high on meth.

"If you type two spaces after a period, you're doing it wrong."

by joelor on Nov 22, 2011 12:00 PM PST up reply actions  

You are literally worse than Hitler for saying there is hyperbole on this board.

It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck

by JShufelt on Nov 22, 2011 4:36 PM PST up reply actions  

I feel philosophised.

It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck

by JShufelt on Nov 22, 2011 4:47 PM PST up reply actions  

Future question...

I know I know – WTD. Believe me when I say I’m a huge fan of Win The Day and think it’s one of the coolest mantras in sports. I want the team to WTD forthe rest of the season, concentrate, and wrap up a BCS bowl victory. We need one. It’ll feel so good. And what better than a Rose Bowl?

With that said, fans have no impact on games.
We don’t have to win any day. In fact, we can talk about whatever we want. And I’m a bit of a dreamer. So, I have a question to throw out to so many ATQers with your intelligent and knowledgeable opinions:

What happens next year?

Let’s say the Duckies do finish with the Rose Bowl am beat Wisconsin by, say, 10. How does next year shape after considering all things?

Do we start the year ranked top 5? What about #1 or 2 overall? Of all the possible early NFL declarations (namely Boyett and LMJ), do any come back? What are our strengths and weaknesses next year? Odds of coaching staff staying intact? And how does the schedule play out based on what other teams in the conference return and lose?

There has been a lot of chatter that this year was UO’s long shot title and most like Rose Bowl year, while next year could be a legit title run. What do you think?

Polk is gone, Luck is gone, my money is on Barkley leaving, AZ has a new coach, etc. Schedule looks like it could be good (especially considering that we’re not traveling to Oxford, Miss to play a neutral game against Alabama).

Our DBs, DL, and offensive backfield could be special. Weaknesses in terms of experience will probably be WRs and TEs, but they’ll also likely be the most talented units we’ve ever ha at each position.

Barner becomes the guy and I think leads the PAC in rushing. Huff steps up to become our go to threat. Dion Jordan and T Mitch are stars on D. Sumler does similar things next year to what DAT did this year.

All things considered, how do you think next year shapes up going into the season? I think it could pan out similar to this season (chance at a title with real hopes of winning conference and getting to another big bowl); but something tells me there is a possibility that next year’s team could challenge 2001, 2007, and 2010 as UO’s best team ever.

"We smoked it all."

by DuckIt on Nov 22, 2011 11:35 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

As much as I hate to look ahead

I have been looking forward to next season since before the LSU game.

by Pelhament on Nov 22, 2011 11:38 AM PST up reply actions  

This.

2011 is just gravy on the cake.

The "Beano Cook" of ATQ

by benzduck on Nov 22, 2011 11:45 AM PST up reply actions  

Mmm, cake gravy.

Is it bacon cake?

Now with mustache guarantee!

by HoodRiverDuck on Nov 22, 2011 11:48 AM PST up reply actions  

What is that unhealthy and amazing looking thing?

It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck

by JShufelt on Nov 22, 2011 11:53 AM PST up reply actions  

I dunno.

I GIS’d bacon cake gravy, and then began salivating uncontrollably.

Now with mustache guarantee!

by HoodRiverDuck on Nov 22, 2011 11:55 AM PST up reply actions  

I would love that in a body spray.

I don’t know what this means – it’s just something I would really love.

For Oregon, King Kelly, and St Quack!

by DamienS on Nov 22, 2011 12:20 PM PST up reply actions  

Further investigation shows this is called "Breakfast Cake"

Two layers of quiche made from eggs, Bisquick, sausage, bacon, onions, peppers, and cheese, stacked and iced with sausage gravy, covered with more bacon, and topped with another layer of cheese.

Now with mustache guarantee!

by HoodRiverDuck on Nov 22, 2011 12:39 PM PST up reply actions  

For the cake?

Or for the 80mg of Lipitor you’re gonna have to take for the next twenty years to counteract the cake’s effect on your coronaries?

Now with mustache guarantee!

by HoodRiverDuck on Nov 22, 2011 12:48 PM PST up reply actions  

That's as close to a recipe as I can find.

It was featured on the now-defunct site thisiswhyyourefat.com. The cookbook is available on Amazon, but doesn’t look like this one made the cut for the book.

Now with mustache guarantee!

by HoodRiverDuck on Nov 22, 2011 12:59 PM PST up reply actions  

Try this.

Find a good quiche recipe (they’re really easy to make). Stack the quiches when cool enough and frost with gravy. Chances are that this picture was taken when all of the above where cold, as making this “cake” with warm “ingredients” wold result in a pile of goo.

It was thought that the "Hanger" beat all shots. Then, the "Balancer" was discovered.

by Wristy on Nov 22, 2011 1:27 PM PST up reply actions  

#teamquiche

#realman

You haven’t eaten the right quiche. Just think of it as breakfast pie.

Now with mustache guarantee!

by HoodRiverDuck on Nov 22, 2011 2:25 PM PST up reply actions  

mmm egg pie

"the putz from that UO blog, Matt Daddy" - Steve Tannen
The Daily Faberian

by Matt Daddy on Nov 22, 2011 2:28 PM PST up reply actions  

IFYPFY
mmm bacon egg pie

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 22, 2011 2:29 PM PST up reply actions  

For a guy on the run

from the feds for selling illegal boner pilz probably made from endangered tiger parts, you are awfully concerned about the state of AtQ’s arteries.

ATQ's #1 fan of ATQ Guys

by daisyduck on Nov 22, 2011 1:21 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

That might have sounded good when I was 20.

Now? My stomach just did a triple-Lindy just thinking about it.

Ducks GOOOOD. Fuskies BAAAAAD.

by BigGreenWreckingMachine on Nov 22, 2011 12:53 PM PST up reply actions  

I think that looks like the mother of all sausage biscuits, Looks like someone took the bisquick and made them in cake pans. I bet that would be easy to make.

I told you to go to your room!

by MCD Mom on Nov 22, 2011 2:32 PM PST up reply actions  

No wonder MCD is so fat

"the putz from that UO blog, Matt Daddy" - Steve Tannen
The Daily Faberian

by Matt Daddy on Nov 22, 2011 8:27 PM PST up reply actions  

Were goin off the rails with the gravy cake…

Euler's #1 fan

by Bill Musgrave on Nov 22, 2011 7:47 PM PST via mobile up reply actions   2 recs

I will be the most interested in what happens with the wideouts.

We will lose Tuinei, so we will be stuck in the same position that we are still in, in need of another receiving threat to step up. The amount of drops (even on the most simple pass plays we run) we have seen this season is astounding.

I'm super thanks for asking! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPNna_f4P4Y

by CaDuck on Nov 22, 2011 11:41 AM PST up reply actions  

We have wideouts?

For Oregon, King Kelly, and St Quack!

by DamienS on Nov 22, 2011 12:24 PM PST up reply actions  

What happens next year?

2012. End of the world. Thanks Mayans, you heartless bastards.

Let’s say the Duckies do finish with the Rose Bowl am beat Wisconsin by, say, 10. How does next year shape after considering all things?

The UW fans will have to slightly change their verbal attacks.

Do we start the year ranked top 5?

Maybe.

What about #1 or 2 overall?

Doubtful.

Of all the possible early NFL declarations (namely Boyett and LMJ), do any come back?

I doubt Boyett leaves.

What are our strengths and weaknesses next year?

Probably not that different.

Odds of coaching staff staying intact?

92.4%

And how does the schedule play out based on what other teams in the conference return and lose?

I think there will be major turnover next year. This bodes well for Oregon, as they are a pretty young team getting experience this year, while maintaining senior leadership on both sides.

There has been a lot of chatter that this year was UO’s long shot title and most like Rose Bowl year, while next year could be a legit title run. What do you think?

We control our destiny to the Rose Bowl. The NCG battle is too political.

All things considered, how do you think next year shapes up going into the season?

Too much can really happen for me to make a logical guess.

It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck

by JShufelt on Nov 22, 2011 11:52 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Yes

No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Noo

"If you type two spaces after a period, you're doing it wrong."

by joelor on Nov 22, 2011 11:53 AM PST up reply actions  

OH CHRIST YOU'RE ALL WRONG.

42.

Now with mustache guarantee!

by HoodRiverDuck on Nov 22, 2011 11:53 AM PST up reply actions   2 recs

If our players can just figure out how to fall and miss the ground

those dragged-out two-minute scoring drives will be a thing of the past.

"If you type two spaces after a period, you're doing it wrong."

by joelor on Nov 22, 2011 11:57 AM PST up reply actions  

Don’t panic.

It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck

by JShufelt on Nov 22, 2011 4:39 PM PST up reply actions  

What happens next year?
Let’s say the Duckies do finish with the Rose Bowl am beat Wisconsin by, say, 10. How does next year shape after considering all things?Do we start the year ranked top 5? What about #1 or 2 overall?

I think it’s very likely that Ducks start in the top 5. If they win out through Wisconsin, they’re likely to finish there, and next year’s team won’t give too much reason for a drop. Had we beaten USC, finishing the year a probable #2, I’d think we were very likely for a #2 spot or even #1. Not too likely now.

Of all the possible early NFL declarations (namely Boyett and LMJ), do any come back?
LMJ is gone, though I doubt he’s a first-round choice, it’s the right decision regardless. No one else should even think about it.
how does the schedule play out based on what other teams in the conference return and lose?
No one should be appreciably better (considering where we play them) other than possibly USC and possibly Cal. I say possibly for USC because, though they do have a young team, they lose some of their biggest stars, and a pretty large senior class. Barkley played out of his mind Saturday, and if anything that should push him further out the door. This game of course scares me – the consensus prediction will be that USC and the Ducks play twice next year, that they’re our LSU/Bama except the rematch is for the league title. That the game will be in LA doesn’t really help. I feel worse about that game than I did a week ago. There may be a lot of bandwagon “THEY’RE BACK ON TOP” type chatter. I wouldn’t be shocked if they get tabbed to win the league, and if they end up ranked ahead of UO in polls to start the year. One thing to consider though is that USC played by far their best game of the year Saturday. Even a week before, two weeks before, they showed all sorts of holes and vulnerability. Barkley to Lee has been taking off for a while, but Barkley should be gone. The two previous weeks, USC looked if anything LESS threatening. UO throwing up on themselves had a lot to do with Saturday’s outcome as well as USC putting it together for basically the first time all year (Ok, UW, I guess). I don’t think USC will fall off much if at all, but unless Barkley comes back they won’t be too much better, and UO on average over this season > USC on average over this season. It will be a very tough game that will probably be played twice but it may be the only really serious threat either team sees in conference, at least from the vantage of right now. I say maybe Cal will be better because they also have a lot of young talent, and we usually don’t play well in the Bay Area. But at this point Tedford has to prove it. OSU should also be better but the gulf is so big right now that I don’t know that it will matter.
There has been a lot of chatter that this year was UO’s long shot title and most like Rose Bowl year, while next year could be a legit title run. What do you think?
Schedule wise, they have a better shot next year. It sets up a lot like Stanford this year, minus Oregon coming to town. Anything could happen, and nothing it guaranteed. Relative to this year, it should be a better shot. But any type of title run will run through LA, with probably a USC rematch in Eugene with the BCSNCG on the line or another trip to LA to get to the RB. It’s all highly speculative at this point, of course. And events/politics in the rest of the country have a huge and unforeseeable impact.
Weaknesses in terms of experience will probably be WRs and TEs, but they’ll also likely be the most talented units we’ve ever ha at each position.
We get a huge influx of raw talent. There are enough returning vets to lead the group though that I think (hope) we should expect notable improvement.
Barner will lead the league in rushing, barring injury. Book it.
All things considered, how do you think next year shapes up going into the season? I think it could pan out similar to this season (chance at a title with real hopes of winning conference and getting to another big bowl); but something tells me there is a possibility that next year’s team could challenge 2001, 2007, and 2010 as UO’s best team ever.
It sets up better. Having that early LSU loss was absolutely huge for the teams’ opportunities this year. Everything of course would have run differently without that game. But that alone will be a huge boost to any title run. Not to be that guy, but in looking ahead, there’s always the chance of an NCAA wildcard that could derail another BCS/Rose Bowl/MBCSNCG run before it starts. Overall, college football is too unpredictable to make any certain predictions. But it’s fun to try anyway.

Somewhere, somehow, a Duck is watching you.

by omb on Nov 22, 2011 12:48 PM PST up reply actions  

Ssssshhhh.

Don’t use the phrase “the grind.” BlockU members might be watching. They don’t believe “the grind” exists.

Ducks GOOOOD. Fuskies BAAAAAD.

by BigGreenWreckingMachine on Nov 22, 2011 12:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Yes indeed.

Strange, this time last year we were heading into the penultimate game on the Fri. after Thanksgiving against Arizona (the epic “Brotzman” night). Now we’re heading into the CW instead with the CCG on the horizon (knocking on wood, throwing salt over shoulder, crossing fingers, etc).

Ducks GOOOOD. Fuskies BAAAAAD.

by BigGreenWreckingMachine on Nov 22, 2011 12:19 PM PST up reply actions  

knocking on wood, throwing salt over shoulder, crossing fingers, etc.

Sacrificing lambs, paying mob bosses, wearing clean underwear.

For Oregon, King Kelly, and St Quack!

by DamienS on Nov 22, 2011 12:23 PM PST up reply actions  

Did that before LSU. Didn't help.

The wife appreciated the clean unders though.

Ducks GOOOOD. Fuskies BAAAAAD.

by BigGreenWreckingMachine on Nov 22, 2011 12:27 PM PST up reply actions  

We got super lucky last year,
  1. We won a close game at cal,
  2. Two of our best players sat out a couple big games (KenJon and DT) that we won.
  3. Jeff Mhael, how about some of the catches he made? Paulson and Mhael are two of the best pass catchers I’ve ever seen. If it’s in the vacinity they have absolute focus and balls just kinda disappear into a black hole around them. If the ball is even remotely close they were going to come down with it every time. It bumms me out that Paulson is a senior.
  4. We didn’t sustain any major injuries. Kenjon’s concussion aside the entire team seemed fresh and healthy at the end of the season. This year DT’s knee is banged up, LMJ has the elbow, Huff, Gildon, Clay, KenJon, Colt, Scales, all have missed time or been limited. Weems has gone down, Asper and York have battled injuries as recent as the USC game. Hell even our kicker Rob Beard is limited which is why Maldanado was even in at the end of the game. All things the same Rob Beard may have been the one kicking if he hadn’t gotten hurt early in the season.

To make it to a NCG, and to make it through an undefeated season things have to roll your way, you have to get lucky. LSU needed 4 turnovers to beat Oregon and needed Alabama’s kicker to miss 4 FG to win in Tuscaloosa. 10 years ago if people told me that Oregon had the best chance to get to the rosebowl out of anybody I’d be ecstatic. And I am.

But you are all the smartest, funniest, most handsome bitches on all the internets.~DaisyDuck 11.2.11

by Quack Addict on Nov 22, 2011 2:00 PM PST up reply actions  

Wait a second...

From Ted’s post on the BCS releasing teams under consideration –

No conference may place more than two teams in the BCS games, unless the conference has two teams in the National Championship Game, and neither team is its champion.

So if LSU beats Arkansas but loses to Georgia, not only would Georgia go to the Sugar bowl but ’Bama/LSU in the NCG could still happen as well, with neither winning its conference? What a messed up system.

Somewhere, somehow, a Duck is watching you.

by omb on Nov 22, 2011 2:05 PM PST reply actions  

Better yet

if LSU loses to Arkansas (and presumably drops to #3 or #4) and beats Georgia, and Alabama beats Auburn, we’ll still probably have SEC teams 1-2-3 in the BCS, but #3 won’t be allowed to go to a BCS game.

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 22, 2011 2:07 PM PST up reply actions  

...THANKS FOR RUINING MY CHRISTMAS :(

ok, so if LSU loses to Arkansas (falls to 3/4), Arkansas moves to #1 (most likely) and then beats Georgia. Alabama beats Auburn @ #2. So LSU would probably be at #3 ahead of Va Tech and Stanford, and at worst #4, and would not be allowed to go to a BCS bowl.

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 22, 2011 2:15 PM PST up reply actions  

You were right, I was just being internet-rude.

I still like the revised scenario, as the #3 team in the country would be relegated to the Gator/Outback bowl.

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 22, 2011 2:17 PM PST up reply actions  

What is this, remember stuff on the internet day?

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 22, 2011 2:47 PM PST up reply actions  

LISTEN

If we can’t convert to Judaism for the jokes, it’s gotta be reciprocal.

/seinfeld’d
/realizesyouwereprobablyfourwhenseinfeldwasrunning
/feelsold
/cries

Now with mustache guarantee!

by HoodRiverDuck on Nov 22, 2011 2:51 PM PST up reply actions  

I've heard that it would be Alabama.

Somewhere, somehow, a Duck is watching you.

by omb on Nov 22, 2011 2:17 PM PST up reply actions  

3 way tiebreak is team with highest BCS ranking

gotta think it goes Arky, Alabama, LSU if Arkansas wins.

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 22, 2011 2:22 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't know.

Alabama destroyed Arkansas. I don’t think voters are going to forget about that, unless Arkansas wins big.

Somewhere, somehow, a Duck is watching you.

by omb on Nov 22, 2011 2:26 PM PST up reply actions  

Voters wont

Computers won’t give a damn.

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 22, 2011 2:29 PM PST up reply actions  

Big Girls Wanna Move?

But you are all the smartest, funniest, most handsome bitches on all the internets.~DaisyDuck 11.2.11

by Quack Addict on Nov 22, 2011 2:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Bat Giblets Won't Macerate?

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 22, 2011 2:43 PM PST up reply actions  

haha

I suggest that when BGWM is being particularly stubborn and argumentative we default to calling him this. It should definitely be a thing.

ATQ's #1 fan of ATQ Guys

by daisyduck on Nov 22, 2011 3:38 PM PST up reply actions  

Or

Blue gonad wussy man

when he’s being good he is

Bang gong with moxie

Euler's #1 fan

by Bill Musgrave on Nov 22, 2011 6:41 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Better Go With Mariota?

I couldnt agree more. START MARIOTA! FIRE DARRON THOMAS!

I'm super thanks for asking! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPNna_f4P4Y

by CaDuck on Nov 22, 2011 3:00 PM PST up reply actions  

I was about to say...

my level of giving a dams iszzzzzzzzzzzzz.

Ducks GOOOOD. Fuskies BAAAAAD.

by BigGreenWreckingMachine on Nov 22, 2011 3:05 PM PST up reply actions  

But the computers aren't going to have any big difference between the 3,

and if they do it’s likely to favor LSU and ’Bama because they have better wins outside the SEC. And voters are still 2/3 of the whole deal.

Somewhere, somehow, a Duck is watching you.

by omb on Nov 22, 2011 2:31 PM PST up reply actions  

It’s flabbergasting that this happened again. As far as I know, the only other time we’ve had full transitivity was 2007, and that was when every team played every other team, so it was more likely to happen then.

What pisses me off: LOSING TO USC CLOSED THE DAMNED CIRCLE.

The "Beano Cook" of ATQ

by benzduck on Nov 22, 2011 5:35 PM PST up reply actions  

Haha, pretty typical Pac-10/12 stuff right there.

It feels like the Pac-10/12 likes to beat up on itself more than any other conference. The Pac-10/12 shenanigans were fun when Oregon was a “Holiday Bowl is a solid year” caliber of team, but now the shenanigans absolutely suck.

I’m not sure how, but a team always seems to go undefeated in the SEC, even though they do play a tough in-conference schedule.

I'm super thanks for asking! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPNna_f4P4Y

by CaDuck on Nov 22, 2011 3:21 PM PST up reply actions  

DON'T DRINK THE KOOL AID MAN
I’m not sure how, but a team always seems to go undefeated in the SEC, even though they do play a tough in-conference schedule.

The SEC has two dominant teams, one very good one, and a ton of also-rans this year. Which is basically how they roll every year.

Now with mustache guarantee!

by HoodRiverDuck on Nov 22, 2011 3:28 PM PST up reply actions  

Actually that's not that true

The SEC often has no undefeated teams. Off the top of my head Auburn, Auburn again (in 2010) and Alabama was it in the last 10 years. Tennessee also counts, but that was 14 years ago. Everyone else has had at least one loss – Florida both times, LSU both times (once with two losses). It’s pretty uncommon.

By comparison it’s a lot more common for either Texas or Oklahoma to come out undefeated from the Big-12. And get stomped.

by kalon on Nov 22, 2011 3:46 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah but

look at those SCORES!! I’ll bet the SEC thinks thats a graphic about basketball.

ATQ's #1 fan of ATQ Guys

by daisyduck on Nov 22, 2011 3:40 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, that's big and all

But I’d much rather see one from the Uw 2008 season with Uw in the middle and every team on the outside greater than

"the putz from that UO blog, Matt Daddy" - Steve Tannen
The Daily Faberian

by Matt Daddy on Nov 22, 2011 5:33 PM PST up reply actions  

Fun!

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 22, 2011 6:51 PM PST up reply actions  

This is either proof that Oregon PERS is working perfectly, or completely broken.
OregonianSports Oregonian Sports
Mike Bellotti, top pensioner in Oregon Public Employee Retirement System, gets $41,000 a month. bit.ly/tD4xje #GoDucks

The "Beano Cook" of ATQ

by benzduck on Nov 22, 2011 6:21 PM PST reply actions  

Another big night of basketball in the Pac 12

UCLA gets #14 Kansas in Maui (right now on ESPN)

  1. Cal gets #21 Missouri (ESPN2)

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 22, 2011 6:52 PM PST reply actions  

Woo hoo!

Probably two more OOC loses for the Pac-12!

I'm super thanks for asking! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPNna_f4P4Y

by CaDuck on Nov 22, 2011 8:29 PM PST up reply actions  

HAI GUYS

I’M EH FAHMOOSE HOOSKIE.

"Forget it. If 21 gets behind you, you can play the fight song." --Scott Van Pelt

by axemen23 on Nov 22, 2011 8:38 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Addicted to Quack, SBN's Oregon Ducks blog and fan community.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Uncle_phil_small
Oregon National Champs? See what ESPN says...
2011-09-03_15-49-32_912_small
Weekend Preview for May 18-20
Mostinteresting_small
Tako Tuesdays: The Music Thread
Small
Better video of DAT in 100m
2011-09-03_15-49-32_912_small
Giant Sports Weekend Open Thread
Atq-spoon-5_small
Miracle Wolf Scholarship Fund: Update
La_foto_small
Spring game online?
Small
Ducks Drafted and also picked up in Free agency
2011-09-03_15-49-32_912_small
------> REVISED: ATQ Spring Game Meet-Up 2012
Dog_in_tree_small
Duck football tied to Kennedy Assassination

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Guest SB Nation correspondent A.J. Jenkins gets a few questions in with his new teammate, LaMichael...
Big Weekend For Ducks Baseball
Hello folks, you may not know me but i'm an alum living in south hateistan (renton WA)  and am looking to find duck fans who enjoy drinking and college football in this hostile environment. Please let me know if you share these pursuits and wish to hang.
While at the NFLPA trading card photo shoot, Amy K. Nelson and Dan Rubenstein gave their microphone...
Spring Football Analysis II & the "Scat" Play
Here is this weeks video with plenty of discussion on the changes for the BCS.  Thanks ATQ and GO Ducks!
Anthony Bennett picks UNLV over Oregon
Chip Kelly Scared
Here is this weeks video. Thanks ATQ, GO DUCKS!
All of DAT's races from Oregon Twilight.

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

ATQ Twitter Feed


Managers

207873_1005773153454_1498651968_14034_9616_n_small David Piper

Pre_small ntrebon

Img_0525_small jtlight

Mostinteresting_small Takimoto

Domsicecream_small dvieira

Editors

Pettingzoo_small PaulSF

Atq-spoon-5_small Matt Daddy

Authors

Ryan__rusty_small jcgoducks

Small nds500