2011 Season Awards: Defense MVP
Looking at the defense it's really tough to pick just one guy that was consistent, a leader and critical to the success of the team. Even when you look at the different units of the secondary, the linebackers and the defensive line, you will see a variance of performance throughout the season. While the secondary played well against teams like Colorado, or washington, they struggled against USC and WSU. The D-line stepped up against Stanford and later in the season, but they took a while to get going. Finally the linebackers always seemed to be missing a key piece in either Alonso, Clay or Stuckey that had guys scrambling and out of position.
On a whole though, the defense put together another impressive year ending up in the top 3 in the conference in rushing yds/att, passing yds/att and total defense yds/att. Aliotti continued to use his hybrid zone blitz scheme, and as guys got more experience and understood it better, they started to create more havoc in the backfield for opposing teams and turnovers and sacks increased steadily.
Trying to pick just one guy out of the group that was the most valuable would be difficult, but here are some candidates:
Boyett returned to his rightful spot as the leading tackler for the Ducks in 2011. He's quickly becoming the most dependable player on Oregon's defense. Not only has he only missed 1 game in his 3 years at Oregon, but he's constantly calling out the defensive assignments to the secondary, breaking up passes on deep routes and getting after guys in the backfield in run support. With the inexperience that Oregon had at corner this season, Boyett was called upon to lead those guys and make sure they were running the right coverage schemes. Given everything that Boyett did the Ducks this year, it is no wonder he was awarded second team all Pac 12 honors.
Probably one of the biggest and most pleasant surprises on the Ducks defense in 2011 was the development and play of Eddie Pleasant. Last year saw Pleasant transition from his hybrid linebacker spot to a full time rover/safety position. At times it looked like Pleasant struggled in 2010 to understand passing routes and angle on gaps in run support. 2011 was a different story. Pleasant had a monster game against Uw with 2 interceptions and 5 tackles. Pleasant was crucial to the Ducks run game as he played closer to the line early in run support to help take away a team's running game to force them into passing situations where Oregon's defense could unleash their attack. His accomplishments and improvements did not go unnoticed as he was awarded with a first team all Pac 12 honor.
Another guy that took some time to get used to his new position seemed to thrive this year. Dion Jordan switched from TE in 2010 to DE and again switched this year to the hybrid drop-end position. While early in the season it seemed that Jordan was lost on the flat routes and getting past guys on the edge, later in the season Jordan picked up the scheme and was a constant force in the opposing team's backfield. Jordan led the Ducks with 7.5 sacks and 13 tackles for a loss and had one of the biggest hits all year in the Pac 12 Championship Game. Along with Pleasant, Jordan racked up first team all Pac 12 honors for his play.
The all Pac 12 team may have forgotten about Michael Clay, but I didn't. What Clay did this year, didn't always show up on the stat sheet or in the box score. His best statistical game had to be against lowly Colorado where he had 2 tackles and an interception returned for a touchdown. Even missing 3 games, he was still third in tackles for a loss and second in tackles on the team. What didn't show up was his steadying influence on the linebackers. Clay's ability to control the weakside, allowed guys like Stuckey, Kaddu and Lokombo to be at their best. If you wanted to escape the blitz or run away from the teeth of the defense you were heading straight into Clay territory, and he usually cleaned up.
---
Those are the top 4 guys in my mind. Vote for the one you think was the defensive MVP this season, or make a case in the comments for who you think was most deserving.
39 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Clay is the anchor out there and has been all year
But I still gotta go with Boyett. He led a secondary that didn’t have Cliffy for most of the year or Gildon for part of it, and brought the young freshmen CBs help when they needed it and big hits and plays when it counted.
You can’t say enough how much Boyett means for this team and we still get him another year.
Agreed.
Clay & Boyett are both deserving, but Boyett got my vote. Secondary would have been atrocious without Boyett’s leadership and smarts on the field. He’s one of my favorite Ducks now – he has had a lights-out season.
Got ahead of myself...
Secondary would not necessarily have been ‘atrocious’ but it would have been : " Lacking" without Boyett.
I went with Clay
The defense just wasn’t the same with him off the field. Yes, other players got better, but his play was exceptional, and allowed other players to be great.
--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
I went with Clay too.
Oregon loves you, Chip Kelly!
I went with Pleasant
Boyett was also an option. Our defense lives or dies by its safety play. The safeties are the ones responsible for cleanup on running plays and coverage options on passing. They enable ballhawking. While LBs get a lot of sacks they’re not in it nearly as much as our safety play is.
John Boyett
All the way. Dude is a baller. Michael Clay would be my second choice.
I went with DeWitt Stuckey. He was the one guy who started the game on time, every time, no fiddely-dicking around.
The one game he got hurt, we lost. He made lots of s-o-l-i-d plays and many really special/spectacular plays. And, he just sorta came out of no where and started laying vicious hits on QBs, staying in position, getting interceptions, causing and recovering fumbles. He had many assists on tackles that otherwise the RB might well have gotten away. Nose to the ball when it was in his zone.
Boyette has always been my favorite but this season, DS was/is ‘The Man.’
"What you are entrusted to do as a coach is to create an environment where your players have a chance to be successful." CHIP KELLY
Tough choice between Clay and Boyett, but I went with Clay.
"I don't do well with pain medicine."
by TennesseeQuackAttack8 on Dec 7, 2011 11:27 AM PST reply actions
I think the poll is pretty accurate
Michael Clay for his knowledge and leadership, which was obviously missed during his absence, followed closely by John Boyett because he’s a heat seeking missile.
My parents believed in me.
I went with Clay.
Ever since he started playing as a RSFR, he looked like he was going to be a fantastic player. As many above have mentioned, when our defense didnt have Michael Clay, the linebackers looked lost. I think this was most apparent against Missouri State (the first game Clay missed). Our defense almost looked outmatched on MSU’s first few drives.
Winners of the Platypus trophy!
Wasn't Clay handling long snapping duties as a freshman?
Addicted to Quack, #1 Oregon blog among female Duck fans, including the ageless and ever-radiant daisyduck.
handling them like a bouse.
12-0 (9-0)
Oregon -- Oregon, for heaven's sakes -- is playing for the national championship. --Ivan Maisel
Yep
I think Clay was incredibly important to the Ducks’ defense this year, but I’d have to go with Boyett. Boyett was such a steadying influence at the back of that defense. Clay made some outstanding plays during the year, but Boyett was more consistent.
"the putz from that UO blog, Matt Daddy" - Steve Tannen
The Daily Faberian
If I had to pick a “Most Improved”, I’m giving it to Eddie. The Praying Mantis gets a close 2nd.
But the defensive MVP is Michael Clay.
It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck
You would give EP most improved?
I’m not planning on doing a most improved post, but I was thinking about it, and you also have to look at the guys that improved throughout the year. Hroniss Grasu was going to be on my list. He looked lost early in the season, but later he was one of the better linemen and his ability to pull and get outside on the blocks was crucial.
I was also thinking about T Mitch as most improved. Again, he struggled early, but he’s become one of our most dependable corners.
"the putz from that UO blog, Matt Daddy" - Steve Tannen
The Daily Faberian
I chalk up Mitch & Grasu to being freshmen.
Compared to this year and last year, the most improved are Eddie Pleasant and Dion Jordan.
It's spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-W-O-O-Z-Y".
"YOU ARE THE KING OF THE AWESOME GUYS, JSHUFELT!!!" - daisyduck
Then what about Stuckey?
The guy pretty much didn’t exist before this year and he was a force at the MIKE. Most of the time I wished for more Stuckey and less Alonso.
"the putz from that UO blog, Matt Daddy" - Steve Tannen
The Daily Faberian
The problem is, what did they "improve" on?
With Eddie, his progress is obvious because he played last year, but Mitch and Hroniss improved on..what exactly? Nothing to go on. They could be up for a newcomer nod, but that’s going to DAT every time.
Ducks GOOOOD. Fuskies BAAAAAD.
by BigGreenWreckingMachine on Dec 7, 2011 4:26 PM PST up reply actions
Boyett.
You look at all our breakdowns and he was there to pick it up, love Clay, but Boyett saved our bacon so many times.
For Oregon, King Kelly, and St Quack!
Tough call, but I went with Boyett.
As good as Clay was when he was on the field, I can’t give him credit for the three games he missed. Boyett, meanwhile, was out there every game, picking up slack from the guys who may have been out with injuries.
Boyett beats Clay on overall value to the team, even though I think Clay was slightly better in the games he played.
Defending maligned chants since 2009
All the candidates had great years
can’t forget DeWitt Stuckey though. Had a great, surprising year, and it was fun to watch his growth. That said, I’d probably take Michael Clay.
I am just glad to see the Defense get some time off to heal...
I am particularly interested in seeing how this unit fares against Wisconsin. For the first time we have a chance to have everyone healed up from nagging injuries. I am particularly interested in seeing Heimuli and Keliikipi getting some rest, so that our interior can regain some momentum that was there during the UW and Stanford span. Heimuli and Clay have been dealing with ankle issues and those really never clear up until you have some time off.
Anyway, I feel like we are more likely to see the ball hawking gang tackling unit we saw against Stanford rather than the unit we saw against USC. Maybe even better.
The best player on the field has to be Clay.
"I love Oregon's obsolete recruiting report on an unhealthy level. Just more proof how balla Chip Kelly really is." Dr. Saturday
Boyett.
I can’t remember how many times I would see him making adjustments pre snap, insuring everyone knew what they where doing and blowing up someone with the ball. Clay had a great year, but Boyett anchored the defense in more ways then one.
"You better show up. You don’t have to be the best team in the country. You just have to be the best team in the stadium on that day." Chip Kelly
Clay
But pretty torn between him and boyett.
by builds character on Dec 7, 2011 5:38 PM PST reply actions
Michael Clay, when healthy
Is our defensive MVP by a landslide. The guy is like a heat seeking missile on the field and we are a far better defense with his speed covering the middle of the field. Boyett has been inconsistent at times this year, Pleasant is still a weak tackler and a liability at times in coverage, Dion Jordan was completely absent at the beginning of the year, and Kaddu is what he is, a good pass rusher but not the kind of consistent player and tackler that Clay is.
Our linebackers have been very good this year. Stuckey, Clay, and Kaddu have all had great years.
Prince: This bores me. Is anyone up for a game of basketball?
Boyett inconsistent and Pleasant a weak tackler?
Huh? Are we watching the same team? Boyett and Pleasant have been some of the most consistent players on the defense all year, from game 1.
"the putz from that UO blog, Matt Daddy" - Steve Tannen
The Daily Faberian
Part of it was just the way that he looked out there in his pads.
But a few times Pleasant had me thinking that TJ Ward had snuck back into the building and suited up.
Somewhere, somehow, a Duck is watching you.
Pleasant was great near the line as well as deep in coverage
I think that’s what stuck out to me the most this year. Pleasant got beat a couple of times last year pretty bad, but this year, he always seemed to be in decent position. Near the line was where he really excelled. He could cover TEs or slots just as well and when he went for the tackle the guy wasn’t getting away.
This year was exactly what we all wanted to see out Pleasant when he switched positions.
"the putz from that UO blog, Matt Daddy" - Steve Tannen
The Daily Faberian
That’s the problem though. Clay wasn’t healthy all season. You can’t have value when you’re not on the field. That may not be Clay’s fault, it’s just the way it is.
As fantastic as Clay was when he was on the field, I don’t know that it can make up the distance between him and Boyett, given that Boyett was on the field a lot more.
Defending maligned chants since 2009
Boyett's neck
looks like it is threatening to swallow his face.
15-yard penalty for my avatar. /Pereira'd
Also...
the biggest and most pleasant surprises on the Ducks defense in 2011 was the development and play of Eddie Pleasant
What you may have unintentionally did there, I see it.
15-yard penalty for my avatar. /Pereira'd
Went with Clay
His return from the ankle injury solidified the D and he always seemed to be in the right place at the right time. I loved Boyett’s toughness and his chippy play. I thought Kaddu would get a little more run, but I think he tended to disappear at times.
Boyett, definitely.
He’s done the hardest hits* on defense, and I always wince in sympathy whenever Boyett is finished demolishing his victims.
*Dion Jordan’s hit on the Bruin QB last week was the hardest hit I’ve seen all year, but Boyett hits harder overall.
Porter, Drexler, Kersey, Williams, Duckworth. The greatest starting 5 ever.

by 


























