Tako Tuesdays Feels Really Good About This One

Do want.

Please indulge my fanboy ravings. Four days to Ducks football, and I'm losing my mind.

If we lose two games this season, I'm going to be disappointed.

For realsies.

The season begins this Saturday with an Arkansas St. team that won ten games in 2011, and return the conference player of the year at QB. Unfortunately for them, that conference is the Sun Belt, and that's just not going to cut it at Autzen. The Red Wolves have a suspect offensive line, inexperienced skill players, and a defense that is gobs and gobs of both aforementioned adjectives. While last year's opener was a high-stakes crapshoot between two immensely talented teams, this should aptly test this team's mettle in a low-stress situation; frankly, this is how Oregon should open the season from now on. The Pac-12 is too talented, and Oregon is too highly regarded based on reputation, to waste time with a high-pressure game against a big-time opponent.

Oregon's non-conference schedule doesn't get a whole lot tougher; Fresno State will be Fresno State, forever flailing in a giant hottub filled with meh, and Tennessee Tech is the fifth-best college football team in a state that includes Vanderbilt.

November 3rd has already been hyped by the media enough; Oregon v. USC, Part I. So much attention has been paid to that game, that at times it can seem like the rest of the schedule has been overlooked. But has it?

The Pac-12 is in a dead heat with the Big XII for the title of "Second-best conference in college football", and every game on a Pac-12 schedule is against a team that must be taken seriously. But Oregon fans should expect this team to win every game; the system is a leg up on all other competition, and Chip Kelly has now had enough recruiting classes to build a group of his high-caliber athletes that match his high-caliber program vision. Add that to Oregon's track record under Kelly of winning games they "should" win, i.e not losing to an inferior opponent. Following a 2009 season filled with close calls (Purdue, Utah, Stanford, and OSU), Oregon has only really had one near-slip; @Cal in 2010. The first five conference games of 2012 do not come without challenge, the home tilt against washington in particular, but they are all games Oregon should be expected to win. And after USC, the Ducks have Cal, Stanford, and Oregon State; all three games pose different challenges, but Oregon will enter all three as the favorites. And the team that Oregon is capable of being should win all three. That just leaves the matter of the Trojans.

We've seen a number of games where Oregon is outplayed in the first half, whether the score reflects it or not. Whether the game ends in a loss (USC '11), or a win (Arizona, Tennessee, or Stanford '10), Oregon has shown its mettle in responding to adversity and dominating in the second half. Coach Kelly and the rest of the staff has shown an uncanny ability to recognize and exploit flaws in an opposing gameplan, when given only twenty minutes or less of observation. It's very possible to beat Oregon for sixty minutes, but beyond that? I'm not so sure. And that's why I just don't see USC beating the Ducks twice. Once? Absolutely. But not twice. That leaves three scenarios:

  • USC beats Oregon, then Oregon beats USC - Oregon wins the Pac-12, and is guaranteed the Rose Bowl. I'm not sure if the Ducks have a national championship resume with only one win over the Trojans though.
  • Oregon beats USC, then USC beats Oregon - In what I would consider the least likely of the three, the Trojans would take the Pac-12 crown, leaving a one-loss Oregon team as an almost-certain BCS at-large team.
  • Oregon wins twice - This spells National Championship game, against another undefeated team (or a one-loss SEC champ).
Has Oregon football reached the point of perennial BCS expectations? I'm not sure. But this team has the schedule and the talent necessary to make a run at crystal. Is it possible that this is an eight-or-nine win team masquerading behind lofty dreams? Sure, there are a half-dozen teams every year that fail to live up to expectations. But the defense will be stout, the best of the Chip Kelly era. And the offense is built from an experienced offensive line, and is led by a talented first-year starter with seemingly unlimited potential.

The last time Oregon debuted a starting quarterback, it was 2010. Duck fans weren't sure what to expect from Darron Thomas' Ducks; what they got was an undefeated regular season and as close to a national title as this program has ever been. Now that we know what the Ducks are capable of, why should we expect anything less?
X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Addicted To Quack

You must be a member of Addicted To Quack to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Addicted To Quack. You should read them.

Join Addicted To Quack

You must be a member of Addicted To Quack to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Addicted To Quack. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9347_tracker