Addicted To Quack: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Backing the Pack for NC State Fans!


My ASU Preview

You know that I think more of ASU than a lot of people do.  All the stats seem to indicate a really good team.  I posted them earlier in the week, but here they are again:



Scoring Offense:

Oregon 43.8

ASU 36.9

Scoring Defense:

ASU 15.6

Oregon 21.9

Turnover Ratio:

ASU +7

Oregon +6

Nobody disputes that those are impressive statistics.  That said, people like to rail on the schedule that they have played.  Here is said schedule:

SJSU  45-3
Colorado  33-14
SDSU  34-13
OSU  44-32
@Stanford  41-3
@WSU  23-20
Washington  44-20
Cal  31-20

For me, its not so much the teams ASU has played that make me question them a bit.  Its where they have played the games.  None of the teams on this list are great (Colorado may be the best, they caught OSU and Cal during really bad times).  And the two road games--Stanford and WSU, may just be the worst teams in the conference (though UA and UW might give them a run for their money).  There is a big difference between rolling into Palo Alto and Pullman (in good weather), and rolling into Autzen.  I'm not really sure how ASU is going to react to that environment.

While ASU's offense has been very good, I think that Oregon has some distinct advantages.  One is that this is not just a conventional offense that you can just stack the box against.  If you stack the box, you're going to bite on the fake, and unlike SC, ASU is not fast enough to stop Dixon quickly as he's turning the corner.  ASU will have to play at least some linebackers back to cover Dixon.  Also, it is the consensus even among many ASU fans that its not a great defensive line, and our offensive line should be able to get a push against them, punching some holes open for Stewart to run through.

Through the air, we know that we're just not going to be able to have the deep threat.  Its going to be a lot of the short stuff we've seen the last few games--bubble screens, flats, etc.  Hopefully, we can get Dickson down the middle a couple of times.  ASU's secondary is pretty good, so I'm not sure that Pflugrad and Williams are going to get open deep a lot.  I'd feel pretty good about Williams having a big game and breaking some tackles if he could actually hold onto the ball.  I actually think that you could see a surprise and have Terrance Scott have a big game.  He's the one guy who might have the speed to get open downfield.  However, if we have to depend on the pass to win this game, we are in trouble.

As for ASU's offense, they have a great deal of balance.  They will try to establish the run, and how the defense responds to that will determine a lot of the game.  If they can limit ASU's running game and force them to throw, they'll have the chance to pressure Carpenter and really slow the ASU offense down (not that Carpenter can't throw, because he can, but ASU takes a lot of negative plays, especially sacks--28 on the season).  If they can make Rudy uncomfortable and throwing on the run, turnovers will happen.  That said, if the defense breaks down, and ASU is able to gain enough on first down to keep running, that much more pressure will be put on the offense.

Anyway, we've been talking all week about the matchups, here are my keys to the game:

  •  Score early and often.  ASU has only given up 29 second half points all season.  If we can score a lot early, we not only get them behind, but also wear down their defense and soften it up for the second half.
  •  Stop the run.  If we can get Carpenter in situations where we can pressure him, their offense will be severely impacted.
  •  Win the battle of the trenches.  If our O-Line can open up holes and allow Stewart to get consistent yardage on first down, I'm not sure that they can keep up with us.
  •  No special teams turnovers.  We can wear down their defense--but cannot give away possessions and keep their defense off the field.
  •  No stupid penalties.  We know that a Dennis Erickson team will make stupid penalties.  Lets not follow suit.

I really think that this will be a nailbiter.  But, as good as their defense as been, our offense has been better.  We pull away late, and win by 7-10.

GO DUCKS!!!

--Dave

0 recs | Comment 2 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I'm not ready to abandon the deep game...
It amazes me that Oregon fans are so ready to just abandon the deep game.  Everyone has been saying that the loss of 3 receivers has hurt our deep game, and while this is somewhat true, I believe the biggest hindrance to our long game is the defensive schemes we've seen.

Since the Cal game, people have been dropping safeties, and have been playing it safe.  The Stanford safeties did not play disciplined, and we got behind them fairly easily for a few big plays.  Herbsteit really broke this down well last week on GameDay.  

Against Michigan, their safeties played some of the worst defense ever, and even though there were in Cover 3 on the big plays, they COMPLETELY broke down.  Here's what Brian (the most thorough blogger on the internet) over at mgoblog said about the three long passes...
"Dixon has all day to throw. Brandon Harrison is burnt all crispy by Paysinger. Harrison just gets run right by. WTF?"
"This into a three-deep zone. Disgusting. Jamar Adams decides not to cover the guy."
"Johnny Sears. Awful coverage. He's in a deep zone and decides to ignore the guy he's lined up over. Aaaaand defensive charting stops here."

These were the games where we had a "deep passing game."  What's the common denominator here?  Zero safety help.  This is the key to any long passing game.  Big plays rarely happen with strong safety play.

Washington and Washington State are horrible examples because we could do whatever we wanted.  Yeah, against UW Dixon missed a couple deep throws, but it wasn't that we couldn't take advantage of what we were given.   If we look at the USC game, every single long pass that was thrown had safety coverage.  Williams missed one long pass and ran the wrong route, but safety coverage was always there on the long throws.  USC could afford to do this because of the strength of their front 7.  And esp. in the first half, we took advantage of that.  Dixon was incredibly efficient up until the final minutes of the half when we took long shots.  In the second half, we really slowed things down more, and again, played efficiently, but didn't go deep because of how they were playing.

The ASU corners will not be able to cover Williams, Scott, Pflugrad, and Strong consistently.  If they play close to stop the short game, there is going to be safety help (cause they'd be burned otherwise), which means the run game is opened up a lot more due to the weaknesses in ASU's line.  If they play off, we'll take the underneath stuff all day long.

If the safeties come up to try to stop the run, our receivers will get open.  That could be long, could be short.  Our receivers will win the one-on-one matchups.  That's not a bash on the ASU CBs, it's just how football goes.  WRs usually have the advantage.  To be a "lock down" corner, you need to have significantly greater skills than who you are covering.  This will not be happening.

Now, I'm not saying that the long pass is gonna be open all day long.  I'm saying that we are gonna take whatever the defense gives us.  If they want to put their corners one-on-one, we have the skills to capitalize on that.  If not, we'll move down the field all day long and wear out their D.

What's great about this is that it all depends on the right decisions, and Dixon has been great at making the right decisions this year, and that will continue.  Our receivers will get open against the ASU corners.  It's as simple as that.  The ASU safeties will determine where the ball will go, and Dixon will get it to the open guy, as he has done all year long.

by jtlight on Nov 2, 2007 7:59 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Addicted to Quack, SBN's Oregon Ducks blog and fan community.
Start posting about the Ducks »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Sleeper running back: LaMichael James
Small
Next Nick Reed
Dscn3070_small
College Football Preview, Part 4 of 11
Dscn3070_small
College Football Preview, Part 3 of 11
Dscn3070_small
College Football Preview, Part 2 of 11
Dscn3070_small
College Football Preview, Part 1 of 11
Small
Is it time to expand Autzen again?
Uowhitehelmet_small
Five Matchups I'd Like
Atq_small
How about some BBall? Pac 10 rundown
Img_1275_1_small
So, does Lane stay or go?

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

I have bought into doing kickass uniforms for doing kickass uniforms' sake. This is what I think would kickass in 2011.
Check out the poll at the bottom
Roper to Montana
Ropert ---> U of Montana
Ted Miller On Video - Can The Ducks Stay Healthy?
Know thy Opponent 2009: Oregon Ducks
Seattle Times reports Pac-10 in talks for better bowl game
Cupcake Detection!
Bored? Check this out. Funny, yet informative.
CFN posts its Purdue preview

Post_icon New FanShot All FanShots Carrot-mini


Managers

Safeco-david_and_deb_small Addicted to Quack

Pre_small ntrebon

Img_0608_small jtlight

Editors

Domsicecream_small dvieira

Oregon_duck_football_helmet_small JConant

41932caf48d25-44-1_small PaulSF

Official Partner of CBS Sports