So full disclosure I missed watching the first 3 quarters of the Stanford game live and had to re-watch the beginning after watching the ending. So that for sure was a rough way to watch the game. But I did get to see my 4 year old daughter ride on the back of a sheep. I think I chose correctly.
Lamb Chops are pretty fast
The Mutton busting as they call it was actually a qualifying event for the local fair and my daughter did well enough to get invited back during the actual fair and rodeo on Thursday night. If she wins Thursday night she gets a pretty belt buckle. the qualifying event cost $30, then you have to pay an additional $30 to have your child ride in the main event. So as an irresponsible parent, I am paying $60 to watch my kid potentially get injured just so she can get a belt buckle. what the hell type of racket is that? there was also a BBQ competition going on at the fairground and my neighbor was competing so we were hanging out with them at their grille site while we killed time. so I ate a ton of smoked pork short ribs, chicken, and brisket. ohh and they had a metric ton of beer at their site. even though it was bud light it was still free. his BBQ team ended up getting 1st place for brisket so that was cool.
My wife had our new baby boy Tuesday morning this last week. They came home from the hospital on Thursday last week so I have been in a more sleep deprived haze than ever. not only having the new baby in our room waking up every 2 hours for feedings, but also if either of the twins has issues I am the one that has to go run and get the one to sleep before they wake up the other. Fun times.
Disclaimer: I am not a writer, editor, statistician, or analyst. If grammatical errors cause you pain, then I bring the pain. All content is for my personal entertainment. If you like it great, if you don’t like it great. Please leave comments and criticism in the comment section.
in case you have any questions on definitions or from where I am getting my info I have provided links below to stats glossary and to both Ducks and Cal Bears stats provided by Bill Connelly.
NOW ON TO THE STATS!!!
Ducks overall S&P
S&P+ Rk: | 33 |
Off. S&P+ Rk: | 19 |
Def. S&P+ Rk: | 77 |
Special Teams S&P+ Rk: | 56 |
Cal's overall S&P
S&P+ Rk: | 56 |
Off. S&P+ Rk: | 118 |
Def. S&P+ Rk: | 5 |
Special Teams S&P+ Rk: | 16 |
S&P+ likes our Offense and is indifferent about our Defense. It absolutely dislikes Cal's Offense and think's their defense is amazing. I will be interested to see which of those numbers gives.
Five Factors Ducks
Offense | Rk | Defense | Rk | |||
EFFICIENCY | Success Rate* | 48.40% | 25 | 35.20% | 27 | |
Marginal Efficiency* | 2.10% | 26 | -8.30% | 36 | ||
EXPLOSIVENESS | IsoPPP* | 1.25 | 45 | 1.31 | 99 | |
Marginal Explosiveness* | 0.16 | 32 | 0.17 | 99 | ||
FIELD POSITION | Avg. FP | 35.5 | 9 | 28.3 | 63 | |
FINISHING DRIVES | Pts. Per Scoring Opp. | 5.24 | 37 | 5.11 | 107 | |
TURNOVERS | Expected TO Margin | -0.9 | 96 | TO Luck (PPG): | -1.4 | |
Actual TO Margin | -2 | 90 |
Cal's Five Factors
Offense | Rk | Defense | RK | |||
EFFICIENCY | Success Rate* | 42.30% | 81 | 32.40% | 10 | |
Marginal Efficiency* | -7.20% | 110 | -12.90% | 2 | ||
EXPLOSIVENESS | IsoPPP* | 0.94 | 125 | 0.86 | 2 | |
Marginal Explosiveness* | -0.13 | 121 | -0.28 | 1 | ||
FIELD POSITION | Avg. FP | 34.9 | 11 | 25 | 13 | |
FINISHING DRIVES | Pts. Per Scoring Opp. | 3.62 | 118 | 4.64 | 83 | |
TURNOVERS | Expected TO Margin | -0.4 | 86 | TO Luck (PPG): | 5.7 | |
Actual TO Margin | 3 | 26 |
As one might expect from the overall stat numbers the Ducks have their work cut out for them. Cal looks scary good on defense and really lucky at turnovers. As good as Cal's defense is their offense is almost the inverse.
The Basics Duck
|
||||||||||||
Offense | Rk | Defense | Rk | Offense | Rk | Defense | Rk | |||||
RUSHING | Rushing marginal efficiency* | -4.10% | 48 | -18.90% | 4 | PASSING | Passing marginal efficiency* | 9.20% | 15 | 1.10% | 96 | |
Rushing marginal explosiveness* | -0.13 | 83 | -0.26 | 23 | Passing marginal explosiveness* | 49.00% | 16 | 36.90% | 100 | |||
Opportunity rate* | 48.50% | 60 | 35.80% | 13 | Passing completion rate* | 61.30% | 60 | 56.60% | 46 | |||
Stuff rate* | 15.40% | 32 | 26.30% | 20 | Sack rate* | 5.40% | 60 | 9.40% | 22 | |||
Offense | Rk | Defense | Rk | Offense | Rk | Defense | Rk | |||||
STANDARD DOWNS | SD marginal efficiency* | -2.60% | 65 | -7.90% | 45 | PASSING DOWNS | PD marginal efficiency* | 13.50% | 6 | -9.00% | 31 | |
SD marginal explosiveness* | 0.06 | 69 | 0.13 | 86 | PD marginal explosiveness* | 0.41 | 21 | 0.27 | 103 | |||
SD line yards per carry* | 2.45 | 74 | 1.64 | 6 | PD line yards per carry* | 2.26 | 97 | 2.09 | 30 | |||
SD sack rate* | 8.20% | 110 | 8.50% | 26 | PD sack rate* | 2.00% | 12 | 10.40% | 43 |
The Basics Cal
Offense | Rk | Defense | Rk | Offense | Rk | Defense | Rk | ||||
RUSHING | Rushing marginal efficiency* | -9.00% | 90 | -14.40% | 26 | PASSING | Passing marginal efficiency* | -5.00% | 105 | -11.60% | 7 |
Rushing marginal explosiveness* | -0.29 | 122 | -0.48 | 1 | Passing marginal explosiveness* | 5.60% | 100 | -4.30% | 22 | ||
Opportunity rate* | 47.30% | 69 | 45.10% | 62 | Passing completion rate* | 63.60% | 42 | 52.50% | 26 | ||
Stuff rate* | 17.00% | 51 | 23.20% | 31 | Sack rate* | 5.20% | 58 | 5.50% | 81 | ||
Offense | Rk | Defense | Rk | Offense | Rk | Defense | Rk | ||||
STANDARD DOWNS | SD marginal efficiency* | -9.60% | 113 | -10.60% | 24 | PASSING DOWNS | PD marginal efficiency* | -1.50% | 55 | -17.00% | 1 |
SD marginal explosiveness* | -0.17 | 123 | -0.24 | 2 | PD marginal explosiveness* | -0.04 | 84 | -0.41 | 5 | ||
SD line yards per carry* | 2.42 | 77 | 2.36 | 56 | PD line yards per carry* | 3.87 | 9 | 2.7 | 74 | ||
SD sack rate* | 5.00% | 75 | 3.70% | 81 | PD sack rate* | 5.60% | 51 | 8.10% | 64 |
So in case you missed it, our defense is our weakness this year. specifically the passing defense giving up explosive plays. Thankfully this week it doesn't appear Cal can exploit that. not to say they won't try and maybe improve their numbers, but thus far they have not been able to do it.
"Bill Walsh Stats" Ducks
Offense | Rk | Defense | Rk | Offense | Rk | Defense | Rk | |||||
OPEN PLAY | Standard Downs success rate | 45.50% | 89 | 36.40% | 12 | THIRD DOWN | Third-and-long percentage | 44.10% | 34 | 53.30% | 62 | |
Pct. of first downs coming on 1st or 2nd | 62.50% | 108 | 67.40% | 63 | Third-and-short percentage | 15.30% | 25 | 10.00% | 77 | |||
Big-play rate (20+ yards) | 12.90% | 6 | 6.70% | 64 | Third-and-long success rate | 46.20% | 7 | 15.60% | 18 | |||
Avg. third-down distance | 6.9 | 41 | 7.3 | 76 | Third-and-medium success rate | 37.50% | 109 | 36.40% | 21 | |||
Third down success rate | 53.90% | 11 | 28.60% | 23 | Third-and-short success rate | 88.90% | 38 | 83.30% | 83 | |||
Offense | Rk | Defense | Rk | |||||||||
BACKED UP | Backed up success rate | 55.60% | 36 | 80.00% | 117 | Offense | Rk | Defense | Rk | |||
Backed up turnover rate | 0.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 11 | RED ZONE | 21- to 30-yard line success rate | 43.20% | 67 | 52.90% | 107 | ||
11- to 20-yard line success rate | 50.00% | 34 | 38.90% | 69 | ||||||||
Offense | Rk | Defense | Rk | Inside 10 success rate | 57.10% | 49 | 38.50% | 32 | ||||
BLITZ DOWNS | Blitz down success rate | 46.30% | 7 | 20.00% | 23 | Inside 10 turnover rate | 8.60% | 121 | 0.00% | 33 | ||
Blitz down big-play rate | 22.00% | 3 | 6.70% | 52 | First-and-goal success rate | 57.10% | 52 | 25.00% | 13 | |||
Blitz down sack rate | 5.00% | 38 | 17.10% | 18 | Goal line success rate | 87.50% | 31 | 100.00% | 99 |
"Bill Walsh Stats" Cal
Offense | Rk | Defense | Rk | Offense | Rk | Defense | Rk | |||||
OPEN PLAY | Standard Downs success rate | 45.80% | 84 | 42.70% | 42 | THIRD DOWN | Third-and-long percentage | 34.00% | 7 | 37.50% | 121 | |
Pct. of first downs coming on 1st or 2nd | 66.00% | 89 | 65.70% | 51 | Third-and-short percentage | 14.90% | 27 | 14.60% | 116 | |||
Big-play rate (20+ yards) | 3.30% | 126 | 3.00% | 7 | Third-and-long success rate | 25.00% | 72 | 5.60% | 1 | |||
Avg. third-down distance | 5.9 | 5 | 5.3 | 129 | Third-and-medium success rate | 41.70% | 94 | 21.70% | 5 | |||
Third down success rate | 31.60% | 114 | 23.70% | 10 | Third-and-short success rate | 42.90% | 120 | 85.70% | 94 | |||
Offense | Rk | Defense | Rk | |||||||||
BACKED UP | Backed up success rate | 50.00% | 40 | 11.10% | 17 | Offense | Rk | Defense | Rk | |||
Backed up turnover rate | 0.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 11 | RED ZONE | 21- to 30-yard line success rate | 42.30% | 72 | 15.80% | 3 | ||
11- to 20-yard line success rate | 30.00% | 103 | 88.90% | 130 | ||||||||
Offense | Rk | Defense | Rk | Inside 10 success rate | 88.90% | 1 | 36.40% | 26 | ||||
BLITZ DOWNS | Blitz down success rate | 33.30% | 43 | 12.50% | 5 | Inside 10 turnover rate | 0.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 33 | ||
Blitz down big-play rate | 3.70% | 108 | 6.30% | 45 | First-and-goal success rate | 100.00% | 1 | 33.30% | 31 | |||
Blitz down sack rate | 0.00% | 1 | 11.50% | 53 | Goal line success rate | 50.00% | 89 | 50.00% | 29 |
Some pretty cool situational stats that I had never seen before. not sure what all to draw from them but like I said they look cool.
Individual Duck Stats
INDIVIDUAL PASSING STATS | Player | Ht, Wt | Year | Comp | Att | Yards | TD-INT | Comp Rate | Yards/Comp | Sack Rate | Yards/Att. | Marg. Eff. | Marg. Expl. |
Justin Herbert | 6'6, 233 | JR |
72 |
114 | 1186 | 13-5 | 63.20% | 16.5 | 5.80% | 9.4 | 10.10% | 0.61 | |
Braxton Burmeister | 6'1, 206 | SO | 4 | 8 | 27 | 0-0 | 50.00% | 6.8 | 0.00% | 3.4 | -16.50% | -0.86 | |
INDIVIDUAL RUSHING STATS | Player | Pos. | Ht, Wt | Year | Yards | Yards/Carry | TD | Hlt Yds/Opp | Opp Rate | Marg. Eff. | Marg. Expl. | Fum (lost) | |
CJ Verdell | RB | 5'9, 201 | FR | 59 | 314 | 5.3 | 2 | 4.85 | 50.90% | 3.10% | -0.02 | 1 (1) | |
Tony Brooks-James | RB | 5'9, 190 | SR | 42 | 200 | 4.8 | 3 | 3.28 | 54.80% | 5.70% | -0.03 | 0 (0) | |
Travis Dye | RB | 5'10, 197 | FR | 26 | 135 | 5.2 | 1 | 5.55 | 42.30% | -4.20% | -0.06 | 0 (0) | |
Justin Herbert | QB | 6'6, 233 | JR | 20 | 127 | 6.4 | 1 | 7.36 | 55.00% | 0.50% | -0.05 | 2 (0) | |
Darrian Felix | RB | 5'11, 191 | SO | 14 | 47 | 3.4 | 0 | 2.43 | 42.90% | -8.40% | -0.17 | 0 (0) | |
Cyrus Habibi-Likio | RB | 6'1, 210 | FR | 7 | 4 | 0.6 | 5 | 2.8 | 14.30% | 24.10% | -0.03 | 1 (0) | |
INDIVIDUAL RECEIVING STATS | Player | Pos. | Ht, Wt | Year | Catches | Yards | TD | Yds/Catch | Yds/Target | Marg. Eff. | Marg. Expl. | ||
Dillon Mitchell | WR | 6'2, 189 | JR | 29 | 20 | 337 | 1 | 16.9 | 11.6 | 26.90% | 0.23 | 25.00% | |
Johnny Johnson III | WR | 6'0, 197 | SO | 18 | 9 | 168 | 4 | 18.7 | 9.3 | 9.60% | 0.81 | 15.50% | |
Jaylon Redd | WR | 5'8, 178 | SO | 12 | 8 | 135 | 3 | 16.9 | 11.3 | 15.80% | 0.94 | 10.30% | |
Jacob Breeland | TE | 6'5, 248 | JR | 12 | 7 | 131 | 2 | 18.7 | 10.9 | -13.00% | 1.56 | 10.30% | |
Kano Dillon | TE | 6'5, 265 | SR | 8 | 4 | 47 | 1 | 11.8 | 5.9 | -0.80% | 0.39 | 6.90% | |
CJ Verdell | RB | 5'9, 201 | FR | 7 | 6 | 94 | 0 | 15.7 | 13.4 | 31.10% | 0.43 | 6.00% | |
Brenden Schooler | WR | 6'2, 193 | JR | 6 | 5 | 38 | 0 | 7.6 | 6.3 | 8.00% | -0.04 | 5.20% | |
Tabari Hines | WR | 5'10, 175 | SR | 5 | 3 | 32 | 1 | 10.7 | 6.4 | 4.80% | 0.8 | 4.30% | |
Tony Brooks-James | RB | 5'9, 190 | SR | 4 | 3 | 73 | 0 | 24.3 | 18.3 | 39.50% | 0.62 | 3.40% | |
Taj Griffin | RB | 5'11, 178 | SR | 3 | 2 | 89 | 1 | 44.5 | 29.7 | 24.20% | 2.91 | 2.60% | |
Travis Dye | RB | 5'10, 197 | FR | 3 | 3 | 21 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 16.60% | -0.14 | 2.60% | |
INDIVIDUAL DEFENSIVE STATS (defense-only -- no special teams tackles) | Player | Pos. | Ht, Wt | Year | TFLs | Sacks | Run Stuffs | INT (PBU) | FF | Yards/Play | Marg. Eff. | Marg. Expl. | |
Justin Hollins | OLB | 6'5, 242 | SR | 19 | 7.5 | 4 | 8 | 1 (3) | 3 | 1 | -10.60% | -0.23 | |
Kaulana Apelu | ILB | 5'10, 208 | SR | 18 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 5 | 0 (2) | 0 | 2.8 | -17.60% | -0.36 | |
Troy Dye | ILB | 6'4, 224 | JR | 17 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 (2) | 0 | 5.5 | 3.10% | -0.19 | |
Jalen Jelks | DE | 6'6, 245 | SR | 14 | 4 | 2.5 | 5.5 | 0 (1) | 0 | 0.3 | -22.40% | -0.3 | |
Ugochukwu Amadi | S | 5'10, 201 | SR | 14 | 2 | 1.5 | 4 | 1 (4) | 0 | 5.6 | 2.60% | -0.33 | |
Thomas Graham Jr. | CB | 5'11, 191 | SO | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (5) | 0 | 17.2 | 50.00% | 0.49 | |
Gary Baker | DL | 6'3, 310 | JR | 10.5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 (0) | 0 | 3 | -30.10% | 0.27 | |
Austin Faoliu | DL | 6'3, 285 | SO | 10.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2 | 0 (1) | 0 | 2.6 | -20.40% | -0.59 | |
Jordon Scott | DL | 6'1, 329 | SO | 10.5 | 1.5 | 0 | 4 | 0 (1) | 0 | 1 | -29.10% | -0.55 | |
Isaac Slade-Matautia | ILB | 6'1, 220 | FR | 10 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 (0) | 0 | 7.3 | -7.30% | 0.37 | |
Deommodore Lenoir | CB | 5'11, 196 | SO | 8.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (2) | 0 | 17.1 | 51.20% | 0.12 | |
Nick Pickett | S | 6'1, 200 | SO | 7.5 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 0 (1) | 0 | 15.5 | 28.60% | 0.3 | |
Jevon Holland | S | 6'1, 192 | FR | 7.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (1) | 0 | 13.7 | 36.40% | 0.29 | |
Drayton Carlberg | DL | 6'5, 282 | JR | 5.5 | 1 | 1 | 2.5 | 0 (0) | 0 | 0.7 | -31.80% | -0.8 | |
Keith Simms | OLB | 6'3, 227 | SO | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0) | 0 | 5.8 | -1.60% | -0.12 | |
La'Mar Winston Jr. | OLB | 6'2, 233 | JR | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 0 (0) | 0 | 6.3 | 12.30% | -0.64 | |
Gus Cumberlander | DL | 6'7, 251 | JR | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 (0) | 0 | -2.7 | -23.60% | NULL | |
Mattrell McGraw | S | 5'10, 196 | SR | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0) | 0 | 3 | -45.50% | NULL | |
Verone McKinley III | CB | 5'10, 183 | FR | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0) | 0 | 3 | -38.40% | NULL | |
Popo Aumavae | DL | 6'3, 303 | FR | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 (0) | 0 | 0.3 | -10.50% | -0.3 |
Individual STATS Cal
INDIVIDUAL PASSING STATS | Player | Ht, Wt | Year | Comp | Att | Yards | TD-INT | Comp Rate | Yards/Comp | Sack Rate | Yards/Att. | Marg. Eff. | Marg. Expl. |
Chase Garbers | 6'2, 205 | FR | 45 | 66 | 454 | 2-Jun | 68.20% | 10.1 | 5.70% | 6.3 | 4.00% | 0.22 | |
Ross Bowers | 6'1, 200 | JR | 8 | 17 | 56 | 0-0 | 47.10% | 7 | 10.50% | 2.3 | -9.20% | -0.58 | |
Brandon McIlwain | 6'1, 180 | SO | 10 | 16 | 92 | Jan-00 | 62.50% | 9.2 | 0.00% | 5.8 | 3.40% | -0.2 | |
INDIVIDUAL RUSHING STATS | Player | Pos. | Ht, Wt | Year | Yards | Yards/Carry | TD | Hlt Yds/Opp | Opp Rate | Marg. Eff. | Marg. Expl. | Fum (lost) | |
Patrick Laird | RB | 6'0, 205 | SR | 50 | 147 | 2.9 | 1 | 2.95 | 30.00% | -16.80% | -0.06 | 0 (0) | |
Brandon McIlwain | QB | 6'1, 180 | SO | 23 | 129 | 5.6 | 1 | 3.54 | 56.50% | 10.20% | -0.05 | 0 (0) | |
Chase Garbers | QB | 6'2, 205 | FR | 21 | 142 | 6.8 | 0 | 3.79 | 76.20% | 12.00% | -0.09 | 1 (0) | |
Marcel Dancy | RB | 5'10, 190 | JR | 12 | 82 | 6.8 | 1 | 4.63 | 66.70% | 18.30% | -0.08 | 0 (0) | |
Christopher Brown Jr. | RB | 6'1, 220 | FR | 5 | 31 | 6.2 | 0 | 7 | 40.00% | -7.70% | -0.44 | 0 (0) | |
Jeremiah Hawkins | WR | 5'8, 175 | SO | 4 | 27 | 6.8 | 0 | 8.7 | 50.00% | 6.60% | -0.33 | 0 (0) | |
INDIVIDUAL RECEIVING STATS | Player | Pos. | Ht, Wt | Year | Catches | Yards | TD | Yds/Catch | Yds/Target | Marg. Eff. | Marg. Expl. | ||
Patrick Laird | RB | 6'0, 205 | SR | 20 | 14 | 89 | 2 | 6.4 | 4.5 | -16.40% | 0.13 | 21.10% | |
Vic Wharton III | WR | 5'11, 190 | SR | 15 | 11 | 76 | 0 | 6.9 | 5.1 | -7.40% | -0.25 | 15.80% | |
Kanawai Noa | WR | 6'0, 185 | JR | 14 | 10 | 108 | 1 | 10.8 | 7.7 | 11.70% | 0.11 | 14.70% | |
Jordan Duncan | WR | 6'1, 205 | JR | 11 | 9 | 127 | 2 | 14.1 | 11.5 | 19.50% | 0.25 | 11.60% | |
Jeremiah Hawkins | WR | 5'8, 175 | SO | 9 | 4 | 54 | 1 | 13.5 | 6 | 0.70% | -0.09 | 9.50% | |
Ray Hudson | TE | 6'3, 245 | SR | 7 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 9 | 1.3 | -23.10% | -0.86 | 7.40% | |
Ian Bunting | TE | 6'7, 255 | SR | 5 | 4 | 48 | 0 | 12 | 9.6 | 16.80% | 0.34 | 5.30% | |
Moe Ways | WR | 6'4, 220 | SR | 5 | 4 | 45 | 0 | 11.3 | 9 | 40.50% | -0.34 | 5.30% | |
Malik McMorris | FB | 5'11, 290 | SR | 3 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 4 | 2.7 | -10.80% | -0.15 | 3.20% | |
Jake Ashton | TE | 6'4, 235 | SR | 1 | 1 | 20 | 1 | 20 | 20 | 61.00% | 1.37 | 1.10% | |
Marcel Dancy | RB | 5'10, 190 | JR | 1 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 14 | 14 | 39.30% | 0.1 | 1.10% | |
INDIVIDUAL DEFENSIVE STATS (defense-only -- no special teams tackles) | Player | Pos. | Ht, Wt | Year | TFLs | Sacks | Run Stuffs | INT (PBU) | FF | Yards/Play | Marg. Eff. | Marg. Expl. | |
Evan Weaver | ILB | 6'3, 235 | JR | 32.5 | 0 | 0 | 4.5 | 0 (4) | 0 | 3.7 | -5.50% | -0.47 | |
Jordan Kunaszyk | ILB | 6'3, 235 | SR | 22.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 0 (0) | 0 | 4.5 | 5.20% | -0.54 | |
Elijah Hicks | CB | 5'11, 190 | SO | 8.5 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 (2) | 0 | 4.2 | -12.00% | -0.53 | |
Ashtyn Davis | S | 6'1, 190 | JR | 8.5 | 0.5 | 0 | 1.5 | 2 (1) | 0 | 14.2 | 35.90% | 0.49 | |
Camryn Bynum | CB | 6'1, 195 | SO | 7.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (5) | 0 | 12.1 | 25.40% | 0.13 | |
Zeandae Johnson | DE | 6'4, 295 | JR | 7.5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 (0) | 0 | 2.7 | 6.70% | -0.44 | |
Tevin Paul | DE | 6'4, 270 | SO | 7 | 3 | 0 | 3.5 | 0 (0) | 0 | 0.4 | -33.70% | 0 | |
Josh Drayden | CB | 5'10, 185 | JR | 6.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (1) | 0 | 8.7 | 27.80% | 0.14 | |
Alex Funches | OLB | 6'2, 240 | SR | 5 | 2.5 | 2 | 3 | 0 (0) | 1 | -0.2 | -10.20% | -0.7 | |
Traveon Beck | CB | 5'9, 160 | JR | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (1) | 0 | 3 | -19.60% | -0.56 | |
Siulagisipai Fuimaono | NG | 6'4, 305 | FR | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1.5 | 0 (0) | 1 | -0.4 | -23.00% | -0.16 | |
Aaron Maldonado | NG | 6'3, 295 | FR | 3.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0 (0) | 0 | -0.1 | -30.40% | -0.24 | |
Chris Palmer | NG | 6'2, 335 | SR | 3.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (1) | 0 | 2.7 | -22.40% | 0 | |
Rusty Becker | DE | 6'4, 285 | SR | 3.5 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 0 (0) | 0 | 3.4 | -20.40% | -0.76 | |
Luc Bequette | DE | 6'2, 300 | JR | 3.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0) | 0 | 2.9 | -14.90% | -0.44 | |
Evan Tattersall | ILB | 6'2, 225 | FR | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 (0) | 0 | 3.3 | -14.90% | -0.27 | |
Quentin Tartabull | S | 5'11, 195 | SR | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0) | 0 | 8.7 | 25.30% | -0.43 | |
Cameron Goode | OLB | 6'3, 225 | SO | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 (1) | 0 | 1.7 | -19.30% | -0.57 | |
Jaylinn Hawkins | S | 6'2, 205 | JR | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 (1) | 0 | 8.2 | 12.00% | -0.49 | |
Evan Rambo | S | 6'4, 215 | JR | 2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0) | 0 | 6.8 | 54.30% | -0.33 |
So any one that wanted a wall of text, well you are in luck. I really wanted to look at the wide out numbers for us so you get to as well.
DUCK PRINTS
OFFENSIVE FOOTPRINT | Category | Team | Rk | Nat'l Avg | DEFENSIVE FOOTPRINT | Category | Team | Rk | Nat'l Avg |
Standard Downs run rate* | 64.50% | 30 | 59.40% | Standard Downs run rate* | 54.60% | 83 | 58.90% | ||
Passing Downs run rate* | 27.10% | 96 | 34.70% | Passing Downs run rate* | 33.30% | 68 | 34.70% | ||
Adj. Pace** | -3.69 | 11 | 0 | Overall Havoc Rate | 9.10% | 62 | 9.30% | ||
% of Solo Tackles | 74.20% | 58 | 72.80% | DL Havoc Rate | 3.40% | 46 | 2.50% | ||
Havoc Rate Allowed | 13.80% | 49 | 15.30% | LB Havoc Rate | 0.00% | 13 | 0.10% | ||
DB Havoc Rate | 5.70% | 81 | 6.70% | ||||||
|
PD to INC | 50.90% | 8 | 34.90% |
CAL PRINTS
OFFENSIVE FOOTPRINT | Category | Team | Rk | Nat'l Avg | DEFENSIVE FOOTPRINT | Category | Team | Rk | Nat'l Avg |
Standard Downs run rate* | 58.90% | 58 | 59.40% | Standard Downs run rate* | 50.90% | 109 | 58.90% | ||
Passing Downs run rate* | 41.90% | 30 | 34.70% | Passing Downs run rate* | 41.30% | 28 | 34.70% | ||
Adj. Pace** | -0.45 | 53 | 0 | Overall Havoc Rate | 7.40% | 88 | 9.30% | ||
% of Solo Tackles | 82.70% | 8 | 72.80% | DL Havoc Rate | 0.00% | 96 | 2.50% | ||
Havoc Rate Allowed | 15.30% | 67 | 15.30% | LB Havoc Rate | 2.10% | 1 | 0.10% | ||
DB Havoc Rate | 5.30% | 88 | 6.70% | ||||||
PD to INC | 51.10% | 7 | 34.90% |
looks like Cal does a good job of getting their play makers in one on one position. We don't really do that as much anymore. for most of these it looks like we have a pretty good advantage. Our offense better scheme their linebackers as they seem pretty disruptive.
SPECIAL DUCKS
SPECIAL TEAMS EFFICIENCY RATINGS | Category | Rate | Rk | ||||||||
FG value (per kick) | -0.34 | 100 | |||||||||
Punt efficiency | 75.00% | 21 | |||||||||
Kickoff efficiency | 87.10% | 47 | |||||||||
Punt return efficiency | 10.00% | 124 | |||||||||
Kick return efficiency | 72.70% | 16 | |||||||||
PLACE-KICKING | Kicker | Ht, Wt | Year | PAT | % | FG | % | Net Pts/FG | |||
Zach Emerson | 6'2, 214 | SO | 21-22 | 95.50% | 0-1 | 0.00% | -1.68 | ||||
Adam Stack | 6'2, 182 | SO | 4-4 | 100.00% | 1-1 | 100.00% | 1 | ||||
PUNTING | Punter | Ht, Wt | Year | Punts | Avg. | TB | FC | I20 | Opp. Ret-Avg | Punt SR | |
Blake Maimone | 6'6, 227 | JR | 8 | 43.4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 - 2.3 | 87.50% | 42.5 | |
Tom Snee | 6'3, 205 | FR | 8 | 38.6 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 62.50% | 38.6 | ||
KICKOFFS | Kicker | Ht, Wt | Year | Kickoffs | Avg. | TB | TB% | OOB | Opp. Ret-Avg | Kickoff SR | |
Zach Emerson | 6'2, 214 | SO | 31 | 62.1 | 12 | 38.70% | 0 | 12 - 24.9 | 87.10% | 42.7 | |
PUNT RETURNS | Punt Returner | Ht, Wt | Year | Returns | Avg. | TD | FC | PR SR | |||
Ugochukwu Amadi | 5'10, 201 | SR | 5 | 22.2 | 0 | 3 | 100.00% | ||||
Travis Dye | 5'10, 197 | FR | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.00% | ||||
Dillon Mitchell | 6'2, 189 | JR | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 50.00% | ||||
KICK RETURNS | Kick Returner | Ht, Wt | Year | Returns | Avg. | TD | FC | KR SR | |||
Tony Brooks-James | 5'9, 190 | SR | 6 | 22.5 | 0 | 0 | 66.70% | ||||
Hunter Kampmoyer | 6'4, 262 | SO | 2 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 100.00% | ||||
Travis Dye | 5'10, 197 | FR | 1 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0.00% |
SPECIAL CAL
SPECIAL TEAMS EFFICIENCY RATINGS | Category | Rate | Rk | ||||||||
FG value (per kick) | 0.21 | 50 | |||||||||
Punt efficiency | 68.40% | 38 | |||||||||
Kickoff efficiency | 94.10% | 17 | |||||||||
Punt return efficiency | 66.70% | 18 | |||||||||
Kick return efficiency | 70.00% | 18 | |||||||||
PLACE-KICKING | Kicker | Ht, Wt | Year | PAT | % | FG | % | Net Pts/FG | |||
Greg Thomas | 5'9, 175 | JR | 12-12 | 100.00% | 2-3 | 66.70% | 0.21 | ||||
PUNTING | Punter | Ht, Wt | Year | Punts | Avg. | TB | FC | I20 | Opp. Ret-Avg | Punt SR | |
Steven Coutts | 6'4, 220 | SR | 19 | 38.9 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 6 - 4.0 | 68.40% | 34.7 | |
KICKOFFS | Kicker | Ht, Wt | Year | Kickoffs | Avg. | TB | TB% | OOB | Opp. Ret-Avg | Kickoff SR | |
Chris Landgrebe | 6'2, 190 | FR | 15 | 63.3 | 10 | 66.70% | 0 | 5 - 16.4 | 93.30% | 41.2 | |
Gabe Siemieniec | 6'1, 230 | SO | 2 | 64 | 1 | 50.00% | 0 | 1 - 15.0 | 100.00% | 44 | |
PUNT RETURNS | Punt Returner | Ht, Wt | Year | Returns | Avg. | TD | FC | PR SR | |||
Vic Wharton III | 5'11, 190 | SR | 8 | 4.5 | 0 | 4 | 25.00% | ||||
Nikko Remigio | 5'10, 170 | FR | 4 | 12.5 | 0 | 0 | 50.00% | ||||
KICK RETURNS | Kick Returner | Ht, Wt | Year | Returns | Avg. | TD | FC | KR SR | |||
Ashtyn Davis | 6'1, 190 | JR | 6 | 32.3 | 1 | 0 | 50.00% | ||||
Jeremiah Hawkins | 5'8, 175 | SO | 1 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 100.00% | ||||
Malik McMorris | 5'11, 290 | SR | 1 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 100.00% |
So the Ducks punt return and kicking have been awful. Lets just hope this game doesn't come down to special teams.
SO WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN?
if the ducks had to pick a ranked team to try and face to shake off the demons from last week this is probably the one to pick. Cal does not seem to posses the ability to exploit our Achilles Heel the long explosive pass. I have faith in the offensive staff to solve Cal's Defense like we "solved" Stanford's Defense. I just hope our defense improves this week.
PREDICTION Ducks win 42 -14
Get the latest Oregon Ducks news with Addicted To Quack